Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
CockroachDB Logo

CockroachDB Reviews

4.0 out of 5

What is CockroachDB?

Featured CockroachDB reviews

CockroachDB mindshare

Product category:
As of December 2025, the mindshare of CockroachDB in the Relational Databases Tools category stands at 4.1%, up from 3.3% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Relational Databases Tools Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
CockroachDB4.1%
SQL Server13.2%
Oracle Database11.8%
Other70.9%
Relational Databases Tools

PeerResearch reports based on CockroachDB reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryRelational Databases ToolsDec 29, 2025Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersDec 29, 2025Download
ComparisonCockroachDB vs SQL ServerDec 29, 2025Download
ComparisonCockroachDB vs Oracle DatabaseDec 29, 2025Download
ComparisonCockroachDB vs SAP HANADec 29, 2025Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Teradata4.14.2%88%83 interviewsAdd to research
SQL Server4.213.2%93%272 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

ROI

Pricing

Popular Use Cases

Service and Support

Deployment

Scalability

Stability

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business6
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise4
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business90
Midsize Enterprise44
Large Enterprise218
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
26%
Computer Software Company
11%
Educational Organization
8%
University
6%
Comms Service Provider
5%
Retailer
5%
Media Company
4%
Manufacturing Company
4%
Government
3%
Transportation Company
2%
Healthcare Company
2%
Aerospace/Defense Firm
2%
Construction Company
2%
Non Profit
2%
Energy/Utilities Company
2%
Wholesaler/Distributor
2%
Logistics Company
2%
Performing Arts
2%
Real Estate/Law Firm
1%
Outsourcing Company
1%
Legal Firm
1%
Consumer Goods Company
1%
Hospitality Company
1%
Insurance Company
1%
Wellness & Fitness Company
1%

Compare CockroachDB with alternative products

Learn more about CockroachDB

CockroachDB customers

Related questions

 
CockroachDB Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Manager, Software Engineering at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees4.0I've used CockroachDB for two years with Hasura, valuing its scalability, resilience, and SQL features. Setup was simple, support responsive, though UI and latency can improve. Overall, it effectively supports our moderate-scale, cloud-native application needs.
Software Engineer at a consultancy with self employed5.0I evaluated CockroachDB on various setups, finding it compatible with PostgreSQL protocols, which allowed easy integration with existing applications. Its extensive documentation and open-source model are valuable, though the serverless pricing can be confusing. It provides good ROI and scalability.
Student at Univerzita obrany4.0I am exploring CockroachDB and YugaByteDB for school applications, testing them alongside PostgreSQL. CockroachDB's distributed nature and geo-replication are valuable, though I wish for better PostgreSQL compatibility, especially concerning connection strings and technical integrations.
Senior Principal Architect ,Technology Strategy at Discover Financial Services4.0I find CockroachDB valuable due to its resilience and geo-partitioning features, which are essential for my company's needs. However, the automatic failover capability needs improvement. We haven't used other solutions, nor have we considered alternate cloud providers.
Chief Information Officer (CIO) at a tech services company with 51-200 employees4.0CockroachDB perfectly suits our legal and compliance needs, allowing us to keep EU and Singapore data isolated while maintaining global instances. Although it's not enterprise-level yet, its lower support costs and distributed nature make it valuable for us.
Staff DBRE at SecurityScorecard4.0I value CockroachDB's ability to solve data residency issues with auto geo-partitioning, reducing costs and improving performance by keeping data close to users. The engine could improve with AI to optimize partition key usage, enhancing query efficiency. Overall, it's cost-effective.
CEO at Go Eve4.0I find CockroachDB nearly compatible with Postgres but wish it were fully so to use Postgres libraries easily. Compared to Google Spanner, CockroachDB allows smaller-scale deployments and better cost efficiency, which is advantageous for our needs.
Co-Founder at Afriziki4.5I use CockroachDB for its ability to handle high-velocity data and its compatibility with Postgres. It offers valuable security features and automatic rebalancing, but it needs better extensibility and integration, particularly with tools like Kafka.