No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Pros & Cons summary

Buyer's Guide

Get pricing advice, tips, use cases and valuable features from real users of this product.
Get the report

Prominent pros & cons

PROS

OpenText Application Quality Management excels in test management, providing comprehensive features for planning, execution, and defect tracking.
The defect tracking capabilities are highly customizable, allowing teams to tailor it to specific project needs and enhance reporting.
Integration with various tools and platforms increases efficiency and streamlines processes across multiple projects.
Its traceability features link requirements, tests, and defects, ensuring complete coverage and facilitating effective quality assurance practices.
The platform's ability to manage multiple releases and maintain project standards through templates is valued by users for maintaining consistency and control.

CONS

BPT can be very time-consuming and not intuitive for new users.
OpenText Application Quality Management requires Internet Explorer, limiting compatibility with other browsers.
Cross-project reporting is limited and complex, requiring manual workarounds for comprehensive analysis.
Requirements management has limitations, often leading users to seek alternative management tools.
OpenText Application Quality Management is expensive and lacks adequate agile support, pushing users towards other methodologies.
 

OpenText Application Quality Management Pros review quotes

Hosney Osman - PeerSpot reviewer
Technical Solution Architect at Vodafone
Jun 5, 2025
From my service provider perspective, the best features of the product are real-time tracking and reporting capabilities, which help with project management by enabling real-time tracking and reporting.
GS
Partner at IS Nordic AS
Jan 15, 2025
Running automated tests against back-level versions in certain environments is possible, and newer versions can be tested as well.
reviewer1564011 - PeerSpot reviewer
President at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees
Nov 20, 2024
OpenText ALM Quality Center is highly customizable.
Learn what your peers think about OpenText Application Quality Management. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2026.
893,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.
reviewer1477047 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Test Analyst at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees
Jan 15, 2025
We can create a requirement for stability metrics with the test cases to ensure all requirements are covered.
VR
Senior Manager, Connected Home Product Management and Strategy at VWR Funding, Inc.
Jun 17, 2024
We were able to manage test cases effectively when we were using it. It worked well for us.
Huong Vuong - PeerSpot reviewer
Sap Fico Consultant at Avient Corporation
Nov 11, 2024
It is beneficial for managing testing data and has integration with Excel, allowing us to download reports easily.
BE
Testing and change management at WestLotto
Sep 26, 2024
It was really good, customizable, and easy to use.
Aphiwat Leetavorn. - PeerSpot reviewer
CTO at Marco Technology
Jun 18, 2024
The product's initial setup phase is easy.
PraveenKumar27 - PeerSpot reviewer
QA Lead at Paytm
May 29, 2024
The tool's most valuable feature is that it is user-friendly, and everybody can learn to use it easily.
AS
Development Project Manager at Virtual business valet inc
May 29, 2024
The solution's most valuable features are its bidirectional traceability, the solid structure within the test plan, and the test lab.
 

OpenText Application Quality Management Cons review quotes

Hosney Osman - PeerSpot reviewer
Technical Solution Architect at Vodafone
Jun 5, 2025
As for the scalability of OpenText ALM _ Quality Center, there are limitations, particularly in agile methodologies, which is currently my main concern.
GS
Partner at IS Nordic AS
Jan 15, 2025
There could be more configurable workflows regarding test case creation approval.
reviewer1564011 - PeerSpot reviewer
President at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees
Nov 20, 2024
The extract format is not ideal, splitting expected results into three line items, making interpretation difficult.
Learn what your peers think about OpenText Application Quality Management. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2026.
893,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.
reviewer1477047 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Test Analyst at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees
Jan 15, 2025
There are great features, however, transitioning between partners and managing a large number of test cases can be time-consuming.
VR
Senior Manager, Connected Home Product Management and Strategy at VWR Funding, Inc.
Jun 17, 2024
The reporting feature could be improved. It would be better if they simplified some things.
Huong Vuong - PeerSpot reviewer
Sap Fico Consultant at Avient Corporation
Nov 11, 2024
There are cases where the system does not meet our reporting requirements.
BE
Testing and change management at WestLotto
Sep 26, 2024
The solution is not browser-based, which modern users prefer.
Aphiwat Leetavorn. - PeerSpot reviewer
CTO at Marco Technology
Jun 18, 2024
The technology used for UI and UX are not user-friendly.
PraveenKumar27 - PeerSpot reviewer
QA Lead at Paytm
May 29, 2024
Recently, I faced some issues while using the product on Mac-based machines, as I was unable to upload test cases.
AS
Development Project Manager at Virtual business valet inc
May 29, 2024
The solution's reporting could be improved.