Dell PowerEdge R-Series Reviews

My role in using or managing Dell PowerEdge R-Series involves having a cluster for all our customers who need a specific type of hosting. We are a hoster and a software development company, and it is an all-in-one solution for hosting and the software they need to have. That is our primary use case for it as well. We are currently having three Dell PowerEdge R-Series in one cluster, and one is due in approximately a year again.

The most valuable features of Dell PowerEdge R-Series for me are the feature richness and the upgradability. I really love the way that it is so dynamically applicable for every situation, and they manage to have an all-in-one solution for every single situation.

Dell PowerEdge has supported the growth and operational success of my company through its great compute power and price-to-performance ratio. Every time Dell is at the top of its game for us, and there is just no other brand for us that is able to reach that kind of price-to-performance ratio.

Dell PowerEdge R-Series has features that specifically cater to the needs of my small company, such as iDRAC. The iDRAC system is a complete feature set for managing servers and hardware technically and monitoring-wise. It really fits in our system and our ecosystem, and monitoring-wise, it is excellent. They have all these sensors available via different protocols and end points, which I love, and the ability to manage and control everything via the iDRAC interface is just a welcome bonus.

In our use case, Dell PowerEdge R-Series is very flexible. It is another computer which helps a lot because of the durability over time. They keep running, making scalability for getting more of those resources in our environment so easy.

I would like to see fewer brand-bound features and no boundaries because of brands in the next releases. More integration with other systems would obviously help.

Non-vendor-specific things could benefit Dell PowerEdge R-Series. Dell has a lot of OEM material, obviously, because it is an OEM provider, but it could benefit from more AMD, more ARM, and more across the line. There are a lot of potential things that they are still missing in their repertoire, so it might be interesting to actually provide that for customers.

I have been working in my current field for approximately fifteen years.

The stability and availability of Dell PowerEdge R-Series systems has been great. I have no issues at all. If there is an issue, we had one issue of a memory DIMM that broke down, but the system told us that this part of hardware broke down and we needed a new one. Dell support has been flawless with that.

Dell support has been flawless. I would evaluate Dell support on a scale of one to ten as a nine because they deliver where they need to, and when they make a promise, it is there. I do not know what would make it a ten for me. A ten is perfect, and perfect does not exist.

Positive

I evaluated servers from Lenovo a couple of years ago. It is another generation, but Dell was absolutely better back then and is now.

The benefits I have realized from using Dell PowerEdge R-Series are the dynamically upgradable hardware. You call Dell and they say what you need. They provide it once you have paid. Then you open the server, you install it, and it is flawless. Everything is detected by itself and it just works.

I have not evaluated or used Dell PowerEdge R-Series with another, non-Intel, CPU vendor inside. I have not evaluated other servers besides Dell PowerEdge R-Series.

I am not sure in what areas Dell PowerEdge R-Series could improve. Everything sums up instead of being scattered around all over the place. Dell PowerEdge R-Series has a particular server for a particular workload, and if you want to do something else with that server, you can. Dell provides options for it, and that just does not work that great with another brand.

Currently, we use Dell PowerEdge R-Series with Intel inside. The Intel processor in our Dell PowerEdge R-Series handles our workloads as expected. We were looking for specific workloads on specific processing power, and previously, we did not have the knowledge about what kind of CPU we needed. Nowadays, we are going into depth about how much a CPU can perform in particular situations, and that is something we did not have. We had to look up that information ourselves, which is where Dell could come in handy.

I am interested in what kind of workloads are particularly interesting for which kind of CPU. Currently, we are balancing between Broadcom licenses and the performance we will get from the price-to-performance ratio on Dell servers themselves. We are noticing that there is a middle ground or at least a balance between what is a great combination for Broadcom licenses including CPU core counts. There is a lot to think about, and that is why there are a few CPUs that really are the sweet spot for Intel and Broadcom combinations.

I can describe specific outcomes or improvements that are attributed to Dell PowerEdge, but not specifically to Intel. The ecosystem really works. I think it works flawlessly. The management consoles, the support—I really love the support—it is all no-nonsense and it works.

We are our own cloud, so for us it is on-premises, but it is kind of a hybrid thing. We do not have any other services from other providers, and we do everything ourselves with open source and Broadcom. I have purchased my Dell PowerEdge servers directly from one of the vendors over here. I would rate this review overall as a nine out of ten.

We use several versions of Dell PowerEdge R-Series. Most of the servers we currently use are the R350s. R370s are not available; they do not exist. We are waiting for the R380s to come out and we intend to transition to those, probably somewhere next year.

As the lead buyer, my role personally is buying the machines for our engineering needs. We create hardware and software for our end clients, usually per use case. When we need servers to host applications, we advise to buy these. We have a lot of racks with these running VMware and other hypervisors to test the environments that the end clients will use and to replicate their errors.

