Rally Software and Codebeamer are prominent tools competing in the project management software category. Codebeamer seems to have an edge due to its comprehensive traceability and regulatory compliance features.
Features: Rally Software is known for robust project tracking, integration with platforms like JIRA, and a comprehensive reporting engine. Users value its capabilities in tracking progress at various levels. Codebeamer stands out for its strong traceability across the development lifecycle and seamless migration features, especially valuable in automotive and pharmaceutical sectors.
Room for Improvement: Rally Software could enhance its defect management cycle, Kanban features, and performance. Its integration with other tools can also be improved. Codebeamer is noted for needing improvements in its UI for better user experience and easier adoption. Aligning with specific company workflows could also be improved for more adaptability.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Rally Software offers flexible deployment options across public and hybrid clouds, coupled with responsive technical support. Codebeamer supports on-premises and hybrid solutions, crucial for industries with specific compliance needs, and is known for satisfactory customer service.
Pricing and ROI: Rally Software is considered expensive as license costs rise with user numbers, yet it delivers significant ROI due to efficiency improvements. It's essential for large-scale agile implementations. Codebeamer offers competitive pricing in the ALM market, maintaining a balance of cost and functionality suitable for industry standards.
ROI can manifest through cost savings and increased development speed.
Codebeamer saves time and money for certain use cases, such as AUTOSPICE implementations.
The solution has produced a return on investment.
The ROI is visible, as that's why we are investing in these tools and running our projects successfully through them, despite a few challenges such as role-based access being somewhat difficult.
If I raise an issue as high priority, I receive responses in six to eight hours.
For out-of-the-box support, the customer service from PTC is satisfactory.
In a project, I have experienced up to 180 licenses running during peak times and as low as ten licenses during downtime without facing upgrade or downgrade issues.
It should come with documentation that is accessible for users, especially for newcomers who might not have any prior knowledge.
On a scale from one to ten, I would rate the scalability of Codebeamer as eight or nine because it is a highly scalable solution.
Running it independently or with a bigger server generally doesn't cause any issues.
From a scale of one to ten, I would rate the stability of Codebeamer as eight to nine because the solution is highly stable.
There were stability issues due to version compatibility.
If terminology changes, modifications must be done manually or by exporting the document to Word or Excel, which is time-consuming.
Beyond standards management for specific industries, Codebeamer should develop standards for areas where software code management and hardware-software integration are needed.
Codebeamer struggles with some DevOps integrations and lacks AI features for enhanced user assistance.
One area for improvement might be the rigidity in role and access configurations, which require many process changes to fit the tool.
Codebeamer is on the expensive side, but it provides ready-made modules for standards like ASPICE and ISO 26262, which might justify the cost for customers looking for those solutions.
Codebeamer is fairly priced against competition.
Rally Software is affordable because our customers also prefer it.
Its integration capability is very high, with almost eighty to eighty-five percent of integrations available readily out of the box, minimizing the need for specific integration-related work.
Codebeamer saves on time and resources with its web-based client, eliminating the need to install it on every system.
The requirements management aspect of Codebeamer is critical because it helps various industries, such as automotive or medical devices, to capture requirements based on industry-specific standards and processes.
Rally Software provides real-time dashboards for different kinds of stakeholders and governance, giving clear insights into project progress, team velocity, and potential risks.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Codebeamer | 8.9% |
| Rally Software | 5.8% |
| Other | 85.3% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 4 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 8 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 13 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 13 |
| Large Enterprise | 110 |
codeBeamer ALM is a market-leading Application Lifecycle Management platform. It is holistically integrated, and is packed with features that help you develop better products faster. Scale, monitor, control, and report on your entire development lifecycle conveniently, and comply with safety-critical regulations. Cut development time and costs.
With Rally Software, you can plan, prioritize, manage, track, and continuously improve your work so that you can deliver the value that your customers need with speed, quality, and efficiency. Our enterprise-class Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) SaaS platform provides visibility into progress, roadblocks, and dependencies across multiple teams, projects, and programs. This allows you to align to your strategic goals and create better business results, and to do it all in a single system of record.
We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
