Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) pros and cons

Vendor: OpenText

4.2 out of 5

83 reviews
90% willing to recommend

Pros & Cons summary

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) provides a centralized testing platform, supports diverse applications and protocols, and manages extensive virtual user creation. Integration with tools like Dynatrace enhances monitoring, but users report high costs, tricky setup, poor technical support, and cloud integration challenges. Resource optimization and AWS integration need enhancement. Despite efficient version upgrades, some users consider JMeter due to cost and performance issues, seeking improved responsiveness and coordination.

Buyer's Guide

Get pricing advice, tips, use cases and valuable features from real users of this product.

Prominent pros & cons

PROS

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) offers centralized testing, allowing agile and on-demand performance tests.

The tool supports a wide variety of applications, including SAP, Oracle, web services, and mobile-based testing, making it versatile for enterprise needs.

LoadRunner Enterprise excels in scaling and generating virtual users for extensive load testing, with capabilities to utilize tens of thousands of virtual users.

The integration with third-party tools like Dynatrace and Splunk is seamless, providing valuable insights for monitoring and performance comparisons.

Users appreciate its flexibility and versatility, accommodating various protocols and testing scenarios effectively.

CONS

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) is considered very expensive compared to other tools, prompting some companies to switch to open-source alternatives.

There are challenges with integrating third-party products and some monitoring tools, making the setup process tricky.

The technical support provided by OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) is less responsive than it was under HP, and better coordination is needed.

A major concern is the resource usage for certain protocols like TrueClient, which requires significant CPU and RAM.

There are issues with recording scripts when a new application is tested, leading to inconsistent results.

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) Pros review quotes

Lead solutions architect at Capgemini

Oct 20, 2023

For me, the test coverage and the performance and load testing aspects are valuable.

Read full review

NJ

Performance Test Lead at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

May 24, 2021

One of the most valuable features of this solution is recording and replaying, and the fact that there are multiple options available to do this.

Read full review

reviewer2297829

Senior systems engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Oct 20, 2023

It is pretty easy to do test execution and results analysis. When it comes to scenario settings, LoadRunner Enterprise has an extra edge over other testing tools in the industry. The scenario setup is easy, and in terms of execution, we have a clear idea of what is happening

Read full review

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Free Report: OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) Reviews and More

Learn what your peers think about OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise). Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: July 2025.

862,514 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Chief Executive Officer at iqst

Feb 27, 2024

Now that LoadRunner integrates with Dynatrace and other monitoring tools, it simplifies the process of integration into a company, taking merely five minutes to set up. This ease of integration allows for quick comparison of monitoring and performance results, a feature I highly appreciate.

Read full review

KM

Senior Performace Engineer at Yolandi,miller@multichoice.co.za

Feb 28, 2024

For me, LoadRunner stands out, especially with its reporting capabilities, the graphs that can be generated, and the unique feature of measuring our application's response alongside our infrastructure metrics, such as CPU, memory, or disk usage, all presented in graph form. This is something other applications struggle to match.

Read full review

Sreenivasula Mukkamalla

Sr.Engineer csit Quality Assurance at Verizon

Aug 5, 2022

What I like most in Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise is the comparison between two different exhibitions which gives value to my company. I also like that the solution is user-friendly, especially in terms of making specific changes. For example, in the past, you can't see the changes when you upload scripts into the Performance Center, but now, it has that visibility, so whenever you want, you can change the script in the Performance Center. I also like that Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise is the only tool you can utilize for all your needs, even for different protocols and scripting. The solution also has the latest features, for example, networkability, where it can, within the UI, follow the waterfall model. You can use the insights in the Performance Center of Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise to address or test URLs that usually take up much time.

Read full review

RM

Senior Consultant at a computer software company with 5,001-10,000 employees

Nov 13, 2019

This product is better oriented to large, enterprise-oriented organizations.

Read full review

IT Manager at Vodafone

May 24, 2017

It allows you to work out how well you are doing project-wise because you see the number of scripts done, the number of tests run, and whether you have mapped all your requirements to it.

Read full review

Senior IT Process Analyst at a energy/utilities company with 10,001+ employees

Jun 15, 2021

We have a centralized delivery team and we are able to meet enterprise requirements, which include different types of protocols that are involved, including scripting. The technology supports that and enables us to have a wider range of testing. Enterprise-level testing is something that we are satisfied with.

Read full review

Performance lead at a healthcare company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Sep 19, 2017

It's a very powerful tool.

Read full review

Show 10 more reviews (out of 50)

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) Cons review quotes

Lead solutions architect at Capgemini

Oct 20, 2023

After they get over the acquisition, the first improvement is going to be tailoring it for their existing stack of other products. How would LoadRunner work for Documentum? How would it work for Business Network? How would it work for other apps? They can have a pre-package or a guide because they are all in the same family as opposed to being outside.

