No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.
Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL] Logo

Top 10 Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL] Alternatives

Vendor: Ivanti
3.8 out of 5
Leave a review

Top Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL] Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL] based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include NinjaOne, Microsoft Configuration Manager, and BigFix. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL] surpasses its competitors by offering seamless integration, comprehensive patch management, and advanced automation features, enabling efficient vulnerability remediation and robust endpoint protection.

Ivanti Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Ivanti, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL] Logo
NinjaOne
4.1 out of 5
Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL] Logo
NinjaOne
4.1 out of 5
Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager offers robust patch management and cost-effective pricing, appealing to budget-conscious buyers. In comparison, NinjaOne provides a cloud-based deployment and diverse IT management features, attracting those seeking an all-in-one solution with efficient customer support.
Download Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL] vs. NinjaOne Report
Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL] has a higher setup cost compared to NinjaOne, which offers a more budget-friendly solution. Differences in pricing can significantly impact the choice based on initial costs.
View comparison
Pricing
Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL] has a higher setup cost compared to NinjaOne, which offers a more budget-friendly solution. Differences in pricing can significantly impact the choice based on initial costs.
Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL] Logo
Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL] Logo
Microsoft Configuration Manager
4.1 out of 5
Microsoft Configuration Manager delivers robust security, scalability, and comprehensive features for larger organizations. In comparison, Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL] offers efficient patch distribution and easier deployment, appealing to smaller IT environments seeking quicker implementations and cost-effective solutions focused on immediate patch management.
Download Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL] vs. Microsoft Configuration Manager Report
Microsoft Configuration Manager requires a significant setup investment, while Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL] offers a more modest initial cost.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Configuration Manager requires a significant setup investment, while Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL] offers a more modest initial cost.
Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL] Logo
BigFix
4.3 out of 5
Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL] Logo
BigFix
4.3 out of 5
BigFix offers comprehensive security management and IT operations integration, providing robust compliance tools and superior deployment efficiency. In comparison, Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL] specializes in extensive patch management, featuring competitive pricing and detailed documentation, benefiting organizations focusing specifically on patching breadth.
Download BigFix vs. Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL] Report
BigFix requires a higher initial setup cost compared to Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager, which offers a lower-cost entry for end-of-life patch management.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
BigFix requires a higher initial setup cost compared to Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager, which offers a lower-cost entry for end-of-life patch management.
Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL] Logo
Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL] Logo
Tenable Vulnerability Management
4.1 out of 5
Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL] offers ease of deployment, with automated patch deployment enhancing its ROI appeal. In comparison, Tenable Vulnerability Management's in-depth analytics and comprehensive security insights justify higher upfront costs, ideal for those seeking robust vulnerability assessment and management capabilities.
Download Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL] vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management Report
Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL] has a higher upfront setup cost compared to Tenable Vulnerability Management, which offers a more budget-friendly initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL] has a higher upfront setup cost compared to Tenable Vulnerability Management, which offers a more budget-friendly initial investment.
Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL] Logo
Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL] Logo
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management
4.5 out of 5
Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL] appeals to budget-conscious buyers with ease of use and lower costs. In comparison, Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management offers comprehensive asset management, excelling in data analysis and continuous monitoring, making it a compelling choice for those prioritizing functionality and long-term ROI.
Download Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL] vs. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Report
Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL] involves variable setup costs depending on infrastructure complexity, while Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management generally offers fixed and predictable setup costs.
View comparison
Pricing
Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL] involves variable setup costs depending on infrastructure complexity, while Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management generally offers fixed and predictable setup costs.
Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL] Logo
Atera
4.7 out of 5
Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL] Logo
Atera
4.7 out of 5
Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL] focuses on robust patch management, appealing to security-focused buyers. In comparison, Atera's all-in-one features, such as remote monitoring and ticketing, attract those seeking comprehensive management. Atera's cloud deployment and flexible pricing offer streamlined onboarding and scalability.
