Top 10 The Fastly Next-Gen WAF (powered by Signal Sciences) Alternatives

3.8 out of 5

3 reviews
50% willing to recommend

Top The Fastly Next-Gen WAF (powered by Signal Sciences) Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to The Fastly Next-Gen WAF (powered by Signal Sciences) based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, and Azure Front Door. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Fastly Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Fastly, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks

4.2 out of 5

Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks

4.2 out of 5

Cortex Cloud offers integrated threat management and automated response, appealing to organizations prioritizing comprehensive security insights. In comparison, Fastly Next-Gen WAF provides real-time threat analysis and flexible deployment, attractive for those seeking agile web application protection with straightforward API integration.

Download Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs. The Fastly Next-Gen WAF (powered by Signal Sciences) Report

Pricing

Cortex Cloud by Palo Alto Networks offers a straightforward setup cost, while The Fastly Next-Gen WAF, powered by Signal Sciences, presents a more complex setup process.

View comparison

Pricing

Cortex Cloud by Palo Alto Networks offers a straightforward setup cost, while The Fastly Next-Gen WAF, powered by Signal Sciences, presents a more complex setup process.

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway

3.6 out of 5

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway

3.6 out of 5

Fastly Next-Gen WAF emphasizes proactive security with agile threat detection and straightforward pricing, appealing to those prioritizing cost and support responsiveness. In comparison, Azure Application Gateway offers comprehensive features like global scaling and integration, attracting businesses seeking extensive security within existing Azure ecosystems.

Download Microsoft Azure Application Gateway vs. The Fastly Next-Gen WAF (powered by Signal Sciences) Report

Pricing

The Fastly Next-Gen WAF has straightforward setup costs, whereas Microsoft Azure Application Gateway incurs higher initial setup expenses. Significant differences in setup costs highlight contrasting budget considerations for businesses evaluating these two security solutions.

View comparison

Pricing

Azure Front Door

4.4 out of 5

Azure Front Door

4.4 out of 5

Fastly Next-Gen WAF excels in real-time threat detection with minimal performance impact. In comparison, Azure Front Door provides global scalability and integrated DDoS protection. Fastly offers straightforward deployment, while Azure's pricing is competitive when leveraging existing Azure infrastructure. Preferences depend on specific needs and infrastructure.

Download Azure Front Door vs. The Fastly Next-Gen WAF (powered by Signal Sciences) Report

Pricing

The Fastly Next-Gen WAF offers a straightforward setup, while Azure Front Door's initial configuration may require more time and effort.

View comparison

Pricing

The Fastly Next-Gen WAF offers a straightforward setup, while Azure Front Door's initial configuration may require more time and effort.

AWS WAF

4.0 out of 5

AWS WAF

4.0 out of 5

Fastly Next-Gen WAF offers real-time monitoring, adaptive learning, and ease of use for technical teams. In comparison, AWS WAF provides extensive customization and integration within AWS. Fastly appeals to teams seeking usability, while AWS suits those requiring deep ecosystem integration and scalability.

Download AWS WAF vs. The Fastly Next-Gen WAF (powered by Signal Sciences) Report

Pricing

Fastly Next-Gen WAF offers lower setup costs, while AWS WAF presents a more involved installation process.

View comparison

Pricing

Fastly Next-Gen WAF offers lower setup costs, while AWS WAF presents a more involved installation process.

F5 Advanced WAF

4.3 out of 5

F5 Advanced WAF

4.3 out of 5

Fastly Next-Gen WAF, known for cost-effectiveness and user-friendly integration, appeals to budget-conscious businesses. In comparison, F5 Advanced WAF, with advanced security features, attracts organizations seeking comprehensive cyber threat protection despite higher costs, emphasizing expert deployment and robust support.

Download F5 Advanced WAF vs. The Fastly Next-Gen WAF (powered by Signal Sciences) Report

Pricing

The Fastly Next-Gen WAF offers competitive setup costs, while F5 Advanced WAF may involve higher initial expenses, highlighting a notable difference in upfront investment.

View comparison

Pricing

The Fastly Next-Gen WAF offers competitive setup costs, while F5 Advanced WAF may involve higher initial expenses, highlighting a notable difference in upfront investment.

