Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Pros & Cons summary

Buyer's Guide

Get pricing advice, tips, use cases and valuable features from real users of this product.
Get the report

Prominent pros & cons

PROS

OpenText Application Quality Management excels in test management, providing comprehensive features for planning, execution, and defect tracking.
The defect tracking capabilities are highly customizable, allowing teams to tailor it to specific project needs and enhance reporting.
Integration with various tools and platforms increases efficiency and streamlines processes across multiple projects.
Its traceability features link requirements, tests, and defects, ensuring complete coverage and facilitating effective quality assurance practices.
The platform's ability to manage multiple releases and maintain project standards through templates is valued by users for maintaining consistency and control.

CONS

BPT can be very time-consuming and not intuitive for new users.
OpenText Application Quality Management requires Internet Explorer, limiting compatibility with other browsers.
Cross-project reporting is limited and complex, requiring manual workarounds for comprehensive analysis.
Requirements management has limitations, often leading users to seek alternative management tools.
OpenText Application Quality Management is expensive and lacks adequate agile support, pushing users towards other methodologies.
 

OpenText Application Quality Management Pros review quotes

it_user678 - PeerSpot reviewer
QA Expert at a insurance company with 10,001+ employees
May 25, 2012
Very robust API to interface with the tool and you can customize how it is used.
it_user795 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Manager of QA at a tech company with 51-200 employees
May 31, 2012
Lots of new features are being rolled out by HP including the Business Process Testing (BPT) module which is at the cutting edge of testing, both manual and automation wise.
it_user975 - PeerSpot reviewer
QA Expert at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
Jun 24, 2012
QC is a versatile Quality management tool that offers test case and defect management capabilities along with a customizable reporting process.
Learn what your peers think about OpenText Application Quality Management. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2026.
884,933 professionals have used our research since 2012.
it_user1545 - PeerSpot reviewer
BPM Manager at a transportation company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Aug 23, 2012
It is an application lifecycle management product for IT projects, powerful to manage the requirement traceability, coverage, test case design, mapping, test execution, defect tracking, and reporting.
it_user70752 - PeerSpot reviewer
IT Administrator at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees
Dec 11, 2013
As long as procedures are clear, then anyone can execute the tests.
it_user110289 - PeerSpot reviewer
Test Analyst with 51-200 employees
Mar 23, 2015
Helps in providing an archive of test suites for easy regression.
CG
Presales Consultant at Oracle
Mar 27, 2020
It’s a great product for managing an end-to-end lifecycle process.
it_user104988 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Performance Consultant at a computer software company with 51-200 employees
Aug 25, 2014
Having HP ALM has helped in streamlining the Performance testing projects and now management has a better view of the projects and their status.
it_user178239 - PeerSpot reviewer
Transition Manager with 1,001-5,000 employees
Jan 5, 2015
Highly customizable GI, easy for designing product backlog, with a whole bunch of metrics on the dashboard page and built-in retrospective and continuous integration features.
it_user208659 - PeerSpot reviewer
QA Lead at a logistics company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Aug 18, 2015
With the addition of BPT (Business Process Testing), QC along with QTP has been the choice for test automation in most of the IT businesses.
 

OpenText Application Quality Management Cons review quotes

it_user678 - PeerSpot reviewer
QA Expert at a insurance company with 10,001+ employees
May 25, 2012
Reporting is almost useless, but it does allow you to extract information directly from the database through a robust API and report with your favorite tool [excel, Crystal].
it_user795 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Manager of QA at a tech company with 51-200 employees
May 31, 2012
High licensing cost.
it_user975 - PeerSpot reviewer
QA Expert at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
Jun 24, 2012
QC comes with a high license and maintenance cost, it is more suitable for large projects in terms of cost.
Learn what your peers think about OpenText Application Quality Management. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2026.
884,933 professionals have used our research since 2012.
it_user1545 - PeerSpot reviewer
BPM Manager at a transportation company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Aug 23, 2012
Agile model support not very good
it_user70752 - PeerSpot reviewer
IT Administrator at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees
Dec 11, 2013
Full product is very complex plus the licensing left much to be improved.
it_user110289 - PeerSpot reviewer
Test Analyst with 51-200 employees
Mar 23, 2015
The client crashes every so often, but only when left idle for a while.
CG
Presales Consultant at Oracle
Mar 27, 2020
The project tracking is a bit complex. It takes some time to maneuver around it.
it_user104988 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Performance Consultant at a computer software company with 51-200 employees
Aug 25, 2014
Customer Service: Fair. It takes at least 2 days for support people to respond to ticket.
it_user178239 - PeerSpot reviewer
Transition Manager with 1,001-5,000 employees
Jan 5, 2015
Licensing model is relatively expensive compared to alternate solutions.
it_user208659 - PeerSpot reviewer
QA Lead at a logistics company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Aug 18, 2015
Backup strategy is lacking in QC. Once the QC server crashes, all your automation artifacts are unrecoverable.