Download Atera vs. Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL] Report
Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL] involves a more intensive setup process, while Atera simplifies setup, offering lower initial costs.
View comparison
Pricing
Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL] involves a more intensive setup process, while Atera simplifies setup, offering lower initial costs.
Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL] Logo
Kaseya VSA
3.8 out of 5
Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL] Logo
Kaseya VSA
3.8 out of 5
Kaseya VSA excels in integration, automation, and remote monitoring, appealing for efficient IT management. In comparison, Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL] attracts buyers prioritizing security with superior patch management, despite a complex deployment, ensuring robust protection against vulnerabilities.
Download Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL] vs. Kaseya VSA Report
Kaseya VSA has a higher setup cost compared to Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL], providing more comprehensive onboarding. Ivanti Patch offers a more budget-friendly initial setup, appealing to cost-conscious users.
View comparison
Pricing
Kaseya VSA has a higher setup cost compared to Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL], providing more comprehensive onboarding. Ivanti Patch offers a more budget-friendly initial setup, appealing to cost-conscious users.
Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL] Logo
Vicarius vRx
4.0 out of 5
Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL] Logo
Vicarius vRx
4.0 out of 5
Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL] offers comprehensive security features and integration capabilities, making it suitable for established systems. In comparison, Vicarius vRx focuses on proactive vulnerability management with real-time protection, providing advanced insights, thus appealing to businesses prioritizing cutting-edge security.
Download Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL] vs. Vicarius vRx Report
Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL] had complex setup costs, whereas Vicarius vRx offered a simpler, more cost-effective setup process.
View comparison
Pricing
Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL] had complex setup costs, whereas Vicarius vRx offered a simpler, more cost-effective setup process.
Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL] Logo
Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL] Logo
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA)
4.4 out of 5
KACE SMA offers flexible deployment and user-centric support, appealing to those needing comprehensive IT management. In comparison, Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL] prioritizes specialized patching capabilities, making it suitable for environments focused on robust security updates and effective patch management.
Download Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL] vs. KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Report
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) incurs moderate setup costs, while Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL] involves substantial setup costs.
View comparison
Pricing
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) incurs moderate setup costs, while Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL] involves substantial setup costs.
Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL] Logo
Automox
4.4 out of 5
Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL] Logo
Automox
4.4 out of 5
Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL] delivers comprehensive patch management and endpoint security. In comparison, Automox leverages a cloud-native platform for superior flexibility and ease of use. Automox's intuitive management console supports automated workflows, while Ivanti requires intricate on-premises deployment.
Download Automox vs. Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL] Report
Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL] has a higher setup cost, while Automox offers a more economical initial investment, highlighting a key distinction in installation expenses. Automox's cost-effective setup makes it a budget-friendly option compared to Ivanti's pricier implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL] has a higher setup cost, while Automox offers a more economical initial investment, highlighting a key distinction in installation expenses. Automox's cost-effective setup makes it a budget-friendly option compared to Ivanti's pricier implementation.
Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL] Logo
Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL] Logo
Microsoft Windows Server Update Services
3.9 out of 5
Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager excels in cross-platform patching, ideal for diverse systems. In comparison, Microsoft Windows Server Update Services integrates seamlessly with Windows environments, providing easy deployment. Ivanti offers competitive pricing for flexibility, while Microsoft’s low entry cost benefits Windows-centric organizations.
Download Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL] vs. Microsoft Windows Server Update Services Report
Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL] has a higher setup cost due to advanced features, while Microsoft Windows Server Update Services presents a lower setup expense, making it a cost-effective option for basic patch management tasks.
View comparison
Pricing
Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL] has a higher setup cost due to advanced features, while Microsoft Windows Server Update Services presents a lower setup expense, making it a cost-effective option for basic patch management tasks.
Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL] Logo
Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL] Logo
ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus
4.1 out of 5
ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus attracts tech buyers with its automated patch deployment, simple management interface, and competitive pricing. In comparison, Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL] is chosen for its comprehensive feature set and robust integration capabilities, justifying its higher cost.
Download Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL] vs. ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus Report
ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus offers a straightforward setup process with a lower initial investment compared to Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL], which typically involves higher upfront costs.
View comparison
Pricing
ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus offers a straightforward setup process with a lower initial investment compared to Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL], which typically involves higher upfront costs.
Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL] Logo
Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL] Logo
Qualys TruRisk Eliminate
4.4 out of 5
Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL] appeals with its competitive pricing and seamless integration with Ivanti systems. In comparison, Qualys Patch Management offers comprehensive features and exceptional vulnerability assessment, providing significant security advantages that justify its higher cost for tech buyers seeking advanced protection.
Download Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL] vs. Qualys TruRisk Eliminate Report
Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL] is noted for its higher setup cost, contrasting with the more affordable setup cost of Qualys Patch Management. This financial distinction highlights a key difference between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL] is noted for its higher setup cost, contrasting with the more affordable setup cost of Qualys Patch Management. This financial distinction highlights a key difference between the two solutions.
Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL] Logo
GFI LanGuard
4.0 out of 5
Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL] Logo
GFI LanGuard
4.0 out of 5
GFI LanGuard attracts tech buyers with its ease of deployment and cost-effectiveness, focusing on vulnerability management and network auditing. In comparison, Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager offers advanced automation and integration, appealing to those seeking comprehensive IT system control and long-term ROI.
Download GFI LanGuard vs. Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL] Report
GFI LanGuard offers a competitive setup cost while Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL] tends to be more expensive, highlighting a significant difference in upfront investment.
View comparison
Pricing
GFI LanGuard offers a competitive setup cost while Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL] tends to be more expensive, highlighting a significant difference in upfront investment.
Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL] Logo
Adaptiva
4.0 out of 5
Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL] Logo
Adaptiva
4.0 out of 5
Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL] appeals with its straightforward deployment and responsive support, ideal for budget-conscious organizations. In comparison, Adaptiva's integration of patch management and content delivery offers improved network efficiency, presenting a compelling choice for those prioritizing comprehensive features and long-term ROI.
Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL] involves substantial initial setup costs, while Adaptiva is known for its simpler and more cost-effective installation process.
View comparison
Pricing
Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL] involves substantial initial setup costs, while Adaptiva is known for its simpler and more cost-effective installation process.
Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL] Logo
Patch My PC
1 out of 5
Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL] Logo
Patch My PC
1 out of 5
Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager offers extensive integration and inventory management, appealing to companies needing detailed system oversight. In comparison, Patch My PC provides simplicity with automatic updates for applications, attracting businesses seeking efficient management and cost-effective solutions for quick ROI.
Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL] typically incurs higher setup costs, while Patch My PC is known for its cost-effective implementation. This contrast highlights a significant difference in upfront investment between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL] typically incurs higher setup costs, while Patch My PC is known for its cost-effective implementation. This contrast highlights a significant difference in upfront investment between the two solutions.
Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL] Logo
ITarian
1 out of 5
Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL] Logo
ITarian
1 out of 5
Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL] receives praise for its effective vulnerability assessment and integration capabilities. In comparison, ITarian offers comprehensive IT management with extensive automation, appealing to businesses needing broader solutions. Ivanti's pricing suits budget-conscious buyers, while ITarian promises higher ROI with its feature-rich investment.
Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL] has a significant setup cost, whereas ITarian offers a more budget-friendly setup. This highlights a notable difference in the initial financial investment required for each solution.
View comparison
Pricing
Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL] has a significant setup cost, whereas ITarian offers a more budget-friendly setup. This highlights a notable difference in the initial financial investment required for each solution.
Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL] Logo
Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL] Logo
Aranda Patch Management
1 out of 5
Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL] offers advanced customization and integration flexibility, appealing to tech buyers seeking detailed control. In comparison, Aranda Patch Management provides intuitive management and simpler deployment, ideal for organizations prioritizing ease of use and rapid implementation with efficient patching.
Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL] incurs higher setup costs compared to Aranda Patch Management, highlighting a significant difference in initial expense between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager [EOL] incurs higher setup costs compared to Aranda Patch Management, highlighting a significant difference in initial expense between the two solutions.

Related categories

Patch Management
Help Desk Software
Network Monitoring Software