Checkmk vs HPE OneView comparison

Checkmk and Hewlett Packard Enterprise are both solutions in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category. Checkmk is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.4, while Hewlett Packard Enterprise is ranked #15 with an average rating of 8.2. Checkmk holds a 4.3% mindshare in IM, compared to Hewlett Packard Enterprise’s 1.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Checkmk users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users who would recommend it.

Checkmk

Read 9 Checkmk reviews

3,414 Views
302 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

HPE OneView

Read 83 HPE OneView reviews

2,130 Views
534 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Checkmk

HPE OneView

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

HPE OneView and Checkmk compete in IT management platforms. HPE OneView has the upper hand due to its strong automation and fast deployment capabilities.

Features:HPE OneView offers a unified management platform ideal for automating server monitoring, configuration, and updates. Its centralized control simplifies management across hybrid and legacy IT environments. Users find its automation and fast deployment capabilities highly valuable. Checkmk is known for its auto-discovery feature, comprehensive monitoring, and integration of multiple systems. Users value its resource and infrastructure monitoring, crucial for maintaining operational efficiency.

Room for Improvement:HPE OneView could improve by expanding integration with more devices and systems and accelerating profile deployments. Users desire better role-based access, support for non-HPE parts, and enhanced reporting. Checkmk requires a more user-friendly interface for new users, improved integration with tools like Dynatrace, and enhanced alert management and high-availability solutions.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:HPE OneView is primarily deployed on-premises, with detailed deployment support. Some users find its technical support robust, while others face delays and lack assistance for complex issues. Checkmk, also deployed mainly on-premises, is recognized for quick and effective customer service, despite initial setup challenges.

Pricing and ROI:HPE OneView's licensing model is costly for some, but the time saved on infrastructure configuration supports strong ROI. However, full management capabilities incur extra costs. Checkmk offers competitive pricing viewed as affordable, providing economic value for small and growing operations.

To learn more, read our detailed Checkmk vs. HPE OneView Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Checkmk vs. HPE OneView

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 859,533 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Checkmk

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

13th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (8th), Server Monitoring (6th), Cloud Monitoring Software (12th)

HPE OneView

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

15th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of Checkmk is 4.3%, up from 2.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of HPE OneView is 1.4%, down from 1.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Featured Reviews

Paolo Sala

Application performance and System monitoring at Agos

A reasonably priced tool for system and application monitoring

The main room for improvement is in the solution's presentation and the integration area. In our company, we use the integration capabilities from ServiceNow. We also have another big monitoring solution in place in our company, which is Dynatrace. At the moment, there doesn't exist an out-of-the-box integration for Dynatrace. I think that the integration and the exporting of the data collected are areas where Checkmk lacks but should try to improve the most. The only implementation of Checkmk that allows high availability is the virtual appliance that has the option for the availability of a different box. Otherwise, you have to find a way to implement it manually with some custom solution, which could be an improvement.

Read full review

Trevor Watkins

Server Applications Senior Administrator at Home Hardware Stores Limited

Provides firmware compliance and the ability to connect to iPO

I've been involved in various upgrades. It's pretty easy to set up with vCenter. We just push out an appliance template in vCenter. We run ours on virtual servers. Deployment can be done by just one person. The number of people needed for maintenance will depend on your server inventory. If you have more than 100 servers, you will need three to five people. If you have 500 to 1,000 servers, you will need a team of 10 to 20 people.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I really like the auto-discovery feature."

"The initial setup of Checkmk was easy...It is a very stable solution."

"It's versatile, scalable, and easier to use compared to other solutions like Nagios and OMD."

"Overall, from one to ten, I rate Checkmk a nine."

"Checkmk was built on a platform that was user-friendly, and I could build my charts easily."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it has a lot of different pieces, and they all work together...It is a very scalable solution. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

"The most valuable features of Checkmk are its resource monitoring, infra monitoring, and log factor configuration."