I appreciate Dell solutions because they are reliable, and we know what we are getting. If we do need support, it is quick. Dell offers us the ability to keep our own hard drive, which we appreciate because we can just get the replacement server, hot-swap, and we are running again.

My personal favorite feature is iDRAC. I appreciate that you do not have to work with the OS itself to flash something; it is easy and manageable.

Currently, it is sometimes challenging when a component gets out of fashion or is no longer available at end of life, to quickly get a drop-in replacement. I would appreciate an XE version of the server where we have some drop-in replacements lined up beforehand, and we already know how to validate them. Right now, when this happens, we have about three months to validate the new systems, and that is usually a little short notice for us. I am already happy we get the time we get.

I do have something to say about customer service and support. From time to time, we need to get special licenses or extended warranties or other items, especially for end customers. I think that could be streamlined. Right now, there is a human factor in it; there is not a click and buy option. This could save Dell some time to iterate that as well. If we have a technical question, it can take a little time, especially if we are trying to reach the Dutch support line. Usually, we still get redirected to a UK representative, which is acceptable because I speak English, but some of our customers are a little less happy. It would be beneficial if there were more local technical support. All of our questions get answered usually within a day or two, which I consider pretty quick. If it is high priority or critical, it gets answered within a couple of hours.

I have been working here for two years.

I am very happy with the stability and reliability. When we know all the factors, they perform the way we want. Usually, if something is not performing the way we want, there is a factor that the client is not using per specification. We can replicate it, and we give them advice on how to better perform.

When I refer to underperformance, it may refer to crashes. We are using non-ruggedized servers, so they are meant for a normal hot aisle, cool aisle server setup. We have some clients who place them in different situations where the temperature or humidity is not within specification. That will make the server a little less reliable.

We do not need to scale that often as it is all per use case. The end clients will also use only one setup, maybe high availability with four nodes, but that is about it. We do not need to scale very often, but we do have the option, and that is beneficial.

From time to time, we need to get special licenses or extended warranties or other items, especially for end customers. I think that could be streamlined. Right now, there is a human factor in it; there is not a click and buy option. This could save Dell some time to iterate that as well.

If we have a technical question, it can take a little time, especially if we are trying to reach the Dutch support line. Usually, we still get redirected to a UK representative, which is acceptable because I speak English, but some of our customers are a little less happy. It would be beneficial if there were more local technical support.

All of our questions get answered usually within a day or two, which I consider pretty quick. If it is high priority or critical, it gets answered within a couple of hours.

Positive

We intend to keep using the same R3x servers for the foreseeable future.

We have used other Dell servers in the past that were either overkill or underperforming. Dell PowerEdge R-Series really meets our criteria with a little bit of space to grow. If our applications get more intense, the resources are available. For at least the next four to five years, I do not see us transitioning to a different system.

We have been using Dell long before I started, so we have always used it. It is pretty standardized by our standards right now. As soon as we get the machine, we flash it, validate it, and ship it or we put it in our test solution racks. It is quick and easy.

As the lead buyer, my role personally is buying the machines for our engineering needs.

We have a partnership with Dell, and we are very happy with the partnership, so I do not think we will go to HP or another competitor.

Dell PowerEdge R-Series receives a rating of 9 out of 10.

Dell PowerEdge R-Series is primarily used for private cloud infrastructure. The main functions involve virtual data centers, disaster recovery, storage, and backup capabilities.

Dell PowerEdge R-Series is delivered as a platform for clients in the AI domain, allowing them to build on top of the infrastructure and utilize the compute capacity provided.

Clients have been using Dell PowerEdge R-Series from the start, so they maintain a fully Dell-focused approach.

The product serves as a good foundation because reliable, stable products are essential based on maintenance requirements and other factors. This reliability is definitely one of the key pillars for choosing Dell.

While other vendors are used on specific parts like storage, Dell is always chosen for the compute base.

The technical team values the product highly. From an organizational perspective, the priority is ensuring the product is reliable with a long lifetime cycle. The goal is to avoid variance in infrastructure, so choosing one series should mean it remains available for three, four, or five years due to maintenance considerations, and that works perfectly.

The CPU inside is an Intel Xeon processor.

There is satisfaction with the product because it delivers compute as it should.

Dell PowerEdge R-Series has been in use within the company for two years now, although the company itself has existed for 25 years in the same business.

From a minimum perspective, stability is excellent. With a large number of systems deployed rather than just one, two, or fifty units, downtime is minimal. The infrastructure is fully redundant, which ensures strong stability.

A combination of internal support and vendor support is utilized. The company manages what it can do internally with spare parts on hand. However, when materials or assistance is needed beyond internal capabilities, the service agreement with Dell is leveraged.

