Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

What is Codebeamer?

Featured Codebeamer reviews

Codebeamer mindshare

As of August 2025, the mindshare of Codebeamer in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category stands at 9.5%, up from 6.1% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Codebeamer9.5%
Jira20.0%
Microsoft Azure DevOps14.9%
Other55.6%
Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

PeerResearch reports based on Codebeamer reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryApplication Lifecycle Management (ALM) SuitesAug 30, 2025Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersAug 30, 2025Download
ComparisonCodebeamer vs JiraAug 30, 2025Download
ComparisonCodebeamer vs Microsoft Azure DevOpsAug 30, 2025Download
ComparisonCodebeamer vs Polarion ALMAug 30, 2025Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Microsoft Azure DevOps4.114.9%95%135 interviewsAdd to research
Jira4.120.0%91%275 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

ROI

Pricing

Popular Use Cases

Service and Support

Deployment

Scalability

Stability

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business3
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise7
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business170
Midsize Enterprise104
Large Enterprise557
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
31%
Computer Software Company
14%
Healthcare Company
7%
Retailer
6%
Transportation Company
5%
Financial Services Firm
4%
Real Estate/Law Firm
3%
Construction Company
3%
University
2%
Educational Organization
2%
Performing Arts
2%
Engineering Company
2%
Non Profit
2%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
2%
Government
2%
Pharma/Biotech Company
2%
Consumer Goods Company
2%
Aerospace/Defense Firm
1%
Media Company
1%
Insurance Company
1%
Comms Service Provider
1%
Energy/Utilities Company
1%
Hospitality Company
1%
Wholesaler/Distributor
1%
 
Codebeamer Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Architect at itcinfotech3.5I use Codebeamer primarily for requirements management due to its efficient built-in project management modules, though it faces challenges with customization, Linux installation, and older PDM Windchill compatibility. Its web-based client saves time and resources.
Software Engineer at Festo AG4.0I use Codebeamer mainly for Kanban boards, release and sprint management, and access control. It's stable and functional but outdated, with a dull UI. While helpful, it could improve in scalability and user-friendliness for newcomers.
Independent Technical Consultant at i4c4.0I find Codebeamer ideal for automotive projects, especially for medium-sized companies, due to its economical nature and extensive integration capabilities. However, it requires server upgrades and its drag-and-drop feature needs improvement. It has boosted our ROI effectively.
National Manager - PLM Business at a computer software company with 201-500 employees4.5We explored Codebeamer for building our ALM practice but deferred for PLM focus with our OEM. Its requirements management aids industries with standards. However, more integration tools are needed. Codebeamer competes with IBM Rational and Siemens Polarion.
Manager at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees3.5We utilize Codebeamer for managing requirements, tasks, and issues within the V-model framework. While it's user-friendly, adapting it to specific workflows poses challenges, and we're collaborating with PTC to address certain issues, ensuring smoother integration.
Solutions Architect at Capgemini3.5I use CodeBeamer to align business requirements and processes, appreciating its flexibility compared to outdated tools like Arvines and Jira. However, during platform migrations, some tasks needed to be redone, indicating room for improvement in this area.
Process Method and Tool Developer at a transportation company with 10,001+ employees4.0I primarily use Codebeamer for lifecycle management, appreciating its integration and stability. However, it lacks maturity compared to Jira, needing better document integration and customization options to simplify its complex UI for specific user roles.
Senior General Manager at a manufacturing company with 501-1,000 employees4.5We utilize Codebeamer for comprehensive project management and CI/CD in our automobile business. Its powerful API-based integration is valuable, but improved processing with Jira would be beneficial. We chose Codebeamer over PTC Integrity for its promising features.