Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Postman Enterprise Logo

Top 10 Postman Enterprise Alternatives

Vendor: Postman
4.1 out of 5
Badge Ranked 1
Leave a review

Top Postman Enterprise Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Postman Enterprise based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Microsoft Azure API Management, Tricentis Tosca, and Apigee. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Postman Enterprise surpasses its competitors by offering advanced API collaboration tools, robust security features, and comprehensive analytics capabilities, empowering teams to streamline API development and enhance productivity with seamless integrations and reliable performance on a global scale.

Postman Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Postman, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Postman Enterprise Logo
Postman Enterprise Logo
Microsoft Azure API Management
3.9 out of 5
Microsoft Azure API Management offers seamless integration within the Microsoft ecosystem, suiting enterprises heavily invested in Azure services. In comparison, Postman Enterprise simplifies API testing and sharing, benefiting teams prioritizing ease in collaborative and automated workflows over broad platform integration.
Download Microsoft Azure API Management vs. Postman Enterprise Report
Microsoft Azure API Management requires higher initial setup costs compared to Postman Enterprise, which offers more budget-friendly setup options for businesses.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Azure API Management requires higher initial setup costs compared to Postman Enterprise, which offers more budget-friendly setup options for businesses.
Postman Enterprise Logo
Tricentis Tosca
4.1 out of 5
Postman Enterprise Logo
Tricentis Tosca
4.1 out of 5
Tricentis Tosca offers extensive scriptless automation suited for non-technical users, excelling in model-based test automation. In comparison, Postman Enterprise specializes in API testing with ease of use. Tech buyers might choose Tosca for integration needs and Postman for affordability in agile environments.
Download Postman Enterprise vs. Tricentis Tosca Report
Tricentis Tosca has higher setup costs compared to Postman Enterprise, which has a more economical initial setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Tricentis Tosca has higher setup costs compared to Postman Enterprise, which has a more economical initial setup.
Postman Enterprise Logo
Apigee
4.1 out of 5
Postman Enterprise Logo
Apigee
4.1 out of 5
Apigee provides robust API management ideal for enterprise needs with features like monetization and lifecycle management. In comparison, Postman Enterprise excels in simplicity and cost-effectiveness, offering accessible API testing and automation tools for developers and smaller organizations seeking efficient development processes.
Download Apigee vs. Postman Enterprise Report
Apigee incurs high setup costs while Postman Enterprise offers competitive pricing for setup, presenting a clear cost difference.
View comparison
Pricing
Apigee incurs high setup costs while Postman Enterprise offers competitive pricing for setup, presenting a clear cost difference.
Postman Enterprise Logo
webMethods.io
4.0 out of 5
Postman Enterprise Logo
webMethods.io
4.0 out of 5
Postman Enterprise stands out with cost-effective pricing and straightforward customer support, ideal for teams needing rapid API development. In comparison, webMethods.io appeals with a robust feature set and complex integration capabilities, making it suitable for enterprises with advanced requirements.
Download Postman Enterprise vs. webMethods.io Report
Postman Enterprise requires minimal setup costs, offering immediate usability, while webMethods.io involves higher initial setup expenses but provides extensive configuration options.
View comparison
Pricing
Postman Enterprise requires minimal setup costs, offering immediate usability, while webMethods.io involves higher initial setup expenses but provides extensive configuration options.
Postman Enterprise Logo
Katalon Studio
3.9 out of 5
Postman Enterprise Logo
Katalon Studio
3.9 out of 5
Katalon Studio excels in end-to-end testing for web and mobile apps with custom keywords and Jenkins automation. In comparison, Postman Enterprise is ideal for API testing with easy collaboration. Both offer cloud deployment, but Postman has more responsive community support and flexible pricing.
Download Katalon Studio vs. Postman Enterprise Report
Katalon Studio requires upfront setup costs, while Postman Enterprise offers a more flexible pricing structure.
View comparison
Pricing
Katalon Studio requires upfront setup costs, while Postman Enterprise offers a more flexible pricing structure.
