| Project Manager, HRIS at a energy/utilities company with 1,001-5,000 employees | 3.0 | We use Cegid Core HR for managing employee data, talent, performance, and compensation. Its modular capabilities are valuable, but reporting features and API integrations need improvement. Removing modular silos could enhance comprehensive reporting across performance and compensation. |
| Human Resources Manager at a retailer with 501-1,000 employees | 3.5 | I appreciate Cegid for its employee lifecycle visibility, engagement tools, and personalized Learning Management Systems. It improves autonomy and development planning. However, enhancements like AI-driven management and subscription learning services are needed. The ROI includes significant cost and time savings. |
| IT Superintendent - Technical Solution/Business System Architecture at Ambatovy Joint-Venture | 2.5 | I find Meta4's payroll and recruitment useful as an HRIS, but its complex setup, customization needs, and poor support are issues. It could improve self-management. I rate it 5/10. |
| Training Administrator at a computer software company with 5,001-10,000 employees | 3.5 | I find Cegid's LMS tool to be feature-rich, but it's slow and depends on HR data. Reporting requires manual definition, which posed challenges. Due to internal changes, we switched to SumTotal for better alignment with our needs. |
| Senior Consultant at SquarePoint | 4.0 | I primarily use Cegid for payroll, finding its customizable payroll calculations particularly valuable. However, the user interface could be improved, and the maintenance becomes complex during upgrades. I haven't considered other solutions or cloud providers. |
| HRIS Manager at a engineering company with 5,001-10,000 employees | 4.0 | I've used this stable HR solution for 12 years, finding its support systematic. However, I experience challenging upgrades, and it lacks Gulf payroll, rendering it unsuitable for that region. Improved reporting and API capabilities are also needed. |
| HRIS Manager at a engineering company with 5,001-10,000 employees | 4.0 | As an implementer for 14+ years, I value Meta4 HCM for consolidating HR data and its customization. However, I note the need for GCC payroll localization and observed slow payroll execution with large data volumes. |
| Senior Application Analyst at Khatib & Alami | 3.0 | I value Meta4's performance appraisal, but the HR portal, training, and career models need improvement. Stability, scalability, and customer service are also weak points. The initial setup was complex, leading to my 6/10 rating. |
