Jama Connect vs OpenText Application Quality Management comparison

Jama and OpenText are both solutions in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category. Jama is ranked #10 with an average rating of 7.8, while OpenText is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.1. Jama holds a 3.5% mindshare in ALM, compared to OpenText’s 7.5% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Jama users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 89% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Jama Connect

Read 17 Jama Connect reviews

5,189 Views
2,854 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

OpenText Application Qualit...

Read 208 OpenText Application Quality Management reviews

16,381 Views
10,156 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

Jama Connect

OpenText Application Qualit...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 1, 2026

Jama Connect and OpenText Application Quality Management compete in the requirements management and quality assurance category. OpenText often has the upper hand due to its extensive features tailored for software development processes.

Features: Jama Connect offers collaborative features, real-time traceability, and an agile project management focus. OpenText provides comprehensive test management capabilities, emphasizing automation and defect tracking, crucial for complex deployments.

Room for Improvement: Jama Connect could enhance its testing modules, user interface, and integration capabilities. OpenText may benefit from streamlining its deployment process, improving resource requirements, and offering detailed cost breakdowns to better match its extensive functionalities with a transparent value proposition.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText's deployment can be more complex due to its wide range of tools, though customer service is responsive. Jama Connect provides a smoother deployment experience and is supported by efficient customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Jama Connect is cost-effective with lower setup costs, appealing to those needing robust requirements management. OpenText, while demanding a higher initial investment, offers significant ROI for those requiring exhaustive quality management and testing functions.

To learn more, read our detailed Jama Connect vs. OpenText Application Quality Management Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Jama Connect vs. OpenText Application Quality Management

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 908,834 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Jama Connect

Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

10th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Requirements Management (4th)

OpenText Application Qualit...

Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

3rd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

208

Ranking in other categories

Quality Management Software (1st), Test Management Tools (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category, the mindshare of Jama Connect is 3.5%, down from 4.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Application Quality Management is 7.5%, up from 5.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
OpenText Application Quality Management	7.5%
Jama Connect	3.5%
Other	89.0%

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

Featured Reviews

Juergen Albrecht

Managing Director at CCC Systems Engineering Suisse GmbH

Has required better change management and easier tool integration but supports certification needs and strong collaboration

The visualization tools are nearly similar, so it does not matter if you use DNG or even Jama Connect, but at Jama Connect, the selection and setup for running complex scripts is very powerful and fast compared to IBM, which is sometimes very slow due to the complex software which has lost focus on usability. The collaboration capabilities of Jama Connect are fantastic, and when comparing IBM, PTC, and Jama Connect, they are nearly equal because all three have recognized the importance of collaboration in today's work environment. The feature that I really appreciate about Jama Connect is its allowance for certifications through the FAA and FDA organizations in the US, which in the past was not possible for smaller companies because larger ones, such as Boeing and Airbus, often advised against using unapproved tools.

Read full review

Greg Stone

Partner at IS Nordic AS

Manages multiple releases seamlessly

We have done some work with companies, probably four or five years ago and found the ability to manage multiple releases simultaneously as a main advantage, especially in complex programs with multiple concurrent releases. Running automated tests against back-level versions in certain environments is possible, and newer versions can be tested as well. It creates constant visibility into the test process, showing the status, bugs, and automated test results. It is a solid product in large corporations in Denmark, ensuring everyone knows where the process stands. There is a good understanding of what is critical, allowing prioritization of test cases.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"You can get full traceability with any other system. It also includes a test module, and you build the traceability matrix incrementally throughout the development process."

"In Jama Connect, users have the capability to view and manage all test cases directly within the platform and execute them. The entire product specification, spanning various domains such as electrical, mechanical, software, and testing, is consolidated within Jama Connect."

"Traceability is a key differentiator for Jama Connect, especially compared to Jira."

"It is good at requirements management and test management, and for day-to-day users, it is very user-friendly."

"Support has been excellent - an advantage of working with a somewhat smaller vendor interested in making users successful."

"The impact that Jama Connect provides for my company overall is significant as it saves a huge amount of time."

"The relationship mapping feature is especially helpful, as it allows us to connect different requirements and compliance-related documentation."

"We use Jama Connect mainly for requirements management."

More Jama Connect pros

"The most beneficial feature of test management in this solution is its ability to manage multiple releases simultaneously."

"Traceability of bugs to script execution (Test Lab) to Script (Test Plan) to Requirements, Easy to use."

"It has sped up our regression testing cycle almost three times what it is if we do it manually."

"In ALM, the most valuable features are the overview, the primary requirements, test cases, defects, and traceability."

"It is a tool, and it works. It has got good linkage and good traceability between the test cases and the defects. It has got lots of features for testing."

