Codebeamer and Jira Align compete in project management and agile program execution. Codebeamer leads with customizable workflows and ALM capabilities, while Jira Align has a wider range of agile features and scalability, favoring larger enterprises.
Features: Codebeamer offers customizable workflows, integrated ALM for full traceability, and adaptability to various methodologies. It supports efficient workflow management and collaboration. Jira Align provides comprehensive agile features, strong integration with Atlassian's ecosystem, and excellent scalability. It manages agile practices effectively across large organizations and enhances project visibility with flexible reporting tools.
Room for Improvement: Codebeamer could improve its user interface design to create a more intuitive user experience, expand its integration options with third-party tools, and offer more detailed reporting features for better analytics. Jira Align would benefit from streamlining its setup process to reduce the learning curve, enhance real-time collaboration features for immediate team updates, and improve its cost structure for smaller enterprises seeking affordability.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Codebeamer supports flexible on-premise and cloud deployment, offering efficient setup processes and reliable customer service. Its adaptable setup ensures quick onboarding. Jira Align primarily deploys in the cloud, providing a robust customer support structure tailored to enterprise needs, though it presents a steeper learning curve due to its complex features.
Pricing and ROI: Codebeamer is praised for cost-effectiveness with competitive pricing, making it accessible for mid-sized companies, and offers quick ROI through lower initial costs. Jira Align justifies higher costs with extensive features and integration capabilities, offering significant value in large organizations looking for long-term gains.
ROI can manifest through cost savings and increased development speed.
Codebeamer saves time and money for certain use cases, such as AUTOSPICE implementations.
The solution has produced a return on investment.
If I raise an issue as high priority, I receive responses in six to eight hours.
For out-of-the-box support, the customer service from PTC is satisfactory.
They have a support knowledge base area on their website, and usually, they are very good at answering questions.
In a project, I have experienced up to 180 licenses running during peak times and as low as ten licenses during downtime without facing upgrade or downgrade issues.
It should come with documentation that is accessible for users, especially for newcomers who might not have any prior knowledge.
On a scale from one to ten, I would rate the scalability of Codebeamer as eight or nine because it is a highly scalable solution.
Running it independently or with a bigger server generally doesn't cause any issues.
From a scale of one to ten, I would rate the stability of Codebeamer as eight to nine because the solution is highly stable.
There were stability issues due to version compatibility.
Older versions of PDM Windchill face compatibility issues with newer versions of Codebeamer, requiring users to downgrade Codebeamer to establish integration.
There should be more integration tools available.
For a client with a medium configuration server, Codebeamer did not work initially until the system was upgraded.
Codebeamer is on the expensive side, but it provides ready-made modules for standards like ASPICE and ISO 26262, which might justify the cost for customers looking for those solutions.
Codebeamer is fairly priced against competition.
Its integration capability is very high, with almost eighty to eighty-five percent of integrations available readily out of the box, minimizing the need for specific integration-related work.
Codebeamer saves on time and resources with its web-based client, eliminating the need to install it on every system.
The requirements management aspect of Codebeamer is critical because it helps various industries, such as automotive or medical devices, to capture requirements based on industry-specific standards and processes.
codeBeamer ALM is a market-leading Application Lifecycle Management platform. It is holistically integrated, and is packed with features that help you develop better products faster. Scale, monitor, control, and report on your entire development lifecycle conveniently, and comply with safety-critical regulations. Cut development time and costs.
Jira Align is a cloud-based agile planning tool designed to help enterprises visualize, manage, and carry out large-scale software and IT projects. Jira Align’s features are designed to align the activities of your company’s development team with the overall goals of the organization by helping you achieve the following results:
With Jira Align’s integration with Jira Software, businesses can simplify governing large-scale software development efforts by translating their strategy and goals into the technical execution and delivery of work.
Jira Align uses the aggregated data from Jira Software to produce reports on every aspect of the development process. Product stakeholders are granted immediate visibility into the progress that has been made and can easily identify delays and their causes.
The solution also assists in budget planning by assigning expenses to various work items and giving management real-time insights into ongoing expenditures and performance against set budgets.
Jira Align Features
Some of the top features and benefits of using Jira Align include:
Reviews from Real Users
Jira Align stands out among its competitors for a number of reasons. Two major ones are its program-level planning options and its reporting capabilities.
A project manager at a consultancy notes, “I like how things can be sorted out, and it shows the different objectives one can do. You could also create a team view that would allow your team to see work outcomes. Jira Align also helps with the reporting, because we can export data to Excel or another format.”
We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
