We performed a comparison between Parasoft SOAtest and Postman based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two API Testing Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We have seen a return on investment."
"Since the solution has both command line and automation options, it generates good reports."
"Technical support is helpful."
"The solution is scalable."
"Good at simulating the API code from a fictitious client application to check API behavior."
"It's easy to see different versions of responses."
"Postman helps us to automate the API testing in the team."
"It is stable and reliable."
"The solution has a great user interface and collection of features."
"In Postman, we have an option to directly import a call, make it a Postman collection, and execute it in a batch. This feature is very useful. It saves a lot of time. The manual effort is also reduced when we can just pick it in a Postman collection and then run and execute it to get the results."
"The scalability is good."
"The most valuable feature of Postman is the verification and testing of APIs."
"The performance could be a bit better."
"The summary reports could be improved."
"UI testing should be more in-depth."
"Tuning the tool takes time because it gives quite a long list of warnings."
"We have previously used Tosca which allowed us to verify information using authentications. It would be useful if this was also possible using Postman. In a future release, Postman should connect to DB."
"I live in Turkey, so for me, the value of dollar currency is high...Postman can change its pricing policy and decrease the prices for Turkey."
"The scalability of the solution can be improved."
"The solution has some user interface difficulties when conducting environment collections."
"Postman could be improved by providing options for performance testing of APIs."
"Reporting can be better. If you have bigger APIs, it takes time."
"They should integrate the solution with one of the CRM solutions."
"The reporting could be better. It should give you a detailed PDF report after you run a test."
Parasoft SOAtest is ranked 9th in API Testing Tools with 4 reviews while Postman is ranked 1st in API Testing Tools with 37 reviews. Parasoft SOAtest is rated 7.0, while Postman is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Parasoft SOAtest writes "Easy to use and understand with multiple types of testing on offer". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Postman writes "Saves time and effort, is user-friendly, and has a free version". Parasoft SOAtest is most compared with SonarQube, Coverity, Tricentis Tosca, Klocwork and Apache JMeter, whereas Postman is most compared with Apache JMeter, ReadyAPI Test, Tricentis Tosca, Katalon Studio and OpenText UFT One. See our Parasoft SOAtest vs. Postman report.
See our list of best API Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all API Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