Dell's customer service is definitely good, which is why Dell remains a valued partner. Contacting them results in direct communication and solutions as quickly as possible.

Customer service receives a rating of eight out of ten. A perfect ten cannot be given because there is always something that can be improved.

Response time is good and technical knowledge is excellent. When contacting support, the conversations go directly into the main issue rather than asking basic troubleshooting questions. This is why the eight rating is given for customer service.

Positive

Dell PowerEdge R-Series is continuously developing and expanding each week and month.

Prices are increasing each year, but density is also improving, allowing more capacity to be placed into the same machine. More can be accomplished with the same resources compared to ten years ago. While the price is increasing, velocity and performance are getting better, which makes the value proposition positive.

Great value for money is definitely provided.

Dell PowerEdge R-Series receives a rating of nine out of ten for the product itself. It is a reliable product, and there are no plans to switch to any competitor soon because it is excellent.

The overall review rating for this product is eight out of ten.

Positive

We are using Dell PowerEdge R-Series for multiple applications, majorly for virtualization solutions. We are using R740 for virtualization, such as VMware and Hypervisor, and R760 for heavy processes such as BigQuery solution and data processing. There are many macros and VBAs running for huge financial processes. For that, we are using R760, and we are using R740 for backup solutions. Currently, 90% of usage is dedicated to virtualization technology.

As the data center lead, I oversee operations for my company across India. One of our primary concerns is Service Level Agreements (SLAs) and uptime. Performance is crucial, and Dell PowerEdge R-Series servers offer a lot of impressive performance. Over the past three to four years, they have provided me with almost 99.999% uptime, which is a significant benchmark for our operations. The servers have not gone down at all during this period.

Dell PowerEdge R-Series servers have successfully reduced my unplanned production downtimes.

We have analyzed the last six months to a year of energy consumption. It has saved us about 30% in energy usage and only produced 4%-5% percent of CO2 emissions, which is quite impressive.

Dell PowerEdge R-Series assists our organization in achieving sustainability goals. It provides a remarkable uptime of 99.999%, which contributes significantly to stability. Additionally, its performance is excellent, currently serving more than 15,000-20,000 users. It’s incredibly effective. I would definitely rate it a ten out of ten for stability.

The first and most important are the security features, especially the inbuilt encryption, which is one of the major business cases for choosing Dell servers over other manufacturers because the security features in terms of encryption and other cryptographic aspects are excellent. 

The second part is the hardware stability; the hardware stability, maintenance, and downtime given by Dell servers occurs once a year for one server, or sometimes not at all. Hardware stability compared to any other manufacturer makes Dell very good, especially the R-Series and M-Series. 

Based on my experience, one area where Dell could improve the PowerEdge R-Series servers is in the disk bus controllers. There is a need for advancements in this area from a hardware perspective. While PowerEdge has several AI-enabled models and is making strides in technology, I believe that the hard disk controllers need to be more effective compared to competitors like Lenovo and HPE. Currently, even when using SSDs or SaaS disk models in my Dell PowerEdge R-Series servers, the throughput is roughly 10%-15% lower compared to similar offerings from HPE and Lenovo. While this doesn't have a major impact on my business, it is worth noting since Dell has a strong position in Gartner ratings.

Overall, the hardware quality is good, but I frequently encounter errors that are not hardware-related; they're mainly cyclic errors where the server struggles to process data as quickly as other manufacturers' controllers. Despite this, I am completely satisfied with the functionality of the Dell PowerEdge R-Series.

Flexibility is a debatable topic, and I would rate it about a six out of ten. When it comes to flexibility, we do need to account for downtime if we want to extend or make changes. There are very few hot-pluggable devices in Dell servers compared to others, making online plug-and-play opportunities limited. So, I would rate flexibility as a six rather than a five.

I have been working with Dell PowerEdge R-Series for more than five years.

Dell PowerEdge R-Series reduced unplanned production downtimes. I would rate it a ten out of ten for stability.

Dell PowerEdge R-Series has many inbuilt SAS controllers, and scalability is very effective, warranting a rating of eight.

Technical support for Dell PowerEdge R-Series products deserves a rating of ten out of ten because it is about a four-hour ETR, so they are getting it closed within four to five hours.

Positive

Lenovo was previously used, but they are not competitive enough in that segment now. HPE is providing good competition for Dell PowerEdge R-Series, but for us, Dell is definitely better. 

It's a half-a-day setup process. It's very simple.

The integration of Dell PowerEdge R-Series products is handled completely by our in-house team. I have not worked with Dell Professional Services recently, but I did work with them about four years ago. It was excellent three or four years back, but now I’m not sure if it meets those standards.

