OpenText ALM and Jira Align compete in the application lifecycle management category. OpenText ALM seems to have the upper hand in complex testing processes and traceability, while Jira Align excels in strategic alignment and business objectives.
Features: OpenText ALM provides customizable fields, integrations with internal applications, and excellent traceability from requirements to defects. It is known for managing complex testing processes and comprehensive reporting tools. Jira Align offers capabilities in aligning software development with business goals, simplifying backlog creation, team collaboration, flexible dashboards, and robust reporting.
Room for Improvement: OpenText ALM could benefit from better reporting, enhanced performance, and user interface modernization. Its support for agile methodologies is limited, and it lacks compatibility beyond Internet Explorer. OpenText's licensing is also considered costly. Jira Align needs better integration with Jira's core suite, quicker sync, and a more intuitive navigation interface. Its setup complexity and high pricing are also concerns, and feature integration and customization options could be enhanced.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText ALM is mainly deployed on-premises but also offers private or hybrid cloud options. Customer support reviews are mixed, with some users satisfied and others citing delays. Jira Align is primarily cloud-based, providing more flexible deployment. Users generally comment favorably on support but note setup complexity and customization needs.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText ALM is perceived as expensive, particularly in licensing, possibly leading smaller companies to consider alternatives. Larger enterprises might justify the cost with its robust features. Jira Align is also costly, potentially limiting access for smaller businesses but deemed reasonable for larger organizations. Both products offer significant functionality, with pricing potentially impacting the choice depending on company size and specific needs.
It acts as an enabler for effective test and program management.
They have a support knowledge base area on their website, and usually, they are very good at answering questions.
Technical support has been excellent.
Quality is always high yet not perfect.
I am mostly happy with the technical support from OpenText ALM _ Quality Center.
OpenText ALM Quality Center is definitely scalable.
From a stability standpoint, OpenText ALM Quality Center has been pretty good.
Improvements are needed so that the system can continue running without creating a new run.
I see a stable tool that remains relevant in the market.
HPLM has one of the best UIs compared to other test management tools, allowing for efficient navigation between test pieces, test folders, test suites, and test execution.
It would be cheaper to use a cloud model with a pay-per-use licensing model.
It creates constant visibility into the test process, showing the status, bugs, and automated test results.
The integration with internal applications and CollabNet is made possible through exposed APIs, allowing necessary integrations.
We can create a requirement for stability metrics with the test cases to ensure all requirements are covered.
Jira Align is a cloud-based agile planning tool designed to help enterprises visualize, manage, and carry out large-scale software and IT projects. Jira Align’s features are designed to align the activities of your company’s development team with the overall goals of the organization by helping you achieve the following results:
With Jira Align’s integration with Jira Software, businesses can simplify governing large-scale software development efforts by translating their strategy and goals into the technical execution and delivery of work.
Jira Align uses the aggregated data from Jira Software to produce reports on every aspect of the development process. Product stakeholders are granted immediate visibility into the progress that has been made and can easily identify delays and their causes.
The solution also assists in budget planning by assigning expenses to various work items and giving management real-time insights into ongoing expenditures and performance against set budgets.
Jira Align Features
Some of the top features and benefits of using Jira Align include:
Reviews from Real Users
Jira Align stands out among its competitors for a number of reasons. Two major ones are its program-level planning options and its reporting capabilities.
A project manager at a consultancy notes, “I like how things can be sorted out, and it shows the different objectives one can do. You could also create a team view that would allow your team to see work outcomes. Jira Align also helps with the reporting, because we can export data to Excel or another format.”
OpenText Application Quality Management offers centralized data management, traceability, and integration capabilities. It aids in handling requirements, test planning, and defect tracking while supporting both manual and automated testing. Challenges exist in deployment and browser compatibility.
Known for its robust reporting and flexibility, OpenText Application Quality Management is tailored for large organizations requiring a comprehensive solution supporting lifecycle coverage and seamless tool integration. Users can consolidate testing processes, manage requirements, and centralize reporting across manual and automated testing. While some face issues with project tracking, outdated interfaces, and limited browser compatibility beyond Internet Explorer, it remains widely used for regression and performance testing. Integration with tools like JIRA and support for tools such as UFT and ALM PC underscore its utility.
What are the key features of OpenText Application Quality Management?In industries such as finance and healthcare, OpenText Application Quality Management is implemented to ensure rigorous testing standards. It supports test case creation and execution, defect tracking, and requirements management. Integration with JIRA and performance testing tools make it suitable for organizations needing synchronized testing environments.
We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.