"Having used the tool before, I like the use of parameters, being able to do exports and reports of the data for monitoring of executions, and the defect management as well. I feel satisfaction in that area."

"So the first impression that hits me about HP UFT 14.0 (formerly QTP) is that it seems to be a whole lot faster! But that could be subjective, as I'm running it on a high end gaming system."

"ALM is a well-known product and is one of the pioneers in providing test management facilities with a 360 degree view of requirements."

More OpenText Application Quality Management pros

Cons

"The solution is expensive."

"There are some security concerns with Jama Connect, including two-factor enablement."

"The solution is very software-centric, and its validation piece is not time-efficient at all."

"I believe one of the weak points is the reporting side. You must export inter-readable reports from Jama if you do not use the system as a repository for your design history file. Jama is great if you keep it in Jama, but reporting out requires some customization to get it right."

"t is rather slow, so the speed of the process and consuming information should be improved. It doesn't have a nice way of viewing information. We would like to see better interfaces for consuming information."

"I have inquired about pricing for this solution but have not yet heard anything, so their response time in this regard is something that should be improved."

"There are a few areas where Jama Connect can improve. One suggestion is to enhance the built-in feature of profile generation."

"I think Jama Connect's change management feature is not well developed at this stage, as it lacks many steps for marks, building IDs, and the usual functionalities such as comparing past changes and generating reports automatically."

More Jama Connect cons

"Our experience with the HPE support was not great."

"The UI is becoming somewhat dated but that shouldn't be a deal breaker."

"We don't have time to develop a lot of reporting and our customers want a lot of reporting."

"The technical support has been deteriorating since the Mercury days."

"We would like to have support for agile development."

"Currently, what's missing in the solution is the ability for users to see the ongoing scenarios and the status of those scenarios versus the requirements. As for the management tools, they also need to be improved so users can have a better idea of what's going on in just one look, so they can manage testing activities better."

"HP is very strong on the testing side, but in the last few years with the agile methodology it has lagged behind."

"Requirements management could be improved as the use is very limited. E.g., they have always stated that, "You can monitor and create requirements," but it has its limitations. That's why companies will choose another requirements management solution and import data from that source system into Quality Center. Micro Focus has also invested in an adapter between Dimensions RM and ALM via Micro Focus Connect. However, I see room for improvements in this rather outdated tool. I feel what Micro Focus did is say, "Our strategy is not to improve these parts within the tool itself, but search for supported integrations within our own tool set." This has not been helpful."

More OpenText Application Quality Management cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"If you want to have creative licenses, pricing may be an issue with the licenses, as it can become quite expensive over time to serve many people."

"Jama Connect is a little pricy."

"To have a single source for all the requirements and all the change requests our company gets is the most valuable feature. It has also helped us to keep track of reviews."

"The cost seems very competitive with other offerings."

"It allows us to keep our costs low. I do not want to pay beyond a certain point for this solution."

"We pay around $30,000 for thirty users, translating to approximately $6,000 to $10,000 per user, which is high."

"It has several limitations in adapting its agility easily."

"I feel that the licenses are expensive. "

"Depending on the volume, the annual maintenance costs vary on a percentage but it's around $300 a year per license for maintenance. It's at 18% of the total cost of the license."

"The licensing fee is a little expensive."

"Sure, HP UFT is not free. But consider what you get for that cost: A stable product that is easy to use; the kitchen sink of technology stack support; decades of code (which in many cases actually is free); a version that is a stepping stone to an easier Selenium design; and a support base that is more that just the kindness of strangers."

"Only major companies that can afford it use OpenText ALM."

More OpenText Application Quality Management pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

908,834 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

28%

Healthcare Company

Aerospace/Defense Firm

Government

Manufacturing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Construction Company

10%

Performing Arts

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	5

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	41
Midsize Enterprise	32
Large Enterprise	161

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Jama Connect?

I think Jama Connect's change management feature is not well developed at this stage, as it lacks many steps for marks, building IDs, and the usual functionalities such as comparing past changes an...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Jama Connect?

I am currently dealing with all options based on what the customer wants because my goal is not to promote one tool over another, but to identify the customer's problems and decide on the most suit...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Jama Connect?

At the moment, from what I hear from clients and from my own use, I would rate Jama Connect between five to six. I have not considered new improvements for PTC Integrity regarding interface, automa...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus ALM Quality Center?

The on-premises setup tends to be on the expensive side. It would be cheaper to use a cloud model with a pay-per-use licensing model.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus ALM Quality Center?

Regarding integration with various development tools, I can provide examples, and I am using customizable dashboards in OpenText ALM _ Quality Center, which definitely help identify project bottlen...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus ALM Quality Center?

People are using OpenText ALM _ Quality Center for recording user cases, testing and hand documentation, defect tracking, business purposes, and reporting.