Year on year, the ROI is comparatively less. We typically opt for five years of AMC, and when comparing cloud and on-premise costs, our on-premise solution is much cheaper—almost 85% cheaper than cloud. Regarding ownership, with AMC for five years with pro support, we have good peace of mind.

The pricing for Dell PowerEdge R-Series is neither the highest nor the lowest. It's appropriately priced, and we secured Dell PowerEdge R-Series for a very good deal.

We are working with models R740, R750, and R760.. 90% of our solutions on Dell PowerEdge R-Series run on VMware. We initiated AI solutioning with bot deployment almost a year and a half ago. We are not beginners in AI, as we have implemented it in most business cases from ticketing mechanisms to fault tolerance mechanisms. While we are not claiming to be very mature in AI, we are at an intermediate stage of using AI solutions in our environment. 

We currently have limited AI workloads running on our PowerEdge servers. About 60% of our overall infrastructure has been migrated to cloud solutions. We are now leveraging microservices for AI from the cloud. Previously, most of our on-premises AI applications in the data centers were primarily focused on ticketing solutions, where we had deployed and implemented AI operations (AIOps). However, we are in the process of migrating those operations to the cloud as well. So, overall, there isn't much running on the PowerEdge servers in the data center at the moment.

I would rate Dell PowerEdge R-Series a nine out of ten.

I am currently working with Dell solutions, particularly with Dell technologies. I am currently working with Dell PowerMax. I work with PowerMax, some Isilon, and some Dell PowerEdge servers, as Dell actually has a huge umbrella with many products.

For Dell PowerEdge, I think I'm working with the 6500 series and I also have expertise in the 7K series. That is the R series. I started working with Dell PowerEdge R-Series around 2016 or 2017, so it has been almost 10 years. We actually have a very huge environment for Dell PowerEdge R-Series, with close to 1300 servers deployed. One of my object storage use cases is MinIO hosted on Dell PowerEdge R-Series, and similarly, I have another NAS storage with Qumulo also hosted on the same Dell PowerEdge R-Series hardware.

I am currently running S3 object storage and eNAS workloads on Dell PowerEdge R-Series. We need strong hardware for object storage to sustain our cloud-native workload, and we also required a robust server for NAS and file sharing, which was a recommendation from the vendor. Before Dell, we faced many challenges with Intel, which is why we switched.

We are integrating AI capabilities, as we have started using Dell AIOps. Right now, we are still getting familiar with it, but I believe we will soon have GenAI workloads on Dell PowerEdge R-Series servers. Testing is ongoing, and while we are not yet using a lot of AI, we are making gradual progress.

The best feature of Dell PowerEdge R-Series is the tool called OpenManage Enterprise, which allows me to manage my entire list of about 1300 servers under one consolidated pane, making the administration absolutely fantastic. The firmware recommendation and upgrades are straightforward, and Dell's iDRAC is one of the finest tools that proactively informs me of hardware failures.

The support from Dell is one significant benefit I observe, especially at American Express where we work with many vendors. Dell's SLA commitments are reliable, and their engineers provide excellent support during escalations, often resolving issues quickly. Their hardware has a lower failure rate compared to other vendors, leading to fewer outages.

Using Dell PowerEdge R-Series has helped reduce unplanned production downtime. The impact of Dell PowerEdge R-Series on our sustainability goals is absolutely fantastic, as we haven't encountered any major outages.

I believe Dell should enhance training for their AIOps product since there is limited tutorial availability. Recently, I attended a Dell webinar discussing various topics, but it didn't focus directly on operational usability. Infrastructure and operations engineers would benefit greatly from more engagement and training to effectively utilize these tools.

From a functionality perspective, I have noticed that Dell PowerEdge R-Series tends to go into maintenance mode frequently after reboots. While the recovery process is quick, there should be a feature to disable automatic maintenance mode.

I started working with Dell PowerEdge R-Series around 2016 or 2017, so it has been almost 10 years.

In the last year, we only experienced a total downtime of 23 minutes for the storage I handle, which is less than 0.00001%. This downtime was due to an external network switch failure, yet the server's redundancy kicked in quickly, resulting in minimal impact on operations.

The scalability of Dell PowerEdge R-Series is very good; we can scale horizontally and vertically as needed, but we prefer horizontal scaling for quick adjustments.

The support from Dell is one significant benefit I observe, especially at American Express where we work with many vendors. Dell's SLA commitments are reliable, and their engineers provide excellent support during escalations, often resolving issues quickly. Their hardware has a lower failure rate compared to other vendors, leading to fewer outages.

Using Dell PowerEdge R-Series has helped reduce unplanned production downtime. The technical support is phenomenal, and I would rate them a 10.

I previously worked with Intel servers before adopting Dell. We decided to switch because Intel had numerous issues, taking up to 10 days to address simple drive failures due to global procurement challenges.

The initial setup with Dell PowerEdge R-Series is very straightforward without any challenges.

