Fudo PAM vs Symantec Privileged Access Manager comparison

Fudo Security and Broadcom are both solutions in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category. Fudo Security is ranked #25, while Broadcom is ranked #18 with an average rating of 8.5. Fudo Security holds a 2.5% mindshare in PAM, compared to Broadcom’s 1.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Fudo Security users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 85% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

Fudo PAM

Read 5 Fudo PAM reviews

1,175 Views
1,152 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Symantec Privileged Access ...

Read 53 Symantec Privileged Access Manager reviews

1,773 Views
1,383 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Fudo PAM

Symantec Privileged Access ...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 6, 2024

Symantec Privileged Access Manager and Fudo PAM compete in the Privileged Access Management category. Symantec Privileged Access Manager appears to have an advantage in pricing and customer support, while Fudo PAM is recognized for superior features.

Features: Symantec Privileged Access Manager offers robust security controls, strong policy management, and flexible deployment options. Fudo PAM features intuitive access control, advanced session monitoring, and an innovative approach to session management.

Room for Improvement: Symantec Privileged Access Manager could enhance reporting, session handling, and simplify processes. Fudo PAM needs better scalability, improved API integration, and more comprehensive support.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Symantec Privileged Access Manager offers flexible deployment and strong customer service but may have a complex setup. Fudo PAM provides straightforward installation but has varied support experiences.

Pricing and ROI: Symantec Privileged Access Manager is valued for competitive pricing and good ROI, especially for larger setups. Fudo PAM users find it a worthwhile investment despite higher initial costs, recognizing its advanced features and quick time-to-value.

To learn more, read our detailed Fudo PAM vs. Symantec Privileged Access Manager Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Fudo PAM vs. Symantec Privileged Access Manager

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,311 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Fudo PAM

Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)

25th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Symantec Privileged Access ...

Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)

18th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category, the mindshare of Fudo PAM is 2.5%, down from 2.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Symantec Privileged Access Manager is 1.6%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Privileged Access Management (PAM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Symantec Privileged Access Manager	1.6%
Fudo PAM	2.5%
Other	95.9%

Privileged Access Management (PAM)

Featured Reviews

Taras Dubrova

BDM at Oberig-it

Works with SCTP, STTPS, SQL, and MySQL protocols

There are some areas for improvement in the Fudo PAM cake that we want to improve in terms of scaling. Scaling is an optional feature because we closed some big projects with enterprise customers from different countries, including Ukraine, Kaloxetine, Uzbekistan, and others. We closed projects in different areas with customers of different sizes. When we talk about enterprise customers, we should consider that they have different use cases and desires for Fudo PAM. We compared our options for customers to choose their vendors, and we discovered Fudo PAM has few scaling options. In Fudo PAM, there should be additional features for scaling and organizing remote sessions for remote systems in remote networks.

Read full review

Muzi Lubisi

Senior technical Consultant at CA Africa

Secure management of sensitive servers and seamless applications with direct linking

The credential injection feature is highly valued, particularly for RDP sessions. A majority of customers use it for RDP, and a couple for Linux servers. The broader capabilities, including access to multiple systems, web-based applications, and clustering, have never posed an issue. The threat analytics aspect is also a robust feature that analyzes all pertinent information.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I think that Fudo Privileged Access Management is a very good program."

"Session recording and password management are the two main aspects."

"it's perfect to control and administer computers in our company."

"We are convinced that Fudo PAM is better than competing products like WALLIX."

"This is a solution that I recommend because it is a simple privileged access management system that is done very well."

"Fudo PAM was the most flexible and intuitive interface out of all of the products in the PAM sector."

"The main benefit of the solution is that it's very easy to set up. It only takes a couple of hours to install everything."

"Right now we are encouraging our customers to use Fudo PAM because it is the only product in PAM technology that we have to offer them."

"The password manager is a valuable feature."

"It reduces the viral attacks on my website. It also allows certain users access to see what happens daily."

"The product is very scalable in terms of concurrent sessions that it can handle at a time, number of device it can support, accounts that it can manage, or number of nodes that you can deploy in a cluster."

"The RDP-gateway: For limiting which server an operator can access."

"It's easy to use and easy to configure."

"I think it's a good solution for anybody who is looking for a single sign-on implementation for administration of the servers."

"The CA PAM’s ability to seamlessly integrate and provide a demarcation between users and systems is the most attractive aspect."

"The interface is very friendly, colorful, and bold."

More Symantec Privileged Access Manager pros

Cons

"Fudo PAM’s scalability is not very strong."

"Professional training and certification would be great."

"I would like to see better server management. You have to know exactly what you're looking for to get the right server."

"The configuration is difficult."

"Professional training and certification would be great."

