OpenText Application Quality Management and Codebeamer both compete in the application lifecycle and quality management category. Based on specific feature sets, Codebeamer seems to have the upper hand due to its suitability in highly regulated industries and effective reporting capabilities.
Features: OpenText Application Quality Management provides extensive customization, traceability from requirements to defects, and integration with tools like JIRA, fitting larger organizations with flexible hosting, including cloud and in-house. Codebeamer offers full traceability, particularly for regulated industries, with strong reporting capabilities and ready-made modules for standards like ASPICE and ISO 26262, accompanied by a user-friendly interface.
Room for Improvement: OpenText could improve by addressing high costs, enhancing browser compatibility, speeding up performance, and updating the interface, while improving reporting functionalities. Codebeamer can focus on enhancing UI intuitiveness and integration capabilities, especially during migrations, along with expanding DevOps integration features.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText supports multiple deployment models like on-premises and cloud options, offering flexibility. Customer service is responsive, but some users face extended response times. Codebeamer supports on-premises and private cloud deployments with hybrid options and offers responsive customer service, contributing to straightforward deployments.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText pricing is high, reflecting its expansive features and enterprise focus; the ROI is justified if fully utilized, though it might challenge smaller organizations. Codebeamer's pricing is also on the higher side, valued for compliance features and integration flexibility, bringing long-term savings and streamlined processes. Both tools offer cost-effectiveness in suitable environments, delivering significant time and effort savings.
ROI can manifest through cost savings and increased development speed.
Codebeamer saves time and money for certain use cases, such as AUTOSPICE implementations.
The solution has produced a return on investment.
It acts as an enabler for effective test and program management.
If I raise an issue as high priority, I receive responses in six to eight hours.
For out-of-the-box support, the customer service from PTC is satisfactory.
Technical support has been excellent.
Quality is always high yet not perfect.
I am mostly happy with the technical support from OpenText ALM _ Quality Center.
In a project, I have experienced up to 180 licenses running during peak times and as low as ten licenses during downtime without facing upgrade or downgrade issues.
It should come with documentation that is accessible for users, especially for newcomers who might not have any prior knowledge.
On a scale from one to ten, I would rate the scalability of Codebeamer as eight or nine because it is a highly scalable solution.
OpenText ALM Quality Center is definitely scalable.
Running it independently or with a bigger server generally doesn't cause any issues.
From a scale of one to ten, I would rate the stability of Codebeamer as eight to nine because the solution is highly stable.
There were stability issues due to version compatibility.
From a stability standpoint, OpenText ALM Quality Center has been pretty good.
Older versions of PDM Windchill face compatibility issues with newer versions of Codebeamer, requiring users to downgrade Codebeamer to establish integration.
For a client with a medium configuration server, Codebeamer did not work initially until the system was upgraded.
There should be more integration tools available.
Improvements are needed so that the system can continue running without creating a new run.
The user-friendly nature could be enhanced as the interface isn’t intuitive.
I see a stable tool that remains relevant in the market.
Codebeamer is on the expensive side, but it provides ready-made modules for standards like ASPICE and ISO 26262, which might justify the cost for customers looking for those solutions.
Codebeamer is fairly priced against competition.
It would be cheaper to use a cloud model with a pay-per-use licensing model.
Codebeamer saves on time and resources with its web-based client, eliminating the need to install it on every system.
Its integration capability is very high, with almost eighty to eighty-five percent of integrations available readily out of the box, minimizing the need for specific integration-related work.
The requirements management aspect of Codebeamer is critical because it helps various industries, such as automotive or medical devices, to capture requirements based on industry-specific standards and processes.
The integration with internal applications and CollabNet is made possible through exposed APIs, allowing necessary integrations.
It creates constant visibility into the test process, showing the status, bugs, and automated test results.
We can create a requirement for stability metrics with the test cases to ensure all requirements are covered.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| OpenText Application Quality Management | 5.0% |
| Codebeamer | 8.9% |
| Other | 86.1% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 4 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 8 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 39 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 32 |
| Large Enterprise | 161 |
codeBeamer ALM is a market-leading Application Lifecycle Management platform. It is holistically integrated, and is packed with features that help you develop better products faster. Scale, monitor, control, and report on your entire development lifecycle conveniently, and comply with safety-critical regulations. Cut development time and costs.
OpenText Application Quality Management offers centralized data management, traceability, and integration capabilities. It aids in handling requirements, test planning, and defect tracking while supporting both manual and automated testing. Challenges exist in deployment and browser compatibility.
Known for its robust reporting and flexibility, OpenText Application Quality Management is tailored for large organizations requiring a comprehensive solution supporting lifecycle coverage and seamless tool integration. Users can consolidate testing processes, manage requirements, and centralize reporting across manual and automated testing. While some face issues with project tracking, outdated interfaces, and limited browser compatibility beyond Internet Explorer, it remains widely used for regression and performance testing. Integration with tools like JIRA and support for tools such as UFT and ALM PC underscore its utility.
What are the key features of OpenText Application Quality Management?In industries such as finance and healthcare, OpenText Application Quality Management is implemented to ensure rigorous testing standards. It supports test case creation and execution, defect tracking, and requirements management. Integration with JIRA and performance testing tools make it suitable for organizations needing synchronized testing environments.
We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
