Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

CockroachDB vs MySQL comparison

Cockroach and Oracle are both solutions in the Relational Databases Tools category. Cockroach is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.4, while Oracle is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.3. Cockroach holds a 4.1% mindshare in SQL, compared to Oracle’s 7.8% mindshare. Additionally, 84% of Cockroach users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of Oracle users who would recommend it.
CockroachDB
Read 13 CockroachDB reviews
  • 2,249 Views
  • 2,092 Comparison Views
84% willing to recommend
MySQL
Read 150 MySQL reviews
  • 10,016 Views
  • 4,808 Comparison Views
91% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 4, 2025

MySQL and CockroachDB are both prominent contenders in the database solutions category. MySQL stands out for its platform support and ease of use in small to medium applications, while CockroachDB showcases its strength in distributed architecture and multi-region deployment resilience.

Features: MySQL's features include multi-threaded architecture, exceptional support for replication, and cross-platform compatibility that makes it appealing for small to medium applications. CockroachDB offers high fault tolerance, a robust distributed architecture, and valuable geospatial capabilities, specifically beneficial for geo-partitioning and data residency solutions.

Room for Improvement: MySQL needs simplification in InnoDB complexity, better transaction management, and improved active directory integration. Enhancements are also required in scaling and backup processes. CockroachDB should enhance its PostgreSQL compatibility, disaster recovery features, and serverless environment handling. Improvements in enterprise features for MySQL and seamless integrations for CockroachDB are necessary.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: MySQL, adaptable across various infrastructures, benefits from a substantial open-source community, although its official support can be costly. It mainly sees on-premises and hybrid implementations. CockroachDB predominantly operates in public cloud environments with solid community backing but requires better official support services. Community support thrives for both platforms, but the budget for technical support varies.

Pricing and ROI: MySQL is cost-effective, especially in its open-source form, offering a high ROI as it is free in most usage scenarios, aside from some enterprise-level features. CockroachDB's pricing, though high, is justified for users prioritizing high availability and distributed systems, offering flexible pricing models. Both databases provide free entry-level options, with more expensive enterprise editions delivering additional benefits.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed CockroachDB vs. MySQL Report (Updated: July 2025).
Buyer's Guide
CockroachDB vs. MySQL
July 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 865,738 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
6.7
CockroachDB's serverless model provides cost-effective, versatile cloud solutions, offering significant savings and operational advantages over separate environments.
Sentiment score
6.3
Users experience varied ROI with MySQL due to its open-source nature, cloud or local use, and operational benefits.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.0
CockroachDB customer service is mixed; technical support quality varies, with users praising the AI chatbot, but responsiveness needs improvement.
Sentiment score
6.8
MySQL support is mostly community-driven and free, but Oracle's support, while effective, can be costly for smaller businesses.
The issue was resolved efficiently.
For more quotes and insights, download the CockroachDB report
We have no issues and usually receive timely responses.
For more quotes and insights, download the MySQL report
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.0
CockroachDB excels in scalability and resource management, praised for seamless scaling from small to large, supporting diverse needs efficiently.
Sentiment score
6.7
MySQL is scalable for small to medium projects but requires enhancements and tools for effective large-scale deployment.
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the CockroachDB report
Meeting scalability requirements through cloud computing is an expensive affair.
For more quotes and insights, download the MySQL report
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
6.6
CockroachDB is stable overall, highly rated for reliability but faces challenges with protocol issues and large, complex workloads.
Sentiment score
7.7
MySQL is widely praised for reliability and performance, but occasional issues with large tables require proper maintenance and configuration.
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the CockroachDB report
We face certain integration issues, especially when we integrate the database with security solutions like IBM QRadar.
For more quotes and insights, download the MySQL report
 

Room For Improvement

CockroachDB requires improvements in documentation, compatibility, UI features, disaster recovery, latency optimization, integration, and cost efficiency for global deployment.
MySQL needs scalability improvements, better replication, enhanced security, integration, and upgraded tools, procedures, user interface, and documentation.
For multi-region deployment, CockroachDB requires at least three plus replicas across data centers to achieve strong consistency across regions, which increases infrastructure costs including compute, storage, and networking.
For more quotes and insights, download the CockroachDB report
When there are multiple application servers connecting to the MySQL cluster and going through the MySQL load balancer, the documentation is not user-friendly.
It could be more beneficial if MySQL can enhance its data masking functionality in the same way it has improved data encryption.
Oracle could improve on scalability.
For more quotes and insights, download the MySQL report
SC
Prabir Kumar Kundu - PeerSpot reviewerMuzzamil Hussain - PeerSpot reviewer
RS
 

