Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
IBM Engineering Test Management Logo

IBM Engineering Test Management Reviews

Vendor: IBM
3.8 out of 5

What is IBM Engineering Test Management?

Featured IBM Engineering Test Management reviews

IBM Engineering Test Management mindshare

Product category:
As of March 2026, the mindshare of IBM Engineering Test Management in the Test Management Tools category stands at 3.1%, up from 2.6% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Test Management Tools Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
IBM Engineering Test Management3.1%
OpenText Application Quality Management8.2%
Tricentis qTest7.8%
Other80.9%
Test Management Tools
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

ROI

Pricing

Popular Use Cases

Service and Support

Deployment

Scalability

Stability

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business1
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise5
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business24
Midsize Enterprise16
Large Enterprise74
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Healthcare Company
25%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Manufacturing Company
12%
University
5%
Government
5%
Marketing Services Firm
5%
Real Estate/Law Firm
4%
Performing Arts
4%
Energy/Utilities Company
4%
Computer Software Company
4%
Outsourcing Company
3%
Comms Service Provider
3%
Educational Organization
3%
Retailer
3%
Aerospace/Defense Firm
2%
Insurance Company
2%
Logistics Company
2%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
2%
Mining And Metals Company
1%
Construction Company
1%
Transportation Company
1%
 
IBM Engineering Test Management Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Lead Systems Tester at Government of Ontario, Canada4.0We use IBM Engineering Test Management daily to create and execute test cases due to its seamless integration with functional testing. Although it occasionally faces performance issues, its automation and test result integration with RQM are invaluable.
Lead Systems Tester at Government of Ontario, Canada4.0I use this solution daily for testing and value its tracking, despite wishing for better test case hierarchy and improved performance. Support is excellent. I've not used all features but plan to after an upgrade, rating it 8/10.
Lead Systems Tester at Government of Ontario, Canada4.5I use RQM for test case management, appreciating its automation and performance testing integration. While stable, I wish for better test requirement selection and mixed manual/automated test plan features. Overall, I rate it 9/10.
Senior Analyst at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees4.0I use this solution for test plan creation and find RFT most valuable for automation. It's stable, scalable, and setup is easy. My only improvement is needing bulk test case upload, but overall I rate it an eight out of ten.
Software Engineering Director at a transportation company with 10,001+ employees3.5I use IBM Rational Quality Manager for testing, appreciating its strong integration with other tools for traceability. While stable, its usability isn't intuitive and setup is complex, necessitating proper user training. I rated it 7/10.
Project Manager and test manager at Venturous Solutions4.0I find this solution very fast, reliable, and scalable with good support. However, the user interface is too complicated and not user-friendly, needing significant improvement to make it truly excellent.
Engenheiro de Software - DevOps - Agile - Application Lifecycle Management Practice Specialist at a tech services company with 201-500 employees4.5I found this solution excellent for reusability and integration, though WebSphere setup is complex. While I experienced some stability issues, support was great. It's a very good choice for ensuring software quality and offers high ROI.
Senior Analyst at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees3.5I find this tool easy to use with great traceability, especially integrated with IBM CLM. Versioning is a valuable new feature. However, it's costly, and integration with other vendors' tools needs improvement, plus there are some bugs.