OpenText Functional Testing and Postman compete in the software testing tool category. Postman seems to have the upper hand due to its ease of use and widespread adoption for API testing.
Features: OpenText Functional Testing offers compatibility across multiple browsers and operating systems and enables various testing formats and object recognition methods, with integration capabilities for platforms like ALM. Postman is user-friendly, supporting API testing with collections, environment variables, and automation, making it ideal for teams looking for functional testing and effective API monitoring.
Room for Improvement: OpenText Functional Testing needs enhancements in browser compatibility, memory usage reduction, and integration with more programming languages and frameworks, as well as better integration with continuous integration tools. Postman could improve documentation and enhance database integration, while simpler navigation could enhance user experience.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Functional Testing is typically installed on-premises or private clouds, focusing on enterprise applications. However, improvements in technical support speed and quality are desired. Postman offers flexibility in deployment across various environments and is noted for its ease of installation. Its customer service is generally seen as positive, though quicker support responses could be beneficial.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText Functional Testing has high licensing costs but justifies them through its extensive capabilities and integrations, offering ROI through reduced testing time and increased automation coverage despite the significant initial investment. Postman offers a free version and moderate costs for its paid version, delivering satisfactory ROI through its feature set for API testing.
The development time using UFT can be cut down into half as compared to coding from scratch.
Automation is done very fast, leading to improvements in the QA process and reducing the time needed for test automation.
We can easily achieve a return on investment in one, two, or three years.
A minimum of 50% time is saved when comparing manual to automation.
Organizations can't wait for this lengthy process, especially when they are under pressure with their timelines.
Support cases are easily created and attended to promptly, depending on urgency.
The technical support is rated eight out of ten.
I appreciate the ease of using Postman, especially its desktop version, due to the features it offers such as cookie management and environment synchronization.
There is a lot of support available through forums and user groups, which has been sufficient for me.
The tool can be installed on all computers used by developers or test automation engineers.
Postman does not have database validation available, which affects its scalability.
This solution is scalable.
One of the key stability issues was that Windows would consume memory without releasing it, leading to regression testing crashes.
I rate it ten out of ten for stability.
I have not experienced any issues or downtimes.
The tool is generally stable.
We frequently encountered stability issues when the browser dependency caused Windows to consume memory without releasing it, leading to crashes during regression testing.
If it could move closer to a no-code or low-code solution, it might dominate the market again.
Incorporating behavior-driven development tests would enhance the capabilities of UFT One.
This feature would allow the response to be validated in the database as well.
One of the primary challenges with Postman is handling authentication issues, especially relating to tokens and passwords.
Maybe Postman can be a good contender and replicate some features such as more scripting and control over API calls.
There are many open-source tools with no cost, and there are no-code tools that are less expensive than UFT.
It's cheaper than Tricentis Tosca but more expensive than some others.
The pricing or licensing policy of OpenText is a bit expensive, however, it's one of the best solutions in the market.
Postman's pricing model includes a basic free version, which is favorable given the Professional enterprise options offered.
Postman is open-source, so the cost is minimal compared to commercial platforms.
Postman is much cheaper than the other tools.
UFT supports Oracle, SAP, PeopleSoft, and other non-web applications, making automation feasible.
OpenText UFT One offered valuable features by allowing us to build up libraries to streamline repetitive tasks, making scripting much easier.
The object repository is one of the best in the market, allowing creation of a repository useful for all tests.
It's easy to navigate because tons of documentation and examples are available.
The desktop version's features like cookie management, environment compatibility, security settings, proxy integration, and data synchronization add significant value.
I taught my business analyst to use it. I just showed them once, and it was easy for them to understand.
OpenText Functional Testing provides automated testing with compatibility across technologies, browsers, and platforms. It targets APIs, GUIs, and applications like SAP and Oracle for efficient test automation, emphasizing usability and integration with tools such as Jenkins and ALM.
OpenText Functional Testing offers wide-ranging automation capabilities for functional and regression testing, API testing, and automation across web, desktop, and mainframe applications. It supports script recording and object identification, appealing to less technical users. Despite its advantages, it grapples with memory issues, stability concerns, and a challenging scripting environment. Its VBScript reliance limits flexibility, generating demand for enhanced language support and speed improvement. Users appreciate its role in continuous integration and deployment processes, managing test data efficiently, and reducing manual testing efforts.
What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing?In industries like finance and healthcare, OpenText Functional Testing is leveraged for end-to-end automation, ensuring streamlined processes and accuracy in testing. Many companies utilize it for efficient test data management and integrating testing within continuous integration/deployment operations.
Postman's Tools Support Every Stage of the API Lifecycle. Through design, testing and full production, Postman is there for faster, easier API development - without the chaos.
We monitor all API Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
