IBM Engineering Test Management and Tricentis NeoLoad compete in software test management and performance testing. IBM Engineering Test Management excels in comprehensive test planning and management, while Tricentis NeoLoad offers advanced performance testing capabilities, offering distinct advantages based on project requirements.
Features: IBM Engineering Test Management offers robust capabilities for managing test workflows, version control, and integration with development tools, making it ideal for complex test environments. Tricentis NeoLoad stands out with powerful load testing features, real-time analytics, and support for modern web technologies, addressing performance optimization needs in web applications.
Room for Improvement: IBM could enhance its deployment simplicity and customer support responsiveness. Its extensive features sometimes complicate the user experience, and clearer documentation would benefit users. Tricentis NeoLoad might improve its integration with additional development tools, expand its protocol support, and offer more detailed training resources to facilitate better use of its performance testing capabilities.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Tricentis NeoLoad provides flexible deployment options, including cloud and on-premises, with responsive customer service, simplifying processes for performance-focused businesses. IBM Engineering Test Management has a more complex deployment, which can pose challenges despite its integration within the IBM suite.
Pricing and ROI: IBM Engineering Test Management requires significant initial setup costs but offers value in large-scale projects with a gradual ROI. Tricentis NeoLoad, though sometimes bearing higher licensing fees, offers quicker ROI by optimizing performance testing processes, saving resources through efficient infrastructure use.
The effect of the new license policy is that NeoLoad becomes more and more unattractive for smaller companies, and only bigger companies are interested or find the license fee fair.
Most graphs can be configured with drag-and-drop, which is handy, and you get graphs suitable for reporting issues.
IBM Engineering Test Management (ETM), formerly known as IBM Rational® Quality Manager (RQM), is a business-driven software quality environment designed for collaborative and customizable test planning, workflow control, tracking, and metrics reporting. When integrated with IBM DevOps Test Embedded (Test Embedded), ETM allows users to create test environments and scripts, deploy and run tests, and view HTML reports. This integration enables the creation of ETM test environments linked to Test Embedded target deployment ports, the deployment and execution of Test Embedded tests through the ETM interface, and the mapping of ETM test scripts to Test Embedded test suites. Additionally, users can import test suites as ETM test scripts, build new ETM test cases, and view test results as HTML reports within ETM. The integration requires the Test Embedded adapter service to be running on the user's computer.
Tricentis NeoLoad is a performance testing tool that provides developers and testers with automatic test design, test maintenance, realistic simulation of user behavior, fast root cause analysis, and built-in integrations with the entire SDLC toolchain. With NeoLoad’s plugins, teams can reuse and share test assets and results from functional testing tools, analytics, metrics, and APM tools in order to catch performance issues early. With NeoLoad’s full tech stack support, users can test the range of mobile, web, and desktop apps.
Tricentis NeoLoad Features
Tricentis NeoLoad has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:
Tricentis NeoLoad Benefits
There are many benefits to implementing Tricentis NeoLoad. Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:
Reviews from Real Users
Tricentis NeoLoad stands out among its competitors for a number of reasons. Some of these include its price, its user-friendly UX, its API support, and its scalability. PeerSpot users take note of the advantages of these features in their reviews:
Patrik B., Technical Lead at a tech services company, writes, “The licensing cost is very less for NeoLoad. It is user-friendly and easy to understand because they have created so many useful functionalities. When I started working with this tool, we just had to do the initial assessment about whether this tool will be able to support our daily work or not. I could easily understand it.”
A Global Delivery Head at a consultancy firm notes, “The API support is much better with this solution, compared with the competition. Pricing for it is also more affordable than its competitor. We have used Tricentis NeoLoad and we find it scalable.”
We monitor all Load Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.