Kaspersky Next XDR Optimum Reviews

For Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business, my major use case is for endpoint security, monitoring, security updates, and antivirus.

The best features in Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business are the file threat protection, web threat protection, mail threat protection, network threat protection, firewall, behavior detection, and exploit prevention. These are the main features of the security which we have.

The security administrator daily logs in and checks the endpoint security console and advises users about the updates and everything.

I previously mentioned that Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business doesn't have built-in DLP, which was a concern. I think they could add it in the future; however, antivirus cannot provide a proper DLP solution, but they can offer a mix of DLP, similar to Trend Micro Apex One, which provides some sort of DLP file management.

Nonetheless, we need a proper DLP solution such as Forcepoint or Symantec, whichever suits us. We'll be conducting performance evaluation in the next quarter while working on other projects.

More value means a better GUI, user interface, and comprehensive reporting capabilities. In Sophos, we receive a daily system-generated report about what is happening, plus an alert system. The reporting system in Trend Micro is also excellent; I receive an email every day at 10:00 AM with a report for the last 24 hours.

Both scalability and stability of Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business are solid. We have explored many options over the last two years for industrial cybersecurity. I spent a significant amount of time in Dubai with the Kaspersky team and during online calls, ultimately receiving a quote of $1.6 million.

I would rate technical support from Kaspersky a nine out of ten.

Positive

The installation of Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is very straightforward.

We are using Microsoft for email security, specifically Microsoft Office 365, and we are using Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business only for endpoint protection.

The scanning patch management capabilities within Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business are good, but Trend Micro patch management with its real-time virtual patching system is better.

Trend Micro is expensive, while Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is not expensive.

For mail security involving Microsoft Office 365, we are not working with the same product or another product as security for the mail server.

Behavioral analysis and firewall management measures help to prevent cyber-attacks within our company, as we have multiple types of firewalls, including Sophos and FortiGate, and we are also using the FortiNet OT firewalls because it's an industrial group and we have implemented operational technology cybersecurity.

We are using whatever is available in the system for encryption tools within Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business.

We are not using encryption tools for securing our company's sensitive data, both in transit and at rest. We are planning to implement a DLP solution for data at rest and data in motion, exploring options and have shortlisted two vendors: Forcepoint and Symantec for that purpose.

Virtual patching with Trend Micro is very simple because it's available on the console, allowing users to update the patches and critical updates easily. I can just click on the control panel, update virtual patches, and after some time, we will update the entire system with actual patching. We patch three times a day if critical updates come. It's very easy to use and implement.

The purpose for which we have acquired Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is being served well. Additionally, we have also implemented SOC and a SIEM solution, contributing to a very good security posture in our organization, which we are daily improving at each level.

I rate Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business eight out of ten. It is a good company providing support, and everything is good, but we want more value from the solution.

The primary use case for Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is scanning and utilizing its capabilities to secure our network, which involves restricting the use of flash memory and ensuring that the system is operating on the latest antivirus version.

Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is easy to implement and has a user-friendly interface. It stands out as an antivirus and malware protection solution due to its extensive feeds and resources for antivirus signatures. These capabilities enable effective malware protection. 

Additionally, it offers scalability as any endpoint added to Active Directory can be easily integrated by Kaspersky Security Center. Its straightforward deployment and ease of management are other valuable features. It does not require an advanced engineer to manage, and resources are readily available online, making it accessible and scalable.

Kaspersky needs to improve its security techniques as it has not been in Gartner records for the last two years. There is also a need to enhance its behavior analytics and integration capabilities.

I have been working with Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business for almost six months.

There have been performance issues during scanning, causing the PC to respond slowly.

The solution is easily scalable. Any endpoint added to Active Directory can be detected by Kaspersky Security Center, which can then push the agent onto it.

The technical support from Kaspersky was very responsive and did not take long to resolve issues.

Neutral

The initial setup was not complex, and the deployment was easy.

Only one person was required for the Kaspersky deployment.

The pricing and licensing cost of Kaspersky Endpoint Security is cheaper compared to Trend Micro.

Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is easy to manage, not requiring an advanced engineer. Anyone can manage it by reading the manual and watching instructional videos. 

I would rate it a seven out of ten and recommend it for small networks where customers prefer not to spend a lot.

I use Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business for threat management in our organization. It is deployed on our server to manage users and offer endpoint security.

The most valuable features include the ability to upgrade and update all users from one console and to install the solution remotely.