I worked with Dell Professional Services during implementation. The engagement during the implementation involved professional services for cabling, rack stacking, and support during the operating system installation and guest OS deployment. Dell also provided onsite expert assistance for configuration issues. I would rate the professional services for this solution a 9, taking off one point due to the associated costs.

The ROI from Dell PowerEdge R-Series servers isn't very visible to me, but the continued investment suggests positive outcomes for the company.

Dell is expensive, which is a known fact. When comparing similar products, Dell often has higher prices. However, if my colleague considers running AI workloads on Dell PowerEdge R-Series, cost is something we must present to management, as it can be a concern. Dell is indeed expensive.

We evaluated Supermicro and HP, but the operational performance of Dell is far superior. Prices are comparable between Dell and HP, but Dell outperforms HP significantly.

If someone is getting a good deal, I'd say go with Dell PowerEdge R-Series for their AI computing needs instead of hyperscalers. The total cost of ownership is something I haven't looked into closely. The Dell products have helped consolidate various technologies under one umbrella, which likely supports reducing the total cost of ownership. I wasn't involved in the calculation process. I primarily use Dell PowerEdge R-Series and have not worked with other series such as XR or MX. For workloads that require guest OS or block storage, I recommend Dell PowerEdge R-Series, and for cloud-native applications with minimal database dependencies, it's a solid choice. My overall review rating for Dell PowerEdge R-Series is 9.

We use Dell PowerEdge R-Series 640 for our servers. Dell PowerEdge R-Series represents our basic infrastructure. It serves as the Hyper-V environment for all our Microsoft machines that we have in use, such as Active Directory and an Exchange server. We used to have SharePoint, but it has been moved online. Ultimately, it is the backbone for the basic services that are also synced towards Microsoft Azure Cloud or something similar.

We set up Dell PowerEdge R-Series completely, with the entire virtual infrastructure using Microsoft Hyper-V, and connected it with the storage, then installed it in the data center. We have already moved it once, from one rack to another, from one component to another. That is what we did in 2017/18. Now it is more just administration, making sure the services are running and that the product itself is running, but daily work with it is actually rather minimal now, because they basically just run.

The most valuable function of Dell PowerEdge R-Series is actually the durability.

Dell PowerEdge R-Series has improved my company because I currently have to worry very little about this whole infrastructure. I know it runs reliably, and I can therefore allocate my working time differently to other areas, and I don't have to check the infrastructure every single day. That is perhaps the real improvement here.

If there are areas where Dell PowerEdge R-Series could still be improved, I find it a bit cumbersome because we have a contact in sales through whom we can order Dell PowerEdge R-Series servers, but storage is only available via certain partners. This makes it a bit cumbersome to get new hardware if necessary, because I then have to order the storage via a partner again. This could perhaps be streamlined so that it can be done directly via sales as well, which would make things a bit easier. Otherwise, I don't currently see any real improvements where we would say this absolutely has to be addressed.

Regarding improvement suggestions for Dell PowerEdge R-Series itself, one thing comes to mind. Those are all hot-swap drives and the latches for locking are very delicate. We now have two of them in the storage and I believe one drive in Dell PowerEdge R-Series where the latch basically gave up after 6 years or so. Either the tension has diminished, or perhaps a small tab broke. This could be looked at again so that the locking mechanism is more robust, because nothing actually happens and the drive sits firmly in place, but it just looks bad if you're standing in front of the rack. The latch could be addressed. Otherwise, as I said, we're currently perfectly happy.

I have been using Dell PowerEdge R-Series since they were purchased in 2017 and have been running since then, from the end of 2017 through the beginning of 2018, so they have basically been running since 2018.

I have had no crashes, failures, or performance problems with Dell PowerEdge R-Series.

I definitely have the feeling that Dell PowerEdge R-Series grows with the needs, meaning it is scalable for the company's long-term plans. You can plan very precisely what you currently need. In 90% of cases, you still have the ability to react and scale up. The respective product lines and respective sizes of Dell PowerEdge R-Series servers are relatively widely and broadly scalable, so you don't always have to move up to the next higher price range to cover the same scenario, but you can actually implement it with a somewhat cheaper model.

With the relatively manageable infrastructure in Dell PowerEdge R-Series, it is designed in such a way that you can relatively easily handle the whole topic of patch management on hypervisors. Due to the very good scalability of the devices, you can plan and implement it in a way that it takes very little effort to shift the entire infrastructure to the next host and then perform patch management properly. That is an example where it has simplified things and still stays within a cost or price range that is affordable.

I do not use performance metrics or benchmarks to measure success with Dell PowerEdge R-Series.

