We performed a comparison between Delinea Secret Server and Fudo PAM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I like the one-way hash, as well as the ability to store it in the cloud and access it from anywhere."
"The ability to give some groups access to different kind of databases with the storage of a password is the most valuable feature."
"The solution is good."
"The GUI interface is well-designed and user-friendly."
"It offers the possibility of secure administration of hardware devices, as well as Linux systems administration from a Windows environment."
"I have found the password management and the secret management features to be the most valuable. Our customers find its ease of integration and the use of power shells really attractive."
"I like that it is Windows-based. It is good that primarily, it is not an appliance. Some of the other applications in the space, such as a Quest Software CPAM or a Safeguard, are appliances, so you can't deploy the ends of them. With Thycotic, you can either install your Temporal Protection module physically in the VM host, or you can use BouncyCastle for high-security module capabilities."
"The secret template, password rotation, and recording sessions are the most valuable."
"The main benefit of the solution is that it's very easy to set up. It only takes a couple of hours to install everything."
"it's perfect to control and administer computers in our company."
"Fudo PAM was the most flexible and intuitive interface out of all of the products in the PAM sector."
"Session recording and password management are the two main aspects."
"We are convinced that Fudo PAM is better than competing products like WALLIX."
"Having more detailed reporting would improve this solution."
"Its remote support feature needs improvement."
"I think that the main interface should integrate better with non-standard applications and clients, to connect with other systems."
"In many PAM tools, when users request a password checkout, they need to provide justification. However, in my experience across four organizations, nobody actually reads the justifications. Users can simply type anything and get the password. This becomes a risk and compliance issue. There needs to be continuous improvement in this area, focusing on problem identification and mitigation strategies."
"I'd prefer a better commercial model that includes partners and options for consulting around it. Where I've worked with my customers, we've only been able to use their professional services, and that has been a risk and constraint."
"The initial setup and deployment can be cumbersome."
"The API is no good."
"The tool should integrate additional features like OCR."
"The stability is not very good."
"Fudo PAM’s scalability is not very strong."
"I would like to see better server management. You have to know exactly what you're looking for to get the right server."
"The configuration is difficult."
"Professional training and certification would be great."
Delinea Secret Server is ranked 2nd in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 47 reviews while Fudo PAM is ranked 21st in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 5 reviews. Delinea Secret Server is rated 8.2, while Fudo PAM is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Delinea Secret Server writes "Effective for password rotation policies triggered by audit requirements, it helps maintain compliance standards and seamless integration with third-party tools ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Fudo PAM writes "Easy to install but needs to provide better server management and organization". Delinea Secret Server is most compared with CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, Azure Key Vault, HashiCorp Vault, IBM Security Secret Server and ManageEngine PAM360, whereas Fudo PAM is most compared with WALLIX Bastion, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, One Identity Safeguard, ManageEngine PAM360 and Teleport. See our Delinea Secret Server vs. Fudo PAM report.
See our list of best Privileged Access Management (PAM) vendors.
We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
