FireEye Endpoint Security Pros

SB
Sr Manager - Information Security & Researcher at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
It is easy to use, flexible, and stable. Because it is a cloud-based solution and it integrates all endpoints of the cloud, we can do an IOC-based search. It can search the entire enterprise and tell us the endpoints that are possibly compromised.
It has a feature called Isolation. If a device is compromised, we can connect it to our SOC, and no one would be able to access it. This way we can limit the damage to the network while we are investigating.
View full review »
RS
Group Manager at HCL Technologies
If the network has seen something, we can use that to put a block to all the endpoints.
View full review »
RT
Manager at a tech company with 1,001-5,000 employees
FireEye Endpoint Security's scalability is awesome. I think it is one of the best on that front.
View full review »
Buyer's Guide
FireEye Endpoint Security
November 2022
Learn what your peers think about FireEye Endpoint Security. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: November 2022.
653,522 professionals have used our research since 2012.
GS
Cyber Defense Advisor | Founder Executive at a tech services company with 1-10 employees
The response part of EDR was most valuable. We used that to separate the endpoint from the network. We utilized the solution during the instant response. We were also utilizing advanced malware detection capabilities, but we benefited the most from its help with the response.
View full review »
LL
IT Manager at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
It's a stable solution with good performance.
View full review »
RS
Delivery Manager at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
A great console with a user-friendly GUI.
View full review »
Simone Scatolini - PeerSpot reviewer
System&Security engineer at Var Group SpA
It is a really strong solution for endpoint security.
View full review »
Syed Faisal - PeerSpot reviewer
ICT Manager at SecurEyes
FireEye Endpoint Security is easy to use and lightweight compared to others.
View full review »
RS
Cyber Security Consultant at a energy/utilities company with 10,001+ employees
The features we have found most valuable have been containment as well as the ability to triage agent activities.
View full review »

FireEye Endpoint Security Cons

SB
Sr Manager - Information Security & Researcher at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Malware detection can be better. It doesn't have support and detection for the recent malware, but it has a compensatory control where it can do the behavior-based assessment and alert you when there is something malicious or unexpected. For example, when a certain user is executing the privilege command, which is not normal. These dynamic detections are good, and they compensate for malware detection.
It has very good integrations. However, its integration with Palo Alto was not good, and they seem to be working on it at the backend. It is not very resource-hungry, but it can be even better in terms of resource utilization. It could be improved in terms of efficiency, memory sizing, and disk consumption by agents.
They have something called Managed Detection and Response. They get intel from their customers, and that intel is shared with the rest of FireEye's customers. I want to subscribe to their intel, but that is not available to us.
View full review »
RS
Group Manager at HCL Technologies
The solution can be expensive.
View full review »
RT
Manager at a tech company with 1,001-5,000 employees
The reports need more development. They need more details on the reports and more details taking the executive view into consideration.
View full review »
Buyer's Guide
FireEye Endpoint Security
November 2022
Learn what your peers think about FireEye Endpoint Security. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: November 2022.
653,522 professionals have used our research since 2012.
GS
Cyber Defense Advisor | Founder Executive at a tech services company with 1-10 employees
In some cases, the detection part was not accurate enough. We opened a few cases for the vendor to help us with some miscategorized findings on the endpoints. There were some false positive detections, and we had to work with the vendor to get them tested. We even had some incidents that were not detected. It was a black box type of solution for us.
View full review »
LL
IT Manager at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
We would like to solution to offer better security.
View full review »
RS
Delivery Manager at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
Search feature could be made more user-friendly.
View full review »
Simone Scatolini - PeerSpot reviewer
System&Security engineer at Var Group SpA
There should be better integration between the ePolicy Orchestrator and FireEye console. The integration of both consoles should be better.
View full review »
Syed Faisal - PeerSpot reviewer
ICT Manager at SecurEyes
Most of these types of solutions including others, such as Carbon Black and FortiEDR, all have the same features. However, Carbon Black is the leader when it comes to being robust and user-friendly and this solution should improve in those areas to stay more competitive.
View full review »
RS
Cyber Security Consultant at a energy/utilities company with 10,001+ employees
The way that signatures work when using this solution could be improved. They could be more user friendly. We would like the ability to select a client's signature from a menu or file share to save time.
View full review »
Buyer's Guide
FireEye Endpoint Security
November 2022
Learn what your peers think about FireEye Endpoint Security. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: November 2022.
653,522 professionals have used our research since 2012.