Top 10 Fabasoft app.test [EOL] Alternatives

Name: Fabasoft app.test [EOL]
Brand: Fabasoft

Top Fabasoft app.test [EOL] Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Fabasoft app.test [EOL] based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Tricentis Tosca, OpenText Functional Testing, and Sauce Labs. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Fabasoft Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Fabasoft, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

Tricentis Tosca

4.1 out of 5

Tricentis Tosca

4.1 out of 5

Tricentis Tosca excels in model-based test automation and end-to-end testing across platforms, offering strong customer support. In comparison, Fabasoft app.test [EOL] provides robust integration and cloud-based deployment, attracting businesses needing a comprehensive solution despite higher costs.

Pricing

Tricentis Tosca's setup cost is higher, offering comprehensive testing tools, whereas Fabasoft app.test presents a more affordable initial setup, appealing to budget-conscious users.

View comparison

Pricing

Tricentis Tosca's setup cost is higher, offering comprehensive testing tools, whereas Fabasoft app.test presents a more affordable initial setup, appealing to budget-conscious users.

OpenText Functional Testing

4.0 out of 5

OpenText Functional Testing

4.0 out of 5

OpenText Functional Testing attracts tech buyers with flexible integration and budget-friendly pricing, making it ideal for cost-focused companies. In comparison, Fabasoft app.test [EOL] appeals through cloud-based testing, scalability, and analytics, offering strategic advantages for those valuing comprehensive testing features.

Pricing

OpenText Functional Testing has moderate setup costs compared to Fabasoft app.test [EOL], which generally has higher initial costs.

View comparison

Pricing

OpenText Functional Testing has moderate setup costs compared to Fabasoft app.test [EOL], which generally has higher initial costs.

Sauce Labs

4.4 out of 5

Sauce Labs

4.4 out of 5

Sauce Labs enables automation testing for mobile and web platforms, facilitating integration with CI/CD pipelines. Teams utilize it for cross-browser and cross-OS testing, leveraging its device repository. Users value parallel test execution, video recording, and robust analytics but seek improved speed, physical device availability, and support for third-party integration.

Pricing

We have an enterprise account; it has worked great for our needs.

Try the free trial and work with a Sauce Labs representative to see what package works best for your application(s).

View comparison

Pricing

We have an enterprise account; it has worked great for our needs.

Try the free trial and work with a Sauce Labs representative to see what package works best for your application(s).

Ranorex Studio

4.0 out of 5

Ranorex Studio

4.0 out of 5

Ranorex Studio is used for automating tests on web and desktop applications and appeals to industries like finance and insurance. With features like mobile testing, object recognition, and Jenkins integration, it supports GUI component testing and functional testing. Users seek better browser support and improved API integration to enhance testing efficiency.

Pricing

There are several types of licenses and you need to choose depending on your needs and level of usage.

We paid €3,000 (approximately $3,300 USD) for this solution. When you add the runtime licenses it will be €3,500 (approximately $3,900 USD).

View comparison

Pricing

There are several types of licenses and you need to choose depending on your needs and level of usage.

We paid €3,000 (approximately $3,300 USD) for this solution. When you add the runtime licenses it will be €3,500 (approximately $3,900 USD).

Visual Studio Test Professional

4.2 out of 5

Visual Studio Test Professional

4.2 out of 5

Visual Studio Test Professional excels in software development automation for environments like C#, Java, and .NET. Users value its support for cloud projects, integration with Azure DevOps, IntelliSense, unit testing, and debugging. However, they seek better Jenkins integration, improved memory leak detection, and increased compatibility for Mac platforms.

Pricing

For the cloud services option, you buy a subscription per account or per user. This costs around $52 a month per person.

I think that the pricing is quite good.

View comparison

Pricing

For the cloud services option, you buy a subscription per account or per user. This costs around $52 a month per person.

I think that the pricing is quite good.

ReadyAPI

3.9 out of 5

ReadyAPI

3.9 out of 5

Organizations leverage ReadyAPI for API testing, including functional, performance, security, and data-driven aspects. Its user-friendliness, integration with Postman, Groovy scripting, and CI/CD compatibility boost automation. Users seek enhancements in UI, integration, and performance amid existing concerns like licensing costs and maintenance, yet appreciate its drag-and-drop features and reporting capabilities.

Pricing

This is a cheap solution when you consider the money that will be saved in testing.

There are costs in addition to the licensing fee. For example, if you want to add the load testing you would pay more.

View comparison

Pricing

This is a cheap solution when you consider the money that will be saved in testing.

There are costs in addition to the licensing fee. For example, if you want to add the load testing you would pay more.

Related categories

Functional Testing Tools

Service Virtualization

Mobile App Testing Tools