Cloudflare Web Application Firewall

4.2 out of 5

Cloudflare Web Application Firewall

4.2 out of 5

Fastly Next-Gen WAF excels in pricing and support, appealing to cost-conscious businesses needing real-time analytics and ease of integration. In comparison, Cloudflare impresses with its extensive feature set, DDoS protection, and global reach, justifying its higher cost for comprehensive protection.

Download Cloudflare Web Application Firewall vs. The Fastly Next-Gen WAF (powered by Signal Sciences) Report

Pricing

The setup cost for The Fastly Next-Gen WAF (powered by Signal Sciences) is higher compared to Cloudflare Web Application Firewall, which offers a more budget-friendly initial expense.

View comparison

Pricing

The setup cost for The Fastly Next-Gen WAF (powered by Signal Sciences) is higher compared to Cloudflare Web Application Firewall, which offers a more budget-friendly initial expense.

Imperva Web Application Firewall

4.3 out of 5

Imperva Web Application Firewall

4.3 out of 5

Imperva offers competitive pricing and extensive policy options, appealing to those seeking comprehensive attack analytics and automated mitigation. In comparison, Fastly Next-Gen WAF's focus on real-time threat detection and flexible, advanced security features may justify its higher initial costs.

Download Imperva Web Application Firewall vs. The Fastly Next-Gen WAF (powered by Signal Sciences) Report

Pricing

Imperva Web Application Firewall requires a higher setup cost compared to The Fastly Next-Gen WAF, which offers a more economical initial investment.

View comparison

Pricing

Imperva Web Application Firewall requires a higher setup cost compared to The Fastly Next-Gen WAF, which offers a more economical initial investment.

Akamai App and API Protector

4.2 out of 5

Akamai App and API Protector

4.2 out of 5

Fastly Next-Gen WAF appeals to businesses seeking cost-effectiveness, scalability, and quick deployment, offering agile security features and customer support. In comparison, Akamai App and API Protector provides comprehensive security with extensive threat detection and in-depth protection, suiting organizations focused on robust security capabilities.

Download Akamai App and API Protector vs. The Fastly Next-Gen WAF (powered by Signal Sciences) Report

Pricing

The Fastly Next-Gen WAF (powered by Signal Sciences) offers a straightforward setup process, while Akamai App and API Protector has a more comprehensive and detailed setup cost, highlighting the difference in implementation approach between both solutions.

View comparison

Pricing

Azure Web Application Firewall

4.3 out of 5

Azure Web Application Firewall

4.3 out of 5

Fastly Next-Gen WAF excels in adaptability and real-time threat detection, making it suitable for environments needing flexible deployment and responsive customer service. In comparison, Azure Web Application Firewall provides comprehensive features and integration, appealing to enterprises utilizing Microsoft's cloud ecosystem despite higher initial costs.

Download Azure Web Application Firewall vs. The Fastly Next-Gen WAF (powered by Signal Sciences) Report

Pricing

The Fastly Next-Gen WAF has a straightforward setup cost, while Azure Web Application Firewall presents a more complex and potentially higher initial setup expense.

View comparison

Pricing

The Fastly Next-Gen WAF has a straightforward setup cost, while Azure Web Application Firewall presents a more complex and potentially higher initial setup expense.

Barracuda Web Application Firewall

4.1 out of 5

Barracuda Web Application Firewall

4.1 out of 5

Barracuda attracts budget-conscious buyers with its intuitive management and strong threat prevention. In comparison, Fastly appeals to tech-focused environments with deep DevOps integration and dynamic edge protection, offering greater versatility despite higher initial costs, leading to more significant long-term ROI.

Download Barracuda Web Application Firewall vs. The Fastly Next-Gen WAF (powered by Signal Sciences) Report

Pricing

Barracuda Web Application Firewall has a higher initial setup cost, while The Fastly Next-Gen WAF (powered by Signal Sciences) offers a more cost-effective setup, reflecting the differing pricing strategies between the two solutions.

View comparison

Pricing

Related categories

Web Application Firewall (WAF)

Container Security

Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM)