Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Postman Enterprise vs Runscope [EOL] comparison

Postman and Broadcom are both solutions in the API Monitoring Software category. Additionally, 95% of Postman users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.
Postman Enterprise
Read 65 Postman Enterprise reviews
  • 4,243 Views
  • 212 Comparison Views
95% willing to recommend
Runscope [EOL]
Read 11 Runscope [EOL] reviews
    100% willing to recommend
     

    Comparison Buyer's Guide

    Download the report
    Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 2, 2025

    Runscope EOL and Postman Enterprise compete in the API testing and monitoring space. Postman Enterprise holds an advantage, offering a more robust solution due to its enhanced features.

    Features: Postman Enterprise offers automated testing workflows, API documentation, and advanced collaboration features. Runscope EOL provided comprehensive API monitoring, internal team collaboration, and was simpler for smaller teams.

    Room for Improvement: Postman Enterprise could improve by simplifying its interface and reducing the learning curve. Runscope EOL needed stronger customer support, scalability, and a broader range of advanced features.

    Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Postman Enterprise is straightforward to deploy and offers reliable customer support for large-scale operations. Runscope EOL was easier to deploy for small teams but lacked extensive support for larger enterprises.

    Pricing and ROI: Runscope EOL was more budget-friendly for startups, whereas Postman Enterprise, despite a higher cost, provides better ROI due to its comprehensive features and scalability.

    DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
    To learn more, read our detailed API Monitoring Software Report (Updated: October 2025).
    Buyer's Guide
    API Monitoring Software
    October 2025
    Download the complete report
    Helped 873,003 peers since 2012

    Review summaries and opinions

    We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
     

    Categories and Ranking

    Postman Enterprise
    Average Rating
    8.2
    Reviews Sentiment
    6.8
    Number of Reviews
    65
    Ranking in other categories
    API Management (8th), API Monitoring Software (1st), API Testing Tools (2nd)
    Runscope [EOL]
    Average Rating
    8.8
    Number of Reviews
    11
    Ranking in other categories
    No ranking in other categories
     

    Featured Reviews

    Anagha Mahadik - PeerSpot reviewer
    Solution simplifies web service testing with impressive speed and accessibility
    It is very easy for me to use and I highly prefer it compared to SoapUI and other products for performing its job. It is more handy and faster. It has impacted us very nicely. Postman is used for free by us. I'm not sure if there might be a paid version for multiple users. It is a very good product used for development. It is easy to install, as well as to learn, particularly for new users, even if they are not developers. I taught my business analyst to use it. I just showed them once, and it was easy for them to understand. For example, I gave them the URL and request format and asked them to test independently. They were able to use it on their own and do their testing as well. It was a good experience, especially for generally smart people, like those we usually hire in our company. It is pretty easy to explain, and learning it is not complex.
    Read full review
    Director5672 - PeerSpot reviewer
    Enables us to monitor API endpoints to ensure everything is running
    I've noticed, once or twice, when there were some updates pushed by Runscope, at times it didn't refresh the pages. I was running it, there were multiple tests running at the same time, and it didn't update the webpage I was looking at. So I had to refresh it manually. Occasionally, it still happens. Another thing I have found is that the built-in editor for the scripts can be improved a lot. Instead of making such a basic editor, maybe include a little more so it is easier to look at things and debug. Finally, other than the Runscope documentation, I haven't seen too much elsewhere. I haven't seen a user community.
    Read full review

