OpenText Content Manager delivers comprehensive document and information management with advanced security and retention functionalities.


| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| OpenText Content Manager | 4.0% |
| SharePoint | 11.4% |
| OpenText Content Management | 7.2% |
| Other | 77.4% |
| Type | Title | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Enterprise Content Management | Apr 29, 2026 | Download |
| Product | Reviews, tips, and advice from real users | Apr 29, 2026 | Download |
| Comparison | OpenText Content Manager vs SharePoint | Apr 29, 2026 | Download |
| Comparison | OpenText Content Manager vs Alfresco | Apr 29, 2026 | Download |
| Comparison | OpenText Content Manager vs IBM FileNet | Apr 29, 2026 | Download |
| Title | Rating | Mindshare | Recommending | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SharePoint | 3.9 | 11.4% | 79% | 165 interviewsAdd to research |
| Hyland OnBase | 4.0 | 5.3% | 100% | 15 interviewsAdd to research |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 8 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 6 |
| Large Enterprise | 6 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 101 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 67 |
| Large Enterprise | 213 |
OpenText Content Manager is a key player in enterprise content and records management. By integrating well with tools like SharePoint and Microsoft Office, it supports metadata search, audit trails, and document lifecycle management. Its drag-and-drop functionality aids in managing both paper and electronic records efficiently. Compliance with standards, combined with automated notifications for destruction and retention, enhances its efficiency. Although integration with other systems and ERP-like features for legal processes needs improvement, it remains a robust solution for content classification, tracking, and document security.
What are the key features?In industries such as legal and engineering, OpenText Content Manager is vital for document archival and digital information handling. Sectors like SAP and Salesforce leverage it for data governance, content classification, and streamlined workflows. Organizations rely on it to bolster document security and facilitate content approval processes.
OpenText Content Manager was previously known as Micro Focus Content Manager, HPE Records Manager, HPE Content Manager.
Missouri State Courts
| Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
|---|---|---|
| Records Management Officer at ANZPAA | 4.5 | As an administrator using OpenText Content Manager, I focus on BCS restructuring, records disposal, and data governance. The system excels in disposal and retention management but lacks online collaboration capabilities and stable Microsoft add-ins. It's a solid but less contemporary tool. |
| Enterprise Information Manager in Practice at Mannai | 4.0 | We use OpenText Content Manager for managing enterprise content and engineering document management. Its stability, reliability, and workflow engine are valuable, but pricing, user-friendliness, and support need improvement. We see ROI but lack specific figures. |
| Area Director at Avvale | 4.5 | I use OpenText Content Manager for organizing and securing documents with streamlined workflows and metadata management. It effectively supports large companies globally and is user-friendly, outperforming SharePoint and IBM, though initial support response could be improved. |
| Partner and Co-founder at Adnate IT Solutions | 5.0 | We use OpenText Content Manager for document management across SAP and Salesforce, finding it valuable for automation, change tracking, and classification, boosting efficiency by 50-60%. However, its user interface and installation process need improvement. Overall, it provides good ROI. |
| Senior Data Analyst at Belhopat Global Services Private Limited | 4.0 | I use OpenText Content Manager for document storage and workflows at my company, appreciating its connectors with SAP and Salesforce. While stability can improve, it provides value with easy access, version control, and strong document security. |
| Consultant at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees | 3.5 | OpenText Content Manager has a robust security infrastructure but complex permission setup compared to SharePoint. Despite being more secure, it lacks user-friendliness. We previously used IBM FinNet and Documentum and are exploring alternatives like Knoxysco for ACR. |
| Director at a tech services company with 11-50 employees | 3.5 | I use this stable and scalable solution for digital records management, appreciating its retention features and workflows. While it's a mature improvement over SharePoint, I feel ease of use and mobility access need addressing. |
| IT Director / CIO at Matanuska-Sustina Borough | 1.5 | We primarily use HPE-CM for mandatory Records Management. While it has robust search, it's a client-side app with difficult integration and poor US support. Setup and training have been challenging for our users. |