Postman Enterprise Logo
Postman Enterprise Logo
Kong Gateway Enterprise
4.0 out of 5
Postman Enterprise is favored for its ease of use and rapid deployment, ideal for streamlining workflows. In comparison, Kong Gateway Enterprise excels in robust API management and scalability, appealing to large enterprises seeking comprehensive features. Postman offers cost-efficiency, while Kong delivers extensive configurability.
Download Kong Gateway Enterprise vs. Postman Enterprise Report
Postman Enterprise requires minimal setup cost, making it an affordable choice, whereas Kong Gateway Enterprise incurs higher expenses upfront.
View comparison
Pricing
Postman Enterprise requires minimal setup cost, making it an affordable choice, whereas Kong Gateway Enterprise incurs higher expenses upfront.
Postman Enterprise Logo
Postman Enterprise Logo
OpenText Functional Testing
4.0 out of 5
OpenText Functional Testing is preferred for comprehensive testing scenarios with extensive automation frameworks. In comparison, Postman Enterprise appeals to users prioritizing ease of use for API testing, offering a user-friendly interface and competitive pricing to optimize API testing efficiencies.
Download OpenText Functional Testing vs. Postman Enterprise Report
OpenText Functional Testing involves higher setup costs compared to Postman Enterprise, which offers a more affordable setup option. These differences highlight the need for careful evaluation when choosing a testing tool based on budget constraints.
View comparison
Pricing
OpenText Functional Testing involves higher setup costs compared to Postman Enterprise, which offers a more affordable setup option. These differences highlight the need for careful evaluation when choosing a testing tool based on budget constraints.
Postman Enterprise Logo
Apache JMeter
3.9 out of 5
Postman Enterprise Logo
Apache JMeter
3.9 out of 5
Apache JMeter's open-source model suits budget-conscious teams needing cost-effective, flexible testing. In comparison, Postman Enterprise offers intuitive design and structured support, appealing to enterprises prioritizing ease of use and formal support. Both tools serve diverse testing demands with varying strengths.
Download Apache JMeter vs. Postman Enterprise Report
Apache JMeter offers a cost-effective setup with open-source accessibility, while Postman Enterprise involves a higher initial expense for its extensive API testing tools.
View comparison
Pricing
Apache JMeter offers a cost-effective setup with open-source accessibility, while Postman Enterprise involves a higher initial expense for its extensive API testing tools.
Postman Enterprise Logo
Postman Enterprise Logo
MuleSoft API Manager
4.1 out of 5
MuleSoft API Manager offers extensive connectivity and policy management, appealing to comprehensive integration needs. In comparison, Postman Enterprise provides robust debugging and automation features, making it ideal for rapid API testing. Both cater to different priorities in API management and development.
Download MuleSoft API Manager vs. Postman Enterprise Report
MuleSoft API Manager involves a higher setup cost compared to Postman Enterprise, reflecting its comprehensive suite of integration features, whereas Postman Enterprise offers a more budget-friendly option with a focus on collaborative API development tools.
View comparison
Pricing
MuleSoft API Manager involves a higher setup cost compared to Postman Enterprise, reflecting its comprehensive suite of integration features, whereas Postman Enterprise offers a more budget-friendly option with a focus on collaborative API development tools.
Postman Enterprise Logo
Worksoft Certify
4.2 out of 5
Postman Enterprise Logo
Worksoft Certify
4.2 out of 5
Worksoft Certify impresses with extensive automation across applications, appealing to enterprises needing robust control. In comparison, Postman Enterprise attracts those seeking ease in API testing with flexible integrations and quick cloud deployments. Both offer unique advantages depending on specific business requirements.
Download Postman Enterprise vs. Worksoft Certify Report
Worksoft Certify involves significant setup costs compared to the more economical Postman Enterprise, making it crucial to weigh initial investment against the features offered by each.
View comparison
Pricing
Worksoft Certify involves significant setup costs compared to the more economical Postman Enterprise, making it crucial to weigh initial investment against the features offered by each.
Postman Enterprise Logo
Parasoft SOAtest
4.1 out of 5
Postman Enterprise Logo
Parasoft SOAtest
4.1 out of 5
Parasoft SOAtest offers robust support for complex, data-driven API tests, making it ideal for enterprise-grade solutions. In comparison, Postman Enterprise's ease of use and flexibility in deployment attract developers seeking a budget-friendly, accessible platform for managing API collections and integrations.
