Codebeamer and Planview AgilePlace are top contenders in the project management software space. Planview AgilePlace holds a slight edge due to its advanced Kanban and workflow features that enhance team collaboration and project delivery.
Features: Codebeamer offers strong requirements management, test management, and compliance support, catering to industries like manufacturing and pharmaceuticals. It provides full traceability and customizable Smart Requirement Views without the need for heavy programming. Meanwhile, Planview AgilePlace stands out with visual management through Kanban boards that facilitate task visibility, board and card hierarchies for cross-functional teams, and effective tracking of progress through custom lanes and colored cards.
Room for Improvement: Codebeamer could enhance its deployment speed and simplify its setup process, requiring less technical expertise. In addition, it might benefit from improving user satisfaction by addressing complexity concerns. Planview AgilePlace could improve by offering more extensive customization options for its reporting tools, integrating instant data access into the application itself, and enhancing the ability to generate customized reports directly within the platform.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Planview AgilePlace offers an easy deployment process with excellent customer service and resources, allowing faster user adoption. Codebeamer’s deployment can be more complex, often requiring technical guidance and a longer setup phase, yet it ensures robust project configuration once fully deployed.
Pricing and ROI: Codebeamer provides competitive pricing with its comprehensive features, although it demands training investment for better ROI. Planview AgilePlace, while potentially costlier, offers efficient ROI due to its task and workflow optimization tools, which reduce project delivery time and enhance team collaboration. Its investment is well offset by the productivity benefits achieved.
ROI can manifest through cost savings and increased development speed.
The solution has produced a return on investment.
Codebeamer saves time and money for certain use cases, such as AUTOSPICE implementations.
If I raise an issue as high priority, I receive responses in six to eight hours.
For out-of-the-box support, the customer service from PTC is satisfactory.
In a project, I have experienced up to 180 licenses running during peak times and as low as ten licenses during downtime without facing upgrade or downgrade issues.
On a scale from one to ten, I would rate the scalability of Codebeamer as eight or nine because it is a highly scalable solution.
Running it independently or with a bigger server generally doesn't cause any issues.
From a scale of one to ten, I would rate the stability of Codebeamer as eight to nine because the solution is highly stable.
There were stability issues due to version compatibility.
Beyond standards management for specific industries, Codebeamer should develop standards for areas where software code management and hardware-software integration are needed.
If terminology changes, modifications must be done manually or by exporting the document to Word or Excel, which is time-consuming.
Codebeamer struggles with some DevOps integrations and lacks AI features for enhanced user assistance.
Codebeamer is on the expensive side, but it provides ready-made modules for standards like ASPICE and ISO 26262, which might justify the cost for customers looking for those solutions.
Codebeamer is fairly priced against competition.
Its integration capability is very high, with almost eighty to eighty-five percent of integrations available readily out of the box, minimizing the need for specific integration-related work.
Codebeamer saves on time and resources with its web-based client, eliminating the need to install it on every system.
The requirements management aspect of Codebeamer is critical because it helps various industries, such as automotive or medical devices, to capture requirements based on industry-specific standards and processes.
codeBeamer ALM is a market-leading Application Lifecycle Management platform. It is holistically integrated, and is packed with features that help you develop better products faster. Scale, monitor, control, and report on your entire development lifecycle conveniently, and comply with safety-critical regulations. Cut development time and costs.
Planview AgilePlace is a cloud-based solution designed to provide businesses with a continuous flow of work to help teams accelerate delivery times by visualizing their work with enterprise Kanban boards and lean metrics. Planview offers project managers the visibility, resource management, and real-time analytics necessary to help their teams reduce bottlenecks and dependencies and work more effectively. By using Kanban boards, teams are able to visually track and manage the flow of their work from the strategy level, through implementation up to end-product delivery.
Planview AgilePlace Benefits
Planview helps teams to smoothly implement their strategies by offering its users the following benefits:
Reviews from Real Users
Planview AgilePlace stands out among its competitors for a number of reasons. Several major ones are its user-friendly management pane, the visibility that it provides for its users, and its agile management capabilities.
A manufacturing manager at a large manufacturing company writes, “Using the tool seems to save time versus trying to do things in a regular manner. It is highly collaborative; everybody can see things in one place. It is a highly functional, but pretty simple tool. That is hard to find: A tool that has a lot of functions, but is also simple.”
We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
