No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

CockroachDB vs Redis comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
6.7
CockroachDB's serverless model provides cost-effective, versatile cloud solutions, offering significant savings and operational advantages over separate environments.
Sentiment score
6.5
Redis improves performance, reduces costs, and enhances developer productivity by managing caching efficiently and minimizing downtime and data loss.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.0
CockroachDB customer service is mixed; technical support quality varies, with users praising the AI chatbot, but responsiveness needs improvement.
Sentiment score
1.0
Redis' customer service feedback varies, with some praising it, others dissatisfied, and many not engaging with support.
The issue was resolved efficiently.
Manager, Software Engineering at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.0
CockroachDB excels in scalability and resource management, praised for seamless scaling from small to large, supporting diverse needs efficiently.
Sentiment score
7.7
Redis is valued for scalability, cloud integration, and platform compatibility, though limited in non-clustered legacy systems.
Data migration and changes to application-side configurations are challenging due to the lack of automatic migration tools in a non-clustered legacy system.
Data Engineer at a photography company with 1,001-5,000 employees
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
6.6
CockroachDB is stable overall, highly rated for reliability but faces challenges with protocol issues and large, complex workloads.
Sentiment score
7.7
Redis offers robust stability and high availability with consistent performance, despite occasional downtime under heavy loads.
Redis is fairly stable.
Data Engineer at a photography company with 1,001-5,000 employees
 

Room For Improvement

CockroachDB requires improvements in documentation, compatibility, UI features, disaster recovery, latency optimization, integration, and cost efficiency for global deployment.
Redis requires better cluster management, enhanced security, improved documentation, and advanced enterprise features for optimal non-cloud and cloud performance.
For multi-region deployment, CockroachDB requires at least three plus replicas across data centers to achieve strong consistency across regions, which increases infrastructure costs including compute, storage, and networking.
Manager, Software Engineering at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Features such as authentication and encryption exist but are not always enabled by default, posing a risk if not properly set up.
SDE 1 at a educational organization with 501-1,000 employees
Data persistence and recovery face issues with compatibility across major versions, making upgrades possible but downgrades not active.
Data Engineer at a photography company with 1,001-5,000 employees
 

Setup Cost

Enterprise users find CockroachDB affordable and reliable, with flexible pricing options appealing despite some perceiving high costs.
Redis provides cost-effective options from free open-source versions to paid managed services, with potential extra costs for high RAM usage.
Since we use an open-source version of Redis, we do not experience any setup costs or licensing expenses.
Data Engineer at a photography company with 1,001-5,000 employees
 

Valuable Features

CockroachDB provides easy setup, fault tolerance, scalability, and security, while supporting PostgreSQL compatibility for optimal performance across regions.
Redis offers fast, easy in-memory storage, supports diverse data types, aids real-time and scalable operations with simple setup.
Compared to traditional databases PostgreSQL and MySQL, CockroachDB provides both SQL features and is horizontally scalable, meaning it is cloud-native.
Manager, Software Engineering at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
The biggest improvement is in response time; by caching frequently accessed data, we reduce the API latency from database level milliseconds to sub-millisecond responses in many cases.
SDE 1 at a educational organization with 501-1,000 employees
It functions similarly to a foundational building block in a larger system, enabling native integration and high functionality in core data processes.
Data Engineer at a photography company with 1,001-5,000 employees
 

Categories and Ranking

CockroachDB
Ranking in Vector Databases
16th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
13
Ranking in other categories
Relational Databases Tools (13th), Database Management Systems (DBMS) (10th)
Redis
Ranking in Vector Databases
3rd
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
5.7
Number of Reviews
24
Ranking in other categories
NoSQL Databases (5th), Managed NoSQL Databases (7th), In-Memory Data Store Services (1st), AI Software Development (10th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Vector Databases category, the mindshare of CockroachDB is 1.0%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Redis is 5.5%, up from 5.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Vector Databases Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Redis5.5%
CockroachDB1.0%
Other93.5%
Vector Databases
 