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM DOORS vs Jama Connect

Compared 14% of the time

Jira vs Jama Connect

Compared 11% of the time

Polarion Requirements vs Jama Connect

Compared 9% of the time

IBM DOORS Next vs Jama Connect

Compared 8% of the time

Orcanos ALM vs Jama Connect

Compared 3% of the time

More Jama Connect Competitors

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs OpenText Application Quality Management

Compared 24% of the time

Jira vs OpenText Application Quality Management

Compared 5% of the time

Zephyr Enterprise vs OpenText Application Quality Management

Compared 4% of the time

OpenText Software Delivery Management vs OpenText Application Quality Management

Compared 3% of the time

More OpenText Application Quality Management Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Jama Connect

August 2026

Download Jama Connect product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Application Quality Management

July 2026

OpenText Application Quality Management report

Download OpenText Application Quality Management product report

Also Known As

No data available

Micro Focus ALM Quality Center, HPE ALM, Quality Center, Quality Center, Micro Focus ALM, OpenText Quality Manager

Overview

Jama Connect is a requirements and test management platform with robust traceability and a user-friendly interface, providing tools for regulatory compliance and enhanced project tracking within workflows.

Jama Connect offers comprehensive management of requirements, test cases, and change processes. The platform enhances traceability with visibility into documentation and integrates seamlessly for data management in regulated industries. Its real-time dashboard and impact analysis tools help in informed decision-making. Despite some collaboration and interface limits, Jama Connect supports lifecycle management through efficient document and specification tracking, integrating with solutions like Google App Store and Microsoft Azure.

What are the Key Features of Jama Connect?

Traceability: Provides detailed tracking and documentation management.
User-Friendly Navigation: Easy-to-use interface that simplifies workflow.
Test Management: Modular test tools streamline processes.
Integration: Compatible with various data management tools, essential for compliance.
Impact Analysis: Informs critical decision-making.

What are the Benefits and ROI in Using Jama Connect?

Efficiency: Consolidates requirements and test cases to boost productivity.
Regulatory Compliance: Templates and tools ensure adherence to standards.
Enhanced Collaboration: Facilitates teamwork across projects.
Real-Time Insights: Dashboards offer immediate data for decision-making.
Lifecycle Support: Manages the full product lifecycle from documentation to validation.

Healthcare and regulated industries utilize Jama Connect to manage requirements and integrate workflows while ensuring compliance. Its features are tailored to support the complex documentation and validation demands of these sectors, improving traceability and lifecycle management.

Jama

OpenText Application Quality Management offers centralized data management, traceability, and integration capabilities. It aids in handling requirements, test planning, and defect tracking while supporting both manual and automated testing. Challenges exist in deployment and browser compatibility.

Known for its robust reporting and flexibility, OpenText Application Quality Management is tailored for large organizations requiring a comprehensive solution supporting lifecycle coverage and seamless tool integration. Users can consolidate testing processes, manage requirements, and centralize reporting across manual and automated testing. While some face issues with project tracking, outdated interfaces, and limited browser compatibility beyond Internet Explorer, it remains widely used for regression and performance testing. Integration with tools like JIRA and support for tools such as UFT and ALM PC underscore its utility.

What are the key features of OpenText Application Quality Management?

Centralized Data Management: Consolidates and organizes testing data efficiently.
Traceability: Ensures traceability across all stages of the testing lifecycle.
Integration Capabilities: Connects seamlessly with automation and other essential tools.
Test Planning and Execution: Supports both manual and automated tests in a streamlined manner.
Advanced Reporting: Provides robust options to generate insightful test reports.
Customization: Offers tailored solutions to fit specific organizational needs.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Efficiency: Increases test management efficiency across projects.
Scalability: Adapts to the varying scope of large-scale projects.
Lifecycle Coverage: Comprehensive management from requirement to defect tracking.
User-Friendly Interface: Designed for ease of use despite needing updates.
Cost-Effectiveness: Balances high initial costs with long-term savings through efficient testing management.

In industries such as finance and healthcare, OpenText Application Quality Management is implemented to ensure rigorous testing standards. It supports test case creation and execution, defect tracking, and requirements management. Integration with JIRA and performance testing tools make it suitable for organizations needing synchronized testing environments.

OpenText

Sample Customers

Deloitte, SpaceX, Omnigon, Delft University

Airbus Defense and Space, Vodafone, JTI, Xellia, and Banco de Creìdito e Inversiones (Bci)

Buyer's Guide

Jama Connect vs. OpenText Application Quality Management

August 2026

Free Report: Jama Connect vs. OpenText Application Quality Management

Find out what your peers are saying about Jama Connect vs. OpenText Application Quality Management and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

908,834 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Jama Connect vs. OpenText Application Quality Management report.

See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors.

We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.