Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Fudo PAM Logo

Fudo PAM Reviews

Vendor: Fudo Security
4.0 out of 5
Leave a review

What is Fudo PAM?

We are the leading vendor of innovative IT security solutions. We focus on privileged access management and privileged session monitoring, combined under the Fudo Security brand. The Fudo product line merges innovation and an intuitive user experience with strong security features. These are the hallmarks of the future designs of the company.

Get the Privileged Access Management (PAM) Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about Fudo PAM, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, Delinea Secret Server and more!
Fudo PAM is the #21 ranked solution in top Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions. PeerSpot users give Fudo PAM an average rating of 8.0 out of 10. Fudo PAM is most commonly compared to CyberArk Privileged Access Manager: Fudo PAM vs CyberArk Privileged Access Manager. Fudo PAM is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 49% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a comms service provider, accounting for 13% of all views.
Buyer's Guide
Privileged Access Management (PAM)
December 2025
Get the category report
Helped 879,259 peers since 2012

Featured Fudo PAM reviews

Read more reviews

Fudo PAM mindshare

As of December 2025, the mindshare of Fudo PAM in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category stands at 2.8%, up from 2.4% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Privileged Access Management (PAM) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Fudo PAM2.8%
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager12.8%
WALLIX Bastion5.9%
Other78.5%
Privileged Access Management (PAM)
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Fudo PAM's interface stands out as highly flexible and intuitive. It excels in controlling and administering computers for systems, enabling easy information retrieval and user activity tracking. The dashboards and front end are well-received. Session recording and password management are key features, along with compatibility with SCTP, STTPS, and database protocols like SQL and MySQL. Users appreciate its potential to block sessions if necessary and its easy installation.
  • "Session recording and password management are the two main aspects."
  • "The main benefit of the solution is that it's very easy to set up. It only takes a couple of hours to install everything."
  • "We are convinced that Fudo PAM is better than competing products like WALLIX."

Room for Improvement

Fudo PAM faces challenges with scalability and ease-of-use. Enhancing session and password management setup would benefit users. Regional support, especially in Ukraine, needs expansion. Professional certification and organized training are lacking, complicating user education. Initial installation is reportedly buggy. Server management requires improvement, as scalability issues are noted when managing large numbers of servers. Users desire features for streamlined organization and account matching to servers, as well as enhanced remote session capabilities on diverse networks.
  • "Fudo PAM’s scalability is not very strong."
  • "I would like to see better server management. You have to know exactly what you're looking for to get the right server."
  • "The stability is not very good."

Pricing

  • "The pricing is great. We've been given discounts that make it cheaper than using any other solution."

Popular Use Cases

Companies primarily use Fudo PAM for access management, securing privileged user access, and administering computers and servers. It helps resellers and system integrators control and restrict user access, maintain logs, and manage passwords for privileged access. Fudo PAM is also employed to protect remote access services and provide password management for IT administrators, database administrators, and third-party users connecting to client systems, addressing typical security concerns.

Deployment

Installation of Fudo PAM is generally quick and straightforward, taking a couple of hours. Users appreciate its ease of setup, often rating it highly. However, some have noted challenges with configuration. It installs rapidly, enabling immediate use without additional components. Fudo PAM is compared favorably to competitors like One Identity, praised for its simplicity. Organizations value brief implementation time, crucial when deploying for clients who prefer fast deployment and scalability.

Scalability

Fudo PAM's scalability receives mixed feedback. Some rate it seven out of ten, expressing satisfaction with its cluster-based capabilities for scaling and rescaling using multiple appliances. Others express concerns about its scalability strength and wish for improvements, especially for remote networks. It is selected by organizations ranging from 500 to 5,000 employees who require scalable systems, aligning with vendor promises. Some users find it inadequate for their needs despite its flexibility in appliance management.

