Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Veeam Agent for Microsoft Windows [EOL] vs Veritas Backup Exec comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Veeam Agent for Microsoft W...
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
40
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Veritas Backup Exec
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
75
Ranking in other categories
Backup and Recovery (13th)
 

Featured Reviews

Muhammad Ibtehaj - PeerSpot reviewer
Easy to use and mange with reasonable pricing
The main feature is a specific file type. If we want some PDF files just to back up, the prefix is very easy, and we do everything in Veeam backup. It's straightforward to set up. It's stable. The solution is easy to use. You can centrally manage it. It's potentially free to use.
Pawel Augustyn - PeerSpot reviewer
Simplified interface with good performance but needs monitoring
I need to use PowerStore and Veritas Backup Exec. It is a direct backup to types, and it is supported by my backup. It offers good performance and stability, and it works properly. I am happy with this program. It is still working on aligning with security requirements and data encryption for Amazon or ATAC. It has a lot of functions and security measures, which ensure our backups are secure.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The Veeam Agent for Microsoft Windows is easy to use and performing a recovery is easy to do."
"Veeam helps to create a stable environment with virtual servers."
"I don't have any major problems with the agent connectivity with Microsoft applications or Microsoft Azure."
"The most valuable feature is the ease of use."
"This is a reliable system that supports Veeam backup and recovery for Windows."
"I love Veeam because it is very easy to work with."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to navigate inside a backup point to look for a specific folder or data you want to recover."
"This is a good product with a simple environment."
"Recovery via Active Directory is painless and much easier than the complicated setup procedures of other products."
"It is one of the most stable backup solutions."
"When something goes down, and we need to restore data, the most used case is being able to restore it. Veritas Backup Exec allows you to restore down to the file level."
"Its reliability and the fact that we have all the skills that we need for Veritas Backup Exec are the most valuable."
"The usability and interface of the solution are good."
"The flexibility is very good."
"The interface, dashboard, and pricing are all perfect."
"Synthetic backup is valuable. It gives you the possibility to do a synthesized backup, which means that it combines a full backup and incremental backup data and gives it to you in one stream. So, you don't have to restore the full backup and then later go and restore the incremental backup. You can do that in one go."
 

Cons

"The compression ratio and application ratio could still be improved in this solution. Reporting could also be improved, for better monitoring."
"Updating and configuration can sometimes be a little bit of a hassel, but once you know the product better it is easy to use."
"There should be an option to use the solution for physical machines."
"The stability of this solution needs to be improved."
"Some customers have Oracle databases and Veeam does support back up of Oracle databases."
"The predictability of the solution needs improvement. Sometimes, if it's doing something at the back end, it may go slow. Today, the backup completion took four hours, but sometimes it can do the backup in 30 minutes or an hour. With solutions like NetBackup, I can predict to a much higher degree of certainty how long something will take to complete."
"Troubleshooting is very hard."
"The support could be improved a lot, as it is currently non-existent."
"I would like to see this solution improve on faster restoration. Currently, it takes a long time to restore my data."
"Doesn't include disaster recovery."
"Something within the software itself isn't quite right. There may be a bug or glitch. It will work fine for weeks and then all of a sudden it just tanks."
"One area that needs improvement is SQL backup. Backup Exec doesn't support higher availability."
"Initial setup is a bit complex and needs some expertise for troubleshooting when something goes wrong."
"The cost is quite high. Along with the general costs, the supposed agents that you have to buy for the various options that you want to use ends up driving the costs higher as well."
"The solution is too heavy and complex with 1,000 menus and options that make it messy rather than lightweight."
"In the future, their console should not be complicated."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The cost for its licenses is reasonable and as per industry standards."
"The licensing fees are billed on a yearly basis, and the fees are much lower than what I pay for NetBackup."
"The solution is inexpensive, more so than other products."
"For the licensing of Veeam Agent for Microsoft Windows, the customer can choose to pay monthly or yearly. It's up to the customer."
"We have an annual license."
"It is less expensive than one of its variants."
"We have a license package."
"Pricing is based on license packaging and duration. Longer term licenses are less per year and license packages also offer a discount."
"I think, at least for the price I've seen, it could be lower compared to other products."
"I think it's sold at the right price. It's not expensive. The license is usually for a year."
"Regarding expense, Backup Exec is generally suitable for small and medium businesses. However, we can customize them based on the workload."
"It is not an expensive product."
"The price is reasonable for the features it offers."
"It is affordable, but I hope that the price will come down a lot because of other competitors. It is a good price for the customer, but sometimes, the competition provides a much lower price. There are two ways to license it. You can license it per instance or per terabytes of data that we are mocking up. It is enough because it is not so complex. It is good when you're working with customers."
"I rate the product's pricing a six out of ten."
"There is an evaluation license available to test this solution."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.
850,760 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
21%
Photography Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Computer Software Company
17%
Manufacturing Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Government
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
How do the backup solutions of Veeam and Veritas compare?
Technically, Veeam is best for hyper-v & VMWare replications, snapshots, HA failover, also support for file system backups inside VMs., support for tape library & FC too. But Veritas Netbac...
What do you like most about Veritas Backup Exec?
The most important feature is the variety of backup applications it supports, including ERP systems and most other programs, such as Microsoft.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Veritas Backup Exec?
The price is one of the best. When I compare it with others, it is twice or three times cheaper, however, the functionality is the same.
 

Also Known As

No data available
Backup Exec, Symantec Backup Exec
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

ContinuitySA, Landmark Information Group
Beta Offshore
Find out what your peers are saying about Veeam Software, Zerto, Commvault and others in Backup and Recovery. Updated: April 2025.
850,760 professionals have used our research since 2012.