Download Parasoft SOAtest vs. Postman Enterprise Report
Parasoft SOAtest has higher setup costs, while Postman Enterprise offers a more cost-effective setup option.
View comparison
Pricing
Parasoft SOAtest has higher setup costs, while Postman Enterprise offers a more cost-effective setup option.
Postman Enterprise Logo
ReadyAPI Test
4.0 out of 5
Postman Enterprise Logo
ReadyAPI Test
4.0 out of 5
ReadyAPI Test supports diverse protocols like SOAP and REST, making it suitable for complex scenarios. In comparison, Postman Enterprise excels with simplicity and collaboration, ideal for REST API management. ReadyAPI's pricing is high, while Postman's free version enhances accessibility.
Download Postman Enterprise vs. ReadyAPI Test Report
ReadyAPI Test has a higher initial setup cost compared to Postman Enterprise, which offers a more budget-friendly setup, highlighting a key difference in their pricing models.
View comparison
Pricing
ReadyAPI Test has a higher initial setup cost compared to Postman Enterprise, which offers a more budget-friendly setup, highlighting a key difference in their pricing models.
Postman Enterprise Logo
SwaggerHub
3.9 out of 5
Postman Enterprise Logo
SwaggerHub
3.9 out of 5
SwaggerHub excels in API documentation and OpenAPI integration, appealing to developers focused on specification standards. In comparison, Postman Enterprise stands out with robust testing and collaboration features, attracting teams needing extensive testing environments and efficient version control.
Download Postman Enterprise vs. SwaggerHub Report
SwaggerHub has a minimal setup cost, providing a straightforward initial experience, while Postman Enterprise offers a more robust setup process, highlighting its comprehensive suite of features.
View comparison
Pricing
SwaggerHub has a minimal setup cost, providing a straightforward initial experience, while Postman Enterprise offers a more robust setup process, highlighting its comprehensive suite of features.
Postman Enterprise Logo
RapidAPI
1 out of 5
Postman Enterprise Logo
RapidAPI
1 out of 5
Postman Enterprise excels with collaborative API design and testing tools, enhancing teamwork and workflows. In comparison, RapidAPI offers a vast API marketplace enabling easy connections. Buyers may favor Postman's flexibility or RapidAPI's extensive API access based on specific needs and deployment preferences.
Postman Enterprise has a straightforward setup process, whereas RapidAPI involves a more intricate setup, potentially requiring additional time and resources.
View comparison
Pricing
Postman Enterprise has a straightforward setup process, whereas RapidAPI involves a more intricate setup, potentially requiring additional time and resources.
Postman Enterprise Logo
Postman Enterprise Logo
IBM Rational Test Workbench
3.8 out of 5
IBM Rational Test Workbench excels with its comprehensive automation and diverse testing capabilities, suitable for environments valuing extensive features. In comparison, Postman Enterprise offers streamlined deployment, efficient API testing, and strong collaboration tools, making it ideal for agile teams seeking quick adoption and effective API-focused solutions.
Download IBM Rational Test Workbench vs. Postman Enterprise Report
IBM Rational Test Workbench has a high setup cost, while Postman Enterprise offers a more economical setup.
View comparison
Pricing
IBM Rational Test Workbench has a high setup cost, while Postman Enterprise offers a more economical setup.
Postman Enterprise Logo
AlertSite
4.0 out of 5
Postman Enterprise Logo
AlertSite
4.0 out of 5
AlertSite offers effective real-time user experience monitoring with cost efficiency, appealing to those prioritizing easy deployment. In comparison, Postman Enterprise provides extensive API development tools and robust support, making it ideal for teams needing comprehensive testing capabilities despite its higher cost.
Download AlertSite vs. Postman Enterprise Report
AlertSite's setup cost is relatively low, making it accessible for small businesses, while Postman Enterprise requires a higher investment, suggesting a focus on larger enterprises with more complex needs.