I have not had contact with Dell support for Dell PowerEdge R-Series. For other products, I have, and it was always that we got everything properly resolved. There are always some issues that perhaps occur rarely in the support environment, where it then takes a bit longer until everything is resolved satisfactorily. Everything has always been handled properly and quickly so far. I would rate the support from Dell from 1 to 10 as an 8, simply so there is still some room for improvement.

Positive

Before Dell PowerEdge R-Series, we switched from HP to Dell. We used HP before. You cannot say anything bad about that either, but in terms of price-performance, HP lagged significantly behind Dell, also in the offers. In terms of quality, we had a lot of problems, especially in storage with failed drives, so that we actually replaced around 8 to 10 of the 25 drives in the storage every year.

I have definitely seen a return on investment through the solution I implemented with Dell PowerEdge R-Series. We are now operating them in the eighth year, and with HP back then, we said after the fifth or sixth year that we needed to replace them. Now I have 8 years and have paid a manageable price for Care Packs and have had no failures at all. The return on investment basically happened at the moment when we can still continue using the existing solution and don't have to invest new money.

Regarding the pricing and licensing of Dell PowerEdge R-Series, you always want to spend a bit less, but it is fine for the quality and for the surrounding services that come with it and are provided. It is completely fine and also manageable for SMEs.

When we wanted to move away from HP, we also requested an offer from HP. We also had Fujitsu Siemens back then. Those three we definitely requested offers from. I think one or two smaller, lesser-known ones as well.

If we're using school grades, I would rate the stability and reliability of Dell PowerEdge R-Series as a 1, which is the best grade, because we have had Dell PowerEdge R-Series and storage since the end of 2017, running 365 days a year, 24/7, without any downtime.

I have not expanded Dell PowerEdge R-Series because we configured it in such a way right from the start that so far it has been sufficient. Currently it is rather decreasing, so we now have many resources we previously had allocated now available again.

We have had a hybrid scenario for years with the on-premises as a backup or fallback. It will continue to be cloud-preferred and the rest still as fallback, but it will definitely end up at some point as a kind of exchange on demand if things get really bad, because the rest will run cloud-based. We still have the safety net to enable a return from the cloud if necessary and above all to be able to do it cheaply in case that ever becomes an issue again, if people decide that the cloud is no longer state of the art.

What sets Dell PowerEdge R-Series apart from other servers, from my experience, is that when it was time to replace the old infrastructure, we decided to go with Dell because of the price-performance ratio and because of very good support, both on the sales side and on the support side, which we were able to take advantage of. We have had Dell in use for so long that of course we don't know how the competitors are doing now, but back then it was really good and the price-performance ratio was also right. Those were the things that brought us to Dell and also made us stick with them.

In terms of functions of Dell PowerEdge R-Series that specifically target the needs of smaller or medium-sized companies, I would actually see it as the price-performance ratio, because that is really solid and viable for medium-sized companies. Especially in relation to the performance offered and the quality offered, that is really an important point, because you still have to keep an eye on the budget. What do I spend, what do I get in return? That is what I would see as a key point for SMEs, that you really look at that.

I would rate this review overall as a 9.5 out of 10.

My role in using and managing Dell PowerEdge R-Series involves virtualization. I use VMware virtualization as my main use case for Dell PowerEdge R-Series.

Using Dell PowerEdge R-Series saves me a lot of time. I'm saving probably at least four hours for each upgrade that I have to do. Dell PowerEdge R-Series servers have helped reduce unplanned production downtime. We achieve approximately 99.8% uptime with Dell PowerEdge R-Series.

The features of Dell PowerEdge R-Series that I prefer most are the iDRAC and firmware updating capabilities, which are the main reasons for my preference. The ease of updating firmware through iDRAC is a significant benefit. It's easy because HPE requires you to download a large firmware package that is about six gigabytes, but with Dell iDRAC, I'm able to reach the internet directly to download the drivers for installation. This is possible because they're stable and they just work without any downtime.

I have not seen benefits from running AI workloads on Dell PowerEdge R-Series servers, as it is not applicable to my situation. I'm not planning to use or run any AI loads on Dell PowerEdge R-Series. The reason is that the cost is too much, so we're looking at other competitors such as Lambda-ware because it's cheaper.

On another subject, it would be nice to see Dell PowerEdge R-Series servers a little bit lighter. They're very heavy and feel about 40 to 50 pounds, so if they could lower the weight by 15 pounds, that would be beneficial.

I've been using Dell PowerEdge R-Series rack servers for approximately 10 years.

Dell PowerEdge R-Series servers have helped reduce unplanned production downtime. We achieve approximately 99.8% uptime with Dell PowerEdge R-Series. This is because they're stable and they just work without any downtime.

Dell PowerEdge R-Series has not affected the overall flexibility of my operations or business. Dell PowerEdge R-Series servers have helped reduce my total cost of ownership.