Setup Cost

Enterprise users find CockroachDB affordable and reliable, with flexible pricing options appealing despite some perceiving high costs.
Enterprise buyers appreciate MySQL's flexible pricing, noting affordable options compared to Microsoft SQL Server or Oracle.
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the CockroachDB report
Oracle has different components, so if you need security, you have to procure a different license, but here everything is inbuilt and it's not costly.
For more quotes and insights, download the MySQL report
 

Valuable Features

CockroachDB provides easy setup, fault tolerance, scalability, and security, while supporting PostgreSQL compatibility for optimal performance across regions.
MySQL is popular for being open-source, SQL-compatible, scalable, easy to manage, cross-platform, with strong integration capabilities.
Security features include encryption in transit, role-based access control, and compliance with data residency laws by pinning data to specific regions.
For more quotes and insights, download the CockroachDB report
With Oracle, we have to buy another solution for encryption and masking, but MySQL supports native encryption, which enhances our return on investment.
Security is inbuilt with the database, and clusters are also possible using MySQL.
It allows programming, writing stored procedures, creating views, constraints, and triggers easily.
For more quotes and insights, download the MySQL report
SC
Muzzamil Hussain - PeerSpot reviewerPrabir Kumar Kundu - PeerSpot reviewer
RS
 

Categories and Ranking

CockroachDB
Ranking in Relational Databases Tools
11th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
13
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
MySQL
Ranking in Relational Databases Tools
5th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
150
Ranking in other categories
Open Source Databases (2nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Relational Databases Tools category, the mindshare of CockroachDB is 4.1%, up from 2.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of MySQL is 7.8%, down from 8.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Relational Databases Tools Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
MySQL7.8%
CockroachDB4.1%
Other88.1%
Relational Databases Tools
 

Featured Reviews

Antonio Tringali - PeerSpot reviewer
Open source with extensive documentation and a University for training
I am a freelancer. A client of mine wanted a solution that would allow them to scale yet not abandon the familiar PostgreSQL front-end (and rewrite a part of their source code). Scalability aside, CockroachDB is a fine way forward from PostgreSQL and is not changing the client source code part of the system. If you are lucky and you do not use newer features from recent versions of PostgreSQL or PostgreSQL extensions, it's fine. There are nice-to-have features for big organizations like regional tables. At the moment, my client simply does not use these. However, the serverless offer from CockroachDB is reacting well as data grows.
Read full review
Prabir Kumar Kundu - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers robust security and availability with impressive replication capabilities
Regarding their documentation and interface, there is room for improvement. Documentation is definitely required when running multiple databases on a cluster system. The load balancer, MySQL LB, which is used to connect to the application, lacks clear documentation. When there are multiple application servers connecting to the MySQL cluster and going through the MySQL load balancer, the documentation is not user-friendly. It's there, but only technical persons with deep knowledge of the MySQL database can implement it. Most of the community users or ISVs who use MySQL don't have many technical persons or DBA experts, so they face some challenges for the high availability of connecting high available databases from high available applications. That documentation should be simplified.
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Relational Databases Tools solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
865,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
33%
Computer Software Company
13%
Educational Organization
6%
Retailer
6%
Computer Software Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Government
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business7
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise5
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business73
Midsize Enterprise31
Large Enterprise61
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about CockroachDB?
The subset of SQL that my client is using is completely supported.
See all answers
What needs improvement with CockroachDB?
I would like CockroachDB to have more compatibility with PostgreSQL, especially with the connection string and technical integrations.
See all answers
What is your primary use case for CockroachDB?
I am studying how to deploy CockroachDB and YugaByteDB, and learning some basic information about them. I am testing these databases as part of my school application to find a suitable database for...
See all answers
Why are MySQL connections encrypted and what is the biggest benefit of this?
MySQL encrypts connections to protect your data and the biggest benefit from this is that nobody can corrupt it. If you move information over a network without encryption, you are endangering it, m...
See all answers
Considering that there is a free version of MySQL, would you invest in one of the paid editions?
I may be considered a MySQL veteran since I have been using it since before Oracle bought it and created paid versions. So back in my day, it was all free, it was open-source and the best among sim...
See all answers
What is one thing you would improve with MySQL?
One thing I would improve related to MySQL is not within the product itself, but with the guides to it. Before, when it was free, everyone was on their own, seeking tutorials and how-to videos onli...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Neon vs CockroachDB Logo
Neon vs CockroachDB
Compared 26% of the time
Citus Data vs CockroachDB Logo
Citus Data vs CockroachDB
Compared 15% of the time
YugabyteDB vs CockroachDB Logo
YugabyteDB vs CockroachDB
Compared 10% of the time
Oracle Database vs CockroachDB Logo
Oracle Database vs CockroachDB
Compared 9% of the time
MariaDB vs CockroachDB Logo
MariaDB vs CockroachDB
Compared 5% of the time
More CockroachDB Competitors
Firebird SQL vs MySQL Logo
Firebird SQL vs MySQL
Compared 23% of the time
PostgreSQL vs MySQL Logo
PostgreSQL vs MySQL
Compared 14% of the time
SAP HANA vs MySQL Logo
SAP HANA vs MySQL
Compared 8% of the time
MariaDB vs MySQL Logo
MariaDB vs MySQL
Compared 6% of the time
Oracle Java DB vs MySQL Logo
Oracle Java DB vs MySQL
Compared 2% of the time
More MySQL Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
CockroachDB
August 2025
CockroachDB reportDownload CockroachDB product report
Buyer's Guide
MySQL
August 2025
MySQL reportDownload MySQL product report
 

