Saviynt alternatives and competitors

We are a solution provider and we help customers migrate to different platforms integrated with multi-factor authentication.

This product is used for the provisioning of devices that are used for different applications and users inside the enterprise.

This solution offers multiple features that are valuable. 

The most valuable feature is the set of out-of-the-box connectors. The connectors can be customized, and we do make use of several custom ones.

The cost of this product needs to be reduced. There are other modern IAM solutions that are available at a better price, and the use cases are very easy. It is cloud-based and it caters to the needs of an enterprise. For example, there are some features that we do not use, yet we still pay for them. In the past, there was no choice, but many options are now offered. 

Customization is not easy to do. For example, additional reports or modules are difficult to create in a timely manner.

We would like to see more support for public cloud services. 

We have been using this solution for approximately five years.

This is a stable product.

There is no doubt that this product scales well. It is a well-established product for enterprise users. One of our customers has an employee base of almost 30,000 people.

Technical support differs depending on the region. We have found that the turnaround time can be high, depending on what regional support we are dealing with. 

I have experience with several similar solutions, including Centrify.

We are currently exploring SailPoint and Saviynt and although no decision has been made as of yet, we might move to another platform.

In the past, I also worked with SiteMinder, but it did not have this level of depth.

The initial setup is complex and for a larger, enterprise-level customer, it becomes very complex.

The cost of support and upgrading to the next release are both expensive. We have an annual maintenance contract.

The suitability of this product depends on the organizational budget and plan, which includes the roadmap to having an IAM solution.

In summary, they are not great, but not poor either. My biggest complaint is about the costs.

I would rate this solution a six out of ten.

We use it for lifecycle management. We have joiner, leaver, rehire, and termination as well as user provisioning. We also do certifications and reporting.

Certifications and user provisioning features are the most valuable.

The UI needs to be more user friendly. More concentration on historical policy violations would be great.

In terms of new features, I would like to see artificial intelligence and machine language added.

I have been using SailPoint IdentityIQ for ten years.

It is stable.

It is scalable. We have 15 users in our organization.

SailPoint support is very good.

The initial setup was straightforward. The deployment was okay.

I used an in-house team.

SailPoint is higher in price as compared to Saviynt. The initial cost of SailPoint is very high. There are additional costs to the standard licensing fees.

I didn't evaluate previously, but I am currently evaluating Saviynt and IdentityNow.

I would rate SailPoint IdentityIQ a nine out of ten. I am happy with it.