I would evaluate customer service and technical support from Dell as a challenging subject. Many of the customer service representatives are located in India, and this creates a struggle with time zone coverage for US customers. Dell does not have much US-based support, which is unfortunate. I would like to see much more of Dell's support coming from the US instead of India. The knowledge level is definitely not as good in India as it is with the US team. The APAC and EMEA teams do have good support, but Dell is pushing all support to India, which is one of our struggles in wanting to continue with Dell.

Prior to adopting Dell PowerEdge R-Series, we were using Hewlett Packard and HPE to address similar needs. The primary reason we moved to Dell was to try something new, and we've been sticking with it. There was really nothing in terms of performance or cost that influenced our decision, as they're all comparable.

I have seen a return on my investment with Dell PowerEdge R-Series in terms of company uptime, which is 99.8% of the time.

I have seen a return on my investment with Dell PowerEdge R-Series in terms of company uptime, which is 99.8% of the time.

My experience with pricing, setup costs, and licensing for Dell PowerEdge R-Series was fair, as we go through our sales representative. We buy directly from Dell.

The other solutions I considered before Dell PowerEdge R-Series were HPE and Cisco UCS.

The investment per project is probably over $100,000. We've been running the equipment for probably about five to six years instead of changing out the equipment every two to three years. I don't know how I would assess Dell PowerEdge R-Series servers for energy consumption, as we don't track that metric. Regarding the impact of Dell PowerEdge R-Series servers on my company's sustainability goals, it's not applicable. During our evaluation process, our sales representative was able to sell the product to us in both positive and negative aspects. What was exceptional about the sales representative was that they were very nice to us. Since hardware is hardware to us, the sales representative being very nice to us resulted in our decision to buy from them. What would make this a perfect rating for me is if they move the support back to the US. I would rate this review a 9 out of 10.

Unity is our main storage for production, and there are virtual machines running.

We have PowerEdge servers for running VMware virtual machines and Unity EMC Unity to store our virtual machines.

We have about nine hundred people in the company, and we have four ESXi servers at headquarters and two ESXi servers at both remote localities. We are planning to have a better impact at other localities and make a bigger infrastructure, as we have two more big remote localities where a virtualization infrastructure does not exist yet.

We are running a lot of workloads on Dell PowerEdge Rack Servers and have a lot of free CPU resources. Each ESXi server has half a terabyte in memory operation, and we have almost two hundred terabytes of storage.

I haven't seen ROI from Dell PowerEdge Rack Servers. My focus is on virtualization and backup, which is really good, and I enjoy it. It is important to do a job or work which I enjoy. It is the first important thing in life, in my opinion.

The benefits I have seen from Dell PowerEdge Rack Servers are stability. I tried to build a visualization infrastructure very systematically and slowly to make this solution, and now it is running very well, stable, and we have no problems with this infrastructure. I am satisfied.

The best features of Dell PowerEdge Rack Servers are that I use iDRAC for remote access to turn off servers. It is a very good feature for me as an admin, and I use vCenter from VMware for controlling all ESXi servers together with a backup solution for backing up our data.

We have very simple alignment and a very simple infrastructure due to Dell PowerEdge Rack Servers, which provides good flexibility.

Mainly, I would like to improve the speed of storage response. We would like to improve our performance by using disks without rotation. The price is better now, and I think it will be better in the future. I think this is the trend.

We haven't experienced any unplanned downtimes. It is a stable platform.

The product has been stable since implementation. We had EMC VNX 430, but there were often failed hard disks. Now, with Unity, there are no problems. There are no faulty hard disks, and it is functioning properly. It is interesting for me to understand why.

The capacity is enough, but when we expand our data, I call Prague, and they deliver to me the next expandable box, and we can add more disks. It is working well.

I have very good experience with their technical support. I have contacts for Dell servers and also for storage and other storage at our remote locations.

I would rate their support as the best, ten out of ten.

Positive

The implementation was easy.

We deployed it ourselves, except for storage settings and installation, which were done by our storage vendor from Prague, the technicians.

The technicians were from a software company named Comparex Prague.

I haven't seen ROI from Dell PowerEdge Rack Servers.

I am not using Dell PowerStore or other Dell products PowerMax or PowerStore.

We are using Dell PowerEdge Rack Servers model 340.

I have good experience with Dell PowerEdge Rack Servers. We are running these servers for maybe four years, and before, we also used Dell servers, a previous version for which we continue with this platform.

They have positively impacted my organization. I find it easy to use Dell PowerEdge Rack Servers; it's intuitive. I use web access to the devices, and it works well. In the past, using Java for Dell Servers was a very bad solution due to many connection mistakes with iDRAC servers. Now Dell has improved the solution and uses a web interface, and it operates without problems.

