Atlan vs Microsoft Purview Data Governance comparison

Atlan and Microsoft are both solutions in the Data Governance category. Atlan is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.7, while Microsoft is ranked #1 with an average rating of 7.6. Atlan holds a 1.9% mindshare in DG, compared to Microsoft’s 22.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Atlan users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 84% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

Atlan

Read 6 Atlan reviews

962 Views
483 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Microsoft Purview Data Gove...

Read 58 Microsoft Purview Data Governance reviews

17,179 Views
6,925 Comparison Views

84% willing to recommend

Atlan

Microsoft Purview Data Gove...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

Microsoft Purview Data Governance and Atlan are products in the data management and governance category. Microsoft Purview may have the edge due to its seamless Azure integration, while Atlan offers a more adaptable and comprehensive feature set.

Features: Microsoft Purview Data Governance provides robust data cataloging, data classification, and data mapping. It supports data lineage and compliance tracking, crucial for enterprises. Atlan is recognized for its flexibility, collaborative workspace, and powerful analytics, offering custom workflows and real-time collaboration.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Purview benefits from straightforward deployment within the Azure ecosystem and reliable Microsoft customer support. Atlan offers a flexible, cloud-agnostic deployment model with good customer service that aids in onboarding and troubleshooting.

Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Purview Data Governance's pricing aligns with Azure's consumption-based model, which provides predictable costs for users within the Azure ecosystem. Atlan's subscription model may represent a higher upfront investment but could potentially deliver superior ROI through greater feature richness and flexibility.

To learn more, read our detailed Atlan vs. Microsoft Purview Data Governance Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Atlan vs. Microsoft Purview Data Governance

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 856,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Atlan

Ranking in Data Governance

10th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Microsoft Purview Data Gove...

Ranking in Data Governance

1st

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Microsoft Security Suite (8th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Data Governance category, the mindshare of Atlan is 1.9%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Purview Data Governance is 22.4%, down from 24.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Governance

Featured Reviews

Leon Pereira

Senior Analytics Engineer at virginmediao2

Enhanced data management with intuitive data lineage and metadata visualization

Certain UI changes could make Atlan more user-friendly. While they have an Excel add-in for interaction with Atlan, it's in its early stages and could be improved. Additionally, data observability capabilities could be enhanced to provide more alerts on stale or outdated data via communication tools like Microsoft Teams, Slack, or email.

Read full review

AmrNaeem

Manager, Service Delivery & Solutions Architect at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees

It helps us by reporting on and auditing leaks and breaches

One important feature is data security, which both end users and the organization seek. Microsoft Purview offers data protection across a multi-cloud and multi-platform environment. It's critical that Purview connects to iOS, Mac, and Android. We could only secure some of our data if it only covered Windows. It provides a comprehensive view of the entire ecosystem's threats and compliance in real time. It's very easy to use. Purview's compliance features are crucial. We have to match some cases in other countries to our own to comply with the policies, procedures, and regulatory frameworks here.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"They also offer automated lineage embedded in the connectors, allowing us to track where the data is coming from and where it's going. We find it very efficient in cataloging data sources. Additionally, the user-friendly interface is a big plus, making it easy for users to familiarize themselves with the solution. These two features, in my opinion, stand out the most."

"Overall, I rate Atlan a nine out of ten."

"The best feature of Atlan is its integration with communication platforms like Microsoft Teams and Slack, so business users don't have to go into a data catalog to see metadata about data assets."

"The AI part is integrated for enriching metadata engagement, making it a comprehensive tool."

"Atlas is quite intuitive."

"Atlan is helpful for identifying datasets and discovering PI data, such as the classification levels of datasets (gold, silver, bronze)."

"As a senior analytics engineer, Atlan's ability to show end-to-end data lineage is the most important feature for me."

"The technical support services are good."

More Atlan pros

"It is pretty early, but the decision to go with this investment was largely driven by the simplification of our information security technology management stack. That is the primary objective. Once you simplify and you have a connected structure, it allows for faster adoption there. It also gives us additional capabilities as we go on using the technology that we are familiar with, and we do not have to depend on outside parties to come in and tell us how to do certain things."

"The availability of pre-designed policies tailored to specific geolocations and customer requirements is a valuable feature."

"The data lineage feature stands out. It tracks where the data comes from and any changes made."

"Microsoft Purview offers data protection across a multi-cloud and multi-platform environment."

"I don't know if I've gotten much value out of Purview personally, but our security team loves it. Our biggest concern is leakage or theft of our data because we have a lot of PII and stuff that has not been released. We like the insights Purview provides and the way the solution can track and manage things. I'd say that was probably their favorite piece of it so far. From everything the security team has told me, the policy management and DLP features are working spectacularly."

"We can prevent, block, or audit however we like."

"The most valuable aspect of Purview is its PowerShell connectivity, enabling automation."

"Microsoft Purview is extremely stable."

More Microsoft Purview Data Governance pros

Cons

"One of the main areas for improvement is its governance capabilities. Atlan supports only basic out-of-the-box workflows, and it becomes challenging to customize features like how data owners should approve access to data assets."

"Certain UI changes could make Atlan more user-friendly."

"The product could be improved by offering scheduled email reports for managed assets."

"One area that could be improved is the capability to find duplicates of datasets."

"There are some improvements. There is a feature called Playbooks, which basically allows me to automate certain activities that would otherwise be manual. It's a very interesting feature, but there is room to improve it because, depending on the task you automate, the playbooks seem to have a hard time handling the task. So, it could be improved there. Even though it's a great feature, it can evolve further."

"One of the main areas for improvement is its governance capabilities."

"The challenge is in the lineage, where it requires improvement."

