Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Postman Enterprise vs Runscope [EOL] comparison

Postman and Broadcom are both solutions in the API Monitoring Software category. Additionally, 95% of Postman users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.
Postman Enterprise
Read 65 Postman Enterprise reviews
  • 4,440 Views
  • 178 Comparison Views
95% willing to recommend
Runscope [EOL]
Read 11 Runscope [EOL] reviews
    100% willing to recommend
     

    Comparison Buyer's Guide

    Download the report
    Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 27, 2025

    Runscope and Postman Enterprise compete in the API testing and monitoring field. Postman Enterprise appears to have the upper hand due to its extensive feature set and integration capabilities, offering a comprehensive solution despite a potentially higher price point, which is seen as worthwhile by many enterprises.

    Features: Runscope offers automated API monitoring, performance insights, and easy test result scheduling. Postman Enterprise provides collaboration tools, integration support, and the ability to manage large-scale testing environments. Runscope focuses on simplifying API monitoring. Postman Enterprise supports extensive testing, team collaboration, and powerful integration options.

    Room for Improvement: Runscope could enhance its collaboration features, improve support for large-scale environments, and expand integration capabilities. Postman Enterprise may benefit from streamlining its user interface, simplifying pricing plans, and reducing complexity in setting up tests. Runscope might enhance alerting features and provide more comprehensive documentation.

    Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Runscope is straightforward to deploy with efficient automated testing but might lack extensive customer guidance. Postman Enterprise offers versatile deployment options and extensive support resources, including tutorials and guides, which assist users in leveraging its broad feature set.

    Pricing and ROI: Runscope has a simple pricing model, making it accessible for businesses needing essential API monitoring. Postman Enterprise is priced higher but offers significant ROI through advanced testing capabilities and robust collaboration features, justifying its cost for those needing comprehensive API management.

    DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
    To learn more, read our detailed API Monitoring Software Report (Updated: September 2025).
    Buyer's Guide
    API Monitoring Software
    September 2025
    Download the complete report
    Helped 871,408 peers since 2012

    Review summaries and opinions

    We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
     

    Categories and Ranking

    Postman Enterprise
    Average Rating
    8.2
    Reviews Sentiment
    6.8
    Number of Reviews
    65
    Ranking in other categories
    API Management (9th), API Monitoring Software (1st), API Testing Tools (1st)
    Runscope [EOL]
    Average Rating
    8.8
    Number of Reviews
    11
    Ranking in other categories
    No ranking in other categories
     

    Featured Reviews

    Anagha Mahadik - PeerSpot reviewer
    Solution simplifies web service testing with impressive speed and accessibility
    It is very easy for me to use and I highly prefer it compared to SoapUI and other products for performing its job. It is more handy and faster. It has impacted us very nicely. Postman is used for free by us. I'm not sure if there might be a paid version for multiple users. It is a very good product used for development. It is easy to install, as well as to learn, particularly for new users, even if they are not developers. I taught my business analyst to use it. I just showed them once, and it was easy for them to understand. For example, I gave them the URL and request format and asked them to test independently. They were able to use it on their own and do their testing as well. It was a good experience, especially for generally smart people, like those we usually hire in our company. It is pretty easy to explain, and learning it is not complex.
    Read full review
    Director5672 - PeerSpot reviewer
    Enables us to monitor API endpoints to ensure everything is running
    I've noticed, once or twice, when there were some updates pushed by Runscope, at times it didn't refresh the pages. I was running it, there were multiple tests running at the same time, and it didn't update the webpage I was looking at. So I had to refresh it manually. Occasionally, it still happens. Another thing I have found is that the built-in editor for the scripts can be improved a lot. Instead of making such a basic editor, maybe include a little more so it is easier to look at things and debug. Finally, other than the Runscope documentation, I haven't seen too much elsewhere. I haven't seen a user community.
    Read full review

