Checkmk vs HPE OneView comparison

Checkmk and Hewlett Packard Enterprise are both solutions in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category. Checkmk is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.4, while Hewlett Packard Enterprise is ranked #20 with an average rating of 8.2. Checkmk holds a 4.1% mindshare in IM, compared to Hewlett Packard Enterprise’s 1.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Checkmk users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users who would recommend it.

Checkmk

Read 9 Checkmk reviews

3,383 Views
2,954 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

HPE OneView

Read 83 HPE OneView reviews

2,177 Views
1,508 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Checkmk

HPE OneView

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

HPE OneView and Checkmk compete in IT management platforms. HPE OneView has the upper hand due to its strong automation and fast deployment capabilities.

Features:HPE OneView offers a unified management platform ideal for automating server monitoring, configuration, and updates. Its centralized control simplifies management across hybrid and legacy IT environments. Users find its automation and fast deployment capabilities highly valuable. Checkmk is known for its auto-discovery feature, comprehensive monitoring, and integration of multiple systems. Users value its resource and infrastructure monitoring, crucial for maintaining operational efficiency.

Room for Improvement:HPE OneView could improve by expanding integration with more devices and systems and accelerating profile deployments. Users desire better role-based access, support for non-HPE parts, and enhanced reporting. Checkmk requires a more user-friendly interface for new users, improved integration with tools like Dynatrace, and enhanced alert management and high-availability solutions.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:HPE OneView is primarily deployed on-premises, with detailed deployment support. Some users find its technical support robust, while others face delays and lack assistance for complex issues. Checkmk, also deployed mainly on-premises, is recognized for quick and effective customer service, despite initial setup challenges.

Pricing and ROI:HPE OneView's licensing model is costly for some, but the time saved on infrastructure configuration supports strong ROI. However, full management capabilities incur extra costs. Checkmk offers competitive pricing viewed as affordable, providing economic value for small and growing operations.

To learn more, read our detailed Checkmk vs. HPE OneView Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Checkmk vs. HPE OneView

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,349 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Checkmk

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

12th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (10th), Server Monitoring (5th), Cloud Monitoring Software (12th)

HPE OneView

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

20th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of Checkmk is 4.1%, up from 2.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of HPE OneView is 1.4%, down from 1.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Featured Reviews

Paolo Sala

Application performance and System monitoring at Agos

A reasonably priced tool for system and application monitoring

The main room for improvement is in the solution's presentation and the integration area. In our company, we use the integration capabilities from ServiceNow. We also have another big monitoring solution in place in our company, which is Dynatrace. At the moment, there doesn't exist an out-of-the-box integration for Dynatrace. I think that the integration and the exporting of the data collected are areas where Checkmk lacks but should try to improve the most. The only implementation of Checkmk that allows high availability is the virtual appliance that has the option for the availability of a different box. Otherwise, you have to find a way to implement it manually with some custom solution, which could be an improvement.

Read full review

Trevor Watkins

Server Applications Senior Administrator at Home Hardware Stores Limited

Provides firmware compliance and the ability to connect to iPO

I've been involved in various upgrades. It's pretty easy to set up with vCenter. We just push out an appliance template in vCenter. We run ours on virtual servers. Deployment can be done by just one person. The number of people needed for maintenance will depend on your server inventory. If you have more than 100 servers, you will need three to five people. If you have 500 to 1,000 servers, you will need a team of 10 to 20 people.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The initial setup of Checkmk was easy...It is a very stable solution."

"Checkmk helps me compare data and foresee issues."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it has a lot of different pieces, and they all work together...It is a very scalable solution. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

"Overall, from one to ten, I rate Checkmk a nine."

"The most valuable features of Checkmk are its resource monitoring, infra monitoring, and log factor configuration."

"Checkmk was built on a platform that was user-friendly, and I could build my charts easily."

"The alerting system in Checkmk really works properly."

"We can monitor multiple sites using the product."

More Checkmk pros

"We can add VLAN and update it."