    Quotes from Members

    We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
     

    Pros

    "One of the biggest advantages of Postman is its user-base approach."
    "The solution collects scenarios and allows for testing SOAP API, REST API and API automation at the same time."
    "Postman helps to write pre-request scripts and make a collection out of each request. You don’t have to spend time writing or copying the requests. The solution lets you integrate multiple environments and their features. Either the tool’s pro or premium version lets you do the merge and pull request for the Git directly."
    "The environment variables are a valuable feature because I can easily switch them and see all the developments in different cycles and stages."
    "Good at simulating the API code from a fictitious client application to check API behavior."
    "The most valuable feature is the user interface because it provides a clear space for the URL, headers, body, prerequisites, and tests."
    "The most valuable feature of this solution is Collections."
    "We can also submit requests multiple times and it allows us to capture the response each time by using utility scripts."
    More Postman Enterprise pros
    "This solution has improved our responsiveness to issues in both production and non-production environments. Through integration with Slack, our development and DevOps teams are quickly aware of issues related to new changes deployed to non-production environments, which tightens our feedback loop during testing. Through integration with PagerDuty, our DevOps resources are able to reduce the adverse impact of a given production issue."
    "It helps us verify that production deployments do not break the features our customers use."
    "We have the ability to populate environment variables using scripts. This allows us to keep the configuration mostly dynamic and avoid a lot of manual updates when something changes."
    "The schedule is definitely the most valuable. Also, being able to check the JSON attribute values is helpful. We always check the attributes. Finally, the notifications are helpful as well."
    "We love the fact that we can have our API tests run on a schedule as often as we need. We also take advantage of being able to set up different environment settings so that we can use the same test in our production, integration, and QA environments, easily. The ability to string together a number of API tests for a test suite is very important to us as well."
    "You can run it off the cloud and against different data centers. That's one of the plus points for most people for this product, as opposed to some other solutions."
    "Environment initial variables allow our team to run tests against multiple environments on the fly."
    "The feature of automatically executing tests at a predefined time interval is great as we can be continuously testing our end-points before and after builds are deployed."
    More Runscope [EOL] pros
     

    Cons

    "Initially, the setup is a little bit complex"
    "There is no support for the testing of the SOAP APIs."
    "The scalability of the solution can be improved."
    "It would be better if we could integrate programming languages like .NET, Java, and JavaScript. It could also be more user-friendly."
    "The product lacks a good console."
    "One of the primary challenges with Postman is handling authentication issues, especially relating to tokens and passwords."
    "We'd like to see videos or user-friendly reference documentation to help us figure out the solution or troubleshoot issues on our own."
    "The pricing should be adjusted for the Pro plan."
    More Postman Enterprise cons
    "The user interface requires a lot of clicking around."
    "We would like to be able to select the actual time a test will run automatically. It appears that you can set up the automatic schedule, but the test runs based on the last time it ran and not a time you select. Since we want these tests to run in the middle of the night, it would be nice to be able to select that."
    "There are not many options for scalability."
    "File upload is a big part of the products that we test. The lack of file upload in Runscope requires us to still use UI (Selenium) automated tests for these scenarios."
    "The initial setup included a lot of repetitive manual work."
    "One thing that can be improved is the logging. Sometimes, when we have an error, we don't know how to find more information about the problem that has happened. Sometimes, it just returns something like "that gateway." More information would be a way to improve it."
    "Currently, we can only schedule to the nearest five minutes, one hour, two hours, etc. If we could set up the exact time that we want it to run, that would be good because sometimes we have one service that crosses another service."
    "If you forget to set the default environment during test creation, you have to go through every test and make sure that it is set to the environment that you prefer if using shared environments. If there was an option to force all tests within a bucket into a specific environment with one click, this would save a lot of time."
    More Runscope [EOL] cons
     

    Pricing and Cost Advice

    "It is free."
    "We are currently using the free version, but we have plans to buy a license."
    "Its price is moderate as compared to other competitors. The version that we are using is not open source, so it is not free."
    "This tool is open-source and free to download and use."
    "The solution's price is reasonable."
    "I am using the free option."
    "The solution is free for individuals, but for companies that use it across the organization, you have to pay per user."
    "We do not pay any money for Postman."
    More Postman Enterprise pricing and cost advice
    "Having the different plans organized by team size, buckets, and requests per billing period works for our needs. Larger companies may need to take a close look at these elements."
    "Runscope pricing is unbeatable"
    "The price for the product is very reasonable for a team of more than four to five members."
    "Pricing is fair."
    report
    See which vendors are best for you
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.
    See recommendations
    873,003 professionals have used our research since 2012.
     