Overview

CockroachDB is a distributed SQL database built on a transactional and strongly-consistent key-value store. It scales horizontally; survives disk, machine, rack, and even datacenter failures with minimal latency disruption and no manual intervention; supports strongly-consistent ACID transactions; and provides a familiar SQL API for structuring, manipulating, and querying data.

CockroachDB is inspired by Google’s Spanner and F1 technologies, and it’s completely open source.

Cockroach

MySQL is a cost-efficient and scalable relational database management system widely used in web, mobile applications, and academic projects.

MySQL is utilized for backend operations, data analysis, reporting, financial transactions, and ERP databases. It supports deployment on local servers, Cloud, and Kubernetes. Its free, open-source nature along with strong community support make it popular among companies. MySQL's compatibility with multiple platforms and programming languages enhances its appeal. While it remains stable and easy to use, areas such as replication, clustering, and backup require improvement to better serve enterprise applications. Enhanced security, error messages, and monitoring tools are also desired for a better user experience.

What are the most important features of MySQL?
  • Free and Open-Source: No licensing costs, perfect for budget-conscious projects.
  • Compatibility: Works with multiple platforms and programming languages.
  • High Performance: Efficient performance across large datasets.
  • Scalability: Easily scales to meet growing business needs.
  • Clustering and Replication: Ensures data availability and redundancy.
  • Easy Installation: Quick setup process on various operating systems.
  • Community Support: Extensive resources and community assistance.
  • Cross-Platform: Operates seamlessly on different operating systems.
  • Data Management Interface: Simplifies data handling and manipulation.
What are the benefits of using MySQL?
  • Cost Efficiency: Reduce expenses with a free, open-source database.
  • Scalability: Adapt to increasing data demands effortlessly.
  • Performance: Handle large datasets with ease and speed.
  • Community Support: Access a vast pool of knowledge and resources.
  • Flexibility: Integrate with various platforms and languages for diverse use cases.
  • Data Reliability: Clustering and replication for high data availability.

In multiple industries, MySQL supports internal applications, billing systems, academic teaching purposes, and ERP databases. Companies leverage MySQL for Cloud and local deployments, ensuring effective data manipulation and backend operations in diverse projects. Its role in financial transactions and reporting further emphasizes its versatility.

Oracle
 

Sample Customers

Baidu, Kindred, Tierion, Heroic Labs, Gorgias
Facebook, Tumblr, Scholastic, MTV Networks, Wikipedia, Verizon Wireless, Sage Group, Glassfish Open Message Queue, and RightNow Technologies.
Buyer's Guide
CockroachDB vs. MySQL
July 2025
Free Report: CockroachDB vs. MySQL
Find out what your peers are saying about CockroachDB vs. MySQL and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
865,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our CockroachDB vs. MySQL report.
See our list of best Relational Databases Tools vendors.

We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.