Read full review

NJ

Performance Test Lead at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

May 24, 2021

OpenText needs to improve in terms of support. With the same support plan but when the product was owned by HP, support was more responsive and better coordinated.

Read full review

reviewer2297829

Senior systems engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Oct 20, 2023

When we have a new application, recording the application is a pretty tough task. We have tried multiple things. We do scripting or try to record with different settings and on different machines. We try to record multiple times, but we do not know why it is recording and why it is not recording. We do the same thing on different machines. It sometimes records, and at other times, it does not. That is one of the major concerns.

Read full review

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Free Report: OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) Reviews and More

Learn what your peers think about OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise). Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: July 2025.

862,514 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Chief Executive Officer at iqst

Feb 27, 2024

It would be beneficial if LoadRunner could optimize resource usage, especially for protocols that require significant resources, like TrueClient, which interacts directly with the UI. If they could improve resource usage, like ingest or for the load generator, using less CPU or RAM memory, that would be great. That's where I have problems.

Read full review

KM

Senior Performace Engineer at Yolandi,miller@multichoice.co.za

Feb 28, 2024

I'd rate the scalability a six out of ten. The main reason is that it's a very expensive application. Other companies might not be able to afford it. For example, if we need to test an application with 10,000 concurrent users, the license can cost a lot of money. That's where OpenText tools shoot themselves in the foot compared to other tools. Because of the price, many companies, like one I used to work for, decided not to renew their licenses and switched to open-source testing tools.

Read full review

Sreenivasula Mukkamalla

Sr.Engineer csit Quality Assurance at Verizon

Aug 5, 2022

A room for improvement in Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise is that it should take multiple exhibitions for a particular scenario and have automatic trending for that. This will be a very useful feature that lets users look into how many exhibitions happened for the scenario and their performance, and you should be able to see the data within the Performance Center dashboard. For example, there's one scenario I'm focusing on multiple times in a month, and if I check five times, there's no way for me to see the trend and find out how it went with those five exhibitions. It would be great if the Performance Center has a view of all five exhibitions, particularly transaction by transaction, and how they happened. If Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise shows you the time trends, information about one exhibition to another, and how each performed, it'll be an immense feature, and that should be visible to every user. Reporting should be simpler in Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise. If I did a scenario with one exhibition now, and I did that scenario again, then I should be able to schedule that scenario for the exhibition, and if that scenario is executed multiple times, there should be the option to turn it into a single view that shows you all the transactions, how the performance was, what the trend graph is for a particular time, etc.

Read full review

RM

Senior Consultant at a computer software company with 5,001-10,000 employees

Nov 13, 2019

While the stability is generally good, there are a few strange issues that crop up unexpectedly which affect consistent use of the product.

Read full review

IT Manager at Vodafone

May 24, 2017

The worst thing about it is it did not have zero footprint on your PC.

Read full review

Senior IT Process Analyst at a energy/utilities company with 10,001+ employees

Jun 15, 2021

It would be good if we could look forward at the future technology needs we have. I would like to see Micro Focus provide more customer awareness around how LoadRunner can fulfill requirements with Big Data use cases, for example, where you do performance testing at the scale of data lakes... when it comes to technologies our company has yet to adopt, I would like to see an indication from Micro Focus of how one does performance testing and what kinds of challenges can we foresee. Those kinds of studies would really help us.

Read full review

Performance lead at a healthcare company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Sep 19, 2017

I think better or more integration with some of the monitoring tools that we're considering.

Read full review

Show 10 more reviews (out of 50)

Product Categories

Product Categories

Performance Testing Tools

Load Testing Tools

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons

Apache JMeter vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Tricentis NeoLoad vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Perfecto vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

BlazeMeter vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

ReadyAPI vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

k6 Open Source vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Appvance AIQ Platform vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Eggplant Performance vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

RadView WebLOAD vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Akamai CloudTest vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

SmartBear LoadNinja vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

IBM Rational Test Workbench vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Automai AppLoader vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

See all alternatives

Product Categories

Product Categories

Performance Testing Tools

Load Testing Tools

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons

Apache JMeter vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Tricentis NeoLoad vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Perfecto vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

BlazeMeter vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

ReadyAPI vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

k6 Open Source vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Appvance AIQ Platform vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Eggplant Performance vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

RadView WebLOAD vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Akamai CloudTest vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

SmartBear LoadNinja vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

IBM Rational Test Workbench vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Automai AppLoader vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

See all alternatives

Related questions

17

When evaluating Load Testing Tools, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?

19

SOAtest vs. SoapUI NG Pro?

8

Does Compuware have a manual testing solution? Which manual testing solutions should we be considering?

29

What are the top performance tools available to load test web applications?

27

What is the best tool for mobile native performance testing on real devices?

7

When evaluating Performance Testing Tools, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?

128

Cost of TOSCA Testsuite?

218

Do you have an RFP template for Testing Tools which you can share?

75

Specflow vs Selenium

32

What are the best performance testing tools?