Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Fudo PAM vs StrongDM comparison

Fudo Security and StrongDM are both solutions in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category. Fudo Security is ranked #21, while StrongDM is ranked #16 with an average rating of 9.0. Fudo Security holds a 2.8% mindshare in PAM, compared to StrongDM’s 2.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Fudo Security users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of StrongDM users who would recommend it.
Fudo PAM
Read 5 Fudo PAM reviews
  • 1,080 Views
  • 1,069 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
StrongDM
Read 2 StrongDM reviews
  • 802 Views
  • 674 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 28, 2025

Fudo PAM and StrongDM are rivals in privileged access management. While StrongDM is recognized for its comprehensive features, Fudo PAM provides competitive advantages in pricing and customer support.

Features: Fudo PAM offers robust security features such as detailed session recording, privileged account management, and support for a wide range of network protocols. StrongDM is known for its cross-platform capabilities, seamless integration into existing infrastructure, and advanced access controls with real-time auditing.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Fudo PAM offers a streamlined deployment process with comprehensive support options, making the implementation process smoother for customers. StrongDM provides efficient deployment solutions for various IT environments and is complemented by responsive customer service with a focus on prompt issue resolution.

Pricing and ROI: Fudo PAM is noted for its affordable setup costs, making it attractive for budget-conscious companies, while StrongDM, though potentially more expensive initially, offers substantial ROI through enhanced productivity and reduced administrative complexities.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Fudo PAM vs. StrongDM Report (Updated: December 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Fudo PAM vs. StrongDM
December 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Fudo PAM
Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)
21st
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
StrongDM
Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)
16th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
Access Management (17th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category, the mindshare of Fudo PAM is 2.8%, up from 2.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of StrongDM is 2.0%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Privileged Access Management (PAM) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
StrongDM2.0%
Fudo PAM2.8%
Other95.2%
Privileged Access Management (PAM)
 

Featured Reviews

TD
Taras Dubrova
BDM at Oberig-it
Works with SCTP, STTPS, SQL, and MySQL protocols
There are some areas for improvement in the Fudo PAM cake that we want to improve in terms of scaling. Scaling is an optional feature because we closed some big projects with enterprise customers from different countries, including Ukraine, Kaloxetine, Uzbekistan, and others. We closed projects in different areas with customers of different sizes. When we talk about enterprise customers, we should consider that they have different use cases and desires for Fudo PAM. We compared our options for customers to choose their vendors, and we discovered Fudo PAM has few scaling options. In Fudo PAM, there should be additional features for scaling and organizing remote sessions for remote systems in remote networks.
Read full review
reviewer2589615 - PeerSpot reviewer
reviewer2589615
Senior Data Engineer at a non-profit with 1,001-5,000 employees
Seamlessly manage cloud access with enhanced security features
I was part of the team managing the infrastructure for a small startup company. We used StrongDM to provide access to cloud private networks, control user access to databases, hosts through SSH, and Kubernetes resources StrongDM was able to replace the combination of different products we…
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"it's perfect to control and administer computers in our company."
"We are convinced that Fudo PAM is better than competing products like WALLIX."
"Session recording and password management are the two main aspects."
"Fudo PAM was the most flexible and intuitive interface out of all of the products in the PAM sector."
"The main benefit of the solution is that it's very easy to set up. It only takes a couple of hours to install everything."
"StrongDM replaced the puzzle of different solutions with one single product, which made managing resources more efficient."
"All of the logging is handled for us, including for auditing purposes. Looking through the audit logs is not a painful experience."
"We primarily used StrongDM for access to resources on private networks like EC2 machines, Kubernetes clusters, and various databases."
 