Stability

Many find Fudo PAM stable, with some experiencing initial instability during implementation. Users are advised to be cautious with new releases like version 5.3, as they may affect stability. Some rate stability as seven out of ten, while others have not encountered issues. Adopters should prefer finalized versions to maintain stability, with attention to any updates.
These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.
Download our Privileged Access Management (PAM) Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Government
13%
Comms Service Provider
13%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Computer Software Company
9%
Healthcare Company
6%
Performing Arts
5%
Manufacturing Company
4%
Construction Company
3%
Outsourcing Company
3%
Media Company
3%
Insurance Company
3%
Wellness & Fitness Company
3%
Energy/Utilities Company
3%
Real Estate/Law Firm
2%
Educational Organization
2%
University
2%
Mining And Metals Company
2%
Renewables & Environment Company
2%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
2%
Wholesaler/Distributor
1%
Transportation Company
1%
Pharma/Biotech Company
1%
Retailer
1%
Security Firm
1%
Non Profit
1%
Consumer Goods Company
1%
Logistics Company
1%
Legal Firm
1%
Recruiting/Hr Firm
1%

Compare Fudo PAM with alternative products

Go!

Learn more about Fudo PAM

Fudo PAM was previously known as Fudo Privileged Access Management.

Fudo PAM customers

KFC, BP, Santander, Burger King, ING, Starbucks, Yahoo, DHL

Related questions

  • 19
When evaluating Privileged Identity Management, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
  • 28
How was the 2020 Twitter Hack carried out? Could it have been prevented?
  • 61
Which is the best Privileged Account Management solution?
  • 20
What are the top 5 PAM solutions that can be implemented which cover both hybrid and cloud?
  • 70
What are the top 5 PAM solutions?
  • 30
How will AI and ML help or work with PIM/PAM?
  • 12
Is BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management really expensive compared to other tools or software?
  • 523
What is the difference between PAM and PAS?
  • 272
What is the difference between IDAM , PIM and PAM?
  • 208
Which PAM tool do you prefer: CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, One Identity Safeguard, Delinea Secret Server, or BeyondTrust Privileged Remote A

Product Categories

Product Categories
Privileged Access Management (PAM)

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs Fudo PAM Logo
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs Fudo PAM
Delinea Secret Server vs Fudo PAM Logo
Delinea Secret Server vs Fudo PAM
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs Fudo PAM Logo
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs Fudo PAM
One Identity Safeguard vs Fudo PAM Logo
One Identity Safeguard vs Fudo PAM
WALLIX Bastion vs Fudo PAM Logo
WALLIX Bastion vs Fudo PAM
BeyondTrust Password Safe vs Fudo PAM Logo
BeyondTrust Password Safe vs Fudo PAM
Delinea Privileged Access Service vs Fudo PAM Logo
Delinea Privileged Access Service vs Fudo PAM
Teleport vs Fudo PAM Logo
Teleport vs Fudo PAM
ManageEngine PAM360 vs Fudo PAM Logo
ManageEngine PAM360 vs Fudo PAM
senhasegura Access Management vs Fudo PAM Logo
senhasegura Access Management vs Fudo PAM
Sectona Privileged Access Management vs Fudo PAM Logo
Sectona Privileged Access Management vs Fudo PAM
SSH PrivX vs Fudo PAM Logo
SSH PrivX vs Fudo PAM
senhasegura SaaS vs Fudo PAM Logo
senhasegura SaaS vs Fudo PAM
OpenText Privileged Access Manager vs Fudo PAM Logo
OpenText Privileged Access Manager vs Fudo PAM
ProofID Privileged Access Management vs Fudo PAM Logo
ProofID Privileged Access Management vs Fudo PAM
See all alternatives
 
Fudo PAM Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
BDM at Oberig-it4.0In evaluating Fudo PAM, I find it excels in session recording and password management for privileged access, yet lacks scalability options. While I rate it below Delinea, it still performs effectively alongside competitors like One Identity for remote access management.
Security Solutions Architect at Netwave3.5I work for an IT integrator company as a reseller and find Fudo PAM's server management lacking. The scalability is complex, managing thousands of installations is tough, and better educational programs are needed, unlike Cisco's comprehensive certification offerings.
Information Technology Security Specialist at BornaNetworkManagers4.0No summary available
IT Specialist at IT Specialist LLC4.0No summary available
Lead Systems Architect at IT Specialist LLC4.0No summary available