"Certain UI changes could make Atlan more user-friendly."

More Atlan cons

"Auto-tagging should be available at lower levels of licensing. Right now, a high level of licensing is needed for auto-tagging, and this feature should be made available at a lower license level."

"Enhancing the tool's capability to connect to multiple sources would be valuable."

"In terms of the competence of the tools with the Microsoft ecosystem, the product can do better."

"It could reduce pricing to encourage usage."

"We have had a lot of issues since we moved to Unified Support. There have been work gaps there, and we believe they fixed them, but we need to make sure that they are going to be sustainable. It is to be seen."

"We are currently in the rollout phase, so I am not entirely sure about specific areas of improvement. However, there are some problems with DLP rules, and it would be great if the security around DLP could be expanded."

"Non-Microsoft use cases are not very high. It's limited for now."

"Two features are unsupported—custom insights and the DLP component—that would be beneficial to me as a consultant and for the customer in terms of security and monitoring. Regarding security, DLP would provide a more granular level of data masking. Custom insights would offer more detailed monitoring and alerts that can notify customers of failures or anything requiring urgent action."

More Microsoft Purview Data Governance cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We pay per-user license. It's a different classification model than with other solutions, where they usually charge you for resources. So, that was a better model for us. And because of this difference in models or classification, it was cheaper for us to go with Atlan."

"Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention is not cheap."

"Price-wise, I think it's very generous and accessible to not just enterprises but small to medium-sized companies as well. I think it's very fair in terms of how they break apart the storage and the actual computing, and that makes it very accessible. So, that is a very big plus for Purview."

"We pay $15,000 per end user for the E5 license."

"Currently, the licensing differs for the governance side compared to the risk and compliance side."

"People often and unjustly say that Microsoft product pricing is not in the scope of reality, that it's just too expensive at times. I do not feel that is the case at all... If I'm able to let go of 30 to 70 percent of my IT administration staff, that makes up for a lot of money."

"Some people find the tier licensing system complicated, but it offers a lot of value for money if we use the features."

"Microsoft Purview has a pay-per-use pricing model, so it's one of the most cost-effective tools, as your cost will be based on your usage. It's a pricing model that Microsoft has nailed down, making it great whether you're a small organization or a multinational, giant organization."

"Purview's price is pretty high when you factor in storage costs."

More Microsoft Purview Data Governance pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Governance solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

10%

Insurance Company

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

13%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Atlan?

They also offer automated lineage embedded in the connectors, allowing us to track where the data is coming from and where it's going. We find it very efficient in cataloging data sources. Additi...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Atlan?

Atlas is competitively priced compared to other data governance platforms like Collibra and Informatica. The only major drawback is its lack of an integrated data quality module.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Atlan?

The challenge is in the lineage, where it requires improvement. Atlas needs to capture areas where organizations use less known applications.

See all answers

What do you like most about Microsoft Azure Purview?

It is designed to seamlessly connect to various data sources, which is particularly beneficial for our customers who primarily use Microsoft technologies.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Azure Purview?

Microsoft Purview Data Governance is quite affordable compared to other market solutions, which have high initial costs. It allows for a cost-effective start with negligible initial cost. However, ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Microsoft Azure Purview?

There should be more clarity about the costing, particularly how the cost is calculated, especially when utilizing health reports and quality features. Additionally, adding more tools around data q...

See all answers

Comparisons

Alation Data Catalog vs Atlan

Compared 13% of the time

Collibra Governance vs Atlan

Compared 11% of the time

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs Atlan

Compared 9% of the time

Ataccama ONE Platform vs Atlan

Compared 7% of the time

Varonis Platform vs Atlan

Compared 6% of the time

More Atlan Competitors

Collibra Governance vs Microsoft Purview Data Governance

Compared 19% of the time

Varonis Platform vs Microsoft Purview Data Governance

Compared 14% of the time

Alation Data Catalog vs Microsoft Purview Data Governance

Compared 10% of the time

Collibra Lineage vs Microsoft Purview Data Governance

Compared 8% of the time

Microsoft Sentinel vs Microsoft Purview Data Governance

Compared 3% of the time

More Microsoft Purview Data Governance Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Atlan

June 2025

Download Atlan product report

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Purview Data Governance

May 2025

Microsoft Purview Data Governance report

Download Microsoft Purview Data Governance product report

Also Known As

No data available

Microsoft Purview, MS Azure Purview

Overview

Atlan is a comprehensive data management platform designed to enhance data democratization, governance, and collaboration across departments in organizations. It offers a centralized data catalog, intuitive user interface, and robust governance framework to ensure data security and compliance. Users appreciate its efficiency in streamlining processes, promoting better communication, and providing insightful analytics, which drive organizational growth and success.

Atlan

The new Microsoft Purview portal offers an enhanced governance experience, serving as a unified platform for managing and governing data across various sources, including Azure, Microsoft 365, on-premises, and multicloud environments. Designed to streamline governance, compliance, risk, and security efforts, the new portal provides a user-friendly interface and unlocks advanced features like live view and preset scans. Existing users of Microsoft Purview can upgrade to this enhanced experience, gaining access to improved user interface, enhanced capabilities, and consolidated management of data assets. Additionally, the upgrade sets the stage for future developments, including account consolidation and fine-grained access control.

Microsoft

Buyer's Guide

Atlan vs. Microsoft Purview Data Governance

June 2025

Free Report: Atlan vs. Microsoft Purview Data Governance

Find out what your peers are saying about Atlan vs. Microsoft Purview Data Governance and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Atlan vs. Microsoft Purview Data Governance report.

See our list of best Data Governance vendors.

We monitor all Data Governance reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.