CockroachDB vs Teradata comparison

Read 76 Teradata reviews

10,603 Views
3,181 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

CockroachDB

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 27, 2025

Teradata and CockroachDB are prominent players in the data management and database industry. Teradata appears to have the upper hand in handling complex queries and large data volumes due to its scalable architecture and advanced analytics.

Features: Teradata offers massively parallel processing, "Parallel Everything” design, and robust tools for data warehousing. It is highly scalable and efficient for handling complex queries. CockroachDB is known for its fault tolerance and easy scalability, with features supporting impressive geographical deployment and high availability, making it suitable for distributed databases.

Room for Improvement: Teradata's high pricing and cloud integration need enhancements, along with improvements in transactional processes and schema optimizations. CockroachDB requires better PostgreSQL compatibility and enhanced enterprise-level features like disaster recovery and improved logging. Clarifying its serverless pricing model and expanding protocol support are also necessary.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Teradata provides versatile deployment options across on-premises and hybrid environments with strong customer support and resources. CockroachDB offers flexible cloud and on-premises deployment with commendable customer service but lacks extensive educational support like Teradata's.

Pricing and ROI: Teradata is a high-cost solution but justifies the investment with performance and reliability, appealing to larger organizations. It offers varied pricing models but remains expensive compared to newer competitors. CockroachDB presents a cost-effective option with flexible pricing, recognized for its performance and ease of deployment, valuable for firms with distributed database needs.

To learn more, read our detailed CockroachDB vs. Teradata Report (Updated: September 2025).

Download the complete report

CockroachDB vs. Teradata

September 2025

Helped 867,370 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

ROI

Sentiment score

6.7

CockroachDB's serverless model provides cost-effective, versatile cloud solutions, offering significant savings and operational advantages over separate environments.

Sentiment score

8.1

Teradata boosts analytics speed over 100%, enhancing customer service and satisfaction, with high ROI and user approval.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the CockroachDB report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Teradata report

Customer Service

Sentiment score

6.0

CockroachDB customer service is mixed; technical support quality varies, with users praising the AI chatbot, but responsiveness needs improvement.

Sentiment score

7.1

Teradata's customer service is praised for expertise but criticized for delays, with ratings ranging from 6 to 10 out of 10.

The issue was resolved efficiently.

Shivam Chauhan

Manager, Software Engineering at Convergys Corporation

For more quotes and insights, download the CockroachDB report

The technical support from Teradata is quite advanced.

Principal Consultant & Director at Quensulting

Customer support is very good, rated eight out of ten under our essential agreement.

For more quotes and insights, download the Teradata report

Team Leader for Data Base Administrators at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score

7.0

CockroachDB excels in scalability and resource management, praised for seamless scaling from small to large, supporting diverse needs efficiently.

Sentiment score

7.4

Teradata is praised for its scalability, speed, and flexibility, despite some complexity and cost challenges in cloud environments.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the CockroachDB report

This expansion can occur without incurring downtime or taking systems offline.

Principal Consultant & Director at Quensulting

Scalability is complex as you need to purchase a license and coordinate with Teradata for additional disk space and CPU.

For more quotes and insights, download the Teradata report

Team Leader for Data Base Administrators at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees

Stability Issues

Sentiment score

6.6

CockroachDB is stable overall, highly rated for reliability but faces challenges with protocol issues and large, complex workloads.

Sentiment score

8.4

Teradata excels in stability with minimal downtime, robust architecture, 99.9% uptime, and reliable performance, despite minor large dataset issues.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the CockroachDB report

I find the stability to be almost a ten out of ten.

Team Leader for Data Base Administrators at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees

The workload management and software maturity provide a reliable system.

For more quotes and insights, download the Teradata report

Principal Consultant & Director at Quensulting

Room For Improvement

CockroachDB requires improvements in documentation, compatibility, UI features, disaster recovery, latency optimization, integration, and cost efficiency for global deployment.

Teradata users seek better transaction processing, enhanced scalability, modern interface, cloud focus, advanced analytics, and improved support and documentation.

