

Microsoft Purview Data Governance and Varonis Platform are prominent competitors in the data governance category. Based on features, user feedback, and pricing, Varonis Platform holds a slight advantage due to its comprehensive data protection and user behavior analytics.
Features: Microsoft Purview Data Governance provides data classification, strong integration capabilities with Azure technologies, data loss prevention tools, and a user-friendly interface. It excels in data protection across multi-cloud and multi-platform environments. Varonis Platform focuses on identifying sensitive data with its robust data protection, user behavior analytics, and comprehensive compliance reporting. It seamlessly unifies data feeds into a centralized reporting system.
Room for Improvement: Microsoft Purview requires enhancements in integration with non-Microsoft tools, better API connectivity, and improved automated compliance processes. Documentation could also be better. Varonis Platform users point to interface complexity and high costs as areas for growth, along with extended cloud integration opportunities.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Purview offers flexibility across cloud environments but experiences mixed customer service reviews with variable support expertise. Varonis supports both on-premises and cloud infrastructures, with generally better-received customer service, although ticket resolution delays are noted. Varonis offers consistent support compared to Microsoft Purview's often license-dependent service quality.
Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Purview is viewed as reasonably priced, especially for Microsoft 365 users, adopting a consumption-based model. Costs can increase with additional licenses. It offers ROI through operational efficiency and reduced security risks. Varonis Platform, with higher licensing fees, offers significant ROI through enhanced data protection, appealing to large enterprises, justifying its cost with extensive security features.
Clients benefit from using a one-stop-shop solution, increasing their visibility across different platforms.
I definitely say that we have had time savings by using the DataVantage module and also time savings using the AD module when we are dealing with different incidents.
I have seen a return on investment mainly through time savings and improved security for sensitive data, making it a valuable investment.
Overall, it doesn't meet our expectations.
They're skillful people who know what they're doing in their space.
I have a dedicated team as a government agency, and Microsoft assists us promptly.
The customer support is above par; it is what I think other organizations should look at to be comparable to.
They respond quickly to anything we need, which is not common among platforms.
I would rate the customer support for Varonis Platform at nine out of ten.
With automation, you can label five documents or 50,000 with the same amount of clicks.
It allows for one-to-one connections with different types of servers, either cloud-based like AWS, or physical servers.
The product is scalable and works across multi-cloud and multi-platform environments.
Varonis Platform is highly rated for scalability.
Varonis's scalability as eight to eight point five out of ten.
It can take seven days to 24 hours to determine whether a policy is effective.
Microsoft Purview Data Governance is absolutely fine in terms of stability.
It's essential to know if a feature isn't working due to missing licenses.
There are some problems with DLP rules, and it would be great if the security around DLP could be expanded.
A watermark feature or similar tools to help enhance security for end users could be added.
Varonis requires more access permissions for its core functions compared to competitors, which can be a concern for companies about data safety.
A phishing email module would be great; I look forward to when that comes out.
Enhancing tighter integration with third-party solutions, such as SIEM or SOAR platforms, for smoother incident response workflows.
The feature might be available in the console, but it won't work without the proper license, creating confusion.
Microsoft Purview Data Governance is quite affordable compared to other market solutions, which have high initial costs.
I'm not exactly sure how much our license costs, but it is very expensive.
Varonis is known for its high licensing cost, which can include the cost of multiple servers required for its operations, called collectors.
My experience with pricing, setup costs, and licensing for Varonis Platform has been good, with competitive costs.
It provides a comprehensive view of the entire ecosystem's threats and compliance in real time.
The sensitivity labeling is the most valuable feature because it is the foundation for automating the encryption process and ensuring proper data handling across the organization.
Microsoft Purview Data Governance has helped my company by finding insider risks, ensuring data loss prevention, and achieving compliance to make sure everybody is compliant.
Varonis is excellent for scanning unstructured data sources like file shares, OneDrive, SharePoint, Azure Blob Storage, and S3s.
Varonis Platform is agent-based and AI-driven for detection and response, identifying data based on its content and context.
We have created automatic scripts in case there is a chance that it is a ransomware malicious actor, and it will automatically disable the user, log them out, and disable the actual workstation.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Microsoft Purview Data Governance | 13.8% |
| Varonis Platform | 7.9% |
| Other | 78.3% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 20 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 13 |
| Large Enterprise | 31 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 3 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 12 |
The new Microsoft Purview portal offers an enhanced governance experience, serving as a unified platform for managing and governing data across various sources, including Azure, Microsoft 365, on-premises, and multicloud environments. Designed to streamline governance, compliance, risk, and security efforts, the new portal provides a user-friendly interface and unlocks advanced features like live view and preset scans. Existing users of Microsoft Purview can upgrade to this enhanced experience, gaining access to improved user interface, enhanced capabilities, and consolidated management of data assets. Additionally, the upgrade sets the stage for future developments, including account consolidation and fine-grained access control.
Varonis Platform enhances data security and governance with advanced analytics, identifying unusual access patterns and sensitive areas. Its centralized interface manages permissions across systems, offering essential capabilities for alerting and reporting.
Varonis Platform provides continuous data protection and monitoring by identifying and alerting on unauthorized data access. It offers comprehensive insights into file access and user activities, supporting data classification and simplifying compliance with tracking and monitoring capabilities. Integration with storage systems enables users to manage permissions and access effectively. Room for improvement includes cloud integration and simplifying its interface and calculation engine for ease of use. Challenges include on-premises dependency, licensing costs, and a need for enhanced DLP capabilities.
What are the primary features of Varonis Platform?
What benefits and ROI should users expect?
In finance, Varonis aids in safeguarding sensitive financial data, while in healthcare, it secures patient records. Legal industries utilize it for protecting client information, and retail sectors manage sensitive customer data. These industries benefit from Varonis' ability to prevent unauthorized access and streamline compliance.
We monitor all Data Governance reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.