Postman vs SwaggerHub comparison

"The most valuable feature of this solution is Collections."

"The most valuable feature of Postman is the verification and testing of APIs."

"We are using the automation and performance testing tools."

"It is easy and simple to use and install. It is compatible with Linux, Mac or Windows."

"Postman is useful for API testing."

"Good at simulating the API code from a fictitious client application to check API behavior."

"I rate Postman as a ten out of ten."

"This solution offers a free version."

"The product's initial setup phase was easy and not at all difficult."

"It is a stable solution."

"The tool's most valuable feature is licensing."

"It is quite a useful tool. It is quite good with the validation of the spec. It works quite well in terms of errors and conformity to the OpenAPI standard. It is better than Visual Studio Code in terms of editing."

"One of the best features of SwaggerHub is how it allows me to create APIs and control the evolution of APIs within an organization."

"I rate the solution's stability a ten out of ten."

"The most valuable features are the collaboration between multiple teams and the control and distribution of specifications."

"One of the best features of SwaggerHub is how it allows me to create APIs and control the evolution of APIs within an organization."

"Initially, the setup is a little bit complex. Whenever a user comes to Postman for the first time, it is just a bit complex since they do not know where to start and what is the structure."

"One of the features that is missing in Postman is reporting; it's very basic."

"The main improvement needed is better integration with test management and other tools to allow a common dashboard for all testing metrics and details."

"We'd like to see some better UI in newer versions."

"I was not even aware that it was possible to automate tasks in Postman...Some features related to the automation of tasks need to be added to the solution."

"Integration of the solution towards Bitbucket, BitHub, and CI pipelines is difficult."

"Could be more user friendly."

"Should have a more improved easy-to-use interface."

"It has limited functionality...Unfortunately, some of its features are not what we need."

"We have to use additional tools to test APIs."

"More integration and usability with the cloud microservices would be nice"

"SwaggerHub could be improved with better integration for tools."

"The review process should be improved. There seem to be some gaps, at least for us, for the editing part because we would like to have a full request review mechanism. They support some comments, but it is really hard to manage those comments. We would like to use the full request. Therefore, we are now looking to integrate with repositories. It has integration with Bitbucket and GitHub, but we have some internal constraints, and we need to move some of the repositories to GitHub. Our source code is on-premise in Bitbucket, and it was a bit of a problem for us to integrate. Now we are transitioning our repositories to GitHub, and hopefully, we can enable the integration. This will probably solve the problem with the review and approval. Its customization should also be improved. There are limitations around the support for the developer portal. There should be more customization options for the website that you can use as a developer portal. Currently, it has only Swagger UI with minimal customization. You cannot actually add additional pages and documentation for explaining concepts and general things. That's why we have started to look around to see what other tools are doing. They should also allow tagging on the API. We would like to add some tagging on the API to reflect certain things. Currently, any metadata that you would like to have has to be a part of the spec. You cannot do anything else. It should also have support for Open API 3.1, which was released at the beginning of the year. It would be great to be able to switch to that."

"Some areas of SwaggerHub that could be improved include the interface between the code editor and the visual editor, the integration with private APIs, which currently requires an upgraded account."

"It could be more intuitive compared to one of its competitors."

"The scalability aspect of SwaggerHub can be improved. It becomes a bit unreliable when the load is increased and isn't up to par with expectations for scalability."

"This solution offers a free version."

"We use the open-source version. They introduced a new licensing model where your company must subscribe to their services if you're using it for business purposes. However, I think they charge too much if you're only using the basic features. It limits what your organization can do if you're not a paying customer."

"Its price is moderate as compared to other competitors. The version that we are using is not open source, so it is not free."

"Postman is an open-source product. It is free to download from Google."

"We do not pay any money for Postman."

"I rate the price of Postman a four out of five."

"The solution is free for individuals, but for companies that use it across the organization, you have to pay per user."

"The solution has moderate pricing."

"The tool is cheap."

"It has a yearly subscription, but I am not sure."