Datadog vs HPE OneView comparison

Datadog and Hewlett Packard Enterprise are both solutions in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category. Datadog is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.7, while Hewlett Packard Enterprise is ranked #21 with an average rating of 8.0. Datadog holds a 5.7% mindshare in IM, compared to Hewlett Packard Enterprise’s 1.4% mindshare. Additionally, 97% of Datadog users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users who would recommend it.

Datadog

Read 188 Datadog reviews

9,616 Views
6,388 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

HPE OneView

Read 83 HPE OneView reviews

2,240 Views
1,556 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Datadog

HPE OneView

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 6, 2025

Datadog and HPE OneView are two prominent products in the IT infrastructure management category. Datadog has the upper hand in environments requiring extensive cloud integration due to its comprehensive observability features, whereas HPE OneView stands out for those embedded in an HPE hardware ecosystem with its centralized management capabilities.

Features: Datadog provides a vast array of integrations, comprehensive dashboards, and advanced real-time user management, allowing businesses to maintain detailed observability across both infrastructure and applications. Its flexibility is exhibited through wide-ranging cloud integrations and seamless API usage. HPE OneView, on the other hand, offers centralized management that simplifies the control of servers, switches, and storage specifically within HPE ecosystems, allowing for an efficient single-pane interface that eases hardware management tasks.

Room for Improvement: Users of Datadog often request better cost predictability, stronger incident management, and enhancements in log management and dashboard performance. Meanwhile, HPE OneView users see room for improvement in expanding hardware support, integrating better with non-HPE systems, and faster deployment speeds. Customizable notifications and more comprehensive device support are also desired improvements for HPE OneView.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Datadog's cloud-based deployment is noted for its detailed documentation and proactive support, though there are mixed experiences with its technical assistance. It excels in providing cloud flexibility. In contrast, HPE OneView is predominantly on-premises and praised for its simple user interface and efficient support, especially suited for HPE-centric environments, enhancing ease of technical management on the ground.

Pricing and ROI: Datadog features a tiered pricing model that can become costly with high usage volumes, yet it offers substantial ROI through improved system transparency and faster problem resolution. Active cost management is crucial to avoid unexpected expenses. HPE OneView's pricing strategy is linked to hardware management functionalities, frequently perceived as an included value, reducing deployment and management time for HPE hardware, and delivering ROI through operational efficiency and hardware management improvements.

To learn more, read our detailed Datadog vs. HPE OneView Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Datadog vs. HPE OneView

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 849,686 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Datadog

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

2nd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

188

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (1st), Network Monitoring Software (3rd), Log Management (3rd), Container Monitoring (1st), Cloud Monitoring Software (1st), AIOps (1st), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (7th)

HPE OneView

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

21st

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of Datadog is 5.7%, down from 7.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of HPE OneView is 1.4%, down from 1.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Featured Reviews

Kevin Palmer

DevOps/Security Principal at Raken

Useful log aggregation and management with helpful metrics aggregation

Datadog provides us value in three major ways: First, Datadog provides best-in-class functionality in many, if not all, of the products to which we subscribe (infrastructure, APM, log management, serverless, synthetics, real user monitoring, DB monitoring). In my experience with other tools that provide similar functionality, Datadog provides the largest feature set with the most flexibility and the best performance. Second, Datadog allows us to access all of those services in one place. Having to learn and manage only one tool for all of those purposes is a major benefit. Third, Datadog provides significant connectivity between those services so that we can view, summarize, organize, translate and correlate our data with maximum effect. Not needing to manually integrate them to draw lines between those pieces of information is a huge time savings for us.

Read full review

Trevor Watkins

Server Applications Senior Administrator at Home Hardware Stores Limited

Provides firmware compliance and the ability to connect to iPO

I've been involved in various upgrades. It's pretty easy to set up with vCenter. We just push out an appliance template in vCenter. We run ours on virtual servers. Deployment can be done by just one person. The number of people needed for maintenance will depend on your server inventory. If you have more than 100 servers, you will need three to five people. If you have 500 to 1,000 servers, you will need a team of 10 to 20 people.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution has offered increased visibility via logging APM, metrics, RUM, etc."

"Datadog's seamless integration with Slack and PagerDuty helped us to receive alerts right to the most common notification methods we use (our mobile devices and Slack)."

"This is definitely a good product and I would consider them one of the leaders within the application monitoring and cloud monitoring space."

"The visibility that it provides is valuable. It is helping in being proactive around incident management. It is helping us to be able to get more visibility into our customers' applications so that we can assist them at the application layer. We also provide them the infrastructure from an AWS standpoint. We are able to make sure that our customers are aware of certain critical things around the analytical piece of either the network or the application. We're able to call customers before they even know about the issue. From there, we can start putting together some change management processes and help them a bit."

"The infrastructure monitoring capabilities are really valuable. You can just log on and see everything that is happening within an IT environment."

"The ability to send notifications based on metadata from the monitor is helpful."