"To tell you the truth, I find that Fudo is not very stable and we had some issues during the implementation."

"The configuration is difficult."

"The stability is not very good."

"We experience stability issues after every patch upgrade. This is a place where CA needs to improve drastically."

"We have to do a lot of manual work to automate features."

"An improvement for this solution is that it should not be constantly based on user name and password. There should be a condition to edit and update your username."

"Recent releases need improvement in webpage management."

"It's difficult to locate the reports, there are limits on what reports can be run from the GUI, and the report formats are lacking."

"There were some issues with stability. From what I remember, people would complain that every 30 minutes to an hour or so, their connection would drop and they'd have to reconnect, but it wasn't clear whether that was a problem with the network we were working on or whether that was a problem with Privileged Access Manager."

"Be prepared to call tech support a lot because the documentation is almost worthless."

"I would like to see improvements in branding customization and multi-tenancy."

More Symantec Privileged Access Manager cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is great. We've been given discounts that make it cheaper than using any other solution."

"Appliances are relatively cheap, don’t skimp. Make sure you have redundancy, high availability, and enough appliances to manage the concurrent workload."

"Pricing is fair compared to other top vendors."

"Don’t go with an agent model. Don’t go with a model that has you buying a thousand different parts. Go with PAM that gives you everything, or you’ll just be paying costs of implementing another tool that PAM would have just given you up front."

"Cost-wise, CA was better compared to others in the market. "

"The licensing is simple and scalable."

"I would prefer better licensing options for the 20-100 users we have at a given time."

"They offer per-device, per-user, or monthly and yearly licensing models."

"The prices are not low, but one can ask for a discount. It’s not the cheapest PAM solution."

More Symantec Privileged Access Manager pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Government

13%

Comms Service Provider

13%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

10%

Marketing Services Firm

10%

Computer Software Company

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	30

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Symantec Privileged Access Manager?

Due to the nature of the solution, it is hard to gauge, but compared to competitors, the pricing is very good. I would rate it as an eight and a half out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Symantec Privileged Access Manager?

Recent releases need improvement in webpage management. For instance, navigating through a webpage that acts like a wizard, where I proceed to the next page and enter more information, is not handl...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Symantec Privileged Access Manager?

With the customers that I have so far, I help them broker RDP sessions to sensitive servers, particularly those that manage aspects like physical access. I have also done it for backend databases, ...

See all answers

Comparisons

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs Fudo PAM

Compared 15% of the time

WALLIX Bastion vs Fudo PAM

Compared 13% of the time

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs Fudo PAM

Compared 9% of the time

SSH PrivX vs Fudo PAM

Compared 7% of the time

Delinea Secret Server vs Fudo PAM

Compared 7% of the time

More Fudo PAM Competitors

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs Symantec Privileged Access Manager

Compared 23% of the time

ARCON Privileged Access Management vs Symantec Privileged Access Manager

Compared 15% of the time

Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) vs Symantec Privileged Access Manager

Compared 12% of the time

BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management vs Symantec Privileged Access Manager

Compared 11% of the time

Delinea Secret Server vs Symantec Privileged Access Manager

Compared 9% of the time

More Symantec Privileged Access Manager Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Privileged Access Management (PAM)

March 2026

Download Fudo PAM product report

Buyer's Guide

Symantec Privileged Access Manager

March 2026

Symantec Privileged Access Manager report

Download Symantec Privileged Access Manager product report

Also Known As

Fudo Privileged Access Management

CA PAM, Xceedium Xsuite, CA Privileged Access Manager

Overview

We are the leading vendor of innovative IT security solutions. We focus on privileged access management and privileged session monitoring, combined under the Fudo Security brand. The Fudo product line merges innovation and an intuitive user experience with strong security features. These are the hallmarks of the future designs of the company.

Fudo Security

CA Privileged Access Manager is a simple-to-deploy, automated, proven solution for privileged access management in physical, virtual and cloud environments. It enhances security by protecting sensitive administrative credentials such as root and administrator passwords, controlling privileged user access, proactively enforcing policies and monitoring and recording privileged user activity across all IT resources. It includes CA PAM Server Control (previously CA Privileged Identity Manager) for fine-grained protection of critical servers

Broadcom

Sample Customers

KFC, BP, Santander, Burger King, ING, Starbucks, Yahoo, DHL

NEOVERA, Telesis, eSoft

Buyer's Guide

Fudo PAM vs. Symantec Privileged Access Manager

March 2026

Free Report: Fudo PAM vs. Symantec Privileged Access Manager

Find out what your peers are saying about Fudo PAM vs. Symantec Privileged Access Manager and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Fudo PAM vs. Symantec Privileged Access Manager report.

See our list of best Privileged Access Management (PAM) vendors.

We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.