Checkmk vs HPE OneView comparison

Checkmk and Hewlett Packard Enterprise are both solutions in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category. Checkmk is ranked #24 with an average rating of 8.5, while Hewlett Packard Enterprise is ranked #16 with an average rating of 8.4. Checkmk holds a 4.0% mindshare in IM, compared to Hewlett Packard Enterprise’s 1.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Checkmk users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users who would recommend it.

Checkmk

Read 9 Checkmk reviews

4,452 Views
3,339 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

HPE OneView

Read 84 HPE OneView reviews

2,126 Views
1,913 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Checkmk

HPE OneView

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

HPE OneView and Checkmk compete in IT management platforms. HPE OneView has the upper hand due to its strong automation and fast deployment capabilities.

Features:HPE OneView offers a unified management platform ideal for automating server monitoring, configuration, and updates. Its centralized control simplifies management across hybrid and legacy IT environments. Users find its automation and fast deployment capabilities highly valuable. Checkmk is known for its auto-discovery feature, comprehensive monitoring, and integration of multiple systems. Users value its resource and infrastructure monitoring, crucial for maintaining operational efficiency.

Room for Improvement:HPE OneView could improve by expanding integration with more devices and systems and accelerating profile deployments. Users desire better role-based access, support for non-HPE parts, and enhanced reporting. Checkmk requires a more user-friendly interface for new users, improved integration with tools like Dynatrace, and enhanced alert management and high-availability solutions.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:HPE OneView is primarily deployed on-premises, with detailed deployment support. Some users find its technical support robust, while others face delays and lack assistance for complex issues. Checkmk, also deployed mainly on-premises, is recognized for quick and effective customer service, despite initial setup challenges.

Pricing and ROI:HPE OneView's licensing model is costly for some, but the time saved on infrastructure configuration supports strong ROI. However, full management capabilities incur extra costs. Checkmk offers competitive pricing viewed as affordable, providing economic value for small and growing operations.

To learn more, read our detailed Checkmk vs. HPE OneView Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Checkmk vs. HPE OneView

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,771 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Checkmk

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

24th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (14th), Server Monitoring (8th), Cloud Monitoring Software (16th)

HPE OneView

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

16th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of Checkmk is 4.0%, up from 2.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of HPE OneView is 1.4%, down from 1.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Infrastructure Monitoring Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
HPE OneView	1.4%
Checkmk	4.0%
Other	94.6%

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Featured Reviews

Paolo Sala

Application performance and System monitoring at Agos

A reasonably priced tool for system and application monitoring

The main room for improvement is in the solution's presentation and the integration area. In our company, we use the integration capabilities from ServiceNow. We also have another big monitoring solution in place in our company, which is Dynatrace. At the moment, there doesn't exist an out-of-the-box integration for Dynatrace. I think that the integration and the exporting of the data collected are areas where Checkmk lacks but should try to improve the most. The only implementation of Checkmk that allows high availability is the virtual appliance that has the option for the availability of a different box. Otherwise, you have to find a way to implement it manually with some custom solution, which could be an improvement.

Read full review

Kapil Pandey

Technology Management Consultant at National Institute for Smart Government - NISG

Gaining seamless monitoring and customization capabilities

One of the best features of HPE OneView is that you get a complete architecture with a single click. The analytics and monitoring tools in HPE OneView are superior to other network monitoring platforms such as Nagios. The features include multiple modules that allow you to create and write your own scripts based on your requirements for different servers such as database servers or tapping roaming servers. There is more feasibility when using HP Service Manager because, unlike other tools with predefined standards for script writing, we have the option for customization as per our choice, and dashboard reports can be customized.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It's versatile, scalable, and easier to use compared to other solutions like Nagios and OMD."

"The most valuable features of Checkmk are its resource monitoring, infra monitoring, and log factor configuration."

"The alerting system in Checkmk really works properly."

"The initial setup of Checkmk was easy...It is a very stable solution."

"Checkmk helps me compare data and foresee issues."

"We can monitor multiple sites using the product."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it has a lot of different pieces, and they all work together...It is a very scalable solution. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

"Overall, from one to ten, I rate Checkmk a nine."

More Checkmk pros

"We get templates, so it's speed to delivery for us. It's a big difference with the template features."

"It is very stable. We have had no downtime nor issues in approximately a year. "

"Profile templates: The ability to generate the profiles and lay them down so the servers are built consistently. I would say that's probably the biggest piece of it."

"Comprehensive dashboard, ease of use are key features."

"The remote support automatically logs service calls and support cases with HPE, which is really good."

"The solution's initial setup process was easy...The technical support is good...It is a stable product, and we will use it for a long time."

"The initial setup is easy."

"Deploys faster new virtual services."

More HPE OneView pros

Cons

"Checkmk does not work too easily with the PowerStore. I use a PowerShell script as Checkmk runs on Linux and a Windows system, connecting with the Checkmk agent."

"It is easy for tech-savvy people, but newcomers might find it intimidating."

"The initial setup is a bit complex."

"Sometimes we receive alerts, and it can become annoying when you acknowledge an alert. It is very clunky when you acknowledge the alert. The process is not very intuitive, and there are instances where it feels a bit cumbersome to acknowledge an alert."

"In Checkmk, the documentation can probably be improved a bit more."

"If an alert is generated for a specific pattern in the log, and if Checkmk catches that log, it will stay there even after the alert is resolved."

"Checkmk does not allow running scripts at varying intervals."

"I think that the integration and the exporting of the data collected are areas where Checkmk lacks but should try to improve the most."

More Checkmk cons

"I would like to see them expand into other cloud platforms, non-HPE platforms."

"We ran into a couple of issues here and there with the baselines for the firmware and not having enough space on the appliance itself to be able to have more than two baselines."