"The OneView Global Dashboard is very user-friendly and it can be used for monitoring the power consumption and temperature of the data center and racks."

"If you have a lot of devices, like we do, then you have to have one single pane of view, otherwise we lose too much time. So, we needed this type of solution."

"Easy to see if all my servers are on correct firmware levels, with SPP packaging."

"The most valuable features of HPE OneView are environment monitoring, the ease of firmware upgrade, and the ability to manage all the servers and the infrastructure from one team."

"It is very stable. We have had no downtime nor issues in approximately a year. "

"Administration-wise it's going to be easier. More smooth and more flexible."

"Gives the business interfaces to view real-time pictures of IT business services."

More HPE OneView pros

Cons

"Sometimes we receive alerts, and it can become annoying when you acknowledge an alert. It is very clunky when you acknowledge the alert. The process is not very intuitive, and there are instances where it feels a bit cumbersome to acknowledge an alert."

"Checkmk does not work too easily with the PowerStore. I use a PowerShell script as Checkmk runs on Linux and a Windows system, connecting with the Checkmk agent."

"The initial setup is a bit complex."

"Checkmk does not allow running scripts at varying intervals."

"I think that the integration and the exporting of the data collected are areas where Checkmk lacks but should try to improve the most."

"If an alert is generated for a specific pattern in the log, and if Checkmk catches that log, it will stay there even after the alert is resolved."

"It is easy for tech-savvy people, but newcomers might find it intimidating."

"In Checkmk, the documentation can probably be improved a bit more."

More Checkmk cons

"My main complaint is about the blades on the frames, which seem to have a lot of problems. We often have to call HPE for replacements, such as for memory."

"The speed and performance of the solution are areas where the product lacks and needs improvement."

"I have to chop it up into smaller parts, because I have an installation in Europe and it covers the whole world. That is not so good. They need to be more localized, so I am going to chop it up into smaller bits."

"The interface is a bit bland. It does its job, but it could have a better interface."

"I saw, maybe three years ago or two years ago here, or in Barcelona, at the HPE Discover conference, a feature that you can update Clusterware with VMware. But the feature is still not live in production. Currently, you have to do all the firmware updates and then you have to do the VMware updates. So you have two reboots and it would be better if it was just one."

"The solution's console can be improved by making it more user-friendly and adding the capability to filter the reports out using only the information required."

"Those features, coming in version 4, that we're looking for are the discovery, primarily. But I think the scope-based access control is of interest, although, we didn't see any directory integration, so that, in itself, seems like it's still limited."

"HPE OneView should be able to cover more device models apart from ProLiant and Synergy."

More HPE OneView cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product is affordable."

"The price of Checkmk is cheaper compared to other enterprise products."

"Checkmk is a fairly reasonably priced solution."

"The solution is free to use, but if you want the management aspect you require a virtual machine such as C7000 or Synergy which require licenses."

"I think that the price of OneView is $500 USD per server, which is a little high."

"When it comes to the government, money is never an issue, so it was excellent in terms of the HPE OneView licensing cost. Hitachi was cheaper, but I'd rate HPE OneView cost-wise as eight out of ten."

"I am happy with the price."

"Synergy does not require iLO licenses but servers and enclosures must be purchased."

"HPE could lower the price."

"This license cost for OneView was $3,000 USD."

"Use it. It is free."

More HPE OneView pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,349 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Government

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Checkmk?

The most valuable feature of the solution is that it has a lot of different pieces, and they all work together...It is a very scalable solution. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Checkmk?

I will get more information about Checkmk when the proof of concept is done. It's going to be before the summer. There will be a report about the tool and a recommendation to use it. So far, it loo...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Checkmk?

Checkmk ( /products/checkmk-reviews ) is a monitoring tool, so that's what I will use it for. Right now, it's not in production, but it's in a proof of concept phase. It looks good, so probably, du...

See all answers

What do you like most about HPE OneView?

The most valuable features of HPE OneView are environment monitoring, the ease of firmware upgrade, and the ability to manage all the servers and the infrastructure from one team.