I have some PCs with one gigabyte of RAM, and it's not easy to set up Kaspersky on these. Additionally, I want to improve how viruses are isolated and receive better notifications.

I have been using Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business for three years.

The stability of Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is good, and I would rate it an eight out of ten.

The scalability of Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is also at eight out of ten.

I do not talk directly with Kaspersky support. We work with the company from which we purchased the product. Currently, I have a problem because my license expired, and the company has not supported extending my license.

Positive

The initial setup was easy and straightforward to deploy.

The pricing of Kaspersky is good, and I rate it an eight out of ten. Our current licensing costs are one hundred dollars per user for three hundred users, which was established three years ago.

I have compared Kaspersky with other products such as Fortinet and Telerix.

I recommend Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business for small companies because it's easy to use and the price is good.

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.

Our company sells solutions to other organizations, including government and private organizations. We cater Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business to enterprise and mid-scale organizations. Our company provides different types of cybersecurity solutions, including antiviruses, firewalls, anti-spam software, and others. 

Implementing Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business in a company enhances cybersecurity much better than other competitor solutions. 

Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business has models that provide more security than other solutions. For instance, the solutions' anti-phishing feature improves a company's complete security. The solution also provides security in emails, spam, phishing and in many other forms. 

The training provided by the vendor to resellers and end users needs to be improved. 

I have been using Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business for nearly five years. 

Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is scalable for numerous organizations and for multiple reasons. For example, the solution can be easily deployed across 10 to 100 endpoints and easily expanded to 200 to 300 endpoints. The solution can be deployed on the cloud as well as on-premises. I would rate the scalability a seven out of ten. The unsatisfactory training, when enhanced, will improve the scalability utilization across users. 

I would rate the technical support a seven out of ten. The response time needs to be improved by the support team, but the quality is satisfactory. 

Neutral

I would rate the initial setup a seven out of ten. The setup process is slightly difficult for Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business. The time to deploy depends on the number of endpoints, where each endpoint can be configured in five to ten minutes. 

A stable internet connection and an active license must be ensured before deploying Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business. 

The solution is available at a highly affordable price. Competitor solutions, such as Cisco's, are more expensive than Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business. The licensing cost of the solution varies from company to company, government organizations can procure the solution at a lower price in comparison to other private institutions such as banks.

Approximately, the license of the product for 100 endpoints will cost $35 for government institutions and $25 for private companies. The standard or basic license of the tool costs about $15 a year. For installation and technical support there are additional charges on top of the standard licensing fees for the product. 

I would advise others to deploy this solution in integration with other tools such as Fortinet and Sophos. I would recommend others to use Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business. There are no AI features in the solution at present. I would overall rate the product a nine out of ten. 

I primarily use this solution for security. 

I appreciate the good control it offers, which simplifies management. So, I feel confident using this solution.

We need a more complete Mobile Device Management (MDM) system.

I have been using Kaspersky for eight years. I use the latest version. 

I would rate the stability a nine out of ten.

There are around 500 to 1000 end users in our organization. I would rate the scalability an eight out of ten. It offers better scalability than CrowdStrike Falcon and other EDR solutions. 

I am planning to open a ticket. 

The installation was quite straightforward. The basic installation is quick. However, customization takes longer, especially with specific privacy settings and organization details.

As new business needs arise, we may need to adjust settings, control features, allow specific actions, or deny others. This is an ongoing process throughout the organization.

Our company handles the maintenance of this product. It's not complicated. The software is user-friendly.

We have about ten engineers on our technical team.

The pricing is in the middle. I would rate the pricing a seven out of ten, where one is expensive, and ten is cheap. 

There are no additional costs to the standard license. 

I recommend using Kaspersky. Overall, I would rate the solution an eight out of ten. There are a few things I'm not satisfied with that are included in the product. For example, the interface is not as flexible as I would like. 

They have been working on it for quite a few years now, and from the beginning, they have been pretty strong in database and network security. The security engine is updated very regularly. They stay on top of it, and if any new threat emerges, they quickly release patches to protect their machines and servers. 

If we compare their strength with that of other companies, like Trend Micro, Trend Micro is a bit faster in upgrading its engines. Trend Micro seems more powerful in stopping any kind of virus or attack, including ransomware and zero-day vulnerabilities. Trend Micro is more active than Kaspersky in this regard. Nonetheless, both are good products, but, Trend Micro currently has a slight edge over Kaspersky.

In EDR, they have a sandbox feature. Kaspersky's threat detection and response capability is very good, making it a strong feature.