For multi-region deployment, CockroachDB requires at least three plus replicas across data centers to achieve strong consistency across regions, which increases infrastructure costs including compute, storage, and networking.

Shivam Chauhan

Manager, Software Engineering at Convergys Corporation

For more quotes and insights, download the CockroachDB report

Unlike SQL and Oracle, which have in-built replication capabilities, we don't have similar functionality with Teradata.

For more quotes and insights, download the Teradata report

Team Leader for Data Base Administrators at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees

Setup Cost

Enterprise users find CockroachDB affordable and reliable, with flexible pricing options appealing despite some perceiving high costs.

Teradata's high cost is justified by its superior performance, competitive total ownership costs, and flexible pricing models.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the CockroachDB report

Initially, it may seem expensive compared to similar cloud databases, however, it offers significant value in performance, stability, and overall output once in use.

Principal Consultant & Director at Quensulting

Teradata is much more expensive than SQL, which is well-performed and cheaper.

For more quotes and insights, download the Teradata report

Team Leader for Data Base Administrators at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees

Valuable Features

CockroachDB provides easy setup, fault tolerance, scalability, and security, while supporting PostgreSQL compatibility for optimal performance across regions.

Teradata offers efficient, scalable data management with fast query performance, robust security, automation, and cloud flexibility for businesses.

CockroachDB's geo-distribution feature is superior to traditional databases.

Shivam Chauhan

Manager, Software Engineering at Convergys Corporation

For more quotes and insights, download the CockroachDB report

The data mover is valuable over the last two years as it allows us to achieve data replication to our disaster recovery systems.

For more quotes and insights, download the Teradata report

Team Leader for Data Base Administrators at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees

Categories and Ranking

CockroachDB

Ranking in Relational Databases Tools

10th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Teradata

Ranking in Relational Databases Tools

8th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Customer Experience Management (7th), Backup and Recovery (22nd), Data Integration (17th), Data Warehouse (3rd), BI (Business Intelligence) Tools (14th), Marketing Management (5th), Cloud Data Warehouse (4th)

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the Relational Databases Tools category, the mindshare of CockroachDB is 4.1%, up from 2.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Teradata is 4.8%, down from 5.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Relational Databases Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Teradata	4.8%
CockroachDB	4.1%
Other	91.1%

Relational Databases Tools

Featured Reviews

Antonio Tringali

Software Engineer at a consultancy with self employed

Open source with extensive documentation and a University for training

I am a freelancer. A client of mine wanted a solution that would allow them to scale yet not abandon the familiar PostgreSQL front-end (and rewrite a part of their source code). Scalability aside, CockroachDB is a fine way forward from PostgreSQL and is not changing the client source code part of the system. If you are lucky and you do not use newer features from recent versions of PostgreSQL or PostgreSQL extensions, it's fine. There are nice-to-have features for big organizations like regional tables. At the moment, my client simply does not use these. However, the serverless offer from CockroachDB is reacting well as data grows.

Read full review

Harnessing advanced parallelism for top performance while embracing cloud trends

Principal Consultant & Director at Quensulting

Teradata is primarily used for data warehousing across all customers. My clients have built-in applications that use Teradata, and their use varies from customer to customer, depending on the industry and database size. The primary function is as an OLAP analytical ecosystem Scalability is…

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Relational Databases Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

867,370 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user232068

Senior Data Architect at a pharma/biotech company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Aug 5, 2015

Netezza vs. Teradata

Original published at https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/should-i-choose-net Two leading Massively Parallel Processing (MPP) architectures for Data Warehousing (DW) are IBM PureData System for Analytics (formerly Netezza) and Teradata. I thought talking about the similarities and differences…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

32%

Computer Software Company

13%

Educational Organization

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

25%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	5

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	25
Midsize Enterprise	12
Large Enterprise	49

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about CockroachDB?

The subset of SQL that my client is using is completely supported.

What needs improvement with CockroachDB?

