No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) pros and cons

Vendor: OpenText

4.1 out of 5

86 reviews
89% willing to recommend

Pros & Cons summary

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) offers centralized performance testing and supports many protocols, enhancing versatility and eliminating extra training. It integrates easily with Dynatrace and Splunk. Scalability allows testing of diverse applications, while its detailed analysis aids reporting. However, users criticize its technical support, high pricing, and resource usage issues. Enhancements are needed for reporting flexibility and out-of-the-box tool integrations without excessive customization.

Buyer's Guide

Get pricing advice, tips, use cases and valuable features from real users of this product.

Prominent pros & cons

PROS

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) provides a centralized location for testing, enabling agile, on-demand performance testing and trend analysis.

The analysis tool in LoadRunner Enterprise is highly valued for its capability to provide detailed reporting and analysis after test runs.

LoadRunner Enterprise supports a wide range of protocols and technologies, making it versatile and eliminating the need for training teams on multiple tools.

The scalability of LoadRunner Enterprise allows the simulation of tens of thousands of virtual users, enhancing the ability to test various applications, including web-based, SAP, Oracle, and others.

LoadRunner Enterprise offers easy integration with third-party tools, such as Dynatrace and Splunk, which simplifies the performance testing process and enhances reporting accuracy.

CONS

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) has integrations with continuous testing tools, but users would prefer out-of-the-box solutions without customization.

The technical support provided by OpenText has been criticized as being poor and not as responsive or coordinated as before.

Users find the pricing of OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) to be high, leading some companies to switch to alternative tools due to cost.

There is room for improvement in scalability and cost optimization, as resource usage with certain protocols can be excessive.

Reporting capabilities in OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) need to be enhanced for better usability and flexibility.

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) Pros review quotes

VK

A VP at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Jul 20, 2026

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) helps us to identify the hotspots from the applications during peak times through the LRE simulation.

Read full review

reviewer2668566

Founder & Chief Executive Officer at a tech vendor with 11-50 employees

Jul 31, 2025

I have seen an ROI from this tool, as it provides enormous value; it ensures that you are not setting yourself up for failure and functions as an insurance.

Read full review

PS

Poonam Saindane

Test Manager at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Oct 23, 2024

LoadRunner's UI is project-convenient, allowing easier simulation of real-time scenarios and producing comprehensive reports that are effortless to read.

Read full review

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Free Report: OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) Reviews and More

Learn what your peers think about OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise). Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: July 2026.

907,664 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Chief Executive Officer at iqst

Feb 27, 2024

Now that LoadRunner integrates with Dynatrace and other monitoring tools, it simplifies the process of integration into a company, taking merely five minutes to set up. This ease of integration allows for quick comparison of monitoring and performance results, a feature I highly appreciate.

Read full review

reviewer2297829

Senior systems engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Oct 20, 2023

It is pretty easy to do test execution and results analysis. When it comes to scenario settings, LoadRunner Enterprise has an extra edge over other testing tools in the industry. The scenario setup is easy, and in terms of execution, we have a clear idea of what is happening

Read full review

KM

Senior Performace Engineer at Yolandi,miller@multichoice.co.za

Feb 28, 2024

For me, LoadRunner stands out, especially with its reporting capabilities, the graphs that can be generated, and the unique feature of measuring our application's response alongside our infrastructure metrics, such as CPU, memory, or disk usage, all presented in graph form. This is something other applications struggle to match.

Read full review

Lead solutions architect at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees

Oct 20, 2023

For me, the test coverage and the performance and load testing aspects are valuable.

Read full review

LS

Luke Steinmetzer

System administrator at Costco Wholesale

Oct 20, 2023

We haven't had an outage since we started using the solution.

Read full review

Advisor at Fiserv

Oct 20, 2023

The tool's most valuable features are scripting, correlations, and parameterization. Debugging is also easy.

Read full review

reviewer2297832

Director of Performance Testing at a healthcare company with 11-50 employees

Oct 20, 2023

The solution supports a number of protocols.

Read full review

Show 10 more reviews (out of 83)

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) Cons review quotes

VK

A VP at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Jul 20, 2026

Regarding OpenText technical support, I find it very pathetic.