"The alerting system in Checkmk really works properly."

More Checkmk pros

"Firmware compliance is one of the most valuable features."

"The hypervisor and cluster profiles make it easy to integrate with VMware."

"We lose less time managing the machines."

"The template management makes the deployment of the firmware updates much faster."

"The best part is that you can integrate a two-way network. Earlier we could not manage the storage and ToR switch. Now we can create a LAN with our storage without any interface. In terms of switch management, it is now easy to understand the current configuration. It provides centralized management. It provides a single pane, and you can easily do all updates in one shot. It is a great product."

"We cannot function without this solution. "

"HPE OneView allows me to monitor access and check the health of the infrastructure in a single console."

"We get templates, so it's speed to delivery for us. It's a big difference with the template features."

More HPE OneView pros

Cons

"The initial setup is a bit complex."

"Checkmk does not allow running scripts at varying intervals."

"If an alert is generated for a specific pattern in the log, and if Checkmk catches that log, it will stay there even after the alert is resolved."

"The main challenge for us is that we're moving from Nagios to Checkmk, and we're still getting used to the new way of working."

"I think that the integration and the exporting of the data collected are areas where Checkmk lacks but should try to improve the most."

"Checkmk does not work too easily with the PowerStore. I use a PowerShell script as Checkmk runs on Linux and a Windows system, connecting with the Checkmk agent."

"In Checkmk, the documentation can probably be improved a bit more."

"Sometimes we receive alerts, and it can become annoying when you acknowledge an alert. It is very clunky when you acknowledge the alert. The process is not very intuitive, and there are instances where it feels a bit cumbersome to acknowledge an alert."

More Checkmk cons

"The solution could add storage, integration services, and end-to-end support for Cisco switches or other competitor products."

"I believe the prices of HPE OneView should be reduced, as it is quite expensive."

"One thing which is missing is that you can't actually log a support call yourself."

"The interface is a bit bland. It does its job, but it could have a better interface."

"I think HPE could make more user-friendly interfaces, exclude Java and move to an HTML5 platform, make more detailed documentation, and lower the price."

"The solution's console can be improved by making it more user-friendly and adding the capability to filter the reports out using only the information required."

"We've had issues, for example, with RAM."

"Does not allow for switch configuration other than through OneView."

More HPE OneView cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of Checkmk is cheaper compared to other enterprise products."

"Checkmk is a fairly reasonably priced solution."

"The product is affordable."

"HPE could lower the price."

"I am happy with the price."

"I think that the price of OneView is $500 USD per server, which is a little high."

"When it comes to the government, money is never an issue, so it was excellent in terms of the HPE OneView licensing cost. Hitachi was cheaper, but I'd rate HPE OneView cost-wise as eight out of ten."

"I would rate the cost as six out of ten."

"Synergy does not require iLO licenses but servers and enclosures must be purchased."

"HPE had some other solutions, but they were actually quite expensive to buy. So, when OneView came along, it was kind of reasonable in terms of price for licenses, etc."

"The solution is free to use, but if you want the management aspect you require a virtual machine such as C7000 or Synergy which require licenses."

More HPE OneView pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

859,533 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Checkmk?

The most valuable feature of the solution is that it has a lot of different pieces, and they all work together...It is a very scalable solution. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Checkmk?

I will get more information about Checkmk when the proof of concept is done. It's going to be before the summer. There will be a report about the tool and a recommendation to use it. So far, it loo...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Checkmk?

Checkmk ( /products/checkmk-reviews ) is a monitoring tool, so that's what I will use it for. Right now, it's not in production, but it's in a proof of concept phase. It looks good, so probably, du...

See all answers

What do you like most about HPE OneView?

The most valuable features of HPE OneView are environment monitoring, the ease of firmware upgrade, and the ability to manage all the servers and the infrastructure from one team.

See all answers

What needs improvement with HPE OneView?