"Synthetic testing is by far the most valuable feature in our organization."

"We have found that we're able to get in and out of troubleshooting issues much more rapidly, which in turn, of course, enables us to spend more time on our products."

More Datadog pros

"By being able to deploy servers very quickly and rapidly, we can respond to any business requirement needed."

"We could literally swap out a piece of hardware, slide one back into the chassis, and immediately - about three reboots later - it was identical. We didn't have to worry about configuring it, we didn't have to spend any time getting anything into place. It came back and it healed the environment almost immediately."

"It is very stable. We have had no downtime nor issues in approximately a year. "

"Administration-wise it's going to be easier. More smooth and more flexible."

"We can add VLAN and update it."

"The hypervisor and cluster profiles make it easy to integrate with VMware."

"The solution's initial setup process was easy...The technical support is good...It is a stable product, and we will use it for a long time."

"Easy to add servers and get them monitored and manageable."

More HPE OneView pros

Cons

"It is very difficult to make the solutions fit perfectly for large organizations, especially in terms of high cardinality objects and multi-tenancy, where the data needs to be rolled up to a summarized level while maintaining its individual data granularity and identifiers."

"There is always room for improvement when dealing with cloud-based technologies. Mainly, I would say, it's just increasing our offerings to attract various other types of industries and businesses across more fields."

"Billing should be more transparent."

"I would like the tooling to have better integration in Slack, specifically sending out reminders to the relevant people to take breaks, do a retrospective, and specify with emojis which messages to log."

"The ease of implementation needs improvement."

"I'm not sure if Datadog can monitor K8s deployments in real-time. For instance, being able to see a deployment step by step visually. This would be helpful if there were any incidents during the deployment."

"The product is quite complex, and there are so many features that I either didn't know about or wasn't sure how to use."

"Ingesting data from various sources to monitor the log metrics of the system can always improve so that, if something goes wrong, the right teams are alerted."

More Datadog cons

"The solution could add storage, integration services, and end-to-end support for Cisco switches or other competitor products."

"My main complaint is about the blades on the frames, which seem to have a lot of problems. We often have to call HPE for replacements, such as for memory."

"The speed and performance of the solution are areas where the product lacks and needs improvement."

"I think HPE could make more user-friendly interfaces, exclude Java and move to an HTML5 platform, make more detailed documentation, and lower the price."

"It needs more reporting capabilities."

"It's a little slow sometimes. Overall, I think it does what it's supposed to do. I think that as they evolve it, it'll get quicker."

"The network configuration part of HPE OneView needs improvement. The solution has way too many features, and there's a need for proper configuration indicators to be put in place."

"It would be better if we can add every HPE device to OneView, such as MSA, as well as the other servers like the DL server and ML server."

More HPE OneView cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It has always scaled for us. Cost scales up too, but that is not necessarily a bad thing. It's reasonable for what they're providing."

"Pricing seems reasonable. It depends on the size of your organization, the size of your infrastructure, and what portion of your overall business costs go toward infrastructure."

"Pricing and licensing are reasonable for what they give you. You get the first five hosts free, which is fun to play around with. Then it's about four dollars a month per host, which is very affordable for what you get out of it. We have a lot of hosts that we put a lot of custom metrics into, and every host gives you an allowance for the number of custom metrics."

"At my last company, we did see ROI, specifically around response time. We could get to mission critical things that were down and losing revenue on immediately. So, the product paid itself back."

"The pricing came up a bit compared to their competitors. It is not that the price has risen, but that the competitors have gone down. They keep adding more features that I would have expected to be baked in at a more nominal price. I have been increasingly dissatisfied with the pricing, but not enough to jump ship."

"It is easy to run up a large bill, so become familiar with the cost of each piece of your bill and use the metrics they supply to estimate and monitor your bill."

"The cost is high and this can be justified if the scale of the environment is big."

"If you do your homework, you'll find that if you're really concerned with cost, it's good."

More Datadog pricing and cost advice

"Synergy does not require iLO licenses but servers and enclosures must be purchased."

"HPE had some other solutions, but they were actually quite expensive to buy. So, when OneView came along, it was kind of reasonable in terms of price for licenses, etc."

"HPE could lower the price."

"I think that the price of OneView is $500 USD per server, which is a little high."

"I am happy with the price."

"Use it. It is free."

"I feel the product's price falls a bit on the higher side."

"This license cost for OneView was $3,000 USD."

More HPE OneView pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

31%

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Any advice about APM solutions?

There are many factors and we know little about your requirements (size of org, technology stack, management systems, the scope of implementation). Our goal was to consolidate APM and infra monitor...

See all answers

Datadog vs ELK: which one is good in terms of performance, cost and efficiency?

With Datadog, we have near-live visibility across our entire platform. We have seen APM metrics impacted several times lately using the dashboards we have created with Datadog; they are very good c...

See all answers

Which would you choose - Datadog or Dynatrace?

Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether the Datadog or Dynatrace network monitoring software was the better fit for us. We decided to go with Dynatrace. Dynatrace offers network ...

See all answers

What do you like most about HPE OneView?

The most valuable features of HPE OneView are environment monitoring, the ease of firmware upgrade, and the ability to manage all the servers and the infrastructure from one team.

See all answers

What needs improvement with HPE OneView?

I believe the prices of HPE OneView should be reduced, as it is quite expensive. Customers with ILO advanced in their servers require HPE OneView licenses for infrastructure monitoring, which means...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for HPE OneView?

I use HPE OneView ( /products/hpe-oneview-reviews ) in servers or storage for unified monitoring purposes. It allows me to manage the Synergy frame and multiple frames, including blade servers, in ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Dynatrace vs Datadog

Compared 13% of the time

Azure Monitor vs Datadog

Compared 11% of the time

AWS X-Ray vs Datadog

Compared 5% of the time

New Relic vs Datadog

Compared 5% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Datadog

Compared 4% of the time

More Datadog Competitors

Dell CloudIQ vs HPE OneView

Compared 15% of the time

Cisco Intersight vs HPE OneView

Compared 15% of the time

Lenovo XClarity Orchestrator vs HPE OneView

Compared 14% of the time

Zabbix vs HPE OneView

Compared 12% of the time

Everbridge IT Alerting vs HPE OneView

Compared 4% of the time

More HPE OneView Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Datadog

April 2025

Download Datadog product report

Buyer's Guide

HPE OneView

April 2025

Download HPE OneView product report

Also Known As

No data available

HP OneView

Overview

Datadog is a comprehensive cloud monitoring platform designed to track performance, availability, and log aggregation for cloud resources like AWS, ECS, and Kubernetes. It offers robust tools for creating dashboards, observing user behavior, alerting, telemetry, security monitoring, and synthetic testing.

Datadog supports full observability across cloud providers and environments, enabling troubleshooting, error detection, and performance analysis to maintain system reliability. It offers detailed visualization of servers, integrates seamlessly with cloud providers like AWS, and provides powerful out-of-the-box dashboards and log analytics. Despite its strengths, users often note the need for better integration with other solutions and improved application-level insights. Common challenges include a complex pricing model, setup difficulties, and navigation issues. Users frequently mention the need for clearer documentation, faster loading times, enhanced error traceability, and better log management.

What are the key features of Datadog?

Graphs and Dashboards: Visualizes servers and infrastructure with customizable views.
Metrics: Offers deep insights into system performance and user behavior.
Log Management: Provides powerful analytics for logs and seamless log aggregation.
Unified Tagging: Facilitates organization and retrieval of metrics and logs.
APM and RUM: Enables application performance monitoring and real user monitoring for comprehensive insights.
Synthetic Testing: Allows the simulation of user interactions to test application performance.

What benefits and ROI should users look for in reviews?

System Reliability: Helps ensure uptime and performance across cloud environments.
Proactive Issue Resolution: Assists in identifying and resolving issues before they impact users.
Operational Efficiency: Streamlines monitoring and log management tasks.
Flexible Integrations: Adapts to various cloud services and infrastructure setups.
Real-Time Alerts: Provides timely notifications to address problems swiftly.

Datadog is implemented across different industries, from tech companies monitoring cloud applications to finance sectors ensuring transactional systems' performance. E-commerce platforms use Datadog to track and visualize user behavior and system health, while healthcare organizations utilize it for maintaining secure, compliant environments. Every implementation assists teams in customizing monitoring solutions specific to their industry's requirements.

Datadog

HPE OneView is your infrastructure automation engine to simplify operations, increasing the speed of IT delivery for new applications and services. Through software defined intelligence, HPE OneView brings a new level of automation to infrastructure management by taking a template driven approach to provisioning, updating, and integrating compute, storage, and networking infrastructure. Designed with a modern, standard-based API and supported by a large and growing partner ecosystem, HPE OneView also makes it easy to integrate powerful infrastructure automation into existing IT tools and processes. Take command with HPE OneView to deploy infrastructure faster, simplify operations and increase productivity.

HPE OneView innovations provide you the industry’s best infrastructure management experience, simplifying operations for HPE BladeSystem, HPE ProLiant servers, 3PAR storage, HPE Networking and HPE ConvergedSystems.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Sample Customers

Adobe, Samsung, facebook, HP Cloud Services, Electronic Arts, salesforce, Stanford University, CiTRIX, Chef, zendesk, Hearst Magazines, Spotify, mercardo libre, Slashdot, Ziff Davis, PBS, MLS, The Motley Fool, Politico, Barneby's

Asante, ITS Nordics, Columbus Communications, Mansfield Oil

Buyer's Guide

Datadog vs. HPE OneView

April 2025

Free Report: Datadog vs. HPE OneView

Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog vs. HPE OneView and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Datadog vs. HPE OneView report.

See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.