Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise pros and cons

One of the most valuable features of this solution is recording and replaying, and the fact that there are multiple options available to do this.

We have a centralized delivery team and we are able to meet enterprise requirements, which include different types of protocols that are involved, including scripting. The technology supports that and enables us to have a wider range of testing. Enterprise-level testing is something that we are satisfied with.

I think the number one feature everybody likes is the capability to easily generate virtual users as well as the reporting.

The most valuable part of the product is the way you can scale the basic testing easily.

Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise Is very user-friendly.

Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise supports a lot of technologies. The existing performance testing that this tool is capable of is good. The protocols that are available are widely varied when compared to other performance testing tools.

The product is good, and the concept is good as well.

The user interface is fine.

Micro Focus needs to improve in terms of support. With the same support plan but when the product was owned by HP, support was more responsive and better coordinated.

It would be good if we could look forward at the future technology needs we have. I would like to see Micro Focus provide more customer awareness around how LoadRunner can fulfill requirements with Big Data use cases, for example, where you do performance testing at the scale of data lakes... when it comes to technologies our company has yet to adopt, I would like to see an indication from Micro Focus of how one does performance testing and what kinds of challenges can we foresee. Those kinds of studies would really help us.

It's not that popular on the cloud.

Third-party product integrations could be a little more slickly handled.

The reporting has room for improvement.

Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise needs to add more features for Citrix performance-based applications testing. This was one of the challenges we observed. Additionally, we experienced some APIs challenges.

The installation has not been straightforward, and we have had so many problems. We have had to re-install, try to install on a different machine, etc. We have not been able to launch the LRE server itself yet.

I believe the data that demonstrates the automated correlations should be corrected.