I switched to high performance in the BIOS environment of Dell PowerEdge Rack Servers. I create solutions for graceful shutdown in blackout events, and I have a higher solution from our connection provider, T-Mobile, in the Czech Republic. I have the condition to get an SMS switch when some important incident occurs, and I receive an SMS. I don't need to be all the time at the computer or on Outlook. I must completely say that I am satisfied with Dell service, and I have good contacts for support from the Czech Republic and also for storage.

I rate Dell PowerEdge Rack Servers ten out of ten.

My main uses for Dell PowerEdge R-Series include using them as IO machines, talking to PCI Express devices, changing over time, and pushing data to the network for in-flight compute.

What I appreciate most about Dell PowerEdge R-Series is how they are engineered internally. You can open them and easily disassemble and reassemble them. I am a fan of the iDRAC management interface, which is unique in the world.

Using Dell PowerEdge R-Series servers has helped reduce unplanned production downtime. Although calculating the exact amount is difficult, before we used servers from another brand, I had boxes exploding every week, with real fires. In more than 15 years using Dell PowerEdge R-Series, I had one motherboard failure in 13 years and a couple of memory bars, leading to almost zero issues. The hard disk used is simply consumable.

Using Dell PowerEdge R-Series servers has affected the overall flexibility of my operations and business. Thanks to iDRAC, I could give access to users, allowing them to reboot the machines, look at consoles, and reconfigure settings. This has created a great new experience for the users compared to before. For the management team, the whole software environment around Dell PowerEdge R-Series portfolio, for example, OpenManage Enterprise as a management platform, has increased efficiency. For instance, it previously took two people full-time for a week to upgrade the BIOS on 120 machines, but today we can do 300 in five minutes, completed by a tenth of a person equivalent. It is incredible.

For the improvement of Dell PowerEdge R-Series, something very personal to me is the number of PCI Express slots in the back. However, that is an engineering choice. Overall, I am happy with the machines, and I cannot think of any improvements at this time.

I have been using Dell PowerEdge R-Series since 2013.

Using Dell PowerEdge R-Series servers has helped reduce unplanned production downtime. Although calculating the exact amount is difficult, before we used servers from another brand, I had boxes exploding every week, with real fires. In more than 15 years using Dell PowerEdge R-Series, I had one motherboard failure in 13 years and a couple of memory bars, leading to almost zero issues. The hard disk used is simply consumable.

Using Dell PowerEdge R-Series servers has affected the overall flexibility of my operations and business. Thanks to iDRAC, I could give access to users, allowing them to reboot the machines, look at consoles, and reconfigure settings. This has created a great new experience for the users compared to before. For the management team, the whole software environment around Dell PowerEdge R-Series portfolio, for example, OpenManage Enterprise as a management platform, has increased efficiency. For instance, it previously took two people full-time for a week to upgrade the BIOS on 120 machines, but today we can do 300 in five minutes, completed by a tenth of a person equivalent. It is incredible.

My evaluation of customer service and technical support with Dell is extremely positive. We have proactive support, with technicians providing spare parts on-site within 24 hours. For me, this is a clear 10. While I know that for desktops, some people may not be as happy, that is not my business unit, but those users also switch from other companies to Dell laptops and desktops.

Before selecting Dell PowerEdge R-Series, I would consider only two brands of IT hardware in the world for running a serious 24/7 data center, and Dell is one of them, with HP as the other. These are the only two I take seriously for production quality and support, which is often overlooked but very important if something explodes at 2:00 in the morning. This is where the difference between vendors is evident.

My experience with pricing, setup costs, and licensing has been very good. Dell has always been a cool company with nice people to talk to. I know the whole chain up to management, so we can always work out prices that work for everybody, leading to extremely competitive and satisfying experiences for all involved.

Using Dell PowerEdge R-Series servers has helped reduce my total cost of ownership (TCO). The efficiency of power supplies is much better than before, leading to lower heat and power consumption for the cluster, resulting in doubling the number of machines while reducing the power consumption for the data center, which is incredible. Additionally, on the personnel side, we previously needed four or five sysadmins for 120 machines. Now, it is a tenth of one person looking after 300, freeing others to do different tasks rather than laying them off.

My experience with pricing, setup costs, and licensing has been very good. Dell has always been a cool company with nice people to talk to. I know the whole chain up to management, so we can always work out prices that work for everybody, leading to extremely competitive and satisfying experiences for all involved.

I would assess Dell PowerEdge R-Series servers for energy consumption as brilliant. We quadruple the computing power while reducing the power consumption by 20%.

My impressions of Dell PowerEdge R-Series servers' impact on my organization's sustainability goals show that a significant factor for us is heat and power consumption. By simply moving from other brands to Dell PowerEdge R-Series, we could reduce it by 20 to 40%.

I give this review a rating of 10.