    Quotes from Members

    We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
     

    Pros

    "It is a stable solution."
    "The tool is simple and easy."
    "It is easy to install, as well as to learn, particularly for new users, even if they are not developers."
    "Postman helps reduce almost 90% of the manual effort in processes that we feel could take a lot of manual work."
    "The product is easy to implement."
    "It's easy to see different versions of responses."
    "The solution is open-source and does the work required for day-to-day API testing activities."
    "The scripting capabilities in Postman are excellent."
    More Postman Enterprise pros
    "We can receive an email and slack notifications if tests are failing/passing."
    "It is a cloud-based environment for building and executing tests, which allows me to focus on building, running, and reviewing test results."
    "The feature of automatically executing tests at a predefined time interval is great as we can be continuously testing our end-points before and after builds are deployed."
    "It uses JavaScript which is easy."
    "We love the fact that we can have our API tests run on a schedule as often as we need. We also take advantage of being able to set up different environment settings so that we can use the same test in our production, integration, and QA environments, easily. The ability to string together a number of API tests for a test suite is very important to us as well."
    "As we have the APIs scheduled, we use the notifications. We know the exact moment it is breaking something that might impact the customer system, that might result in a feature not working. We know "in advance" and we can fix it before the customer notices. It helps us to be more proactive."
    "You can run it off the cloud and against different data centers. That's one of the plus points for most people for this product, as opposed to some other solutions."
    "This solution has improved our responsiveness to issues in both production and non-production environments. Through integration with Slack, our development and DevOps teams are quickly aware of issues related to new changes deployed to non-production environments, which tightens our feedback loop during testing. Through integration with PagerDuty, our DevOps resources are able to reduce the adverse impact of a given production issue."
    More Runscope [EOL] pros
     

    Cons

    "The product lacks a good console."
    "One thing which Postman needs to improve is the documentation. The documentation of Postman is not that great when compared to other tools."
    "We have previously used Tosca which allowed us to verify information using authentications. It would be useful if this was also possible using Postman. In a future release, Postman should connect to DB."
    "During the development phase, you will face issues, but once it goes to production, you won't face such issues."
    "The performance needs to be improved."
    "It should be able to check the records and compare them to the regression testing more on the automation side."
    "I would like that if you click on one of the fields you should be able to see the entire row of fields, names, and values."
    "The solution can be improved by providing detailed error logs including the line the error took place to make it easier to correct."
    More Postman Enterprise cons
    "If you forget to set the default environment during test creation, you have to go through every test and make sure that it is set to the environment that you prefer if using shared environments. If there was an option to force all tests within a bucket into a specific environment with one click, this would save a lot of time."
    "The initial setup included a lot of repetitive manual work."
    "the built-in editor for the scripts can be improved a lot. Instead of making such a basic editor, maybe include a little more so it is easier to look at things and debug."
    "We would like the ability to configure Runscope behavior when a given test has its schedule modified. That is, in a non-production environment, we often need to pause a test (either by removing it from the schedule or adjusting its frequency) and this results in the automatic kick-off of this test in all other environments. We would like the ability to simply pause a test for a specific shared environment without causing additional tests to be started."
    "We would like to be able to select the actual time a test will run automatically. It appears that you can set up the automatic schedule, but the test runs based on the last time it ran and not a time you select. Since we want these tests to run in the middle of the night, it would be nice to be able to select that."
    "If triggering test bucket via trigger API, there is no option to see if the tests which were triggered passed or failed."
    "There are not many options for scalability."
    "Currently, we can only schedule to the nearest five minutes, one hour, two hours, etc. If we could set up the exact time that we want it to run, that would be good because sometimes we have one service that crosses another service."
    More Runscope [EOL] cons
     

    Pricing and Cost Advice

    "I rate the price of Postman a four out of five."
    "I rate the product's price a nine or ten on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is very expensive. Postman is an expensive tool for Turkey."
    "The solution is free for individuals, but for companies that use it across the organization, you have to pay per user."
    "I use the tool's free version."
    "We do not pay any money for Postman."
    "We are using the free version that is available."
    "It is free."
    "We are currently using the free version, but we have plans to buy a license."
    More Postman Enterprise pricing and cost advice
    "Runscope pricing is unbeatable"
    "Having the different plans organized by team size, buckets, and requests per billing period works for our needs. Larger companies may need to take a close look at these elements."
    "Pricing is fair."
    "The price for the product is very reasonable for a team of more than four to five members."
    report
    See which vendors are best for you
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.
    See recommendations
    871,408 professionals have used our research since 2012.
     

