Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Cisco Wireless WAN Logo

Cisco Wireless WAN Reviews

Vendor: Cisco
4.1 out of 5

What is Cisco Wireless WAN?

Featured Cisco Wireless WAN reviews

Cisco Wireless WAN mindshare

As of December 2025, the mindshare of Cisco Wireless WAN in the Wireless WAN category stands at 6.3%, up from 2.8% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Wireless WAN Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Cisco Wireless WAN6.3%
Ubiquiti Wireless35.3%
Ruckus Wireless WAN28.3%
Other30.10000000000001%
Wireless WAN

PeerResearch reports based on Cisco Wireless WAN reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryWireless WANDec 29, 2025Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersDec 29, 2025Download
ComparisonCisco Wireless WAN vs Ubiquiti WirelessDec 29, 2025Download
ComparisonCisco Wireless WAN vs Ruckus Wireless WANDec 29, 2025Download
ComparisonCisco Wireless WAN vs Cambium Networks Wireless WANDec 29, 2025Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Ubiquiti Wireless4.035.3%89%77 interviewsAdd to research
Ruckus Wireless WAN4.128.3%92%58 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers
Last updated Nov 22, 2025

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

ROI

Pricing

Popular Use Cases

Service and Support

Deployment

Scalability

Stability

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business23
Midsize Enterprise15
Large Enterprise32
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business27
Midsize Enterprise12
Large Enterprise22
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
13%
Government
10%
Educational Organization
8%
Performing Arts
8%
Computer Software Company
7%
Retailer
7%
Construction Company
5%
Transportation Company
5%
Comms Service Provider
3%
Consumer Goods Company
3%
Logistics Company
3%
Non Profit
3%
Outsourcing Company
3%
Real Estate/Law Firm
3%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
3%
Wellness & Fitness Company
3%
Financial Services Firm
2%
Aerospace/Defense Firm
2%
Marketing Services Firm
2%
Renewables & Environment Company
2%
Healthcare Company
2%
Hospitality Company
2%
Photography Company
2%

Compare Cisco Wireless WAN with alternative products

Learn more about Cisco Wireless WAN

Cisco Wireless WAN customers

Related questions

 
Cisco Wireless WAN Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Manager IT Infrastructure & Helpdesk at LCI Pakistan3.5I've used Cisco Wireless WAN for four years in an all-Cisco environment. It's easy to set up, stable, and scalable, but sometimes has coverage issues. Despite initial high prices, it offers good value and support overall.
Network Administrator at frieslandcampina4.0No summary available
Network Security at Tech Mahindra Limited4.0I've used Cisco Wireless WAN for six years and find it reliable, easy to integrate, and user-friendly, though the interface could be simpler. Support is strong, and overall, I’d rate it eight out of ten.
Consultant at a comms service provider with 11-50 employees4.5I am an SE engineer engaging with customers across various industries. Cisco Wireless WAN, with Meraki's cloud-based accessibility, facilitates remote troubleshooting and updates. While trusted, it's more expensive than FortiNet due to Cisco's tiered licensing.
Senior Manager at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees4.0Cisco Wireless WAN offers reliable long-term solutions with features like AI capabilities and easy WAN handoff, although encryption in WLAN needs improvement. Despite higher costs, Cisco provides a better overall solution, ensuring strong ROI for most users.
Network Engineer at KOREAN AIR3.5We have been using Cisco Wireless WAN for a decade, appreciating its scalability, but we're transitioning to Xtream. Cisco's complex structure, higher cost, and issues with roaming prompted the switch, despite experiencing a 20% time saving with Cisco.
Network Engineer at Atkins Houston Offshore Engineering, a member of the Kent group3.5We use Cisco Wireless WAN for seamless wireless connectivity in the oil and gas industry, valuing its authentication and strong signal coverage. However, the operating system installation on access points could be more straightforward for ease of use.
AGM, Network Administration at Partex Star Group3.5I've been using Cisco Wireless WAN because it's scalable and reasonably priced, though its security features are similar to Cambium and Aruba. Licensing and support need improvement, particularly due to inadequate local technical support. However, it offers good performance without hanging.