Datto Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) offers comprehensive cybersecurity capabilities, specifically designed to protect endpoints from potential threats. With features like real-time monitoring and automated threat response, it provides essential protection for IT infrastructures.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Datto Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) | 1.2% |
| CrowdStrike Falcon | 7.4% |
| Microsoft Defender for Endpoint | 5.9% |
| Other | 85.5% |
Datto Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) features a transparent pricing structure with no setup costs, facilitating a smooth integration process for users. Pricing methods typically involve subscription-based models, accommodating per-endpoint or per-user licensing options. The pricing range is flexible, catering to organizations of varying sizes and security needs, offering robust endpoint security solutions.
Datto EDR delivers an integrated approach to endpoint security, focusing on detecting threats in real time and providing automated response mechanisms. It efficiently safeguards systems by leveraging advanced threat intelligence and analytics. This EDR solution is instrumental for IT professionals seeking robust endpoint protection and seamless integration with existing systems, promoting a proactive security posture.
What Are the Key Features of Datto Endpoint Detection and Response?Datto EDR implementation is prevalent in sectors like healthcare and finance, where security and compliance are critical. Its ability to integrate with industry-specific IT systems makes it a preferred choice to safeguard sensitive data and maintain operational integrity.
Datto Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) was previously known as Infocyte HUNT.
Check Point Software, PwC, Grant Thornton, AT&T, DHL, U.S. Department of Defense
| Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
|---|---|---|
| Director at a computer software company with 11-50 employees | 4.0 | We use Datto Endpoint Detection and Response as part of our solutions. Its ease of deployment and effective risk responsiveness are valuable features. However, adding web filtering would be beneficial. It has reduced our security incident costs by 15%. |
| IT Manager at a educational organization with 501-1,000 employees | 3.0 | I use this for security, valuing its excellent scanning and insights. However, deployment is terrible, agents often lock up, and OS support is limited, making management difficult. I'd rate it 6/10 due to these challenges. |
| Security Auditor at a tech services company with 51-200 employees | 4.5 | Datto Endpoint Detection and Response is excellent for endpoint security, integrating well with other Kaseya products like RMM and Autotask. However, it's insufficient for building an advanced SOC, requiring additional tools and playbook automation for comprehensive solutions. |
| Co Founder at Carredas | 4.0 | I use Datto EDR for endpoint detection and response, and its most valuable feature is the visibility of endpoints it provides. However, it would benefit from offering more deployment methods to enhance its overall usability. |
They use Datto EDR as part of the solutions that we supply.
Datto EDR has helped reduce overall security incident costs by fifteen percent.
The ease of deployment has been good, and the responsiveness of the application to risks has been quite effective.
The inclusion of web filtering would be good.
I have been working with this solution for about six months now.
The stability of the solution is very good, and I haven't had any problems.
There could be some room for improvement, but it is very scalable.
Technical support has been quite good. We haven't had any problems with technical support.
Positive
The initial setup was easy and really good.
It has reduced security incident costs by 15%.
The price is quite low. On a scale of one to ten, I would rate it a four, meaning it is quite cheap.
For the ease of use, responsiveness of support, and ease of deployment, I would recommend this solution.
I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.
We primarily use the solution for security.
The insight that the solution provides is the most valuable aspect. The security scanning they do is excellent.
The deployment of the solution right now is terrible. We find it to be very bad. It could be improved enormously.
The stability isn't ideal. The agents are in locked states and need to be reinstalled occasionally.
There's also an area where they lack is the grouping of the agents. If it could be made a little easier to manage and for agents to be moved around it would make for a better solution.
The solution needs to offer more support of different operating systems.
I've been using the solution for three months.
The stability isn't quite ideal yet. It has work to do. Sometimes the agents are in locked states and they need to be reinstalled from time to time.
With the nature of that install on OS, the platform itself is scalable. However, they lack support for operating systems. Some of the older versions of Linux and Linux, in general, are not supported.
There was support for the tool itself being able to be installed on different platforms. Trying the support, we found them to be pretty responsive. Overall, we've been very satisfied with the service.
We didn't previously use a different solution. Infocyte HUNT was the first one we've worked with in this manner.
The initial setup is not straightforward at all. It's very complex.
The deployment is not an enjoyable process at all.
We tried to use the integration strategies such as the regular deployment tools like SCCA. However, the provided binaries don't work with those tools. We had to do a lot of the installation manually. It took time.
I didn't take part in the purchasing process and therefore can't speak to the costs surrounding licensing.
We're just a customer. We don't have a business relationship with the company.
I'm not sure which version of the solution I'm currently using. As I'm on cloud deployment, I believe it to be the most recent version.
I'd warn others considering the solution that they'll need to build their own packages, so they should be prepared for that.
I'd rate the solution six out of ten.
Datto Endpoint Detection and Response is a perfect product for endpoint security. The solution is well integrated with other Kaseya products. I like how the solution integrates with other products like RMM and Autotask.
Datto Endpoint Detection and Response is good for what it does for the endpoint, but it is not enough to build a SOC. It may be enough for a small, first-level SOC or just a part of a SOC, but you probably need more tools if you want a more complicated solution and more advanced SOC.
The solution should allow the automation of playbooks. If you have a typical problem, it automatically switches off something or locks the computer.
It was really easy to implement the solution because it's cloud-based.
Datto Endpoint Detection and Response is not an expensive solution.
Datto Endpoint Detection and Response is a fine solution for small customers who don't have many servers and don't require a lot of attention in terms of security.
Overall, I rate Datto Endpoint Detection and Response a nine out of ten.
Datto EDR is used for detection and response for endpoints.
The most valuable feature of Datto EDR is the visibility of the endpoints.
The solution could improve by having more deployment methods.
Datto EDR is stable.
We have approxiamtelt 40 epople using the stoluiton.
This solution is scalable.
The technical support was satisfactory.
We have managers, team managers, and others in development doing the deployment.
There is an annual license to use this solution. The price of the solution can be expensive depending on the company.
I would recommend this solution to others.
I rate Datto EDR an eight out of ten.
