OpenText Content Manager and Adobe Experience Manager compete in the content management system sector. Based on the features, Adobe Experience Manager holds an advantage in digital marketing capabilities with its strong integration with Adobe's cloud products.
Features: OpenText Content Manager provides strong document management and lifecycle compliance, robust retention, and search capabilities, with integration with SharePoint. It is ideal for legal and government use. Adobe Experience Manager excels in asset management, extensibility, and ease of content creation, integrating with Adobe Analytics and Campaigns for enhanced digital marketing.
Room for Improvement: OpenText Content Manager struggles with user-friendliness, complex security models, and needs improved Microsoft integration. Adobe Experience Manager could enhance integration with non-Adobe products, simplify coding for marketers, and improve support and documentation, especially for less technical users.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Content Manager offers on-premises and hybrid cloud options but suffers from slower, less thorough support. Adobe Experience Manager provides flexibility with private and public cloud options but faces criticism for high deployment complexity, cost, and slower support response times.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText Content Manager generally offers more favorable pricing models compared to Adobe Experience Manager, known for higher costs and complexity. Both systems can deliver significant ROI, with OpenText showing value in comprehensive information management and Adobe Experience Manager excelling in digital content and marketing functionalities.
They are attentive to big companies but tend to be negligent towards mid-sized companies.
There are Adobe engineers, sales representatives, and engineers assigned to Sephora North America.
They are always supportive.
You cannot simply add more servers without purchasing the license.
The scalability of Adobe Experience Manager is pretty good because we have so many engineers that are knowledgeable about and have experience in altering the Adobe Experience Manager system.
Since they are enterprise and have significant digital business coming through the digital medium, the stability of the product is very important.
Technical support could be improved, especially for smaller companies.
Many people complain about the price as it's one of the most expensive tools.
There is a feature missing where if content is created on the UAT environment and needs to be transferred or synced to the production environment, there is no direct way of doing the sync.
Adobe Experience Manager is expensive compared to competitors.
For large enterprises, the cost is often comparable with other major CMSs.
Feature-wise, I believe the dispatcher module is the best aspect of Adobe Experience Manager.
The integration of customer behavior and website setup is impressive.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| OpenText Content Manager | 5.0% |
| Adobe Experience Manager | 3.2% |
| Other | 91.8% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 5 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 14 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 8 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 6 |
| Large Enterprise | 8 |
Adobe Communique 5 (Adobe CQ5), currently manifested as Adobe Experience Manager (AEM), is a web-based content management system which is developed to help businesses in offering high-end digital experience to their customers.
OpenText Content Manager, formerly Records Manager, is a governance-based enterprise content management system designed to help government agencies, regulated industries and global organizations manage their business content from creation to disposal. Regardless of how you create and collaborate on your content, Content Manager gives you the ability to leverage accurate, contextual, and complete information throughout its lifecycle. Managing your content in this way helps you significantly improve services to your customers, business decisions and insight for future strategy.
We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