Kaspersky used to have a feature for data recovery or data backup. Initially, their documentation mentioned this capability, allowing users to recover or back up their data within their systems. However, they have since removed this feature entirely and no longer offer it in any of their products, even as a separate service. This feature was quite helpful during attacks, as it allowed for the recovery of databases and other important data.

Kaspersky focuses on improving its security engines and ensuring timely updates. Its products, which used to be heavy and slow-down machines, have become much lighter and now have minimal impact on system performance. 

I have been using Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business as a partner for 15 years.

Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business offers two types of support. The first is free support, which may take some time to respond. The second option is paid support, which can be purchased directly from Kaspersky and includes various options. In case of emergencies, network compromises, or if you need help with integrations or policies, you can contact their support team. Their response time depends on the nature of your agreement, ranging from within an hour to within twenty-four hours. They offer different levels of support agreements to suit your needs.

Trend Micro is generally more expensive than Kaspersky. However, Kaspersky is less expensive than Trend Micro for some products, especially for small projects involving endpoint security.

Kaspersky doesn't have a solution that competes with Trend Micro's offerings. Trend Micro's XDR  feature is included in their version 1, which also includes endpoint security. This means that if you buy endpoint security from Trend Micro, you automatically get EDR. In contrast, with Kaspersky, you have to purchase EDR separately, as their endpoint security for business does not include EDR or XDR features.

The licensing models for both products are quite similar. Kaspersky uses a user-based license model.

One of my corporate clients, who has about 150 licenses, recently purchased Kaspersky. Prior to this, they experienced a ransomware attack, which resulted in the loss of their database, servers, and all the information stored on their machines. 

The value of the database and information depends on how critical the client considers their data and emails to be. The potential loss from an attack can be substantial, making it essential to invest in robust security measures. When considering the ROI, Kaspersky can deliver ROI within a year. Recovering from a data loss incident requires significant time, effort, money, and expertise. 

The product is expensive.

If you buy a bundle such as XDR, you purchase per-user licenses. This bundle includes other product features like Endpoint Security and EDR. Therefore, regardless of the specific product you are buying, you will purchase it on a per-user license basis

Kaspersky has become much easier to use. It's very user-friendly. On its website, Kaspersky offers a variety of datasheets, installation guides, and user guides. By following these resources, you can handle the installation on your own. However, if you have an expert or certified engineer in endpoint security, the integration, installation, and configuration process becomes quite easy.

A notable feature is the management console or dashboard. Even if you are using three or four different licenses for your network and subnetworks that are connected to a centralized network but located in different parts of the country, you can manage everything from a single console. You don't need to install a separate console for each license. For instance, if a company has about a thousand users spread out geographically and wants to purchase multiple licenses.

I recommend this solution.

If a company can afford it and is willing to spend more, I suggest considering Trend Micro. However, if they choose Kaspersky, I recommend opting for their high-end solutions like Data or XDR, depending on their budget.

Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

I used the solution to manage the server and push the policies that we had on the computer through the network agent. I also used the tool to remediate from the server the vulnerabilities that were detected. If they were more complicated, I would just go to the computer and try to fix them.

Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is a very good and reliable product. The only reason why we left it was because of the EDR. It is a useful tool for software deployment. The computer used to connect to the server with the public IP, so it was very useful. When the computer is not connected to the VPN, I can use that computer to do the troubleshooting I need to do.

I can use Kaspersky to easily connect to the computer and push the software with the script I created. In the beginning, we used to deploy the OS on computers. After we implemented the Microsoft MDT, we left the deployment. The functionality is still good, but we have another tool for that.

It would be good if Kaspersky could lower the solution's price so people could afford to buy the licenses.

I have been using Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business for seven years.

I rate the solution a nine out of ten for stability.

Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is a scalable solution.

I contacted the technical support team only once, and they helped to fix my issue.

Positive

I've heard from my manager that the solution is expensive.

I used to open the security console center every day. When I opened the console, I could see all the issues and vulnerabilities with the antivirus or with the software on the workstations. From there, I could fix them myself or go to the computer and directly fix them. The solution was very clear to understand and manage.

I could easily do everything required by the workstation security, even managing the exceptions in the firewall. I could easily find help from the solution's website.

I would recommend the solution to other users because it's a very good product. People generally look for product quality and price. It would be good if Kaspersky could lower the solution's price so people could afford to buy the licenses.

