

OpenText Application Quality Management and Jira Align compete in the application lifecycle management space, with each offering distinct advantages. Jira Align holds the upper hand due to its alignment with Agile methodologies and strategic capabilities.
Features: OpenText provides comprehensive test management with features like defect linking and modular storage, complemented by tool integrations. Meanwhile, Jira Align thrives in Agile environments, offering comprehensive reporting, roadmap views, and program-level management, facilitating Agile scaling across organizations.
Room for Improvement: OpenText faces criticism for high costs, limited Agile support, and browser compatibility issues. Improvements in report generation are also needed. Jira Align could benefit from enhanced customization, simplified navigation, and improved tool integrations. Users seek better reporting and executive visibility capabilities.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText mainly supports On-premises and Private Cloud deployments, while Jira Align is favored for Public and Private Cloud setups. OpenText's customer service receives mixed reviews, and Jira Align users highlight the need for more responsive support.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText is considered costly, appealing more to large organizations due to its extensive test management features, seen as offering better ROI in large projects. Jira Align is also perceived as expensive, justified by its Agile and strategic management offerings, although cost concerns affect mid-sized and smaller companies.
It acts as an enabler for effective test and program management.
They have a support knowledge base area on their website, and usually, they are very good at answering questions.
Technical support has been excellent.
Quality is always high yet not perfect.
I am mostly happy with the technical support from OpenText ALM _ Quality Center.
OpenText ALM Quality Center is definitely scalable.
From a stability standpoint, OpenText ALM Quality Center has been pretty good.
It is probably better in almost all aspects over Jira; the dashboards are better, the filters or the queries are better, and it is more aligned to Scaled Agile.
HPLM has one of the best UIs compared to other test management tools, allowing for efficient navigation between test pieces, test folders, test suites, and test execution.
I see a stable tool that remains relevant in the market.
As for the scalability of OpenText ALM _ Quality Center, there are limitations, particularly in agile methodologies, which is currently my main concern.
It all depends on what sort of Microsoft licensing agreements the company has as to whether one is going to be better than the other.
It would be cheaper to use a cloud model with a pay-per-use licensing model.
We export most of what is in Jira to Power BI so we can run better reports.
The integration with internal applications and CollabNet is made possible through exposed APIs, allowing necessary integrations.
It creates constant visibility into the test process, showing the status, bugs, and automated test results.
We can create a requirement for stability metrics with the test cases to ensure all requirements are covered.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| OpenText Application Quality Management | 8.5% |
| Jira Align | 2.0% |
| Other | 89.5% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 18 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 10 |
| Large Enterprise | 19 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 41 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 32 |
| Large Enterprise | 161 |
Jira Align offers robust cross-project visibility, managing large initiatives with customizable dashboards and powerful reporting. It integrates with testing tools, supporting strategic planning and agile methodologies like Scrum and Kanban.
Jira Align is known for its capacity to enhance collaboration and transparency through agile frameworks. Its roadmaps and dependency tracking aid in aligning business strategies and managing portfolios. Despite navigation complexities, teams find it adaptable with automation features and familiar interfaces. Challenges include integrating with Jira and other tools, improving navigation, and simplifying licensing. Enhancements in mobile accessibility and AI could elevate user experience further.
What are Jira Align's key features?Jira Align is implemented in industries focusing on scaled agile frameworks. It aids in Agile development, strategic roadmaps, and backlog management, supporting both IT service management and operational processes. It connects business strategies to execution, streamlining task tracking and defect management across teams.
OpenText Application Quality Management offers a scalable, user-friendly interface with seamless automation tool integration, positioned to enhance test case management and defect tracking.
OpenText Application Quality Management provides comprehensive tools for scalable test management and effective defect management, supporting real-time tracking and detailed reporting. It empowers users with enhanced traceability between requirements, tests, and defects. The customization options and integration capabilities ensure adaptability for a broad range of testing requirements to support efficient test management, execution, and reporting. Improvements are necessary in requirements traceability, user interface updates, and integration with Agile and DevOps tools. Performance and reporting enhancements, browser compatibility, licensing, costs, and customer support remain areas for growth. Users manage test cycles, log defects, and maintain test cases, benefiting from the system's ability to record results for manual and automated testing. It facilitates regression and performance testing and supports software development lifecycle tracking to ensure comprehensive coverage.
What are the key features of OpenText Application Quality Management?OpenText Application Quality Management is widely implemented in industries focusing on test management, defect tracking, and requirements mapping. Companies utilize its capabilities to integrate with systems supporting regression and performance testing, effectively tracking phases of the software development lifecycle to ensure comprehensive requirements coverage and insightful reporting. Transitioning to newer versions and managing large projects are seen as opportunities for increased efficiency.
We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.