"Specifically, it would be great if we had the ability to reapply the server profile faster."

"I believe the prices of HPE OneView should be reduced, as it is quite expensive."

"The logs are not proper."

"Integration could be improved. Sometimes OneView doesn't identify physical hardware."

"Use it, but do not think it is going into the clouds, because it is not. There is room for improvement."

"There was a feature called HPE cloud manager, but now it is owned by Micro Focus. HPE should make a cloud optimizer again."

More HPE OneView cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product is affordable."

"Checkmk is a fairly reasonably priced solution."

"The price of Checkmk is cheaper compared to other enterprise products."

"HPE could lower the price."

"I am happy with the price."

"When it comes to the government, money is never an issue, so it was excellent in terms of the HPE OneView licensing cost. Hitachi was cheaper, but I'd rate HPE OneView cost-wise as eight out of ten."

"HPE had some other solutions, but they were actually quite expensive to buy. So, when OneView came along, it was kind of reasonable in terms of price for licenses, etc."

"This license cost for OneView was $3,000 USD."

"I feel the product's price falls a bit on the higher side."

"Use it. It is free."

"Synergy does not require iLO licenses but servers and enclosures must be purchased."

More HPE OneView pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,771 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

12%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Healthcare Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	22
Midsize Enterprise	15
Large Enterprise	51

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Checkmk?

The most valuable feature of the solution is that it has a lot of different pieces, and they all work together...It is a very scalable solution. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Checkmk?

I will get more information about Checkmk when the proof of concept is done. It's going to be before the summer. There will be a report about the tool and a recommendation to use it. So far, it loo...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Checkmk?

Checkmk ( /products/checkmk-reviews ) is a monitoring tool, so that's what I will use it for. Right now, it's not in production, but it's in a proof of concept phase. It looks good, so probably, du...

See all answers

What do you like most about HPE OneView?

The most valuable features of HPE OneView are environment monitoring, the ease of firmware upgrade, and the ability to manage all the servers and the infrastructure from one team.

See all answers

What needs improvement with HPE OneView?

From the dashboard and reporting perspective, HPE OneView could be improved by having multiple modules rather than just a single customization option.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for HPE OneView?

The typical use case for HPE OneView addresses a shift from manual monitoring, where clients needed to log in to the server every hour. After integrating everything on HP Service Manager and HP Ope...

See all answers

Comparisons

Zabbix vs Checkmk

Compared 41% of the time

LibreNMS vs Checkmk

Compared 9% of the time

Icinga vs Checkmk

Compared 8% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs Checkmk

Compared 5% of the time

Nagios Core vs Checkmk

Compared 4% of the time

More Checkmk Competitors

Dell CloudIQ vs HPE OneView

Compared 15% of the time

Cisco Intersight vs HPE OneView

Compared 14% of the time

Everbridge IT Alerting vs HPE OneView

Compared 11% of the time

Zabbix vs HPE OneView

Compared 10% of the time

Lenovo XClarity Orchestrator vs HPE OneView

Compared 8% of the time

More HPE OneView Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Checkmk

October 2025

Download Checkmk product report

Buyer's Guide

HPE OneView

October 2025

Download HPE OneView product report

Also Known As

No data available

HP OneView

Overview

Checkmk provides a comprehensive monitoring solution designed to streamline IT infrastructure management with features like auto-discovery, custom checks, and effective alerting.

Checkmk serves as a powerful tool for organizations managing large networks of servers, databases, and network appliances across multiple locations. It simplifies monitoring tasks with features like auto-discovery, custom scripting, and Slack integration. Users benefit from its resource monitoring capabilities and scalability, although there are areas for improvement, such as alert acknowledgment and greater usability. It supports both Linux and Windows environments, enabling effective oversight of IT infrastructure. The growing body of documentation enhances its adaptability in complex settings.

What are the key features of Checkmk?

Auto-Discovery: Identifies new hosts and applies monitoring rules automatically.
Custom Monitoring Checks: Tailor checks for databases and specific applications.
Slack Integration: Receive downtime alerts directly in Slack channels.
Automation for Scripts: Streamline repetitive tasks with scripts.
Effective Alerting System: Offers timely notifications on network activities.

What benefits can users expect?

Resource Efficiency: Saves time on configuration with automated features.
Scalability: Easily adapts to growing network and system requirements.
Cost-Effectiveness: Suitable option for budget-conscious users.
User-Friendly Setup: Easy to configure, reducing the learning curve.

Industries deploying Checkmk frequently utilize it for monitoring IT infrastructure, including servers and network appliances, to manage proactive issue identification and compliance. Companies employ it in the proof of concept phase or for ongoing monitoring, covering hosts, services, and custom application metrics.

Checkmk

HPE OneView is your infrastructure automation engine to simplify operations, increasing the speed of IT delivery for new applications and services. Through software defined intelligence, HPE OneView brings a new level of automation to infrastructure management by taking a template driven approach to provisioning, updating, and integrating compute, storage, and networking infrastructure. Designed with a modern, standard-based API and supported by a large and growing partner ecosystem, HPE OneView also makes it easy to integrate powerful infrastructure automation into existing IT tools and processes. Take command with HPE OneView to deploy infrastructure faster, simplify operations and increase productivity.

HPE OneView innovations provide you the industry’s best infrastructure management experience, simplifying operations for HPE BladeSystem, HPE ProLiant servers, 3PAR storage, HPE Networking and HPE ConvergedSystems.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Asante, ITS Nordics, Columbus Communications, Mansfield Oil

Buyer's Guide

Checkmk vs. HPE OneView

September 2025

Free Report: Checkmk vs. HPE OneView

Find out what your peers are saying about Checkmk vs. HPE OneView and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,771 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Checkmk vs. HPE OneView report.

See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.