    Top Industries

    By visitors reading reviews
    Financial Services Firm
    20%
    Computer Software Company
    15%
    Insurance Company
    8%
    Manufacturing Company
    6%
    No data available
     

    Company Size

    By reviewers
    Large Enterprise
    Midsize Enterprise
    Small Business
    By reviewers
    Company SizeCount
    Small Business17
    Midsize Enterprise9
    Large Enterprise41
    By reviewers
    Company SizeCount
    Small Business6
    Midsize Enterprise1
    Large Enterprise3
     

    Questions from the Community

    How does Postman compare with Apache JMeter?
    Postman lets you easily define variables, which then get updated automatically. This is a huge time-saver and makes processes very efficient. We can also export the test cases we create and share t...
    See all answers
    What do you like most about Postman?
    The product is easy to implement.
    See all answers
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Postman?
    Postman is much cheaper than the other tools. I am not aware of the current pricing for Postman because that's taken care of by the client; we just pay and they simply create options. On a per-pers...
    See all answers
    Ask a question
    Earn 20 points
     

    Comparisons

    Tricentis Tosca vs Postman Enterprise Logo
    Tricentis Tosca vs Postman Enterprise
    Compared 14% of the time
    Katalon Studio vs Postman Enterprise Logo
    Katalon Studio vs Postman Enterprise
    Compared 14% of the time
    Apache JMeter vs Postman Enterprise Logo
    Apache JMeter vs Postman Enterprise
    Compared 12% of the time
    ReadyAPI Test vs Postman Enterprise Logo
    ReadyAPI Test vs Postman Enterprise
    Compared 10% of the time
    Parasoft SOAtest vs Postman Enterprise Logo
    Parasoft SOAtest vs Postman Enterprise
    Compared 7% of the time
    More Postman Enterprise Competitors
    No data available
     

    Product Reports

    Buyer's Guide
    Postman Enterprise
    October 2025
    Postman Enterprise reportDownload Postman Enterprise product report
    Buyer's Guide
    Runscope [EOL]
    October 2025
    Runscope [EOL] reportDownload Runscope [EOL] product report
     

    Also Known As

    No data available
    CA Runscope
     

    Overview

    Postman Enterprise provides API testing capabilities with features like automation, integration, and shared environments, enhancing efficiency for REST and SOAP APIs. Teams benefit from its intuitive interface and support for automation and scripting.

    Postman Enterprise is designed for API testing, supporting REST and SOAP APIs to enhance manual and automated testing. It offers endpoint validation, unit and integration testing, and data-driven testing. This platform is valued for its easy setup, flexibility in automation, and scripting, enabling collaborations through shared collections and generating reports. However, users find room for improvement in automation, integration with platforms, SOAP API testing, and collection management.

    What are the key features of Postman Enterprise?
    • Intuitive Interface: Simplifies navigation and usage across teams.
    • Automation Capabilities: Speeds up testing processes.
    • Integration Support: Connects with tools like Jenkins and Newman.
    • Scripting and Version Control: Enhances collaboration.
    • Testing Flexibility: Supports REST and SOAP API testing.
    What benefits can users expect from Postman Enterprise?
    • Efficiency Gains: Streamlines API testing processes.
    • Improved Collaboration: Facilitates teamwork through shared environments.
    • Better Testing Accuracy: Validates requests and responses thoroughly.

    In industries relying on API development, Postman Enterprise aids in creating robust testing environments. Whether technology, finance, or healthcare, teams leverage its data-driven testing capability and collaboration features for comprehensive and accurate testing outcomes.

    Postman
    Information not available
    Broadcom
     

    Sample Customers

    PayPal, Shopify, Microsoft, Adobe, Atlassian, Twitter, BestBuy, Coursera
    Twilio, Microsoft, Adobe, Okta, Tesco, Charter Communications
    Buyer's Guide
    API Monitoring Software
    September 2025
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Postman, F5, SmartBear and others in API Monitoring Software. Updated: September 2025.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    871,408 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    See our list of best API Monitoring Software vendors.

    We monitor all API Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.