View comparison
Pricing
AlertSite's setup cost is relatively low, making it accessible for small businesses, while Postman Enterprise requires a higher investment, suggesting a focus on larger enterprises with more complex needs.
Postman Enterprise Logo
Apiary
4.1 out of 5
Postman Enterprise Logo
Apiary
4.1 out of 5
Apiary emphasizes API design and testing, offering robust documentation and cost-effectiveness, suitable for small to medium businesses. In comparison, Postman Enterprise features a collaborative workspace and advanced testing tools, appealing to enterprises needing extensive features and substantial support.
Download Apiary vs. Postman Enterprise Report
Apiary has a lower setup cost compared to Postman Enterprise, highlighting a budget-friendly option for small teams, while Postman Enterprise offers comprehensive features that justify its higher price for larger organizations needing robust scalability and support.
View comparison
Pricing
Apiary has a lower setup cost compared to Postman Enterprise, highlighting a budget-friendly option for small teams, while Postman Enterprise offers comprehensive features that justify its higher price for larger organizations needing robust scalability and support.
Postman Enterprise Logo
Apollo GraphOS
3.5 out of 5
Postman Enterprise Logo
Apollo GraphOS
3.5 out of 5
Postman Enterprise attracts tech buyers with competitive pricing and extensive API protocol support. In comparison, Apollo GraphOS appeals to those valuing advanced GraphQL features and detailed analytics, despite higher costs. Organizations prioritize based on their specific API management needs and complexity.
Postman Enterprise requires a significant setup cost, offering advanced integration capabilities, whereas Apollo GraphOS has a minimal setup cost, focusing on ease of integration. This contrast highlights Postman Enterprise's robust feature set versus Apollo GraphOS's accessible deploym...
View comparison
Pricing
Postman Enterprise requires a significant setup cost, offering advanced integration capabilities, whereas Apollo GraphOS has a minimal setup cost, focusing on ease of integration. This contrast highlights Postman Enterprise's robust feature set versus Apollo GraphOS's accessible deploym...
Postman Enterprise Logo
Stoplight
1 out of 5
Postman Enterprise Logo
Stoplight
1 out of 5
Postman Enterprise excels with robust testing and strong customer support, appealing to users prioritizing testing rigor and a comprehensive setup. In comparison, Stoplight attracts those focusing on innovative design features and cost-effective deployment with personalized assistance, making it ideal for design-centric applications.
Postman Enterprise has a substantial setup cost, making it less accessible upfront compared to Stoplight, which offers a more budget-friendly setup option.
View comparison
Pricing
Postman Enterprise has a substantial setup cost, making it less accessible upfront compared to Stoplight, which offers a more budget-friendly setup option.
Postman Enterprise Logo
NGINX API Gateway
4.2 out of 5
Postman Enterprise Logo
NGINX API Gateway
4.2 out of 5
Postman Enterprise excels with its cloud-based deployment and robust developer tools. In comparison, NGINX API Gateway is valued for its pricing strategy and high-performance capabilities. Tech buyers might choose Postman for its collaborative environment or NGINX for its scalability and cost-efficiency.
Download NGINX API Gateway vs. Postman Enterprise Report
Postman Enterprise involves a straightforward setup cost, while NGINX API Gateway may incur higher initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Postman Enterprise involves a straightforward setup cost, while NGINX API Gateway may incur higher initial expenses.
Postman Enterprise Logo
API Fortress
1 out of 5
Postman Enterprise Logo
API Fortress
1 out of 5
Postman Enterprise offers cost-effectiveness with seamless support and integration capabilities. In comparison, API Fortress provides advanced automation and customizability, appealing to those needing extensive testing features. Postman simplifies deployments, while API Fortress offers comprehensive coverage despite higher costs.
Postman Enterprise offers a minimal setup cost, focusing on quick onboarding, while API Fortress requires a more significant initial investment, emphasizing comprehensive integration services.
View comparison
Pricing
Postman Enterprise offers a minimal setup cost, focusing on quick onboarding, while API Fortress requires a more significant initial investment, emphasizing comprehensive integration services.

Related categories

API Management
API Testing Tools
API Monitoring Software