Fortra's JAMS surpasses its competitors by offering comprehensive job scheduling, advanced automation capabilities, and robust integration options, ensuring efficient and streamlined operations for businesses across various industries.
Control-M excels in workflow automation, scalability, and reliability in complex environments. In comparison, Fortra's JAMS offers flexibility and extensive integration options. Control-M suits large enterprises, while Fortra's JAMS is adaptable for diverse use cases, balancing cost and features effectively.
AutoSys Workload Automation is robust, reliable, and excels in feature set and security. In comparison, JAMS offers intuitive operations and quick deployment. A tech buyer might choose AutoSys for its powerful scheduling and complexity handling or JAMS for its ease of use and rapid ROI.
IBM Workload Automation boasts extensive features like dependency management and workload forecasting, suitable for complex environments. In comparison, Fortra's JAMS offers straightforward job setup and flexible scheduling, ideal for quick deployment and cost-effective solutions for smaller businesses or those with limited budgets.
To my knowledge, IWA is the only WLA product that will provide "parallel tracking" capability to assist in upgrading from one platform to IWA.
It is about one-third of the cost of a controller.
To my knowledge, IWA is the only WLA product that will provide "parallel tracking" capability to assist in upgrading from one platform to IWA.
It is about one-third of the cost of a controller.
Tidal by Redwood excels in ease of deployment, customer service, and has reasonable setup costs, making it ideal for quick implementation. In comparison, Fortra's JAMS offers extensive features, robust integration, and advanced automation, justifying its higher costs for organizations needing a versatile, comprehensive solution.
Stonebranch excels in robust automation, flexible scheduling, and strong integration. In comparison, Fortra\'s JAMS stands out for its job monitoring, scheduling tools, and value in deployment. Tech buyers might choose Stonebranch for comprehensive features, while others may opt for JAMS for its targeted job-specific strengths.
When we reviewed this solution against other vendors, Stonebranch blew everybody out of the water in terms of cost.
Outside of licensing fees, there aren't any other costs.
When we reviewed this solution against other vendors, Stonebranch blew everybody out of the water in terms of cost.
Outside of licensing fees, there aren't any other costs.
ActiveBatch attracts tech buyers with its flexibility and extensive integrations, offering good value and responsive customer support. In comparison, Fortra\'s JAMS is appealing due to its comprehensive job library and robust automation capabilities, despite higher costs, supported by detailed documentation and strong deployment resources.
The price was fairly in line with other automation tools. I don't think it's exorbitantly expensive, relatively speaking.
It allows for lower operational overhead.
The price was fairly in line with other automation tools. I don't think it's exorbitantly expensive, relatively speaking.
It allows for lower operational overhead.
Redwood RunMyJobs offers competitive pricing, straightforward deployment, and responsive support, appealing to businesses seeking simplicity and cost efficiency. In comparison, Fortra\'s JAMS provides advanced integration capabilities, high reliability, and superior customer service, making it ideal for complex, large-scale implementations.
Rocket Zena excels in pricing and customer support, making it attractive for cost-conscious buyers. In comparison, Fortra\'s JAMS boasts superior features and reliability, appealing to those needing advanced functionalities with long-term ROI potential.
The pricing and the licensing are good. It is affordable and can be used to improve and optimize productivity.
The pricing and the licensing are good. It is affordable and can be used to improve and optimize productivity.
VisualCron offers attractive pricing and superior customer support with a range of task options and ease of use. In comparison, Fortra’s JAMS excels in feature richness, boasting robust scheduling, detailed reporting, and seamless integration, justifying its higher cost and delivering significant long-term value through advanced features.
ROI is 95 percent.
ROI is one month.
ROI is 95 percent.
ROI is one month.
AppWorx is noted for its robust scheduling, reliability, and flexible scripting. In comparison, Fortra\'s JAMS features advanced job monitoring, cross-platform support, and extensive third-party integrations. Both products have distinctly different strengths that appeal to buyers based on specific needs and technical priorities.
Licensing options are fairly straightforward.
We are satisfied with the pricing.
Licensing options are fairly straightforward.
We are satisfied with the pricing.
Dollar Universe Workload Automation excels in pricing and ROI, offering robust scheduling capabilities. In comparison, Fortra\'s JAMS leads in features with comprehensive job monitoring and reporting. A tech buyer might choose Dollar Universe for cost-effectiveness, while Fortra\'s JAMS offers extensive functionality.
