Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway ensures secure internet access with features like URL filtering and real-time analytics. It's known for robust security, scalability, and integration capabilities, making it ideal for managing web traffic and preventing data loss.

| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway | 3.0% |
| Cisco Umbrella | 10.9% |
| Zscaler Internet Access | 10.9% |
| Other | 75.2% |
| Type | Title | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Secure Web Gateways (SWG) | Apr 30, 2026 | Download |
| Product | Reviews, tips, and advice from real users | Apr 30, 2026 | Download |
| Comparison | Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway vs Cisco Umbrella | Apr 30, 2026 | Download |
| Comparison | Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway vs Fortinet FortiGate | Apr 30, 2026 | Download |
| Comparison | Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway vs Zscaler Internet Access | Apr 30, 2026 | Download |
| Title | Rating | Mindshare | Recommending | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fortinet FortiGate | 4.2 | 6.7% | 92% | 592 interviewsAdd to research |
| iboss | 4.2 | 2.8% | 95% | 21 interviewsAdd to research |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 15 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 6 |
| Large Enterprise | 25 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 115 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 89 |
| Large Enterprise | 156 |
Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway is designed to provide comprehensive protection for web traffic while enabling organizations to maintain security and productivity. By integrating well with Forcepoint offerings like DLP and CASB, it offers added functionality. The gateway equips users with tools such as SSL inspection and Shadow IT visibility. Despite its complex setup and challenges with updates, the platform is recognized for its flexibility, performance reliability, and ability to deliver granular policy control. Customers in demanding environments benefit from its extensive IP-based protection and robust report customization capabilities.
What are the standout features?Government agencies and professional services deploy Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway in on-premises and hybrid cloud setups for enhanced web security. By monitoring and controlling user activity, these entities maintain productivity and protect sensitive data. The gateway effectively manages internal and external web traffic, ensuring cyber threats are minimized. Specific industry needs are addressed with robust security frameworks tailored to maintain data integrity and efficiency.
Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway was previously known as Forcepoint SWG, Websense Web Security, Forcepoint TRITON.
Adventist Health, Alphawest, Amadori, Anoka County, Compartamos Banco, Davies Turner, EverBank, iGATE, Karlstad Municipality, Lake Michigan Credit Union, Scavolini, Smurfit Kappa, Toyota
| Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
|---|---|---|
| PS & Technical Manager at a tech services company with 11-50 employees | 3.0 | We use Forcepoint mainly due to limited DLP alternatives; while its URL filtering is effective, the interface is outdated, setup is complex, and it’s not user-friendly—we’d switch if better options were available. |
| Works | 3.5 | I use Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway mainly for DLP and content filtering. Its robust on-premises solution is valuable, but improvements like SaaS offerings and enhanced CASB are needed. Competitors include Netskope and Zscaler, with better cloud support. |
| Network and Security Engineer at a government with 201-500 employees | 4.5 | I use Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway to block unnecessary sites like social media to enhance productivity. It ensures smooth traffic flow, unlike Bluecoat or Symantec, which caused network issues. However, the dashboard needs improvement for better user usage insights. |
| Systems Engineer at a tech services company with 11-50 employees | 3.5 | I’ve found Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway effective for web filtering and data protection, though it’s pricey and lacks multi-tenancy. It’s stable, integrates well with other Forcepoint tools, and meets most functionality needs despite room for enterprise-level improvements. |
| Director Market Growth and Development at a tech services company with 51-200 employees | 4.5 | I use Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway for secure traffic redirection and appreciate its easy configuration and policy customization. While similar to McAfee in functionality, Forcepoint plans to enhance offerings with a cloud-based platform for integrated security solutions. |
| Vice President Cloud Security Architect at Reliance Industries Ltd | 4.5 | We utilize Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway for malware protection and content filtering, valuing its content and URL filtering features. Although it requires improvements in scalability and occasionally faces performance issues, we chose it for our available skill set after evaluating Zscaler and Palo Alto. |
| Director of cyber security at GlobalLogic | 2.5 | In my company, I use Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway to address proxy-related slowness. However, it lacks detailed generative AI category updates, necessitating improvements due to potential security risks. I've also evaluated Netskope and Zscaler as alternatives. |
| Manager, Strategic Alliances at Softcell Technologies Limited | 4.0 | We used Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway for scalable, secure internet access without hardware limitations. It delivered good speed and data loss prevention. However, the reporting needs improvement for complete visibility. Despite this, the ROI is strong, reducing hardware and staffing needs. |