My main complaint is about the blades on the frames, which seem to have a lot of problems. We often have to call HPE for replacements, such as for memory. Constant issues arise, leading to frequent...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for HPE OneView?

We use HPE OneView ( /products/hpe-oneview-reviews ) to manage our Synergy frames. We have multiple OneView environments, and we manage a lot of Synergy 12,000 series frames with Synergy 480 Gen10 ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Zabbix vs Checkmk

Compared 46% of the time

Icinga vs Checkmk

Compared 8% of the time

LibreNMS vs Checkmk

Compared 7% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs Checkmk

Compared 5% of the time

Centreon vs Checkmk

Compared 3% of the time

More Checkmk Competitors

Dell CloudIQ vs HPE OneView

Compared 14% of the time

Cisco Intersight vs HPE OneView

Compared 12% of the time

Lenovo XClarity Orchestrator vs HPE OneView

Compared 12% of the time

Zabbix vs HPE OneView

Compared 11% of the time

ServiceNow IT Operations Management vs HPE OneView

Compared 8% of the time

More HPE OneView Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Checkmk

June 2025

Download Checkmk product report

Buyer's Guide

HPE OneView

June 2025

Download HPE OneView product report

Also Known As

No data available

HP OneView

Overview

Checkmk is a powerful tool for monitoring IT infrastructure, providing vital insights on servers, databases, network devices, and custom applications.

Primarily used for supervising IT infrastructure, Checkmk helps organizations ensure service availability by monitoring hosts, processes, load, storage, and network appliances. With support for both Linux and Windows environments across multiple data centers, Checkmk performs compliance checks and preserves historical data for core network devices.

What are the key features of Checkmk?

Auto-discovery: Automatically identifies new hosts and applies monitoring rules.
Custom monitoring: Enhances MySQL performance tracking.
Slack integration: Provides immediate downtime alerts.
Graphical trend analysis: Offers 400 days of trend data.
Multiple site monitoring: Ensures seamless data synchronization through task automation.
Resource and infrastructure monitoring: Configures log factors to fit budget constraints.
System metric imports: Includes servers, SQL, file systems, and application monitoring.

What benefits and ROI should users look for in reviews?

Time-saving: Auto-discovery and task automation streamline processes.
Proactive alerts: Immediate downtime notifications optimize response times.
Historical insights: Long-term graphical trend analysis aids strategic planning.
Cost efficiency: Resource monitoring aligned with budget constraints.

Checkmk is deployed extensively in large enterprise environments for monitoring critical infrastructure. It proves particularly useful under conditions of frequent power outages or network issues, helping maintain smooth operations. While the alert acknowledgment process and interface require improvements, and the lack of an agent-less platform complicates server management, the strengths in auto-discovery, integration, and comprehensive monitoring make Checkmk a strong contender for IT infrastructure monitoring.

Checkmk

HPE OneView is your infrastructure automation engine to simplify operations, increasing the speed of IT delivery for new applications and services. Through software defined intelligence, HPE OneView brings a new level of automation to infrastructure management by taking a template driven approach to provisioning, updating, and integrating compute, storage, and networking infrastructure. Designed with a modern, standard-based API and supported by a large and growing partner ecosystem, HPE OneView also makes it easy to integrate powerful infrastructure automation into existing IT tools and processes. Take command with HPE OneView to deploy infrastructure faster, simplify operations and increase productivity.

HPE OneView innovations provide you the industry’s best infrastructure management experience, simplifying operations for HPE BladeSystem, HPE ProLiant servers, 3PAR storage, HPE Networking and HPE ConvergedSystems.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Asante, ITS Nordics, Columbus Communications, Mansfield Oil

Buyer's Guide

Checkmk vs. HPE OneView

June 2025

Free Report: Checkmk vs. HPE OneView

Find out what your peers are saying about Checkmk vs. HPE OneView and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

859,533 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Checkmk vs. HPE OneView report.

See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.