The platform should provide a UI feature where users have the ability to manage it. The CockroachDB platform should have a chatbot where users can inquire about pricing or seek solutions for querie...

What is your primary use case for CockroachDB?

We have been using CockroachDB for the last two years. From 2023, we started working on a product similar to Google Capture. We decided to work with CockroachDB with Hasura. Hasura is a UI for the ...

Comparing Teradata and Oracle Database, which product do you think is better and why?

I have spoken to my colleagues about this comparison and in our collective opinion, the reason why some people may declare Teradata better than Oracle is the pricing. Both solutions are quite simi...

Which companies use Teradata and who is it most suitable for?

Before my organization implemented this solution, we researched which big brands were using Teradata, so we knew if it would be compatible with our field. According to the product's site, the comp...

Is Teradata a difficult solution to work with?

Teradata is not a difficult product to work with, especially since they offer you technical support at all levels if you just ask. There are some features that may cause difficulties - for example,...

Citus Data vs CockroachDB

Comparisons

Neon vs CockroachDB

Compared 26% of the time

Compared 15% of the time

YugabyteDB vs CockroachDB

Compared 11% of the time

Oracle Database vs CockroachDB

Compared 8% of the time

More CockroachDB Competitors

Oracle Exadata vs Teradata

Compared 12% of the time

IBM Db2 Database vs Teradata

Compared 7% of the time

Snowflake vs Teradata

Compared 7% of the time

SQL Server vs Teradata

Compared 7% of the time

OpenText Analytics Database (Vertica) vs Teradata

Compared 6% of the time

More Teradata Competitors

Product Reports

Download CockroachDB product report

CockroachDB

September 2025

Download Teradata product report

August 2025

Also Known As

No data available

IntelliFlex, Aster Data Map Reduce, , QueryGrid, Customer Interaction Manager, Digital Marketing Center, Data Mover, Data Stream Architecture

Overview

CockroachDB is a distributed SQL database built on a transactional and strongly-consistent key-value store. It scales horizontally; survives disk, machine, rack, and even datacenter failures with minimal latency disruption and no manual intervention; supports strongly-consistent ACID transactions; and provides a familiar SQL API for structuring, manipulating, and querying data.

CockroachDB is inspired by Google’s Spanner and F1 technologies, and it’s completely open source.

Cockroach

Teradata is a scalable data analytics platform designed to meet enterprise demands for large-scale data management and processing, focusing on performance, scalability, and security for complex query executions.

As a leading data warehousing solution, Teradata integrates advanced analytics enabling organizations to derive insights from massive datasets. It supports high-volume data workloads with its architecture optimized for analytical queries. Users benefit from its robust scalability, allowing seamless expansion as data grows. Teradata's SQL engine is compatible with a wide range of data types, ensuring flexibility in data analysis. With advanced security measures, it protects sensitive data across various environments, providing peace of mind to users handling critical information.

What are the most important features of Teradata?

Linear Scalability: Easily expands data processing capabilities to handle increasing data loads without performance degradation.
Advanced Analytics: Supports complex analytical operations integrating machine learning and AI for predictive insights.
SQL Compatibility: Offers a comprehensive SQL interface that supports complex queries across diverse data types.
Data Security: Implements rigorous security protocols to protect data integrity and confidentiality.

What benefits and ROI should users look for?

Improved Decision-Making: Derive actionable insights quickly for strategic business decisions.
Cost Efficiency: Optimized resource usage reduces operational costs associated with data processing.
Increased Productivity: Streamlined data operations save time, allowing teams to focus on analysis.
Enhanced Scalability: Seamless growth without significant additional investment as data volumes increase.

Teradata is widely used in industries like finance, telecommunications, and healthcare, where data-driven decisions are critical. Companies leverage its robust analytics capabilities to enhance customer experiences, streamline operations, and ensure compliance with regulatory requirements. In these sectors, quick access to data insights can significantly impact competitive advantage.

Sample Customers

Baidu, Kindred, Tierion, Heroic Labs, Gorgias

Netflix