No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.
Sharepoint 2016 Standard Logo

Sharepoint 2016 Standard Reviews

4.5 out of 5

What is Sharepoint 2016 Standard?

Featured Sharepoint 2016 Standard reviews

Sharepoint 2016 Standard mindshare

As of June 2026, the mindshare of Sharepoint 2016 Standard in the Enterprise Content Management category stands at 0.3%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Enterprise Content Management Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Sharepoint 2016 Standard0.3%
SharePoint11.7%
Alfresco6.7%
Other81.3%
Enterprise Content Management

PeerResearch reports based on Sharepoint 2016 Standard reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryEnterprise Content ManagementJun 1, 2026Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersJun 1, 2026Download
ComparisonSharepoint 2016 Standard vs SharePointJun 1, 2026Download
ComparisonSharepoint 2016 Standard vs IBM FileNetJun 1, 2026Download
ComparisonSharepoint 2016 Standard vs Adobe Experience ManagerJun 1, 2026Download
 
 
Key learnings from peers
Last updated Jun 1, 2026

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

ROI

Pricing

Popular Use Cases

Service and Support

Deployment

Scalability

Stability

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise2
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business21
Midsize Enterprise36
Large Enterprise23
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Construction Company
35%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Healthcare Company
8%
Retailer
5%
Outsourcing Company
4%
Government
4%
Educational Organization
3%
Import And Exporter
3%
University
3%
Renewables & Environment Company
1%
Wholesaler/Distributor
1%
Transportation Company
1%
Real Estate/Law Firm
1%
Religious Institution
1%

Learn more about Sharepoint 2016 Standard

Related questions

Product Categories

 
Sharepoint 2016 Standard Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Senior Team Lead at Infosys4.5I use SharePoint 2016 Standard for secure file storage and collaboration, praising its Office 365 integration and mobile access. While stable and scalable, I find the UI slow and external access difficult. It offers good ROI and customer service.
HITRUST and GRC Consultant at a consultancy with 11-50 employees4.0I use SharePoint 2016 Standard as a secure, scalable repository for policies and business impact analysis, and it supports large files well. It improves collaboration and workflows, delivering ROI, but needs better evolution and third‑party workflow integration.
Technical Manager at IBM4.0I use SharePoint 2016 for storing product and project documents. While good for retrieval, I find its integration with Microsoft Office, SAP, and scanning solutions severely lacking, needing significant improvement for broader ECM use. I rate it 8/10.
Analyst at Synergy connect5.0SharePoint 2016 Standard is excellent for collaborative file storage, like Excel and PowerPoint. Its intuitive folder management, co-editing features, and progress tracking save me significant time. It's stable, reliable, and I rate it 10/10, finding no missing features.
Consultant at a tech services company with 1-10 employees4.5As a project manager, I find SharePoint 2016 Standard user-friendly, efficient, and flexible. It excels in AI integration and secure document management, proving scalable and cost-effective. My expert team ensures successful implementations, earning it a 9/10 rating.
Data Engineer at a outsourcing company with 201-500 employees5.0I use SharePoint 2016 Standard daily for document management, knowledge sharing, collaboration, and workflow approvals. Its Microsoft Office/Outlook integration, intuitive UI, and role-based access improve productivity and onboarding. Setup is easy with documentation; fewer repeated review questions would help.
Electrical Engineer at a construction company with 11-50 employees4.5I use SharePoint 2016 Standard to design internal workflows and control processes. It's effective and easier than past solutions, requiring just training, not specialists. Though expensive, I find it the best and rate it 8/10 for its usefulness.