Featured Reviews

SC
Manager, Software Engineering at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Provides developer-friendly environment with robust security and cost-efficiency
The platform should provide a UI feature where users have the ability to manage it. The CockroachDB platform should have a chatbot where users can inquire about pricing or seek solutions for queries, rather than relying on email support. The current UI only provides SQL playground, which is technical. There should be a UI playground where users with limited technical knowledge can run and update queries, similar to phpMyAdmin or Adminer. Latency optimization could be improved for globally distributed applications, particularly in query routing. For multi-region deployment, CockroachDB requires at least three plus replicas across data centers to achieve strong consistency across regions, which increases infrastructure costs including compute, storage, and networking. The disadvantages include cost-efficiency with multi-region deployment and schema migration speed, which should be faster compared to other drivers. The query optimizer should handle complex queries better through the UI interface.
reviewer2811600 - PeerSpot reviewer
SDE 1 at a educational organization with 501-1,000 employees
Caching and session design has improved performance and now supports high-traffic workloads
Overall, Redis is a powerful and reliable tool, but there are a few areas for improvement. One limitation is that Redis is memory-based, so scaling can become expensive compared to disk-based systems. While it offers persistence options, it is not always ideal for large datasets where cost efficiency is critical. Another area is cache consistency; Redis itself does not enforce consistency with the primary database, so developers need to carefully design cache invalidation strategies. More built-in mechanisms or patterns to simplify this would be helpful. Additional areas where Redis could improve include monitoring, security, and ease of use in large-scale ecosystems. From a monitoring perspective, while Redis provides basic metrics, deep visibility into issues such as memory fragmentation, hot keys, or latency spikes often requires external tools; more built-in, user-friendly options would make diagnosing production issues quicker. Regarding security, Redis has improved over time, but historically, it required careful configurations; features such as authentication and encryption exist but are not always enabled by default, posing a risk if not properly set up. A strong, secure by default configuration would be beneficial. In terms of ease of use, while Redis is straightforward for basic use cases, managing clusters and persistence strategies can become complex at scale, so better abstractions or tooling for distributed setups and operations would make it more developer-friendly.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Vector Databases solutions are best for your needs.
885,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
20%
Educational Organization
10%
Computer Software Company
8%
University
7%
Financial Services Firm
24%
Computer Software Company
10%
Comms Service Provider
7%
University
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business7
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise5
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business11
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise9
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with CockroachDB?
The platform should provide a UI feature where users have the ability to manage it. The CockroachDB platform should have a chatbot where users can inquire about pricing or seek solutions for querie...
What is your primary use case for CockroachDB?
We have been using CockroachDB for the last two years. From 2023, we started working on a product similar to Google Capture. We decided to work with CockroachDB with Hasura. Hasura is a UI for the ...
What advice do you have for others considering CockroachDB?
The tech support deserves a rating of nine out of ten. My overall rating for CockroachDB is 8 out of 10.
What do you like most about Redis?
Redis is better tested and is used by large companies. I haven't found a direct alternative to what Redis offers. Plus, there are a lot of support and learning resources available, which help you u...
What needs improvement with Redis?
The disadvantage of Redis is that it's a little bit hard to have too many clusters or too many nodes and create the clusters. The sync between the nodes is easier to implement with Couchbase, for e...
What is your primary use case for Redis?
Redis is used for a part of a booking engine for travel, specifically for the front part to get some sessions and information about the sessions. If a customer or user is using the sites in differe...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

No data available
Redis Enterprise
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Baidu, Kindred, Tierion, Heroic Labs, Gorgias
1. Twitter 2. GitHub 3. StackOverflow 4. Pinterest 5. Snapchat 6. Craigslist 7. Digg 8. Weibo 9. Airbnb 10. Uber 11. Slack 12. Trello 13. Shopify 14. Coursera 15. Medium 16. Twitch 17. Foursquare 18. Meetup 19. Kickstarter 20. Docker 21. Heroku 22. Bitbucket 23. Groupon 24. Flipboard 25. SoundCloud 26. BuzzFeed 27. Disqus 28. The New York Times 29. Walmart 30. Nike 31. Sony 32. Philips
Find out what your peers are saying about CockroachDB vs. Redis and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.
885,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.