We performed a comparison between Fudo PAM and Symantec Privileged Access Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Fudo PAM was the most flexible and intuitive interface out of all of the products in the PAM sector."
"it's perfect to control and administer computers in our company."
"We are convinced that Fudo PAM is better than competing products like WALLIX."
"The main benefit of the solution is that it's very easy to set up. It only takes a couple of hours to install everything."
"Session recording and password management are the two main aspects."
"Comprehensive coverage of the required features for the PAM solution."
"It will provide us with more security."
"Stability is solid as a rock."
"The DB clustering is a really good benefit of using CA PAM."
"Whoever built it from the ground up, they understand how an organization is laid out."
"It's easy to use and easy to configure."
"We have received good support from the tech support team."
"We can enforce complicated password policies and very important frequent password changes."
"Fudo PAM’s scalability is not very strong."
"I would like to see better server management. You have to know exactly what you're looking for to get the right server."
"The stability is not very good."
"The configuration is difficult."
"Professional training and certification would be great."
"I would like this solution to be simpler. It should have a one-click access that works together with AWS."
"The support for other remote assistance tools would be excellent. Free included tools in Windows (Remote Assist) and Microsoft SCCM Configuration Manager (ConMgr Remote Control) allow companies to reduce the amount of RDP connections and expand the usage of the tools are frequently used by companies to provide technical support for remote assistance."
"The management console could be improved."
"The service account management functionality needs to be extended to application pools, SQL database, PowerShell scripts, service account discovery, etc."
"It'd be great if you just stuck in your PIV card and Windows popped up, asked you for your password. You typed it in, then it remembered your credentials."
"Bring more technology into the portfolio and being able to collapse those products into a much more integrated way."
"They need to do a little bit more on the mainframe side."
"The setup is complex."
More Symantec Privileged Access Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
Fudo PAM is ranked 21st in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 5 reviews while Symantec Privileged Access Manager is ranked 18th in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 50 reviews. Fudo PAM is rated 8.0, while Symantec Privileged Access Manager is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Fudo PAM writes "Easy to install but needs to provide better server management and organization". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Symantec Privileged Access Manager writes "Allows IT and consultants to access the infrastructure environment but needs more security and better support". Fudo PAM is most compared with WALLIX Bastion, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, Delinea Secret Server, One Identity Safeguard and ManageEngine PAM360, whereas Symantec Privileged Access Manager is most compared with CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management, ARCON Privileged Access Management and Delinea Secret Server. See our Fudo PAM vs. Symantec Privileged Access Manager report.
See our list of best Privileged Access Management (PAM) vendors.
We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
