codeBeamer ALM is a market-leading Application Lifecycle Management platform. It is holistically integrated, and is packed with features that help you develop better products faster. Scale, monitor, control, and report on your entire development lifecycle conveniently, and comply with safety-critical regulations. Cut development time and costs.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Codebeamer | 8.9% |
| Jira | 17.7% |
| Microsoft Azure DevOps | 13.0% |
| Other | 60.4% |
| Type | Title | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites | Sep 9, 2025 | Download |
| Product | Reviews, tips, and advice from real users | Sep 9, 2025 | Download |
| Comparison | Codebeamer vs Jira | Sep 9, 2025 | Download |
| Comparison | Codebeamer vs Microsoft Azure DevOps | Sep 9, 2025 | Download |
| Comparison | Codebeamer vs Polarion ALM | Sep 9, 2025 | Download |
| Title | Rating | Mindshare | Recommending | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Microsoft Azure DevOps | 4.1 | 13.0% | 95% | 135 interviewsAdd to research |
| Jira | 4.1 | 17.7% | 91% | 275 interviewsAdd to research |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 3 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 8 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 171 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 104 |
| Large Enterprise | 557 |
Codebeamer was previously known as codeBeamer ALM.
Medtronic, Align Technology, Daimler, Samsung, Harman, Dassault
| Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
|---|---|---|
| Architect at itcinfotech | 3.5 | I use Codebeamer primarily for requirements management due to its efficient built-in project management modules, though it faces challenges with customization, Linux installation, and older PDM Windchill compatibility. Its web-based client saves time and resources. |
| Software Engineer at Festo AG | 4.0 | I use Codebeamer mainly for Kanban boards, release and sprint management, and access control. It's stable and functional but outdated, with a dull UI. While helpful, it could improve in scalability and user-friendliness for newcomers. |
| Independent Technical Consultant at i4c | 4.0 | I find Codebeamer ideal for automotive projects, especially for medium-sized companies, due to its economical nature and extensive integration capabilities. However, it requires server upgrades and its drag-and-drop feature needs improvement. It has boosted our ROI effectively. |
| Process Method and Tool Developer at ZF Group NAO | 4.0 | <p>I've used Codebeamer for several years and value its integrated toolset, especially for R&D, but wish it had better speed, user interface customization, and support for promised features like working sets and Pure Variants integration.</p> |
| National Manager - PLM Business at a computer software company with 201-500 employees | 4.5 | We explored Codebeamer for building our ALM practice but deferred for PLM focus with our OEM. Its requirements management aids industries with standards. However, more integration tools are needed. Codebeamer competes with IBM Rational and Siemens Polarion. |
| Solutions Architect at Capgemini | 3.5 | I use CodeBeamer to align business requirements and processes, appreciating its flexibility compared to outdated tools like Arvines and Jira. However, during platform migrations, some tasks needed to be redone, indicating room for improvement in this area. |
| Process Method and Tool Developer at a transportation company with 10,001+ employees | 4.0 | I primarily use Codebeamer for lifecycle management, appreciating its integration and stability. However, it lacks maturity compared to Jira, needing better document integration and customization options to simplify its complex UI for specific user roles. |
| Manager at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees | 3.5 | We utilize Codebeamer for managing requirements, tasks, and issues within the V-model framework. While it's user-friendly, adapting it to specific workflows poses challenges, and we're collaborating with PTC to address certain issues, ensuring smoother integration. |
