Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Oracle SOA Suite Logo

Top 10 Oracle SOA Suite Alternatives

Vendor: Oracle
4.0 out of 5
Badge Ranked 1
Leave a review

Top Oracle SOA Suite Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Oracle SOA Suite based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include IBM BPM, IBM DataPower Gateway, and IBM WebSphere Application Server. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Oracle Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Oracle, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Oracle SOA Suite Logo
IBM BPM
3.9 out of 5
Oracle SOA Suite Logo
IBM BPM
3.9 out of 5
Oracle SOA Suite offers robust integration with minimal coding, ideal for complex Oracle environments. In comparison, IBM BPM excels in process automation within IBM's ecosystem but faces challenges in non-IBM integration. Both solutions require strategic planning to balance costs with expected ROI.
Download IBM BPM vs. Oracle SOA Suite Report
Oracle SOA Suite setup costs are often highlighted as more initial investment, while IBM BPM requires a comparatively lower setup expense, reflecting a significant financial consideration for businesses evaluating these solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Oracle SOA Suite setup costs are often highlighted as more initial investment, while IBM BPM requires a comparatively lower setup expense, reflecting a significant financial consideration for businesses evaluating these solutions.
Oracle SOA Suite Logo
Oracle SOA Suite Logo
IBM DataPower Gateway
4.2 out of 5
Oracle SOA Suite offers robust integration capabilities through comprehensive tools for service virtualization and process automation, excelling with Oracle and third-party systems. In comparison, IBM DataPower Gateway emphasizes superior security and ease of integration, handling complex tasks with stability and scalability.
Download IBM DataPower Gateway vs. Oracle SOA Suite Report
Oracle SOA Suite has a higher setup cost compared to IBM DataPower Gateway, which offers a more budget-friendly initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Oracle SOA Suite has a higher setup cost compared to IBM DataPower Gateway, which offers a more budget-friendly initial investment.
Oracle SOA Suite Logo
Oracle SOA Suite Logo
IBM WebSphere Application Server
3.8 out of 5
Oracle SOA Suite excels in integration capabilities with comprehensive service functions, ideal for complex enterprise needs. In comparison, IBM WebSphere Application Server is noted for stability and scalability, perfect for large-scale, high-performance applications demanding compliance with Java standards.
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server vs. Oracle SOA Suite Report
Oracle SOA Suite requires a higher initial setup cost compared to IBM WebSphere Application Server, which offers a more budget-friendly setup, providing a distinct financial choice for organizations evaluating these enterprise solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Oracle SOA Suite requires a higher initial setup cost compared to IBM WebSphere Application Server, which offers a more budget-friendly setup, providing a distinct financial choice for organizations evaluating these enterprise solutions.
Oracle SOA Suite Logo
IIS
4.0 out of 5
Oracle SOA Suite Logo
IIS
4.0 out of 5
Oracle SOA Suite offers robust integration capabilities with numerous adapters, ideal for complex needs. In comparison, IIS provides a lightweight, straightforward solution for web hosting. Oracle suits extensive integrations, while IIS is optimal for cost-effective Windows-based deployments.
Download IIS vs. Oracle SOA Suite Report
Oracle SOA Suite has a higher setup cost compared to IIS, which often results in a more budget-friendly initial investment for businesses choosing IIS.
View comparison
Pricing
Oracle SOA Suite has a higher setup cost compared to IIS, which often results in a more budget-friendly initial investment for businesses choosing IIS.
Oracle SOA Suite Logo
Apache Web Server
4.3 out of 5
Oracle SOA Suite Logo
Apache Web Server
4.3 out of 5
Oracle SOA Suite offers robust integration with technology adapters, ideal for complex enterprise environments. In comparison, Apache Web Server provides stability and modularity from its open-source nature, appealing to cost-conscious buyers needing simplicity and flexibility without licensing complexities.
Download Apache Web Server vs. Oracle SOA Suite Report
Oracle SOA Suite usually has a higher initial setup cost compared to Apache Web Server, offering more advanced features and integration capabilities; meanwhile, Apache Web Server provides a more cost-effective option with its robust web server functionalities.
View comparison
Pricing
Oracle SOA Suite usually has a higher initial setup cost compared to Apache Web Server, offering more advanced features and integration capabilities; meanwhile, Apache Web Server provides a more cost-effective option with its robust web server functionalities.
Oracle SOA Suite Logo
Oracle SOA Suite Logo
JBoss Enterprise Application Platform
4.4 out of 5
Oracle SOA Suite provides seamless integration and enterprise scalability. In comparison, JBoss Enterprise Application Platform offers flexibility with open-source modularity. Oracle may appeal to those needing deep integration, while JBoss attracts those valuing adaptability and lower costs.
