Parasoft SOAtest and Postman are both prominent tools in the API testing market. Postman seems to have the upper hand due to its superior features and flexibility, despite Parasoft SOAtest's advantages in pricing and support.
Features: Parasoft SOAtest is praised for its comprehensive test automation, extensive protocol support, and strong integration with development workflows. Postman is appreciated for its intuitive approach to API testing, ease of use, and powerful collaboration features. Users find Postman's versatility and extensive library of pre-built APIs advantageous.
Room for Improvement: Users note that Parasoft SOAtest could improve by offering more user-friendly interfaces, better documentation, and enhanced usability. Postman users suggest enhancements in load testing capabilities, integrations with more CI/CD tools, and better technical functionalities for advanced testing needs.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Parasoft SOAtest users appreciate the tool’s robust deployment models and responsive customer service, though they note a steep learning curve. Postman is recognized for smooth deployment and an abundance of user resources, though its customer service is noted to be less responsive than Parasoft.
Pricing and ROI: Parasoft SOAtest is considered to have a higher initial setup cost, but users find its long-term ROI justifiable due to its comprehensive capabilities. Postman offers a more affordable setup cost and quick returns through its scalable pricing model, highlighting its cost efficiency and quick time to value.
We found Parasoft SOAtest to be quick in building up test patterns, allowing us to create complex tests efficiently.
A minimum of 50% time is saved when comparing manual to automation.
I appreciate the ease of using Postman, especially its desktop version, due to the features it offers such as cookie management and environment synchronization.
There is a lot of support available through forums and user groups, which has been sufficient for me.
Postman does not have database validation available, which affects its scalability.
This solution is scalable.
I rate it ten out of ten for stability.
I have not experienced any issues or downtimes.
The tool is generally stable.
It did not support enough of the protocols or cryptography formats we needed, which led us to create our own solutions.
One of the primary challenges with Postman is handling authentication issues, especially relating to tokens and passwords.
Maybe Postman can be a good contender and replicate some features such as more scripting and control over API calls.
If they can enhance it to have a database kind of validation like we have in ReadyAPI, it would be better.
Parasoft SOAtest is expensive, but it was acquired because the company was dissatisfied with Quick Test Pro.
Postman is open-source, so the cost is minimal compared to commercial platforms.
Postman is much cheaper than the other tools.
Postman's pricing model includes a basic free version, which is favorable given the Professional enterprise options offered.
Parasoft SOAtest is very good at ensuring tests don't pass or fail until they genuinely pass or fail.
Postman's collaboration tools, such as version control and team workspaces, are particularly useful when working with teams of three to four people.
It has helped significantly since it is easy; the development team and QA team all use it, enabling us to automate almost 70% of our APIs using Postman.
The desktop version's features like cookie management, environment compatibility, security settings, proxy integration, and data synchronization add significant value.
Parasoft SOAtest delivers fully integrated API and web service testing capabilities that automate end-to-end functional API testing. Streamline automated testing with advanced codeless test creation for applications with multiple interfaces (REST & SOAP APIs, microservices, databases, and more).
SOAtest reduces the risk of security breaches and performance outages by transforming functional testing artifacts into security and load equivalents. Such reuse, along with continuous monitoring of APIs for change, allows faster and more efficient testing.
Postman's Tools Support Every Stage of the API Lifecycle. Through design, testing and full production, Postman is there for faster, easier API development - without the chaos.
We monitor all API Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
