Apigee and Postman Enterprise compete in the API management and testing domain. Apigee seems to have the upper hand with its robust management features and powerful analytics.
Features: Apigee offers comprehensive API management with strong analytics, monetization options, and custom coding flexibility. Its developer portal and documentation provide excellent control over API interactions. Postman Enterprise is noted for its simplicity, offering user-friendly testing features that easily integrate with diverse development environments.
Room for Improvement: Apigee needs to enhance integration capabilities, improve pricing transparency, and document Open Banking Standards more comprehensively. Additionally, it struggles with on-premise support and user role management. Postman Enterprise could enhance performance under heavy loads, improve support for SOAP APIs, and expand its reporting and collaboration features.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Apigee offers flexible deployment models, including cloud and on-premises options, though deployment can be complex and costly. Customer service varies, with technical support being responsive for some users but slow for others. Postman Enterprise benefits from easy cloud-based deployment and straightforward setup, with support seen as adequate but reliant on self-service via thorough documentation.
Pricing and ROI: Apigee's pricing is high, suited for large enterprises with complex API needs, offering significant ROI through monetization opportunities. Postman Enterprise provides a more affordable alternative, with most features available in a free version offering substantial ROI through cost and time efficiency in API testing.
A minimum of 50% time is saved when comparing manual to automation.
They are responsive and provide assistance even during production issues.
The customer service and support are cooperative and effective in providing insights and solutions during challenges.
In the past two years, I have been experiencing less assistance.
I appreciate the ease of using Postman, especially its desktop version, due to the features it offers such as cookie management and environment synchronization.
There is a lot of support available through forums and user groups, which has been sufficient for me.
Adding extra Cassandra databases is complex.
Postman does not have database validation available, which affects its scalability.
This solution is scalable.
Apigee is stable, and we have had the system running on Apigee servers for more than four years without any stability issues.
I rate it ten out of ten for stability.
I have not experienced any issues or downtimes.
During the development phase, you will face issues, but once it goes to production, you won't face such issues.
Apigee only allows validation of transactions up to a four-hour period, which requires manual hovering over the date and time.
Analytics is one of the areas needing enhancement, specifically more visibility and control over traffic to improve capacity management and high availability.
Apigee should also incorporate these capabilities, especially in the on-premises version.
One of the primary challenges with Postman is handling authentication issues, especially relating to tokens and passwords.
If they can enhance it to have a database kind of validation like we have in ReadyAPI, it would be better.
Maybe Postman can be a good contender and replicate some features such as more scripting and control over API calls.
Apigee is perceived as slightly costly compared to other tools in the market.
Apigee is high-priced, suitable for large enterprises where the benefit aligns with the cost.
Apigee is costlier compared to other solutions.
Postman's pricing model includes a basic free version, which is favorable given the Professional enterprise options offered.
Postman is open-source, so the cost is minimal compared to commercial platforms.
Postman is much cheaper than the other tools.
It provides all the necessary capabilities for current technologies, enabling communication and translation between protocols, along with supporting stringent security features.
The features for API security have been significant with Apigee.
Apigee provides catalog management, onboarding of new customers, an API portal, and security features.
The desktop version's features like cookie management, environment compatibility, security settings, proxy integration, and data synchronization add significant value.
It's easy to navigate because tons of documentation and examples are available.
Postman's collaboration tools, such as version control and team workspaces, are particularly useful when working with teams of three to four people.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Apigee | 8.8% |
| Postman Enterprise | 1.5% |
| Other | 89.7% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 20 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 9 |
| Large Enterprise | 65 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 17 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 9 |
| Large Enterprise | 41 |
Apigee is a platform for developing and managing APIs. Apigee offers an interface for your core services by wrapping them with a proxy layer which is then accessed by other developers. With Apigee, you can design and build APIs and then securely share their services and data without exposing any code.
Because app developers make HTTP requests to an API proxy rather than directly to your services, your services are separated from the developers. All the developer needs to know is the URL of the API proxy endpoint, necessary query parameters, authorization credentials (if they exist), and the response data format.
The API proxy isolates the app developer from your backend service. Therefore, you are free to change the service implementation if the public API remains consistent. By maintaining a consistent frontend API, existing client apps will continue to work regardless of changes on the backend.
Key capabilities of the Apigee API management platform include:
Reviews from Real Users:
Apigee stands out among its competitors for a number of reasons. Several major ones are its rich developer portal, its advanced analytics, and its central monitoring system.
Carlos R., a software architect at Caja Los Andes writes, “The central monitoring feature is the most valuable. It also provides security for the APIs and high availability for our use cases. Apigee is the best product in the industry in comparison to other API management solutions. It helps in fast development, which is a top point. It also supports a lot of industry standards and has excellent documentation.”
An associate vice president at a tech services company notes, “The analytics function and the developer portal are the two valuable features of Apigee. The analytics part is very good, and the developer portal is quite rich in features. The authentication mechanisms are quite easily built into Apigee, which is something that most of the other products have also now started supporting.”
Postman Enterprise provides API testing capabilities with features like automation, integration, and shared environments, enhancing efficiency for REST and SOAP APIs. Teams benefit from its intuitive interface and support for automation and scripting.
Postman Enterprise is designed for API testing, supporting REST and SOAP APIs to enhance manual and automated testing. It offers endpoint validation, unit and integration testing, and data-driven testing. This platform is valued for its easy setup, flexibility in automation, and scripting, enabling collaborations through shared collections and generating reports. However, users find room for improvement in automation, integration with platforms, SOAP API testing, and collection management.
What are the key features of Postman Enterprise?In industries relying on API development, Postman Enterprise aids in creating robust testing environments. Whether technology, finance, or healthcare, teams leverage its data-driven testing capability and collaboration features for comprehensive and accurate testing outcomes.
We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
