OpenText Application Quality Management and Codebeamer compete in application lifecycle management tools category. Codebeamer might have an edge with its focus on industry standards compliance and user-friendly approach.
Features: OpenText Application Quality Management offers robust traceability, seamless integration with automation and defect tracking tools, and comprehensive reporting capabilities. It excels in test management, defect tracking, and requirements handling, making it ideal for large organizations. Codebeamer highlights include strong project traceability, built-in modules for ASPICE and ISO 26262 compliance, and flexibility in customization and performance, suiting sectors like automotive and pharmaceuticals.
Room for Improvement: OpenText Application Quality Management faces challenges with high licensing costs, browser compatibility issues, and a complex interface that can be less intuitive for new users. Codebeamer, while priced on the higher side, benefits from better integration tools and predefined compliance modules. However, it could improve its UI and compatibility with third-party tools.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Application Quality Management supports on-premises, public, and private cloud deployment, but customer service receives mixed reviews due to slower response times. Codebeamer offers similar deployment options and is regarded as more user-friendly with responsive support teams.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText Application Quality Management is perceived as expensive for medium and small environments with high licensing and maintenance costs but offers a strong ROI through traceability and time savings. Codebeamer is also seen as costly but is preferred for its extensive feature set and scalability, providing good value for money, especially for industry-specific applications.
ROI can manifest through cost savings and increased development speed.
The solution has produced a return on investment.
Codebeamer saves time and money for certain use cases, such as AUTOSPICE implementations.
It acts as an enabler for effective test and program management.
If I raise an issue as high priority, I receive responses in six to eight hours.
For out-of-the-box support, the customer service from PTC is satisfactory.
Technical support has been excellent.
Quality is always high yet not perfect.
In a project, I have experienced up to 180 licenses running during peak times and as low as ten licenses during downtime without facing upgrade or downgrade issues.
On a scale from one to ten, I would rate the scalability of Codebeamer as eight or nine because it is a highly scalable solution.
OpenText ALM Quality Center is definitely scalable.
Running it independently or with a bigger server generally doesn't cause any issues.
From a scale of one to ten, I would rate the stability of Codebeamer as eight to nine because the solution is highly stable.
There were stability issues due to version compatibility.
From a stability standpoint, OpenText ALM Quality Center has been pretty good.
If terminology changes, modifications must be done manually or by exporting the document to Word or Excel, which is time-consuming.
There should be more integration tools available.
Codebeamer struggles with some DevOps integrations and lacks AI features for enhanced user assistance.
Improvements are needed so that the system can continue running without creating a new run.
I see a stable tool that remains relevant in the market.
HPLM has one of the best UIs compared to other test management tools, allowing for efficient navigation between test pieces, test folders, test suites, and test execution.
Codebeamer is on the expensive side, but it provides ready-made modules for standards like ASPICE and ISO 26262, which might justify the cost for customers looking for those solutions.
Codebeamer is fairly priced against competition.
It would be cheaper to use a cloud model with a pay-per-use licensing model.
Its integration capability is very high, with almost eighty to eighty-five percent of integrations available readily out of the box, minimizing the need for specific integration-related work.
Codebeamer saves on time and resources with its web-based client, eliminating the need to install it on every system.
The requirements management aspect of Codebeamer is critical because it helps various industries, such as automotive or medical devices, to capture requirements based on industry-specific standards and processes.
The integration with internal applications and CollabNet is made possible through exposed APIs, allowing necessary integrations.
It creates constant visibility into the test process, showing the status, bugs, and automated test results.
We can create a requirement for stability metrics with the test cases to ensure all requirements are covered.
codeBeamer ALM is a market-leading Application Lifecycle Management platform. It is holistically integrated, and is packed with features that help you develop better products faster. Scale, monitor, control, and report on your entire development lifecycle conveniently, and comply with safety-critical regulations. Cut development time and costs.
OpenText Application Quality Management offers extensive capabilities in test management, automation tool integration, and defect traceability, providing an efficient and user-friendly experience for tracking and managing testing workflows.
The platform supports test management by integrating with automation tools and managing the traceability of defects and requirements. It facilitates users with linking test cases to defects, uploading from Excel, and generating customizable reports, which enhances efficiency. Business Process Testing and requirement capturing for test cases further extend its capabilities. Users report concerns about its integration with other tools, particularly in DevOps and agile frameworks, as well as challenges with its complex interface and high cost. Improved integration, better browser compatibility, upgraded dashboards, and enhanced support for agile methodologies are recommended by many users.
What are the most important features of OpenText Application Quality Management?In industries such as finance, healthcare, and technology, organizations apply OpenText Application Quality Management for test management, planning, and automation. It is an essential tool for managing test scenarios, recording results, and supporting both manual and automated testing processes. This tool aids in regression testing, ensuring requirement traceability and acting as a repository for executing test cycles, thereby supporting robust quality assurance practices.
We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
