Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Fudo PAM vs StrongDM comparison

Fudo Security and StrongDM are both solutions in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category. Fudo Security is ranked #22, while StrongDM is ranked #19 with an average rating of 9.0. Fudo Security holds a 2.7% mindshare in PAM, compared to StrongDM’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Fudo Security users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of StrongDM users who would recommend it.
Fudo PAM
Read 5 Fudo PAM reviews
  • 994 Views
  • 530 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
StrongDM
Read 2 StrongDM reviews
  • 335 Views
  • 176 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 15, 2025

Fudo PAM and StrongDM are competing products in privileged access management and security. StrongDM holds the edge due to its robust feature set and perceived long-term value, despite Fudo PAM's more favorable pricing.

Features: Fudo PAM offers comprehensive access control, session monitoring, and extensive security protocols. StrongDM provides intuitive system integrations, cross-platform capabilities, and connectivity across diverse environments, meeting modern business needs.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Fudo PAM provides straightforward deployment and reliable customer service. StrongDM delivers agile deployment and exceptional ongoing support, suitable for organizations with complex requirements.

Pricing and ROI: Fudo PAM is more cost-effective upfront with tangible setup benefits. StrongDM requires a higher initial investment but offers significant ROI by enhancing efficiency and long-term savings, justified by higher value creation.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Fudo PAM vs. StrongDM Report (Updated: June 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Fudo PAM vs. StrongDM
June 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 860,168 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Fudo PAM
Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)
22nd
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
StrongDM
Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)
19th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
Access Management (15th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category, the mindshare of Fudo PAM is 2.7%, up from 2.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of StrongDM is 1.2%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Privileged Access Management (PAM)
 

Featured Reviews

Oleksiy-Zaionchkovskyy - PeerSpot reviewer
Easy to install but needs to provide better server management and organization
I would like to see better server management. You have to know exactly what you're looking for to get the right server. Working with 100 or 200 server installations is comfortable, but not thousands. The scalability isn't very good because it's complicated. I would like more organization. For instance, they could add a table that matches an account to many servers at once. There could also be better education services. They don't have any certification program, at least in Ukraine, so the training is complicated and divided into different pieces. Cisco, for example, has a great education program that starts from the basics and progresses to advanced features.
Read full review
reviewer2589615 - PeerSpot reviewer
Seamlessly manage cloud access with enhanced security features
I was part of the team managing the infrastructure for a small startup company. We used StrongDM to provide access to cloud private networks, control user access to databases, hosts through SSH, and Kubernetes resources StrongDM was able to replace the combination of different products we…
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"We are convinced that Fudo PAM is better than competing products like WALLIX."
"Fudo PAM was the most flexible and intuitive interface out of all of the products in the PAM sector."
"it's perfect to control and administer computers in our company."
"The main benefit of the solution is that it's very easy to set up. It only takes a couple of hours to install everything."
"Session recording and password management are the two main aspects."
"We primarily used StrongDM for access to resources on private networks like EC2 machines, Kubernetes clusters, and various databases."
"All of the logging is handled for us, including for auditing purposes. Looking through the audit logs is not a painful experience."
"StrongDM replaced the puzzle of different solutions with one single product, which made managing resources more efficient."
 

Cons

"Professional training and certification would be great."
"I would like to see better server management. You have to know exactly what you're looking for to get the right server."
"Fudo PAM’s scalability is not very strong."
"The stability is not very good."
"The configuration is difficult."
"It would be beneficial to have better control and alignment between frequent updates and improved communication regarding possible negative effects on existing customer bases."
"We've had a few issues with the stability of this product in the past."
"It would be beneficial to have better control and alignment between frequent updates and improved communication regarding possible negative effects on existing customer bases."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is great. We've been given discounts that make it cheaper than using any other solution."
"The licensing is per user per month."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
860,168 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
18%
Comms Service Provider
11%
Computer Software Company
10%
Government
8%
Computer Software Company
36%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Manufacturing Company
11%
University
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for StrongDM?
The leadership chose StrongDM after comparative research, which suggests economic benefits. It was mentioned that while the product is rapidly gaining features, it might become cost-prohibitive for...
See all answers
What needs improvement with StrongDM?
It would be beneficial to have better control and alignment between frequent updates and improved communication regarding possible negative effects on existing customer bases. Also, documentation s...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for StrongDM?
I was part of the team managing the infrastructure for a small startup company. We used StrongDM to provide access to cloud private networks, control user access to databases, hosts through SSH, an...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs Fudo PAM Logo
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs Fudo PAM
Compared 25% of the time
WALLIX Bastion vs Fudo PAM Logo
WALLIX Bastion vs Fudo PAM
Compared 16% of the time
Teleport vs Fudo PAM Logo
Teleport vs Fudo PAM
Compared 15% of the time
ManageEngine PAM360 vs Fudo PAM Logo
ManageEngine PAM360 vs Fudo PAM
Compared 14% of the time
One Identity Safeguard vs Fudo PAM Logo
One Identity Safeguard vs Fudo PAM
Compared 11% of the time
More Fudo PAM Competitors
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs StrongDM Logo
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs StrongDM
Compared 56% of the time
KeeperPAM vs StrongDM Logo
KeeperPAM vs StrongDM
Compared 23% of the time
Teleport vs StrongDM Logo
Teleport vs StrongDM
Compared 21% of the time
More StrongDM Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Privileged Access Management (PAM)
June 2025
Fudo PAM reportDownload Fudo PAM product report
Buyer's Guide
Privileged Access Management (PAM)
June 2025
StrongDM reportDownload StrongDM product report
 

Also Known As

Fudo Privileged Access Management
No data available
 

Overview

We are the leading vendor of innovative IT security solutions. We focus on privileged access management and privileged session monitoring, combined under the Fudo Security brand. The Fudo product line merges innovation and an intuitive user experience with strong security features. These are the hallmarks of the future designs of the company.

Fudo Security

StrongDM offers an innovative solution for managing infrastructure access, focusing on security and compliance while ensuring streamlined operations.

StrongDM simplifies infrastructure access by unifying management and auditing capabilities. It provides a seamless way for organizations to quickly secure sensitive data across all environments, enhancing access control without compromising efficiency. With a focus on integrating access data and compliance requirements, StrongDM is designed to meet the needs of security-conscious organizations.

What are standout features of StrongDM?
  • Access Management: Centralizes access control, reducing complexity.
  • Auditability: Offers detailed logs for thorough audit trails.
  • Compliance Support: Ensures compliance with industry standards.
  • Scalability: Adapts to changes in infrastructure effortlessly.
What are the benefits of choosing StrongDM?
  • Enhanced Security: Reports show improved security postures.
  • Efficiency Gains: Users experience reduced time in access management.
  • Improved Compliance: Facilitates meeting regulatory requirements.
  • Cost Effectiveness: Invests in reducing potential data breaches.

In finance and healthcare industries, StrongDM is often implemented to safeguard sensitive information, ensuring compliance with stringent regulatory requirements. It provides an agile approach to access management, which is critical for sectors dealing with confidential data and strict compliance mandates.

StrongDM
 

Sample Customers

KFC, BP, Santander, Burger King, ING, Starbucks, Yahoo, DHL
Information Not Available
Buyer's Guide
Fudo PAM vs. StrongDM
June 2025
Free Report: Fudo PAM vs. StrongDM
Find out what your peers are saying about Fudo PAM vs. StrongDM and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
860,168 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Fudo PAM vs. StrongDM report.
See our list of best Privileged Access Management (PAM) vendors.

We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.