Download JBoss Enterprise Application Platform vs. Oracle SOA Suite Report
Oracle SOA Suite involves a higher setup cost, while JBoss Enterprise Application Platform offers a more cost-effective initial setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Oracle SOA Suite involves a higher setup cost, while JBoss Enterprise Application Platform offers a more cost-effective initial setup.
Oracle SOA Suite Logo
Oracle SOA Suite Logo
Microsoft .NET Framework
4.2 out of 5
Oracle SOA Suite offers robust integration with versatile enterprise systems, making it ideal for complex setups. In comparison, Microsoft .NET Framework provides versatility and cost-effectiveness, especially for cross-platform development, appealing to organizations prioritizing ease of use and budget considerations.
Download Microsoft .NET Framework vs. Oracle SOA Suite Report
Oracle SOA Suite involves a high initial setup cost, while Microsoft .NET Framework presents a more cost-effective setup option, highlighting a significant difference in pricing structure between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Oracle SOA Suite involves a high initial setup cost, while Microsoft .NET Framework presents a more cost-effective setup option, highlighting a significant difference in pricing structure between the two solutions.
Oracle SOA Suite Logo
Oracle SOA Suite Logo
IBM WebSphere Message Broker
3.9 out of 5
Oracle SOA Suite excels in integration capabilities and business process management with wide adapter support. In comparison, IBM WebSphere Message Broker is superior for protocol transformations and handling large data volumes, making it ideal for legacy system communications. Oracle offers more deployment flexibility, while IBM requires careful cost management.
Download IBM WebSphere Message Broker vs. Oracle SOA Suite Report
Oracle SOA Suite has a lower setup cost compared to IBM WebSphere Message Broker, making SOA Suite a budget-friendly option while WebSphere Message Broker provides more extensive initial support for complex integration needs.
View comparison
Pricing
Oracle SOA Suite has a lower setup cost compared to IBM WebSphere Message Broker, making SOA Suite a budget-friendly option while WebSphere Message Broker provides more extensive initial support for complex integration needs.
Oracle SOA Suite Logo
Oracle SOA Suite Logo
Microsoft System Center
3.9 out of 5
Oracle SOA Suite excels in integration with its extensive adapters and support for service virtualization, ideal for complex environments. In comparison, Microsoft System Center is praised for managing Windows environments easily and offering strong compatibility with Microsoft products, suitable for simpler setups.
Download Microsoft System Center vs. Oracle SOA Suite Report
Oracle SOA Suite's setup cost is generally higher compared to Microsoft System Center, which offers a more budget-friendly initial cost.
View comparison
Pricing
Oracle SOA Suite's setup cost is generally higher compared to Microsoft System Center, which offers a more budget-friendly initial cost.
Oracle SOA Suite Logo
SAP NetWeaver
4.0 out of 5
Oracle SOA Suite Logo
SAP NetWeaver
4.0 out of 5
SAP NetWeaver is an open application platfrom that provides a comprehensive set of tools and Web services technologies that support seamless enterprise application integration, master data management (MDM), system integration, and more.
Download Oracle SOA Suite vs. SAP NetWeaver Report
It's a very expensive solution.
The licensing costs are on a yearly basis.
View comparison
Pricing
It's a very expensive solution.
The licensing costs are on a yearly basis.
Oracle SOA Suite Logo
Oracle SOA Suite Logo
TIBCO ActiveMatrix
1 out of 5
TIBCO ActiveMatrix provides tools for developing and packaging distributed applications, a distributed service execution environment, and tools for managing the runtime environment, applications and the services the applications provide. Service Grid is a comprehensive SOA development platform that transform business logic written in different programming languages into re-usable SOA services, and then assemble those services into powerful composite applications. TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Grid is a scalable and extensible platform for developing, deploying, and managing applications that conform to a service-oriented architecture.
View comparison
Oracle SOA Suite Logo
Oracle SOA Suite Logo
JBoss Enterprise SOA Platform
1 out of 5
The JBoss Enterprise SOA Platform is a framework for developing enterprise application integration (EAI) and service-oriented architecture (SOA) solutions. It is made up of an enterprise service bus (JBoss ESB) and some business process automation infrastructure. It allows you to build, deploy, integrate and orchestrate business services. Key Points of a Service-Oriented Architecture: the messages being exchanged, the agents that act as service requesters and providers and the shared transport mechanisms that allow the messages to flow back and forth. By using its business rules and message transformation and routing capabilities, JBoss Enterprise SOA Platform enables you to manipulate business data from multiple sources.
View comparison

Related categories

Application Infrastructure
SOA Governance
Business Process Management (BPM)