The firewall was sometimes difficult to manage. Understanding how exactly it works is a bit complicated, and you have to go through the documentation for that.

Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

We're using Kaspersky on our server and some clients. It is the only security solution we have for these systems. We manage website categories through it, similar to how some website brands manage their categories. For example, we categorize websites like Facebook. Our approach to website management may differ slightly.

Kaspersky provides robust protection. It allows us to manage 30 clients from a single PC. We monitor and block data transfers via USB to prevent virus infections and other threats. 

Kaspersky includes web protection and user protection features. Web threat protection ensures that users are immediately protected whenever they browse the internet and encounter potentially harmful websites. This process helps safeguard users, and Kaspersky certifies websites to enhance the browsing experience.

It is not stable. It may not meet all our current requirements. Clients might face issues, which implies that our infrastructure might not be robust enough to handle additional components or tasks.

The admin console interface is difficult to navigate. If you don't use it for an extended period, you might encounter issues when looking for specific functions or events. Additionally, the UNC.exe file is still being utilized, which can affect system performance. It's important to periodically reinstall and update the software to ensure everything functions correctly. Managing a large infrastructure with this system may require additional effort and resources.

The admin console must be a little bit easier.

We have been working with Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business for three years.

It is stable. I rate the solution's stability a seven out of ten.

We have 30 people working on this solution.

I rate the solution's scalability an eight out of ten.

The technical services helped a lot.

Positive

Deployment takes two days to complete. I am the only person doing it.

I rate the initial setup a seven out of ten.

I rate the pricing as five out of ten, whereas ten is expensive.

Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

We use the solution for protection against malware.

Kaspersky detects and moves issues to quarantine.

Kaspersky is an excellent choice for enterprise security. It supports Windows 10 and earlier versions like Windows 7, ensuring compatibility across various Windows operating systems used by our organization. Whether it's PCs or servers, Kaspersky provides robust protection and supports private communication. In case of security threats such as Java vulnerabilities or malicious links, Kaspersky effectively mitigates risks. It's important to note that while Kaspersky Endpoint Security can be installed on Windows 7, it integrates with Windows 10 without disrupting network connectivity.

I have been using Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business for three years.

The solution is stable.

The solution is scalable.

If we pay more money for support, we got a convenient support, but we paid for minimum charges.

Neutral

The initial setup takes five business days. One person is enough for the deployment.

Pricing is very reasonable for a small companies. It cost around 64 dollars.

It works very fine and prevent any issues for operation. It is valued by estimated ten million.

I recommend the solution.

Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

Kaspersky is a good product. It helps clients with adequate protection using the latest technologies, such as AI, Azure, and zero-day attack protection.

The number of incidents has been completely reduced. We haven't reported any incidents since we deployed the product. Additionally, on the dashboard, you can easily see all the attempts that have been detected. On the reporting side, it operates smoothly and effectively, ensuring security.

Kaspersky has EDR capabilities and extended EDR features, which help in mitigating legacy issues. Additionally, the robust management tools enable effective vulnerability patching and application deployment. 

It integrates well across different operating systems, including mobile devices like Android and Mac. It effectively manages firewalls, particularly with Fortinet, enhancing overall security posture.

The solution could provide more integration.

I have been using Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business since 2019.

We're looking for a comprehensive solution that integrates multiple services, such as malware protection and firewall capabilities, similar to what the Sophos platform offers. Our technicians have indicated that Sophos provides superior integration and functionality compared to Kaspersky.

The management console is user-friendly. We haven't encountered any problems with it. Our technicians can easily navigate the dashboard and perform any necessary tasks.

Administrators can easily monitor detections and remediations, saving considerable time on the administrator's side. Additionally, when threats are detected, the program promptly reports to the administrator, allowing for immediate action or manual intervention to mitigate potential risks.

Kaspersky does not exclusively focus on network security solutions. Instead, it primarily concentrates on securing endpoints. Adding additional components could enhance its effectiveness in protecting your environment.

Kaspersky primarily focuses on endpoint protection and includes features like application controls, unlike solutions such as Sophos, which integrate seamlessly with EDR and extend to network security. Kaspersky's offering remains focused on endpoint security without the same level of integration into broader network security frameworks.

The solution includes various components that can be tailored to meet specific needs. It provides comprehensive endpoint security, including email security, as a separate module. You can purchase and configure the necessary components without buying unnecessary add-ons like sandboxing separately.

Overall, I rate the solution a seven out of ten.