Read full review

reviewer2668566

Founder & Chief Executive Officer at a tech vendor with 11-50 employees

Jul 31, 2025

From time to time, we encounter bugs that are unexpected from a 20-plus years old solution.

Read full review

PS

Poonam Saindane

Test Manager at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Oct 23, 2024

Many of my customers have had to switch to different tools due to the cost of LoadRunner, despite its advantages, leading them to alternatives like JMeter and RPT.

Read full review

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Free Report: OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) Reviews and More

Learn what your peers think about OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise). Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: July 2026.

907,664 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Chief Executive Officer at iqst

Feb 27, 2024

It would be beneficial if LoadRunner could optimize resource usage, especially for protocols that require significant resources, like TrueClient, which interacts directly with the UI. If they could improve resource usage, like ingest or for the load generator, using less CPU or RAM memory, that would be great. That's where I have problems.

Read full review

reviewer2297829

Senior systems engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Oct 20, 2023

When we have a new application, recording the application is a pretty tough task. We have tried multiple things. We do scripting or try to record with different settings and on different machines. We try to record multiple times, but we do not know why it is recording and why it is not recording. We do the same thing on different machines. It sometimes records, and at other times, it does not. That is one of the major concerns.

Read full review

KM

Senior Performace Engineer at Yolandi,miller@multichoice.co.za

Feb 28, 2024

I'd rate the scalability a six out of ten. The main reason is that it's a very expensive application. Other companies might not be able to afford it. For example, if we need to test an application with 10,000 concurrent users, the license can cost a lot of money. That's where OpenText tools shoot themselves in the foot compared to other tools. Because of the price, many companies, like one I used to work for, decided not to renew their licenses and switched to open-source testing tools.

Read full review

Lead solutions architect at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees

Oct 20, 2023

After they get over the acquisition, the first improvement is going to be tailoring it for their existing stack of other products. How would LoadRunner work for Documentum? How would it work for Business Network? How would it work for other apps? They can have a pre-package or a guide because they are all in the same family as opposed to being outside.

Read full review

LS

Luke Steinmetzer

System administrator at Costco Wholesale

Oct 20, 2023

The product's scalability must be improved.

Read full review

Advisor at Fiserv

Oct 20, 2023

The debugging feature needs to include graphs.

Read full review

reviewer2297832

Director of Performance Testing at a healthcare company with 11-50 employees

Oct 20, 2023

The process of upgrading LoadRunner can be difficult and time-consuming.

Read full review

Show 10 more reviews (out of 83)

Product Categories

Product Categories

Performance Testing Tools

Load Testing Tools

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons

Apache JMeter vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Tricentis NeoLoad vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Perfecto vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

BlazeMeter vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

ReadyAPI vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Appvance AIQ Platform vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Telerik Test Studio vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Oracle Application Testing Suite vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

IBM Rational Test Workbench vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

IBM Engineering Test Management vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

k6 Open Source vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

RadView WebLOAD vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Akamai CloudTest vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

See all alternatives

Product Categories

Product Categories

Performance Testing Tools

Load Testing Tools

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons

Apache JMeter vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Tricentis NeoLoad vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Perfecto vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

BlazeMeter vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

ReadyAPI vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Appvance AIQ Platform vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Telerik Test Studio vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Oracle Application Testing Suite vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

IBM Rational Test Workbench vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

IBM Engineering Test Management vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

k6 Open Source vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

RadView WebLOAD vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Akamai CloudTest vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

See all alternatives

Related questions

80

When evaluating Load Testing Tools, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?

100

SOAtest vs. SoapUI NG Pro?

64

Does Compuware have a manual testing solution? Which manual testing solutions should we be considering?

91

What are the top performance tools available to load test web applications?

79

What is the best tool for mobile native performance testing on real devices?

83

When evaluating Performance Testing Tools, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?

100

Cost of TOSCA Testsuite?

183

Do you have an RFP template for Testing Tools which you can share?

63

Specflow vs Selenium

82

What are the best performance testing tools?