We performed a comparison between CockroachDB and SAP HANA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Relational Databases Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."CockroachDB is highly reliable."
"I use CockroachDB to test big data samples and to create the best structure for databases. We have four users and required 10 people for deployment and maintenance."
"The solution is stable."
"We use SAP HANA for Master Data Governance."
"When we upgraded, we received more functions or more features."
"Anyone currently using SAP will be transitioning to HANA."
"It's stable and reliable."
"The most valuable features I have found are speed, dashboard, and reporting."
"The in-memory database is excellent."
"The most valuable feature of SAP HANA is the interaction it provides with external suppliers and clients."
"The closer they can make CockroachDB to being completely compatible with Postgres, the better. It's almost compatible, but not completely. If it was, it would be nice to just be able to use Postgres libraries without any fiddling."
"Cockroach does not support all types of protocols. I need to improve it myself to support a CouchDB on my network."
"The user interface and CRM need to be more user-friendly."
"The surface side or Attack dashboard needs improvement because there are some gaps after sales services."
"SAP HANA is not perfect and they could improve by having more options and more integration."
"You cannot apply mulit-join inside the calculation views, for example, when you are joining tables."
"The relationship with a partner that sells SAP could be better. We depend much more on our own development, and the partner is for selling us the solutions, so we need them to be able to supply help and answers. The partner isn't very helpful, and we have to rely on our own knowledge and research."
"While new users to this solution have the benefit of the new design, existing ERP users may experience issues with migrating legacy data. We would like to see development of ready-made tools that allow for easy mapping when upgrading."
"The installation process could be more straightforward."
"The solution could improve in the handling of backup data and the administration tools."
CockroachDB is ranked 12th in Relational Databases Tools with 2 reviews while SAP HANA is ranked 4th in Relational Databases Tools with 46 reviews. CockroachDB is rated 8.6, while SAP HANA is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of CockroachDB writes "Reliable, quick and simple implementation ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP HANA writes "Good integration capabilities, easy to implement, and reliable". CockroachDB is most compared with Oracle Database, Citus Data, MySQL, Amazon Aurora and Teradata, whereas SAP HANA is most compared with Oracle Database, SQL Server, IBM Db2 Database, MySQL and Apache Spark. See our CockroachDB vs. SAP HANA report.
See our list of best Relational Databases Tools vendors.
We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.