See all answers

What needs improvement with HPE OneView?

I believe the prices of HPE OneView should be reduced, as it is quite expensive. Customers with ILO advanced in their servers require HPE OneView licenses for infrastructure monitoring, which means...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for HPE OneView?

I use HPE OneView ( /products/hpe-oneview-reviews ) in servers or storage for unified monitoring purposes. It allows me to manage the Synergy frame and multiple frames, including blade servers, in ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Zabbix vs Checkmk

Compared 48% of the time

Icinga vs Checkmk

Compared 9% of the time

LibreNMS vs Checkmk

Compared 7% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs Checkmk

Compared 4% of the time

Centreon vs Checkmk

Compared 3% of the time

More Checkmk Competitors

Dell CloudIQ vs HPE OneView

Compared 15% of the time

Cisco Intersight vs HPE OneView

Compared 15% of the time

Lenovo XClarity Orchestrator vs HPE OneView

Compared 14% of the time

Zabbix vs HPE OneView

Compared 12% of the time

ServiceNow IT Operations Management vs HPE OneView

Compared 9% of the time

More HPE OneView Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Checkmk

May 2025

Download Checkmk product report

Buyer's Guide

HPE OneView

April 2025

Download HPE OneView product report

Also Known As

No data available

HP OneView

Overview

Checkmk is a powerful tool for monitoring IT infrastructure, providing vital insights on servers, databases, network devices, and custom applications.

Primarily used for supervising IT infrastructure, Checkmk helps organizations ensure service availability by monitoring hosts, processes, load, storage, and network appliances. With support for both Linux and Windows environments across multiple data centers, Checkmk performs compliance checks and preserves historical data for core network devices.

What are the key features of Checkmk?

Auto-discovery: Automatically identifies new hosts and applies monitoring rules.
Custom monitoring: Enhances MySQL performance tracking.
Slack integration: Provides immediate downtime alerts.
Graphical trend analysis: Offers 400 days of trend data.
Multiple site monitoring: Ensures seamless data synchronization through task automation.
Resource and infrastructure monitoring: Configures log factors to fit budget constraints.
System metric imports: Includes servers, SQL, file systems, and application monitoring.

What benefits and ROI should users look for in reviews?

Time-saving: Auto-discovery and task automation streamline processes.
Proactive alerts: Immediate downtime notifications optimize response times.
Historical insights: Long-term graphical trend analysis aids strategic planning.
Cost efficiency: Resource monitoring aligned with budget constraints.

Checkmk is deployed extensively in large enterprise environments for monitoring critical infrastructure. It proves particularly useful under conditions of frequent power outages or network issues, helping maintain smooth operations. While the alert acknowledgment process and interface require improvements, and the lack of an agent-less platform complicates server management, the strengths in auto-discovery, integration, and comprehensive monitoring make Checkmk a strong contender for IT infrastructure monitoring.

Checkmk

HPE OneView is your infrastructure automation engine to simplify operations, increasing the speed of IT delivery for new applications and services. Through software defined intelligence, HPE OneView brings a new level of automation to infrastructure management by taking a template driven approach to provisioning, updating, and integrating compute, storage, and networking infrastructure. Designed with a modern, standard-based API and supported by a large and growing partner ecosystem, HPE OneView also makes it easy to integrate powerful infrastructure automation into existing IT tools and processes. Take command with HPE OneView to deploy infrastructure faster, simplify operations and increase productivity.

HPE OneView innovations provide you the industry’s best infrastructure management experience, simplifying operations for HPE BladeSystem, HPE ProLiant servers, 3PAR storage, HPE Networking and HPE ConvergedSystems.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Asante, ITS Nordics, Columbus Communications, Mansfield Oil

Buyer's Guide

Checkmk vs. HPE OneView

April 2025

Free Report: Checkmk vs. HPE OneView

Find out what your peers are saying about Checkmk vs. HPE OneView and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,349 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Checkmk vs. HPE OneView report.

See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.