    Top Industries

    By visitors reading reviews
    Financial Services Firm
    20%
    Computer Software Company
    15%
    Insurance Company
    8%
    Manufacturing Company
    6%
    No data available
     

    Company Size

    By reviewers
    Large Enterprise
    Midsize Enterprise
    Small Business
    By reviewers
    Company SizeCount
    Small Business17
    Midsize Enterprise9
    Large Enterprise41
    By reviewers
    Company SizeCount
    Small Business6
    Midsize Enterprise1
    Large Enterprise3
     

    Questions from the Community

    How does Postman compare with Apache JMeter?
    Postman lets you easily define variables, which then get updated automatically. This is a huge time-saver and makes processes very efficient. We can also export the test cases we create and share t...
    See all answers
    What do you like most about Postman?
    The product is easy to implement.
    See all answers
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Postman?
    Postman is much cheaper than the other tools. I am not aware of the current pricing for Postman because that's taken care of by the client; we just pay and they simply create options. On a per-pers...
    See all answers
    Ask a question
    Earn 20 points
     

    Comparisons

    Katalon Studio vs Postman Enterprise Logo
    Katalon Studio vs Postman Enterprise
    Compared 14% of the time
    Tricentis Tosca vs Postman Enterprise Logo
    Tricentis Tosca vs Postman Enterprise
    Compared 13% of the time
    Apache JMeter vs Postman Enterprise Logo
    Apache JMeter vs Postman Enterprise
    Compared 12% of the time
    ReadyAPI Test vs Postman Enterprise Logo
    ReadyAPI Test vs Postman Enterprise
    Compared 8% of the time
    Parasoft SOAtest vs Postman Enterprise Logo
    Parasoft SOAtest vs Postman Enterprise
    Compared 6% of the time
    More Postman Enterprise Competitors
    No data available
     

    Product Reports

    Buyer's Guide
    Postman Enterprise
    October 2025
    Postman Enterprise reportDownload Postman Enterprise product report
    Buyer's Guide
    Runscope [EOL]
    October 2025
    Runscope [EOL] reportDownload Runscope [EOL] product report
     

    Also Known As

    No data available
    CA Runscope
     

    Overview

    Postman Enterprise provides API testing capabilities with features like automation, integration, and shared environments, enhancing efficiency for REST and SOAP APIs. Teams benefit from its intuitive interface and support for automation and scripting.

    Postman Enterprise is designed for API testing, supporting REST and SOAP APIs to enhance manual and automated testing. It offers endpoint validation, unit and integration testing, and data-driven testing. This platform is valued for its easy setup, flexibility in automation, and scripting, enabling collaborations through shared collections and generating reports. However, users find room for improvement in automation, integration with platforms, SOAP API testing, and collection management.

    What are the key features of Postman Enterprise?
    • Intuitive Interface: Simplifies navigation and usage across teams.
    • Automation Capabilities: Speeds up testing processes.
    • Integration Support: Connects with tools like Jenkins and Newman.
    • Scripting and Version Control: Enhances collaboration.
    • Testing Flexibility: Supports REST and SOAP API testing.
    What benefits can users expect from Postman Enterprise?
    • Efficiency Gains: Streamlines API testing processes.
    • Improved Collaboration: Facilitates teamwork through shared environments.
    • Better Testing Accuracy: Validates requests and responses thoroughly.

    In industries relying on API development, Postman Enterprise aids in creating robust testing environments. Whether technology, finance, or healthcare, teams leverage its data-driven testing capability and collaboration features for comprehensive and accurate testing outcomes.

    Postman
    Information not available
    Broadcom
     

    Sample Customers

    PayPal, Shopify, Microsoft, Adobe, Atlassian, Twitter, BestBuy, Coursera
    Twilio, Microsoft, Adobe, Okta, Tesco, Charter Communications
    Buyer's Guide
    API Monitoring Software
    October 2025
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Postman, F5, SmartBear and others in API Monitoring Software. Updated: October 2025.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    873,003 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    See our list of best API Monitoring Software vendors.

    We monitor all API Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.