| Sr. Systems Engineer at a media company with 5,001-10,000 employees | 4.0 | I use HPE OneView to manage Synergy frames for VMware ESXi hosts, benefiting from ease of management and streamlined upgrades. However, frequent blade issues require replacements, and aligning upgrades can be slow. We are also evaluating a Nutanix proof of concept. |
| Technology Management Consultant at National Institute for Smart Government - NISG | 4.5 | I've used HPE OneView for three years; it's stable, scalable, and offers strong monitoring and customization. Setup was simple, integration smooth, and support reliable. I appreciate its analytics, but dashboard customization could be more versatile. |
| Presales engineer and consultant at Hybrid Tech | 4.5 | I use HPE OneView for unified server and storage monitoring, which enhances operational efficiency by managing Synergy frames and blade servers in one console. However, the high cost of licenses is a significant drawback, impacting financial feasibility. |
| Server Applications Senior Administrator at Home Hardware Stores Limited | 4.0 | I use HPE OneView for managing Windows, Linux, backup servers, and Oracle database servers on-premises. Firmware compliance is highly valuable, though the update process could be faster. Overall, we've seen a return on investment without considering other solutions. |
| Team Lead for Core Infrastructure at Raiffeisen bank Serbia | 4.0 | I find HPE OneView valuable for configuring HPE servers and managing VLANs, though its functionality is lacking and the logs are inadequate. We complement it with Ansible for automation, enhancing our overall experience despite its limitations. |
| Senior Technical Architect at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees | 4.0 | I appreciate the solution's composable infrastructure and automation, enabling comprehensive server implementation. However, I find technical support slow, the console needs improvement, and stability can be an issue. I primarily recommend it for Synergy platforms. |
| Reaserch Engineer at a university with 10,001+ employees | 4.0 | I value HPE OneView's strong automation and scalability, and its improved stability. Yet, I find switch configuration lacks flexibility, and local support is poor. I prefer Dell MX7000 for its better administration options. |
| Cyber Risk Advisory Associate at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees | 4.0 | I used HPE OneView as a cloud administrator for a government project, valuing its easy interface over competitors like Hitachi. However, it needs better network configuration indicators and automation to address specific scenarios and errors efficiently. |
