IBM Workload Automation and JAMS compete in the workload automation category. IBM Workload Automation holds an advantage with robust automation integrations, while JAMS stands out for its flexibility and ease of use.
Features: IBM Workload Automation is renowned for its dynamic scheduling, seamless integration with Oracle and SAP, and efficient batch processing capabilities. JAMS excels in interactive agent support, versatile scripting options, and comprehensive task management across platforms.
Room for Improvement: IBM Workload Automation could enhance its user interface, SLA monitoring, and integration capabilities to streamline user experience. JAMS could benefit from improved search functionality, exception handling, and a more comprehensive global search feature, which would enhance user satisfaction.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM Workload Automation offers both on-premises and hybrid cloud deployment but faces challenges with support delays and complex queries. JAMS provides a primarily on-premises and hybrid approach, with users finding its technical support more responsive and consistent.
Pricing and ROI: IBM Workload Automation is seen as a premium solution, facing criticism for high licensing costs despite a notable ROI. JAMS presents more flexible and competitive pricing options, offering good value with unlimited licensing potential and lower base pricing, making it cost-effective for scalable growth.
I would rate their support between eight and nine out of ten.
They are very quick to respond depending on the issue's severity.
Their response is prompt, exemplifying how support should be.
We might be underutilizing it, but as more jobs require processing, additional servers would be necessary.
We experience periods of major incidents annually due to capacity constraints, which result in job failures.
Being on the new version, there's been zero downtime.
The maintenance charges have increased significantly, and a lower cost would be beneficial.
Another area for improvement would be the addition of source control for jobs internally, as this feature would solve several problems for me.
A major improvement would be the integration of AI to help us accomplish various tasks.
The price is fair considering the functionality and importance of the tool, although the increase did unsettle our management.
One valuable feature of IBM Workload Automation is the ability to combine different applications and platforms to organize jobs together, creating dependencies.
The most valuable feature of JAMS is its user-friendly interface, especially after upgrading from version six to seven.
This efficient feature has been invaluable, enabling us to streamline our workflow and enhance productivity.
Product | Market Share (%) |
---|---|
JAMS | 2.0% |
IBM Workload Automation | 6.2% |
Other | 91.8% |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 4 |
Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
Large Enterprise | 29 |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 11 |
Midsize Enterprise | 7 |
Large Enterprise | 17 |
IBM Workload Automation streamlines scheduling with automation and dynamic workload balancing. It integrates multiple platforms, offering efficient management across diverse systems, enhancing operational productivity.
IBM Workload Automation provides end-to-end control in managing tasks across varied platforms, supporting event-based scheduling and real-time updates. Its intuitive GUI allows seamless scripting and monitoring, facilitating integration with applications like SAP and Oracle. The inclusion of FTA agents ensures efficient local dependency management, while offering versatile scheduling options. Its capability to provide a comprehensive view, manage CPU usage, and meet service level agreements positions it as a valuable tool for large-scale operations.
What are the most important features?Industries such as government, banking, and large enterprises implement IBM Workload Automation for automated scheduling, workload balancing, and batch processing. It assists in migrating from legacy systems to web-based services, integrating with numerous applications, and managing extensive daily job lists. Key functions include offshore management and backend data collection, crucial for effective resource tracking. This adaptability enables organizations to efficiently support operations while scaling workloads as needed.
JAMS offers efficient automation and scheduling with strong capabilities in planning, dependency management, and multi-platform support. Its intuitive interface and robust tools assist in managing complex workflows for enhanced resource allocation.
JAMS stands out for its blend of automation and scheduling capabilities, making it suitable for handling complex workflows across platforms. Its features such as batch scheduling, natural language scheduling, and interactive agents promote seamless integration with other tools like PowerShell. The focus on metrics and notifications ensures users are informed about operational efficiency enhancements. While JAMS is effective in many areas, users report a need for improved simulation for termination processes and a more intuitive client setup. They see potential in enhanced search functions, better exception handling, and greater transparency in custom execution. The current setup challenges like disappearing options and mobile accessibility can affect user satisfaction. Including a fully web-based client and improving documentation could add value.
What are JAMS' key features?
What benefits should users consider?
Organizations using JAMS for workflow and batch job automation leverage its capabilities for SSIS, SQL procedures, and Python scripts. JAMS supports file automation and managed file transfers across environments like AWS and Azure. Users employ JAMS for data management, reporting, and integration tasks, including handling holiday-aware scheduling for improved task coordination.
We monitor all Workload Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.