Cons

"Fudo PAM’s scalability is not very strong."
"Professional training and certification would be great."
"The stability is not very good."
"I would like to see better server management. You have to know exactly what you're looking for to get the right server."
"The configuration is difficult."
"We've had a few issues with the stability of this product in the past."
"It would be beneficial to have better control and alignment between frequent updates and improved communication regarding possible negative effects on existing customer bases."
"It would be beneficial to have better control and alignment between frequent updates and improved communication regarding possible negative effects on existing customer bases."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is great. We've been given discounts that make it cheaper than using any other solution."
"The licensing is per user per month."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
13%
Government
13%
Comms Service Provider
13%
Computer Software Company
9%
Computer Software Company
23%
Financial Services Firm
19%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Leisure / Travel Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for StrongDM?
The leadership chose StrongDM after comparative research, which suggests economic benefits. It was mentioned that while the product is rapidly gaining features, it might become cost-prohibitive for...
See all answers
What needs improvement with StrongDM?
It would be beneficial to have better control and alignment between frequent updates and improved communication regarding possible negative effects on existing customer bases. Also, documentation s...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for StrongDM?
I was part of the team managing the infrastructure for a small startup company. We used StrongDM to provide access to cloud private networks, control user access to databases, hosts through SSH, an...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs Fudo PAM Logo
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs Fudo PAM
Compared 17% of the time
WALLIX Bastion vs Fudo PAM Logo
WALLIX Bastion vs Fudo PAM
Compared 14% of the time
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs Fudo PAM Logo
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs Fudo PAM
Compared 10% of the time
ManageEngine PAM360 vs Fudo PAM Logo
ManageEngine PAM360 vs Fudo PAM
Compared 8% of the time
Teleport vs Fudo PAM Logo
Teleport vs Fudo PAM
Compared 7% of the time
More Fudo PAM Competitors
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs StrongDM Logo
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs StrongDM
Compared 19% of the time
Endpoint Privilege Manager vs StrongDM Logo
Endpoint Privilege Manager vs StrongDM
Compared 19% of the time
HashiCorp Boundary vs StrongDM Logo
HashiCorp Boundary vs StrongDM
Compared 18% of the time
KeeperPAM vs StrongDM Logo
KeeperPAM vs StrongDM
Compared 13% of the time
Teleport vs StrongDM Logo
Teleport vs StrongDM
Compared 12% of the time
More StrongDM Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Privileged Access Management (PAM)
January 2026
Fudo PAM reportDownload Fudo PAM product report
Buyer's Guide
Privileged Access Management (PAM)
January 2026
StrongDM reportDownload StrongDM product report
 

Also Known As

Fudo Privileged Access Management
No data available
 

Overview

We are the leading vendor of innovative IT security solutions. We focus on privileged access management and privileged session monitoring, combined under the Fudo Security brand. The Fudo product line merges innovation and an intuitive user experience with strong security features. These are the hallmarks of the future designs of the company.

Fudo Security

StrongDM offers an innovative solution for managing infrastructure access, focusing on security and compliance while ensuring streamlined operations.

StrongDM simplifies infrastructure access by unifying management and auditing capabilities. It provides a seamless way for organizations to quickly secure sensitive data across all environments, enhancing access control without compromising efficiency. With a focus on integrating access data and compliance requirements, StrongDM is designed to meet the needs of security-conscious organizations.

What are standout features of StrongDM?
  • Access Management: Centralizes access control, reducing complexity.
  • Auditability: Offers detailed logs for thorough audit trails.
  • Compliance Support: Ensures compliance with industry standards.
  • Scalability: Adapts to changes in infrastructure effortlessly.
What are the benefits of choosing StrongDM?
  • Enhanced Security: Reports show improved security postures.
  • Efficiency Gains: Users experience reduced time in access management.
  • Improved Compliance: Facilitates meeting regulatory requirements.
  • Cost Effectiveness: Invests in reducing potential data breaches.

In finance and healthcare industries, StrongDM is often implemented to safeguard sensitive information, ensuring compliance with stringent regulatory requirements. It provides an agile approach to access management, which is critical for sectors dealing with confidential data and strict compliance mandates.

StrongDM
 

Sample Customers

KFC, BP, Santander, Burger King, ING, Starbucks, Yahoo, DHL
Information Not Available
Buyer's Guide
Fudo PAM vs. StrongDM
December 2025
Free Report: Fudo PAM vs. StrongDM
Find out what your peers are saying about Fudo PAM vs. StrongDM and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Fudo PAM vs. StrongDM report.
See our list of best Privileged Access Management (PAM) vendors.

We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.